Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup
Summary Aim To assess the three dimensional (3D) surface accuracy of a phantom's face acquired from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and to determine the reliability of selected cephalometric measurements performed with Maxilim® software (Medicim N.V., Mechelen, Belgium). Material an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2009-01, Vol.37 (1), p.18-23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 23 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 18 |
container_title | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L Gelaude, Frederik Swennen, Gwen R.J Casselman, Jan W Van Der Sloten, Jos Mommaerts, Maurice Y |
description | Summary Aim To assess the three dimensional (3D) surface accuracy of a phantom's face acquired from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and to determine the reliability of selected cephalometric measurements performed with Maxilim® software (Medicim N.V., Mechelen, Belgium). Material and methods A mannequin head was imaged with a CBCT (I-CAT™, Imaging Sciences International, Inc., Hatfield, USA). The data were used to produce 3D surface meshes (Maxilim® and Mimics® , Materialise N.V., Leuven, Belgium) which were compared with an optical surface scan of the head using Focus Inspection® software (Metris N.V., Leuven, Belgium). The intra- and inter-observer reliability for the measurement of distances between facial landmarks with Maxilim® 3D cephalometry were determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation (ICC). The Dahlberg formula was used to assess the method error (ME). Results (1) The maximal range of the 3D mesh deviations was 1.9 mm for Maxilim® , and 1.8 mm for Mimics® segmentation. (2) Test–retest and inter-observer reliability were high; Pearson's correlation coefficient was 1.000 and the ICC was 0.9998. The ME of the vertical measurements was a little larger than that calculated for the width measurements. Maximum ME was 1.33 mm. Conclusions The 3D surface accuracy of CBCT scans segmented with Maxilim® and Mimics® software is high. Maxilim® also shows satisfactory intra- and inter-assessor reliability for measurement of distances on a rigid facial surface. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66759004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1010518208001480</els_id><sourcerecordid>66759004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-618b929adf54407d8925b1b2691fd968dbf60f3652761c1e3aca6a80b57800a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk-L1TAUxYsozjj6BVxIVqKLPm_6J01BhPHhPxhw4bgOt8mtk9o2NUmFfg6_sCnvieDCVS7kdw7cc26WPeVw4MDFq-Ew6CkcCgB5gOYAIO5ll1w2Mq84b--nGTjkNZfFRfYohAESAbJ9mF1wKXkNdXmZ_brWevWoN4azYZ4WwoidHW3cmOuZdjPlHeGUpmlZIxkW3eS-eVzuNvbi-PZ4-5JNhGH1NNEcA1tDYuzM4h0xQ5H8ZGeM1s27XY_a4pi-jdUU_mAjds5jdH5jgeK6PM4e9DgGenJ-r7Kv79_dHj_mN58_fDpe3-S6gjbmgsuuLVo0fV1V0BjZFnXHu0K0vDetkKbrBfSlqItGcM2pRI0CJXR1IwEQyqvs-cl38e7HSiGqyQZN44gzuTUoIZq6BagSWJxA7V0Innq1eDuh3xQHtVehBrVXofYqFDQqBZ1Ez87uazeR-Ss5Z5-A1yeA0o4_LXkVtKVZk7GedFTG2f_7v_lHrkc7W43jd9ooDG71c0pPcRUKBerLfgz7LUBanlcSyt8PJLEZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66759004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L ; Gelaude, Frederik ; Swennen, Gwen R.J ; Casselman, Jan W ; Van Der Sloten, Jos ; Mommaerts, Maurice Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L ; Gelaude, Frederik ; Swennen, Gwen R.J ; Casselman, Jan W ; Van Der Sloten, Jos ; Mommaerts, Maurice Y</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Aim To assess the three dimensional (3D) surface accuracy of a phantom's face acquired from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and to determine the reliability of selected cephalometric measurements performed with Maxilim® software (Medicim N.V., Mechelen, Belgium). Material and methods A mannequin head was imaged with a CBCT (I-CAT™, Imaging Sciences International, Inc., Hatfield, USA). The data were used to produce 3D surface meshes (Maxilim® and Mimics® , Materialise N.V., Leuven, Belgium) which were compared with an optical surface scan of the head using Focus Inspection® software (Metris N.V., Leuven, Belgium). The intra- and inter-observer reliability for the measurement of distances between facial landmarks with Maxilim® 3D cephalometry were determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation (ICC). The Dahlberg formula was used to assess the method error (ME). Results (1) The maximal range of the 3D mesh deviations was 1.9 mm for Maxilim® , and 1.8 mm for Mimics® segmentation. (2) Test–retest and inter-observer reliability were high; Pearson's correlation coefficient was 1.000 and the ICC was 0.9998. The ME of the vertical measurements was a little larger than that calculated for the width measurements. Maximum ME was 1.33 mm. Conclusions The 3D surface accuracy of CBCT scans segmented with Maxilim® and Mimics® software is high. Maxilim® also shows satisfactory intra- and inter-assessor reliability for measurement of distances on a rigid facial surface.