Determinants of radial artery pulse wave analysis in asymptomatic individuals

Noninvasive techniques to evaluate arterial stiffness include noninvasive radial artery pulse contour analysis. Diastolic pulse contour analysis provides a separate assessment of large (C1) and small artery (C2) elasticity. Analysis of the systolic pulse contour identifies two pressure peaks (P1 and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of hypertension 2004-08, Vol.17 (8), p.647-653
Hauptverfasser: Duprez, Daniel A, Kaiser, Daniel R, Whitwam, Wayne, Finkelstein, Stanley, Belalcazar, Andres, Patterson, Robert, Glasser, Stephen, Cohn, Jay N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 653
container_issue 8
container_start_page 647
container_title American journal of hypertension
container_volume 17
creator Duprez, Daniel A
Kaiser, Daniel R
Whitwam, Wayne
Finkelstein, Stanley
Belalcazar, Andres
Patterson, Robert
Glasser, Stephen
Cohn, Jay N
description Noninvasive techniques to evaluate arterial stiffness include noninvasive radial artery pulse contour analysis. Diastolic pulse contour analysis provides a separate assessment of large (C1) and small artery (C2) elasticity. Analysis of the systolic pulse contour identifies two pressure peaks (P1 and P2) that relate to incident and reflected waves. This study aimed to compare indices from systolic and diastolic pulse contour analysis from the radial pressure waveform and to correlate these indices with traditional risk factors in asymptomatic individuals screened for cardiovascular disease. In 298 consecutive subjects (206 male and 92 female healthy subjects with a mean age of 50 ± 12 years), noninvasive radial artery pressure waveforms were acquired with a piezoelectric transducer and analyzed for 1) diastolic indices of C1 and C2 from the CR-2000 CVProfiler, and 2) systolic indices of augmentation as defined by augmentation pressure (AP), augmentation index (AIx), and systolic reflective index (SRI = P2/P1). These indices were then correlated to each other as well as to individual traditional risk factors and the Framingham Risk Score. Diastolic indices were significantly and inversely correlated to systolic indices with C2 showing a stronger inverse association than C1. C2 and Alx were significantly correlated with height, weight, and body mass index in men but not in women. All indices correlated better to blood pressure in women than men. In women, only systolic indices were significantly correlated to HDL cholesterol and only diastolic indices were significantly correlated to LDL cholesterol. All indices were significantly correlated to the Framingham Risk Score, which was stronger in women then men, but when adjusted for age only diastolic indices remained significant in women. Diastolic and systolic indices of pulse contour analysis correlate differently with traditional risk factors in men and women.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.03.671
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66760492</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0895706104007514</els_id><sourcerecordid>2712497051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-c5d8feb31e0de775ab71f674d3b5c361798398855e3d2fba43d1b80d02edcbc03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V2L1DAUBuAgiju7-heWguhdx6SZJO2dMuu6woqIios34TQ5ZVP7ZdKO9t-b0tEBb-xFQ8qTk3PeEnLJ6JZRJl_WW2jr-3lAv80o3W0p30rFHpANy1WRsoKKh2RD80Kkikp2Rs5DqGmEUrLH5IyJLI8P25D3Vziib10H3RiSvko8WAdNAj5-npNhagImP-GACXTQzMGFxHUJhLkdxr6F0Zm4t-7g7ARNeEIeVXHBp8f1gny5fvN5f5Pefnj7bv_6NjVCsDG-bV5hyRlSi0oJKBWrpNpZXgrDJVNFzos8FwK5zaoSdtyyMqeWZmhNaSi_IC_WuoPvf0wYRt26YLBpoMN-ClpKJemuyCJ89g-s-8nHSYJmNJMimlxFJVdlfB-Cx0oP3rXg54j0Ereu9Z-49RK3plzHuOPBy2P5qWzRno4d843g-RFAMNBUHjrjwsnJWFxyHl2yug7GyeNfAPX9ch_LlpnTlbgw4q-T8N9jK1wJfXP3TV_dfVUf9_KTXkq-Wj3GH3FwsfNgHHYGrfNoRm1797_xfgPif7xC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1026549287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of radial artery pulse wave analysis in asymptomatic individuals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Journals</source><creator>Duprez, Daniel A ; Kaiser, Daniel R ; Whitwam, Wayne ; Finkelstein, Stanley ; Belalcazar, Andres ; Patterson, Robert ; Glasser, Stephen ; Cohn, Jay N</creator><creatorcontrib>Duprez, Daniel A ; Kaiser, Daniel R ; Whitwam, Wayne ; Finkelstein, Stanley ; Belalcazar, Andres ; Patterson, Robert ; Glasser, Stephen ; Cohn, Jay N</creatorcontrib><description>Noninvasive