Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup

Summary Aim To assess the three dimensional (3D) surface accuracy of a phantom's face acquired from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and to determine the reliability of selected cephalometric measurements performed with Maxilim® software (Medicim N.V., Mechelen, Belgium). Material an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2009-01, Vol.37 (1), p.18-23
Hauptverfasser: Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L, Gelaude, Frederik, Swennen, Gwen R.J, Casselman, Jan W, Van Der Sloten, Jos, Mommaerts, Maurice Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23
container_issue 1
container_start_page 18
container_title Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery
container_volume 37
creator Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L
Gelaude, Frederik
Swennen, Gwen R.J
Casselman, Jan W
Van Der Sloten, Jos
Mommaerts, Maurice Y
description Summary Aim To assess the three dimensional (3D) surface accuracy of a phantom's face acquired from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and to determine the reliability of selected cephalometric measurements performed with Maxilim® software (Medicim N.V., Mechelen, Belgium). Material and methods A mannequin head was imaged with a CBCT (I-CAT™, Imaging Sciences International, Inc., Hatfield, USA). The data were used to produce 3D surface meshes (Maxilim® and Mimics® , Materialise N.V., Leuven, Belgium) which were compared with an optical surface scan of the head using Focus Inspection® software (Metris N.V., Leuven, Belgium). The intra- and inter-observer reliability for the measurement of distances between facial landmarks with Maxilim® 3D cephalometry were determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation (ICC). The Dahlberg formula was used to assess the method error (ME). Results (1) The maximal range of the 3D mesh deviations was 1.9 mm for Maxilim® , and 1.8 mm for Mimics® segmentation. (2) Test–retest and inter-observer reliability were high; Pearson's correlation coefficient was 1.000 and the ICC was 0.9998. The ME of the vertical measurements was a little larger than that calculated for the width measurements. Maximum ME was 1.33 mm. Conclusions The 3D surface accuracy of CBCT scans segmented with Maxilim® and Mimics® software is high. Maxilim® also shows satisfactory intra- and inter-assessor reliability for measurement of distances on a rigid facial surface.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66759004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1010518208001480</els_id><sourcerecordid>66759004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-618b929adf54407d8925b1b2691fd968dbf60f3652761c1e3aca6a80b57800a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk-L1TAUxYsozjj6BVxIVqKLPm_6J01BhPHhPxhw4bgOt8mtk9o2NUmFfg6_sCnvieDCVS7kdw7cc26WPeVw4MDFq-Ew6CkcCgB5gOYAIO5ll1w2Mq84b--nGTjkNZfFRfYohAESAbJ9mF1wKXkNdXmZ_brWevWoN4azYZ4WwoidHW3cmOuZdjPlHeGUpmlZIxkW3eS-eVzuNvbi-PZ4-5JNhGH1NNEcA1tDYuzM4h0xQ5H8ZGeM1s27XY_a4pi-jdUU_mAjds5jdH5jgeK6PM4e9DgGenJ-r7Kv79_dHj_mN58_fDpe3-S6gjbmgsuuLVo0fV1V0BjZFnXHu0K0vDetkKbrBfSlqItGcM2pRI0CJXR1IwEQyqvs-cl38e7HSiGqyQZN44gzuTUoIZq6BagSWJxA7V0Innq1eDuh3xQHtVehBrVXofYqFDQqBZ1Ez87uazeR-Ss5Z5-A1yeA0o4_LXkVtKVZk7GedFTG2f_7v_lHrkc7W43jd9ooDG71c0pPcRUKBerLfgz7LUBanlcSyt8PJLEZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66759004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L ; Gelaude, Frederik ; Swennen, Gwen R.J ; Casselman, Jan W ; Van Der Sloten, Jos ; Mommaerts, Maurice Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L ; Gelaude, Frederik ; Swennen, Gwen R.J ; Casselman, Jan W ; Van Der Sloten, Jos ; Mommaerts, Maurice Y</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Aim To assess the three dimensional (3D) surface accuracy of a phantom's face acquired from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and to determine the reliability of selected cephalometric measurements performed with Maxilim® software (Medicim N.V., Mechelen, Belgium). Material and methods A mannequin head was imaged with a CBCT (I-CAT™, Imaging Sciences International, Inc., Hatfield, USA). The data were used to produce 3D surface meshes (Maxilim® and Mimics® , Materialise N.V., Leuven, Belgium) which were compared with an optical surface scan of the head using Focus Inspection® software (Metris N.V., Leuven, Belgium). The intra- and inter-observer reliability for the measurement of distances between facial landmarks with Maxilim® 3D cephalometry were determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation (ICC). The Dahlberg formula was used to assess the method error (ME). Results (1) The maximal range of the 3D mesh deviations was 1.9 mm for Maxilim® , and 1.8 mm for Mimics® segmentation. (2) Test–retest and inter-observer reliability were high; Pearson's correlation coefficient was 1.000 and the ICC was 0.9998. The ME of the vertical measurements was a little larger than that calculated for the width measurements. Maximum ME was 1.33 mm. Conclusions The 3D surface accuracy of CBCT scans segmented with Maxilim® and Mimics® software is high. Maxilim® also shows satisfactory intra- and inter-assessor reliability for measurement of distances on a rigid facial surface.