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18815053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[cephalometry ; Cephalometry - methods ; Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data ; Chin - anatomy & histology ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - statistics & numerical data ; Dentistry ; Eye - anatomy & histology ; Eyelids - anatomy & histology ; face ; Face - anatomy & histology ; facial index ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics & numerical data ; Nose - anatomy & histology ; Observer Variation ; Orbit - anatomy & histology ; Phantoms, Imaging ; radiography ; Reference Values ; reproducibility of results ; Software Validation ; Surgery ; surgery, maxillofacial ; Vertical Dimension ; Zygoma - anatomy & histology]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2009-01, Vol.37 (1), p.18-23</ispartof><rights>European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery</rights><rights>2008 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-618b929adf54407d8925b1b2691fd968dbf60f3652761c1e3aca6a80b57800a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-618b929adf54407d8925b1b2691fd968dbf60f3652761c1e3aca6a80b57800a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18815053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelaude, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swennen, Gwen R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casselman, Jan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Sloten, Jos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mommaerts, Maurice Y</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup</title><title>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Summary Aim To assess the three dimensional (3D) surface accuracy of a phantom's face acquired from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and to determine the reliability of selected cephalometric measurements performed with Maxilim® software (Medicim N.V., Mechelen, Belgium). Material and methods A mannequin head was imaged with a CBCT (I-CAT™, Imaging Sciences International, Inc., Hatfield, USA). The data were used to produce 3D surface meshes (Maxilim® and Mimics® , Materialise N.V., Leuven, Belgium) which were compared with an optical surface scan of the head using Focus Inspection® software (Metris N.V., Leuven, Belgium). The intra- and inter-observer reliability for the measurement of distances between facial landmarks with Maxilim® 3D cephalometry were determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation (ICC). The Dahlberg formula was used to assess the method error (ME). Results (1) The maximal range of the 3D mesh deviations was 1.9 mm for Maxilim® , and 1.8 mm for Mimics® segmentation. (2) Test–retest and inter-observer reliability were high; Pearson's correlation coefficient was 1.000 and the ICC was 0.9998. The ME of the vertical measurements was a little larger than that calculated for the width measurements. Maximum ME was 1.33 mm. Conclusions The 3D surface accuracy of CBCT scans segmented with Maxilim® and Mimics® software is high. Maxilim® also shows satisfactory intra- and inter-assessor reliability for measurement of distances on a rigid facial surface.</description><subject>cephalometry</subject><subject>Cephalometry - methods</subject><subject>Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Chin - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Eye - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Eyelids - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>face</subject><subject>Face - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>facial index</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Nose - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Orbit - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>radiography</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>reproducibility of results</subject><subject>Software Validation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>surgery, maxillofacial</subject><subject>Vertical Dimension</subject><subject>Zygoma - anatomy & histology</subject><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk-L1TAUxYsozjj6BVxIVqKLPm_6J01BhPHhPxhw4bgOt8mtk9o2NUmFfg6_sCnvieDCVS7kdw7cc26WPeVw4MDFq-Ew6CkcCgB5gOYAIO5ll1w2Mq84b--nGTjkNZfFRfYohAESAbJ9mF1wKXkNdXmZ_brWevWoN4azYZ4WwoidHW3cmOuZdjPlHeGUpmlZIxkW3eS-eVzuNvbi-PZ4-5JNhGH1NNEcA1tDYuzM4h0xQ5H8ZGeM1s27XY_a4pi-jdUU_mAjds5jdH5jgeK6PM4e9DgGenJ-r7Kv79_dHj_mN58_fDpe3-S6gjbmgsuuLVo0fV1V0BjZFnXHu0K0vDetkKbrBfSlqItGcM2pRI0CJXR1IwEQyqvs-cl38e7HSiGqyQZN44gzuTUoIZq6BagSWJxA7V0Innq1eDuh3xQHtVehBrVXofYqFDQqBZ1Ez87uazeR-Ss5Z5-A1yeA0o4_LXkVtKVZk7GedFTG2f_7v_lHrkc7W43jd9ooDG71c0pPcRUKBerLfgz7LUBanlcSyt8PJLEZ</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L</creator><creator>Gelaude, Frederik</creator><creator>Swennen, Gwen R.J</creator><creator>Casselman, Jan W</creator><creator>Van Der Sloten, Jos</creator><creator>Mommaerts, Maurice Y</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup</title><author>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L ; Gelaude, Frederik ; Swennen, Gwen R.J ; Casselman, Jan W ; Van Der Sloten, Jos ; Mommaerts, Maurice Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-618b929adf54407d8925b1b2691fd968dbf60f3652761c1e3aca6a80b57800a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>cephalometry</topic><topic>Cephalometry - methods</topic><topic>Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Chin - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Eye - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Eyelids - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>face</topic><topic>Face - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>facial index</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Nose - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Orbit - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>radiography</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>reproducibility of results</topic><topic>Software Validation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>surgery, maxillofacial</topic><topic>Vertical Dimension</topic><topic>Zygoma - anatomy & histology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelaude, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swennen, Gwen R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casselman, Jan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Sloten, Jos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mommaerts, Maurice Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moerenhout, Bernard A.M.M.L</au><au>Gelaude, Frederik</au><au>Swennen, Gwen R.J</au><au>Casselman, Jan W</au><au>Van Der Sloten, Jos</au><au>Mommaerts, Maurice Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>18-23</pages><issn>1010-5182</issn><eissn>1878-4119</eissn><abstract>Summary Aim To assess the three dimensional (3D) surface accuracy of a phantom's face acquired from a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan and to determine the reliability of selected cephalometric measurements performed with Maxilim® software (Medicim N.V., Mechelen, Belgium). Material and methods A mannequin head was imaged with a CBCT (I-CAT™, Imaging Sciences International, Inc., Hatfield, USA). The data were used to produce 3D surface meshes (Maxilim® and Mimics® , Materialise N.V., Leuven, Belgium) which were compared with an optical surface scan of the head using Focus Inspection® software (Metris N.V., Leuven, Belgium). The intra- and inter-observer reliability for the measurement of distances between facial landmarks with Maxilim® 3D cephalometry were determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation (ICC). The Dahlberg formula was used to assess the method error (ME). Results (1) The maximal range of the 3D mesh deviations was 1.9 mm for Maxilim® , and 1.8 mm for Mimics® segmentation. (2) Test–retest and inter-observer reliability were high; Pearson's correlation coefficient was 1.000 and the ICC was 0.9998. The ME of the vertical measurements was a little larger than that calculated for the width measurements. Maximum ME was 1.33 mm. Conclusions The 3D surface accuracy of CBCT scans segmented with Maxilim® and Mimics® software is high. Maxilim® also shows satisfactory intra- and inter-assessor reliability for measurement of distances on a rigid facial surface.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18815053</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.006</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1010-5182 |
ispartof | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2009-01, Vol.37 (1), p.18-23 |
issn | 1010-5182 1878-4119 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66759004 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | cephalometry Cephalometry - methods Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data Chin - anatomy & histology Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - statistics & numerical data Dentistry Eye - anatomy & histology Eyelids - anatomy & histology face Face - anatomy & histology facial index Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics & numerical data Nose - anatomy & histology Observer Variation Orbit - anatomy & histology Phantoms, Imaging radiography Reference Values reproducibility of results Software Validation Surgery surgery, maxillofacial Vertical Dimension Zygoma - anatomy & histology |
title | Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A50%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20and%20repeatability%20of%20cone-beam%20computed%20tomography%20(CBCT)%20measurements%20used%20in%20the%20determination%20of%20facial%20indices%20in%20the%20laboratory%20setup&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cranio-maxillo-facial%20surgery&rft.au=Moerenhout,%20Bernard%20A.M.M.L&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=18-23&rft.issn=1010-5182&rft.eissn=1878-4119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66759004%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66759004&rft_id=info:pmid/18815053&rft_els_id=S1010518208001480&rfr_iscdi=true |