techniques to evaluate arterial stiffness include noninvasive radial artery pulse contour analysis. Diastolic pulse contour analysis provides a separate assessment of large (C1) and small artery (C2) elasticity. Analysis of the systolic pulse contour identifies two pressure peaks (P1 and P2) that relate to incident and reflected waves. This study aimed to compare indices from systolic and diastolic pulse contour analysis from the radial pressure waveform and to correlate these indices with traditional risk factors in asymptomatic individuals screened for cardiovascular disease. In 298 consecutive subjects (206 male and 92 female healthy subjects with a mean age of 50 ± 12 years), noninvasive radial artery pressure waveforms were acquired with a piezoelectric transducer and analyzed for 1) diastolic indices of C1 and C2 from the CR-2000 CVProfiler, and 2) systolic indices of augmentation as defined by augmentation pressure (AP), augmentation index (AIx), and systolic reflective index (SRI = P2/P1). These indices were then correlated to each other as well as to individual traditional risk factors and the Framingham Risk Score. Diastolic indices were significantly and inversely correlated to systolic indices with C2 showing a stronger inverse association than C1. C2 and Alx were significantly correlated with height, weight, and body mass index in men but not in women. All indices correlated better to blood pressure in women than men. In women, only systolic indices were significantly correlated to HDL cholesterol and only diastolic indices were significantly correlated to LDL cholesterol. All indices were significantly correlated to the Framingham Risk Score, which was stronger in women then men, but when adjusted for age only diastolic indices remained significant in women. Diastolic and systolic indices of pulse contour analysis correlate differently with traditional risk factors in men and women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-7061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-7225</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.03.671</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15288881</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJHYE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arterial hypertension. Arterial hypotension ; arterial stiffness ; augmentation index ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood and lymphatic vessels ; blood pressure ; Blood Pressure - physiology ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis ; Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology ; Cardiovascular Diseases - physiopathology ; Elasticity ; Female ; Humans ; large and small artery elasticity index ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pulsatile Flow - physiology ; Pulse wave analysis ; radial artery ; Radial Artery - physiology ; Risk Factors ; systolic reflective index</subject><ispartof>American journal of hypertension, 2004-08, Vol.17 (8), p.647-653</ispartof><rights>2004 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-c5d8feb31e0de775ab71f674d3b5c361798398855e3d2fba43d1b80d02edcbc03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16016633$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15288881$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duprez, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Daniel R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitwam, Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finkelstein, Stanley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belalcazar, Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasser, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, Jay N</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of radial artery pulse wave analysis in asymptomatic individuals</title><title>American journal of hypertension</title><addtitle>AJH</addtitle><description>Noninvasive techniques to evaluate arterial stiffness include noninvasive radial artery pulse contour analysis. Diastolic pulse contour analysis provides a separate assessment of large (C1) and small artery (C2) elasticity. Analysis of the systolic pulse contour identifies two pressure peaks (P1 and P2) that relate to incident and reflected waves. This study aimed to compare indices from systolic and diastolic pulse contour analysis from the radial pressure waveform and to correlate these indices with traditional risk factors in asymptomatic individuals screened