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18815053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[cephalometry ; Cephalometry - methods ; Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data ; Chin - anatomy & histology ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - statistics & numerical data ; Dentistry ; Eye - anatomy & histology ; Eyelids - anatomy & histology ; face ; Face - anatomy & histology ; facial index ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics & numerical data ; Nose - anatomy & histology ; Observer Variation ; Orbit - anatomy & histology ; Phantoms, Imaging ; radiography ; Reference Values ; reproducibility of results ; Software Validation ; Surgery ; surgery, maxillofacial ; Vertical Dimension ; Zygoma - anatomy & histology]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2009-01, Vol.37 (1), p.18-23</ispartof><rights>European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery</rights><rights>2008 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-618b929adf54407d8925b1b2691fd968dbf60f3652761c1e3aca6a80b57800a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-618b929adf54407d8925b1b2691fd968dbf60f3652761c1e3aca6a80b57800a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18815053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelaude, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swennen, Gwen R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casselman, Jan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Sloten, Jos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mommaerts, Maurice Y</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup</title><title>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Summary Aim To assess the three dimensional (3D) surface accuracy of a phantom's face acquired from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and to determine the reliability of selected cephalometric measurements performed with Maxilim® software (Medicim N.V., Mechelen, Belgium). Material and methods A mannequin head was imaged with a CBCT (I-CAT™, Imaging Sciences International, Inc., Hatfield, USA). The data were used to produce 3D surface meshes (Maxilim® and Mimics® , Materialise N.V., Leuven, Belgium) which were compared with an optical surface scan of the head using Focus Inspection® software (Metris N.V., Leuven, Belgium). The intra- and inter-observer reliability for the measurement of distances between facial landmarks with Maxilim® 3D cephalometry were determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation (ICC). The Dahlberg formula was used to assess the method error (ME). Results (1) The maximal range of the 3D mesh deviations was 1.9 mm for Maxilim® , and 1.8 mm for Mimics® segmentation. (2) Test–retest and inter-observer reliability were high; Pearson's correlation coefficient was 1.000 and the ICC was 0.9998. The ME of the vertical measurements was a little larger than that calculated for the width measurements. Maximum ME was 1.33 mm. Conclusions The 3D surface accuracy of CBCT scans segmented with Maxilim® and Mimics® software is high. Maxilim® also shows satisfactory intra- and inter-assessor reliability for measurement of distances on a rigid facial surface.</description><subject>cephalometry</subject><subject>Cephalometry - methods</subject><subject>Cephalometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Chin - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Eye - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Eyelids - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>face</subject><subject>Face - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>facial index</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Nose - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Orbit - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>radiography</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>reproducibility of results</subject><subject>Software Validation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>surgery, maxillofacial</subject><subject>Vertical Dimension</subject><subject>Zygoma - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk-L1TAUxYsozjj6BVxIVqKLPm_6J01BhPHhPxhw4bgOt8mtk9o2NUmFfg6_sCnvieDCVS7kdw7cc26WPeVw4MDFq-Ew6CkcCgB5gOYAIO5ll1w2Mq84b--nGTjkNZfFRfYohAESAbJ9mF1wKXkNdXmZ_brWevWoN4azYZ4WwoidHW3cmOuZdjPlHeGUpmlZIxkW3eS-eVzuNvbi-PZ4-5JNhGH1NNEcA1tDYuzM4h0xQ5H8ZGeM1s27XY_a4pi-jdUU_mAjds5jdH5jgeK6PM4e9DgGenJ-r7Kv79_dHj_mN58_fDpe3-S6gjbmgsuuLVo0fV1V0BjZFnXHu0K0vDetkKbrBfSlqItGcM2pRI0CJXR1IwEQyqvs-cl38e7HSiGqyQZN44gzuTUoIZq6BagSWJxA7V0Innq1eDuh3xQHtVehBrVXofYqFDQqBZ1Ez87uazeR-Ss5Z5-A1yeA0o4_LXkVtKVZk7GedFTG2f_7v_lHrkc7W43jd9ooDG71c0pPcRUKBerLfgz7LUBanlcSyt8PJLEZ</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L</creator><creator>Gelaude, Frederik</creator><creator>Swennen, Gwen R.J</creator><creator>Casselman, Jan W</creator><creator>Van Der Sloten, Jos</creator><creator>Mommaerts, Maurice