Does traditional birth attendant training improve referral of women with obstetric complications: a review of the evidence
This narrative and meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of traditional birth attendant (TBA) training to improve access to skilled birth attendance for obstetric emergencies produced mixed results. Among 16 studies that fit the inclusion criteria, there is a medium, positive, non-significant as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2004-10, Vol.59 (8), p.1757-1768 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1768 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1757 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Sibley, Lynn Sipe, Theresa Ann Koblinsky, Marge |
description | This narrative and meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of traditional birth attendant (TBA) training to improve access to skilled birth attendance for obstetric emergencies produced mixed results. Among 16 studies that fit the inclusion criteria, there is a medium, positive, non-significant association between training and TBA knowledge of risk factors and conditions requiring referral; and small, positive, significant associations between TBA referral behavior and maternal service use. These results cannot be causally attributed to TBA training because of the overall quality of studies; moreover, in several studies TBA training was a component of integrated intervention packages.
The effort and expense of more rigorous research focusing on TBA training to improve access to emergency obstetric care are difficult to justify. The referral process is complex; the real effects of TBA training on TBA and maternal behavior are likely to be small; and while the proportion of TBA-attended births worldwide varies, it is, on average, quite low. The behavioral determinants and logistical barriers to care seeking for emergency obstetric care are generally well known. We suggest a more promising research agenda would reposition the questions surrounding referral into a broader ecological perspective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66751054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953604000589</els_id><sourcerecordid>61561656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-ec6b0642cd3bd9768d69f902c962e1287b18ee68e1cf2eb361b15a0ca6929f033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuP0zAUhS0EYobCX4AICXYtfsR2zG40PKVKbGBtOc4NdZXExXZbDb-eG1oViU0X15bl71wd-x5CXjG6YpSpd9tVjj77MEK34pTWK8pXlJpH5JY1WiylqPVjcku51ksjhbohz3LeUkoZbcRTcsMk18YIdkt-f4iQq5JcF0qIkxuqNqSyqVwpMHVuKvNdmML0swrjLsUDVAl6SAnJ2FfHOMJUHQMqYpsLlBR85eO4G4J3c8P8vnKoOAQ4znzZQIWHDiYPz8mT3g0ZXpz3Bfnx6eP3-y_L9bfPX-_v1kuvmC5L8Kqlqua-E21ntGo6ZXpDuTeKA-ONblkDoBpgvufQCsVaJh31ThlueirEgrw99UX7v_aQix1D9jAMboK4z1YpLRmV9XWQScWUVNdBin8u8auvgVJTpVgjr4JCm9ooHO2CvP4P3MZ9wrllywWtG6XqGdInyKeYM87L7lIYXXqwjNo5P3ZrL_mxc34s5Rbzg8r1SZlgB_4iAwDkZ_hghZMGlwesv0rhAlaDtcNiWmrLcEp2U0Zs9_Lsdt_O6ouNc_4QeHMGXPZu6JObfMj_OIWmmKHI3Z04wKBgmJJF83OIupDAF9vFcPVtfwDpUQIZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230486647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does traditional birth attendant training improve referral of women with obstetric complications: a review of the evidence</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Sibley, Lynn ; Sipe, Theresa Ann ; Koblinsky, Marge</creator><creatorcontrib>Sibley, Lynn ; Sipe, Theresa Ann ; Koblinsky, Marge</creatorcontrib><description>This narrative and meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of traditional birth attendant (TBA) training to improve access to skilled birth attendance for obstetric emergencies produced mixed results. Among 16 studies that fit the inclusion criteria, there is a medium, positive, non-significant association between training and TBA knowledge of risk factors and conditions requiring referral; and small, positive, significant associations between TBA referral behavior and maternal service use. These results cannot be causally attributed to TBA training because of the overall quality of studies; moreover, in several studies TBA training was a component of integrated intervention packages.