for cardiovascular disease. In 298 consecutive subjects (206 male and 92 female healthy subjects with a mean age of 50 ± 12 years), noninvasive radial artery pressure waveforms were acquired with a piezoelectric transducer and analyzed for 1) diastolic indices of C1 and C2 from the CR-2000 CVProfiler, and 2) systolic indices of augmentation as defined by augmentation pressure (AP), augmentation index (AIx), and systolic reflective index (SRI = P2/P1). These indices were then correlated to each other as well as to individual traditional risk factors and the Framingham Risk Score. Diastolic indices were significantly and inversely correlated to systolic indices with C2 showing a stronger inverse association than C1. C2 and Alx were significantly correlated with height, weight, and body mass index in men but not in women. All indices correlated better to blood pressure in women than men. In women, only systolic indices were significantly correlated to HDL cholesterol and only diastolic indices were significantly correlated to LDL cholesterol. All indices were significantly correlated to the Framingham Risk Score, which was stronger in women then men, but when adjusted for age only diastolic indices remained significant in women. Diastolic and systolic indices of pulse contour analysis correlate differently with traditional risk factors in men and women.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arterial hypertension. Arterial hypotension</subject><subject>arterial stiffness</subject><subject>augmentation index</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood and lymphatic vessels</subject><subject>blood pressure</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>large and small artery elasticity index</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pulsatile Flow - physiology</subject><subject>Pulse wave analysis</subject><subject>radial artery</subject><subject>Radial Artery - physiology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>systolic reflective index</subject><issn>0895-7061</issn><issn>1879-1905</issn><issn>1941-7225</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V2L1DAUBuAgiju7-heWguhdx6SZJO2dMuu6woqIios34TQ5ZVP7ZdKO9t-b0tEBb-xFQ8qTk3PeEnLJ6JZRJl_WW2jr-3lAv80o3W0p30rFHpANy1WRsoKKh2RD80Kkikp2Rs5DqGmEUrLH5IyJLI8P25D3Vziib10H3RiSvko8WAdNAj5-npNhagImP-GACXTQzMGFxHUJhLkdxr6F0Zm4t-7g7ARNeEIeVXHBp8f1gny5fvN5f5Pefnj7bv_6NjVCsDG-bV5hyRlSi0oJKBWrpNpZXgrDJVNFzos8FwK5zaoSdtyyMqeWZmhNaSi_IC_WuoPvf0wYRt26YLBpoMN-ClpKJemuyCJ89g-s-8nHSYJmNJMimlxFJVdlfB-Cx0oP3rXg54j0Ereu9Z-49RK3plzHuOPBy2P5qWzRno4d843g-RFAMNBUHjrjwsnJWFxyHl2yug7GyeNfAPX9ch_LlpnTlbgw4q-T8N9jK1wJfXP3TV_dfVUf9_KTXkq-Wj3GH3FwsfNgHHYGrfNoRm1797_xfgPif7xC</recordid><startdate>20040801</startdate><enddate>20040801</enddate><creator>Duprez, Daniel A</creator><creator>Kaiser, Daniel R</creator><creator>Whitwam, Wayne</creator><creator>Finkelstein, Stanley</creator><creator>Belalcazar, Andres</creator><creator>Patterson, Robert</creator><creator>Glasser, Stephen</creator><creator>Cohn, Jay N</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040801</creationdate><title>Determinants of radial artery pulse wave analysis in asymptomatic individuals</title><author>Duprez, Daniel A ; Kaiser, Daniel R ; Whitwam, Wayne ; Finkelstein, Stanley ; Belalcazar, Andres ; Patterson, Robert ; Glasser, Stephen ; Cohn, Jay N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-c5d8feb31e0de775ab71f674d3b5c361798398855e3d2fba43d1b80d02edcbc03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arterial hypertension. Arterial hypotension</topic><topic>arterial stiffness</topic><topic>augmentation index</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood and lymphatic vessels</topic><topic>blood pressure</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>large and small artery elasticity index</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pulsatile Flow - physiology</topic><topic>Pulse wave analysis</topic><topic>radial artery</topic><topic>Radial Artery - physiology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>systolic reflective index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duprez, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Daniel R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitwam, Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finkelstein, Stanley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belalcazar, Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasser, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, Jay