Does traditional birth attendant training improve referral of women with obstetric complications: a review of the evidence

This narrative and meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of traditional birth attendant (TBA) training to improve access to skilled birth attendance for obstetric emergencies produced mixed results. Among 16 studies that fit the inclusion criteria, there is a medium, positive, non-significant as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science & medicine (1982) 2004-10, Vol.59 (8), p.1757-1768
Hauptverfasser: Sibley, Lynn, Sipe, Theresa Ann, Koblinsky, Marge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1768
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1757
container_title Social science & medicine (1982)
container_volume 59
creator Sibley, Lynn
Sipe, Theresa Ann
Koblinsky, Marge
description This narrative and meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of traditional birth attendant (TBA) training to improve access to skilled birth attendance for obstetric emergencies produced mixed results. Among 16 studies that fit the inclusion criteria, there is a medium, positive, non-significant association between training and TBA knowledge of risk factors and conditions requiring referral; and small, positive, significant associations between TBA referral behavior and maternal service use. These results cannot be causally attributed to TBA training because of the overall quality of studies; moreover, in several studies TBA training was a component of integrated intervention packages. The effort and expense of more rigorous research focusing on TBA training to improve access to emergency obstetric care are difficult to justify. The referral process is complex; the real effects of TBA training on TBA and maternal behavior are likely to be small; and while the proportion of TBA-attended births worldwide varies, it is, on average, quite low. The behavioral determinants and logistical barriers to care seeking for emergency obstetric care are generally well known. We suggest a more promising research agenda would reposition the questions surrounding referral into a broader ecological perspective.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66751054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953604000589</els_id><sourcerecordid>61561656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-ec6b0642cd3bd9768d69f902c962e1287b18ee68e1cf2eb361b15a0ca6929f033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuP0zAUhS0EYobCX4AICXYtfsR2zG40PKVKbGBtOc4NdZXExXZbDb-eG1oViU0X15bl71wd-x5CXjG6YpSpd9tVjj77MEK34pTWK8pXlJpH5JY1WiylqPVjcku51ksjhbohz3LeUkoZbcRTcsMk18YIdkt-f4iQq5JcF0qIkxuqNqSyqVwpMHVuKvNdmML0swrjLsUDVAl6SAnJ2FfHOMJUHQMqYpsLlBR85eO4G4J3c8P8vnKoOAQ4znzZQIWHDiYPz8mT3g0ZXpz3Bfnx6eP3-y_L9bfPX-_v1kuvmC5L8Kqlqua-E21ntGo6ZXpDuTeKA-ONblkDoBpgvufQCsVaJh31ThlueirEgrw99UX7v_aQix1D9jAMboK4z1YpLRmV9XWQScWUVNdBin8u8auvgVJTpVgjr4JCm9ooHO2CvP4P3MZ9wrllywWtG6XqGdInyKeYM87L7lIYXXqwjNo5P3ZrL_mxc34s5Rbzg8r1SZlgB_4iAwDkZ_hghZMGlwesv0rhAlaDtcNiWmrLcEp2U0Zs9_Lsdt_O6ouNc_4QeHMGXPZu6JObfMj_OIWmmKHI3Z04wKBgmJJF83OIupDAF9vFcPVtfwDpUQIZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230486647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does traditional birth attendant training improve referral of women with obstetric complications: a review of the evidence</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Sibley, Lynn ; Sipe, Theresa Ann ; Koblinsky, Marge</creator><creatorcontrib>Sibley, Lynn ; Sipe, Theresa Ann ; Koblinsky, Marge</creatorcontrib><description>This narrative and meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of traditional birth attendant (TBA) training to improve access to skilled birth attendance for obstetric emergencies produced mixed results. Among 16 studies that fit the inclusion criteria, there is a medium, positive, non-significant association between training and TBA knowledge of risk factors and conditions requiring referral; and small, positive, significant associations between TBA referral behavior and maternal service use. These results cannot be causally attributed to TBA training because of the overall quality of studies; moreover, in several studies TBA training was a component of integrated intervention packages. The effort and expense of more rigorous research focusing on TBA training to improve access to emergency obstetric care are difficult to justify. The referral process is complex; the real effects of TBA training on TBA and maternal behavior are likely to be small; and while the proportion of TBA-attended births worldwide varies, it is, on average, quite low. The behavioral determinants and logistical barriers to care seeking for emergency obstetric care are generally well known. We suggest a more promising research agenda would reposition the questions surrounding referral into a broader ecological perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15279931</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSMDEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Birth ; Complications ; Emergency Medical Services ; Emergency obstetric care ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Female ; Gynecology ; Health care ; Health education ; Health Professions ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Meta-analysis ; Midwifery ; Miscellaneous ; Motherhood ; Obstetric complications ; Obstetrics ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications ; Pregnant women ; Professional Training ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Referral ; Referral and Consultation ; Referral system ; Referrals ; Risk ; Safe motherhood ; Social sciences ; Tradition ; Traditional birth attendant training ; Traditional birth attendant training Obstetric complications Emergency obstetric care Safe motherhood Referral system Meta-analysis ; Traditional birth attendants ; Training ; Women ; Womens Health Care</subject><ispartof>Social science &amp; medicine (1982), 2004-10, Vol.59 (8), p.1757-1768</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Oct 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-ec6b0642cd3bd9768d69f902c962e1287b18ee68e1cf2eb361b15a0ca6929f033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-ec6b0642cd3bd9768d69f902c962e1287b18ee68e1cf2eb361b15a0ca6929f033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953604000589$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27903,27904,30979,33753,33754,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16009190$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15279931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeesocmed/v_3a59_3ay_3a2004_3ai_3a8_3ap_3a1757-1768.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sibley, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sipe, Theresa Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koblinsky, Marge</creatorcontrib><title>Does traditional birth attendant training improve referral of women with obstetric complications: a review of the evidence</title><title>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>This narrative and meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of traditional birth attendant (TBA) training to improve access to skilled birth attendance for obstetric emergencies produced mixed results. Among 16 studies that fit the inclusion criteria, there is a medium, positive, non-significant association between training and TBA knowledge of risk factors and conditions requiring referral; and small, positive, significant associations between TBA referral behavior and maternal service use. These results cannot be causally attributed to TBA training because of the overall quality of studies; moreover, in several studies TBA training was a component of integrated intervention packages. The effort and expense of more rigorous research focusing on TBA training to improve access to emergency obstetric care are difficult to justify. The referral process is complex; the real effects of TBA training on TBA and maternal behavior are likely to be small; and while the proportion of TBA-attended births worldwide varies, it is, on average, quite low. The behavioral determinants and logistical barriers to care seeking for emergency obstetric care are generally well known. We suggest a more promising research agenda would reposition the questions surrounding referral into a broader ecological perspective.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services</subject><subject>Emergency obstetric care</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health Professions</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Motherhood</subject><subject>Obstetric complications</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Professional Training</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Referral</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Referral system</subject><subject>Referrals</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Safe motherhood</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Tradition</subject><subject>Traditional birth attendant training</subject><subject>Traditional birth attendant training Obstetric complications Emergency obstetric care Safe motherhood Referral system Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Traditional birth attendants</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens Health Care</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuP0zAUhS0EYobCX4AICXYtfsR2zG40PKVKbGBtOc4NdZXExXZbDb-eG1oViU0X15bl71wd-x5CXjG6YpSpd9tVjj77MEK34pTWK8pXlJpH5JY1WiylqPVjcku51ksjhbohz3LeUkoZbcRTcsMk18YIdkt-f4iQq5JcF0qIkxuqNqSyqVwpMHVuKvNdmML0swrjLsUDVAl6SAnJ2FfHOMJUHQMqYpsLlBR85eO4G4J3c8P8vnKoOAQ4znzZQIWHDiYPz8mT3g0ZXpz3Bfnx6eP3-y_L9bfPX-_v1kuvmC5L8Kqlqua-E21ntGo6ZXpDuTeKA-ONblkDoBpgvufQCsVaJh31ThlueirEgrw99UX7v_aQix1D9jAMboK4z1YpLRmV9XWQScWUVNdBin8u8auvgVJTpVgjr4JCm9ooHO2CvP4P3MZ9wrllywWtG6XqGdInyKeYM87L7lIYXXqwjNo5P3ZrL_mxc34s5Rbzg8r1SZlgB_4iAwDkZ_hghZMGlwesv0rhAlaDtcNiWmrLcEp2U0Zs9_Lsdt_O6ouNc_4QeHMGXPZu6JObfMj_OIWmmKHI3Z04wKBgmJJF83OIupDAF9vFcPVtfwDpUQIZ</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Sibley, Lynn</creator><creator>Sipe, Theresa Ann</creator><creator>Koblinsky, Marge</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Does traditional birth attendant training improve referral of women with