Y</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup</title><author>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L ; Gelaude, Frederik ; Swennen, Gwen R.J ; Casselman, Jan W ; Van Der Sloten, Jos ; Mommaerts, Maurice Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-618b929adf54407d8925b1b2691fd968dbf60f3652761c1e3aca6a80b57800a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>cephalometry</topic><topic>Cephalometry - methods</topic><topic>Cephalometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Chin - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Eye - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Eyelids - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>face</topic><topic>Face - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>facial index</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Nose - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Orbit - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>radiography</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>reproducibility of results</topic><topic>Software Validation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>surgery, maxillofacial</topic><topic>Vertical Dimension</topic><topic>Zygoma - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelaude, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swennen, Gwen R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casselman, Jan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Sloten, Jos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mommaerts, Maurice Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L</au><au>Gelaude, Frederik</au><au>Swennen, Gwen R.J</au><au>Casselman, Jan W</au><au>Van Der Sloten, Jos</au><au>Mommaerts, Maurice Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>18-23</pages><issn>1010-5182</issn><eissn>1878-4119</eissn><abstract>Summary Aim To assess the three dimensional (3D) surface accuracy of a phantom's face acquired from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and to determine the reliability of selected cephalometric measurements performed with Maxilim® software (Medicim N.V., Mechelen, Belgium). Material and methods A mannequin head was imaged with a CBCT (I-CAT™, Imaging Sciences International, Inc., Hatfield, USA). The data were used to produce 3D surface meshes (Maxilim® and Mimics® , Materialise N.V., Leuven, Belgium) which were compared with an optical surface scan of the head using Focus Inspection® software (Metris N.V., Leuven, Belgium). The intra- and inter-observer reliability for the measurement of distances between facial landmarks with Maxilim® 3D cephalometry were determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation (ICC). The Dahlberg formula was used to assess the method error (ME). Results (1) The maximal range of the 3D mesh deviations was 1.9 mm for Maxilim® , and 1.8 mm for Mimics® segmentation. (2) Test–retest and inter-observer reliability were high; Pearson's correlation coefficient was 1.000 and the ICC was 0.9998. The ME of the vertical measurements was a little larger than that calculated for the width measurements. Maximum ME was 1.33 mm. Conclusions The 3D surface accuracy of CBCT scans segmented with Maxilim® and Mimics® software is high. Maxilim® also shows satisfactory intra- and inter-assessor reliability for measurement of distances on a rigid facial surface.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18815053</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.006</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-5182
ispartof Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2009-01, Vol.37 (1), p.18-23
issn 1010-5182
1878-4119
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66759004
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects cephalometry
Cephalometry - methods
Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data
Chin - anatomy & histology
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - statistics & numerical data
Dentistry
Eye - anatomy & histology
Eyelids - anatomy & histology
face
Face - anatomy & histology
facial index
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics & numerical data
Nose - anatomy & histology
Observer Variation
Orbit - anatomy & histology
Phantoms, Imaging
radiography
Reference Values
reproducibility of results
Software Validation
Surgery
surgery, maxillofacial
Vertical Dimension
Zygoma - anatomy & histology
title Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A50%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20and%20repeatability%20of%20cone-beam%20computed%20tomography%20(CBCT)%20measurements%20used%20in%20the%20determination%20of%20facial%20indices%20in%20the%20laboratory%20setup&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cranio-maxillo-facial%20surgery&rft.au=Moerenhout,%20Bernard%20A.M.M.L&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=18-23&rft.issn=1010-5182&rft.eissn=1878-4119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66759004%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66759004&rft_id=info:pmid/18815053&rft_els_id=S1010518208001480&rfr_iscdi=true