N</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duprez, Daniel A</au><au>Kaiser, Daniel R</au><au>Whitwam, Wayne</au><au>Finkelstein, Stanley</au><au>Belalcazar, Andres</au><au>Patterson, Robert</au><au>Glasser, Stephen</au><au>Cohn, Jay N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of radial artery pulse wave analysis in asymptomatic individuals</atitle><jtitle>American journal of hypertension</jtitle><addtitle>AJH</addtitle><date>2004-08-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>647</spage><epage>653</epage><pages>647-653</pages><issn>0895-7061</issn><eissn>1879-1905</eissn><eissn>1941-7225</eissn><coden>AJHYE6</coden><abstract>Noninvasive techniques to evaluate arterial stiffness include noninvasive radial artery pulse contour analysis. Diastolic pulse contour analysis provides a separate assessment of large (C1) and small artery (C2) elasticity. Analysis of the systolic pulse contour identifies two pressure peaks (P1 and P2) that relate to incident and reflected waves. This study aimed to compare indices from systolic and diastolic pulse contour analysis from the radial pressure waveform and to correlate these indices with traditional risk factors in asymptomatic individuals screened for cardiovascular disease. In 298 consecutive subjects (206 male and 92 female healthy subjects with a mean age of 50 ± 12 years), noninvasive radial artery pressure waveforms were acquired with a piezoelectric transducer and analyzed for 1) diastolic indices of C1 and C2 from the CR-2000 CVProfiler, and 2) systolic indices of augmentation as defined by augmentation pressure (AP), augmentation index (AIx), and systolic reflective index (SRI = P2/P1). These indices were then correlated to each other as well as to individual traditional risk factors and the Framingham Risk Score. Diastolic indices were significantly and inversely correlated to systolic indices with C2 showing a stronger inverse association than C1. C2 and Alx were significantly correlated with height, weight, and body mass index in men but not in women. All indices correlated better to blood pressure in women than men. In women, only systolic indices were significantly correlated to HDL cholesterol and only diastolic indices were significantly correlated to LDL cholesterol. All indices were significantly correlated to the Framingham Risk Score, which was stronger in women then men, but when adjusted for age only diastolic indices remained significant in women. Diastolic and systolic indices of pulse contour analysis correlate differently with traditional risk factors in men and women.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15288881</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.03.671</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-7061
ispartof American journal of hypertension, 2004-08, Vol.17 (8), p.647-653
issn 0895-7061
1879-1905
1941-7225
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66760492
source MEDLINE; Oxford Journals
subjects Adult
Arterial hypertension. Arterial hypotension
arterial stiffness
augmentation index
Biological and medical sciences
Blood and lymphatic vessels
blood pressure
Blood Pressure - physiology
Cardiology. Vascular system
Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnosis
Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology
Cardiovascular Diseases - physiopathology
Elasticity
Female
Humans
large and small artery elasticity index
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pulsatile Flow - physiology
Pulse wave analysis
radial artery
Radial Artery - physiology
Risk Factors
systolic reflective index
title Determinants of radial artery pulse wave analysis in asymptomatic individuals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A33%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20radial%20artery%20pulse%20wave%20analysis%20in%20asymptomatic%20individuals&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20hypertension&rft.au=Duprez,%20Daniel%20A&rft.date=2004-08-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=647&rft.epage=653&rft.pages=647-653&rft.issn=0895-7061&rft.eissn=1879-1905&rft.coden=AJHYE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.03.671&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2712497051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1026549287&rft_id=info:pmid/15288881&rft_els_id=S0895706104007514&rfr_iscdi=true