obstetric complications: a review of the evidence</title><author>Sibley, Lynn ; Sipe, Theresa Ann ; Koblinsky, Marge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-ec6b0642cd3bd9768d69f902c962e1287b18ee68e1cf2eb361b15a0ca6929f033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services</topic><topic>Emergency obstetric care</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health Professions</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Motherhood</topic><topic>Obstetric complications</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Professional Training</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Referral</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Referral system</topic><topic>Referrals</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Safe motherhood</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Tradition</topic><topic>Traditional birth attendant training</topic><topic>Traditional birth attendant training Obstetric complications Emergency obstetric care Safe motherhood Referral system Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Traditional birth attendants</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens Health Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sibley, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sipe, Theresa Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koblinsky, Marge</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sibley, Lynn</au><au>Sipe, Theresa Ann</au><au>Koblinsky, Marge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does traditional birth attendant training improve referral of women with obstetric complications: a review of the evidence</atitle><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1757</spage><epage>1768</epage><pages>1757-1768</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSMDEP</coden><abstract>This narrative and meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of traditional birth attendant (TBA) training to improve access to skilled birth attendance for obstetric emergencies produced mixed results. Among 16 studies that fit the inclusion criteria, there is a medium, positive, non-significant association between training and TBA knowledge of risk factors and conditions requiring referral; and small, positive, significant associations between TBA referral behavior and maternal service use. These results cannot be causally attributed to TBA training because of the overall quality of studies; moreover, in several studies TBA training was a component of integrated intervention packages. The effort and expense of more rigorous research focusing on TBA training to improve access to emergency obstetric care are difficult to justify. The referral process is complex; the real effects of TBA training on TBA and maternal behavior are likely to be small; and while the proportion of TBA-attended births worldwide varies, it is, on average, quite low. The behavioral determinants and logistical barriers to care seeking for emergency obstetric care are generally well known. We suggest a more promising research agenda would reposition the questions surrounding referral into a broader ecological perspective.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15279931</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.009</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-9536
ispartof Social science & medicine (1982), 2004-10, Vol.59 (8), p.1757-1768
issn 0277-9536
1873-5347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66751054
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Birth
Complications
Emergency Medical Services
Emergency obstetric care
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Gynecology
Health care
Health education
Health Professions
Humans
Literature reviews
Medical sciences
Medicine
Meta-analysis
Midwifery
Miscellaneous
Motherhood
Obstetric complications
Obstetrics
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
Pregnant women
Professional Training
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Referral
Referral and Consultation
Referral system
Referrals
Risk
Safe motherhood
Social sciences
Tradition
Traditional birth attendant training
Traditional birth attendant training Obstetric complications Emergency obstetric care Safe motherhood Referral system Meta-analysis
Traditional birth attendants
Training
Women
Womens Health Care
title Does traditional birth attendant training improve referral of women with obstetric complications: a review of the evidence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A56%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20traditional%20birth%20attendant%20training%20improve%20referral%20of%20women%20with%20obstetric%20complications:%20a%20review%20of%20the%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Sibley,%20Lynn&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1757&rft.epage=1768&rft.pages=1757-1768&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSMDEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61561656%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230486647&rft_id=info:pmid/15279931&rft_els_id=S0277953604000589&rfr_iscdi=true