The effort and expense of more rigorous research focusing on TBA training to improve access to emergency obstetric care are difficult to justify. The referral process is complex; the real effects of TBA training on TBA and maternal behavior are likely to be small; and while the proportion of TBA-attended births worldwide varies, it is, on average, quite low. The behavioral determinants and logistical barriers to care seeking for emergency obstetric care are generally well known. We suggest a more promising research agenda would reposition the questions surrounding referral into a broader ecological perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15279931</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSMDEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Birth ; Complications ; Emergency Medical Services ; Emergency obstetric care ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Female ; Gynecology ; Health care ; Health education ; Health Professions ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Meta-analysis ; Midwifery ; Miscellaneous ; Motherhood ; Obstetric complications ; Obstetrics ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications ; Pregnant women ; Professional Training ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Referral ; Referral and Consultation ; Referral system ; Referrals ; Risk ; Safe motherhood ; Social sciences ; Tradition ; Traditional birth attendant training ; Traditional birth attendant training Obstetric complications Emergency obstetric care Safe motherhood Referral system Meta-analysis ; Traditional birth attendants ; Training ; Women ; Womens Health Care</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 2004-10, Vol.59 (8), p.1757-1768</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Oct 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-ec6b0642cd3bd9768d69f902c962e1287b18ee68e1cf2eb361b15a0ca6929f033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-ec6b0642cd3bd9768d69f902c962e1287b18ee68e1cf2eb361b15a0ca6929f033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953604000589$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27903,27904,30979,33753,33754,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16009190$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15279931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeesocmed/v_3a59_3ay_3a2004_3ai_3a8_3ap_3a1757-1768.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sibley, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sipe, Theresa Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koblinsky, Marge</creatorcontrib><title>Does traditional birth attendant training improve referral of women with obstetric complications: a review of the evidence</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>This narrative and meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of traditional birth attendant (TBA) training to improve access to skilled birth attendance for obstetric emergencies produced mixed results. Among 16 studies that fit the inclusion criteria, there is a medium, positive, non-significant association between training and TBA knowledge of risk factors and conditions requiring referral; and small, positive, significant associations between TBA referral behavior and maternal service use. These results cannot be causally attributed to TBA training because of the overall quality of studies; moreover, in several studies TBA training was a component of integrated intervention packages.
The effort and expense of more rigorous research focusing on TBA training to improve access to emergency obstetric care are difficult to justify. The referral process is complex; the real effects of TBA training on TBA and maternal behavior are likely to be small; and while the proportion of TBA-attended births worldwide varies, it is, on average, quite low. The behavioral determinants and logistical barriers to care seeking for emergency obstetric care are generally well known. We suggest a more promising research agenda would reposition the questions surrounding referral into a broader ecological perspective.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services</subject><subject>Emergency obstetric care</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health Professions</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Motherhood</subject><subject>Obstetric complications</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Professional Training</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Referral</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Referral system</subject><subject>Referrals</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Safe motherhood</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Tradition</subject><subject>Traditional birth attendant training</subject><subject>Traditional birth attendant training Obstetric complications Emergency obstetric care Safe motherhood Referral system Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Traditional birth attendants</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens Health Care</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuP0zAUhS0EYobCX4AICXYtfsR2zG40PKVKbGBtOc4NdZXExXZbDb-eG1oViU0X15bl71wd-x5CXjG6YpSpd9tVjj77MEK34pTWK8pXlJpH5JY1WiylqPVjcku51ksjhbohz3LeUkoZbcRTcsMk18YIdkt-f4iQq5JcF0qIkxuqNqSyqVwpMHVuKvNdmML0swrjLsUDVAl6SAnJ2FfHOMJUHQMqYpsLlBR85eO4G4J3c8P8vnKoOAQ4znzZQIWHDiYPz8mT3g0ZXpz3Bfnx6eP3-y_L9bfPX-_v1kuvmC5L8Kqlqua-E21ntGo6ZXpDuTeKA-ONblkDoBpgvufQCsVaJh31ThlueirEgrw99UX7v_aQix1D9jAMboK4z1YpLRmV9XWQScWUVNdBin8u8auvgVJTpVgjr4JCm9ooHO2CvP4P3MZ9wrllywWtG6XqGdInyKeYM87L7lIYXXqwjNo5P3ZrL_mxc34s5Rbzg8r1SZlgB_4iAwDkZ_hghZMGlwesv0rhAlaDtcNiWmrLcEp2U0Zs9_Lsdt_O6ouNc_4QeHMGXPZu6JObfMj_OIWmmKHI3Z04wKBgmJJF83OIupDAF9vFcPVtfwDpUQIZ</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Sibley, Lynn</creator><creator>Sipe, Theresa Ann</creator><creator>Koblinsky, Marge</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Does traditional birth attendant training improve referral of women with obstetric complications: a review of the evidence</title><author>Sibley, Lynn ; Sipe, Theresa Ann ; Koblinsky, Marge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-ec6b0642cd3bd9768d69f902c962e1287b18ee68e1cf2eb361b15a0ca6929f033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services</topic><topic>Emergency obstetric care</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health Professions</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Motherhood</topic><topic>Obstetric complications</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Professional Training</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Referral</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Referral system</topic><topic>Referrals</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Safe motherhood</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Tradition</topic><topic>Traditional birth attendant training</topic><topic>Traditional birth attendant training Obstetric complications Emergency obstetric care Safe motherhood Referral system Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Traditional birth attendants</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens Health Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sibley, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sipe, Theresa Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koblinsky, Marge</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sibley, Lynn</au><au>Sipe, Theresa Ann</au><au>Koblinsky, Marge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does traditional birth attendant training improve referral of women with obstetric complications: a review of the evidence</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1757</spage><epage>1768</epage><pages>1757-1768</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSMDEP</coden><abstract>This narrative and meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of traditional birth attendant (TBA) training to improve access to skilled birth attendance for obstetric emergencies produced mixed results. Among 16 studies that fit the inclusion criteria, there is a medium, positive, non-significant association between training and TBA knowledge of risk factors and conditions requiring referral; and small, positive, significant associations between TBA referral behavior and maternal service use. These results cannot be causally attributed to TBA training because of the overall quality of studies; moreover, in several studies TBA training was a component of integrated intervention packages.
The effort and expense of more rigorous research focusing on TBA training to improve access to emergency obstetric care are difficult to justify. The referral process is complex; the real effects of TBA training on TBA and maternal behavior are likely to be small; and while the proportion of TBA-attended births worldwide varies, it is, on average, quite low. The behavioral determinants and logistical barriers to care seeking for emergency obstetric care are generally well known. We suggest a more promising research agenda would reposition the questions surrounding referral into a broader ecological perspective.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15279931</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.009</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 2004-10, Vol.59 (8), p.1757-1768 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66751054 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Birth Complications Emergency Medical Services Emergency obstetric care Evidence-Based Medicine Female Gynecology Health care Health education Health Professions Humans Literature reviews Medical sciences Medicine Meta-analysis Midwifery Miscellaneous Motherhood Obstetric complications Obstetrics Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications Pregnant women Professional Training Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Referral Referral and Consultation Referral system Referrals Risk Safe motherhood Social sciences Tradition Traditional birth attendant training Traditional birth attendant training Obstetric complications Emergency obstetric care Safe motherhood Referral system Meta-analysis Traditional birth attendants Training Women Womens Health Care |
title | Does traditional birth attendant training improve referral of women with obstetric complications: a review of the evidence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A56%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20traditional%20birth%20attendant%20training%20improve%20referral%20of%20women%20with%20obstetric%20complications:%20a%20review%20of%20the%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Sibley,%20Lynn&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1757&rft.epage=1768&rft.pages=1757-1768&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSMDEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61561656%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230486647&rft_id=info:pmid/15279931&rft_els_id=S0277953604000589&rfr_iscdi=true |