Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate factors affecting the risk for reexcision following breast-conserving surgery. Positive tumor margins are critical for local disease control following surgery for breast cancer. Several factors, including tumor size, multifocality, and an extensive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of surgical oncology 2009-01, Vol.35 (1), p.32-37
Hauptverfasser: Bani, M.R, Lux, M.P, Heusinger, K, Wenkel, E, Magener, A, Schulz-Wendtland, R, Beckmann, M.W, Fasching, P.A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue 1
container_start_page 32
container_title European journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 35
creator Bani, M.R
Lux, M.P
Heusinger, K
Wenkel, E
Magener, A
Schulz-Wendtland, R
Beckmann, M.W
Fasching, P.A
description Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate factors affecting the risk for reexcision following breast-conserving surgery. Positive tumor margins are critical for local disease control following surgery for breast cancer. Several factors, including tumor size, multifocality, and an extensive in situ component, may be associated with a higher rate of repeat operations due to positive margins. This study included mammographic density in the analysis. Methods A total of 565 breast cancer patients were considered eligible for breast-conserving therapy after a core biopsy had confirmed malignancy. The patients’ mammographic findings were reviewed, and mammographic density was documented in addition to the histopathological features of the lesions. Associations between these factors and the risk for a second operation were analyzed using the chi-squared test, and a model was developed for multivariate analysis. Results At least one repeat operation was necessary in 121 patients (21.4%), and mastectomy was ultimately necessary in 54 patients (9.6%). Tumor size, multifocality, and the presence of an in situ component were identified as risk factors. A mammographic density of category 4 was associated with a need for further surgery (OR 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2–11). Conclusions Mammographic density is an additional risk factor for a second operation following breast-conserving procedures, and it may make radiographic and intraoperative localization of the tumor technically difficult. Using mammographic density to define a group of patients with a higher risk of reexcision might allow these patients to benefit from more sophisticated methods of localization and margin assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.04.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66750930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0748798308001479</els_id><sourcerecordid>66750930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-e8f86b305134bf7d1d636f39ce26b63b7a2225a611ec19424860477bcfed8c313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAUxC0EokvhC3BAOXFLeP4T25EQElpRQKrUA-3ZcpwX6pCNF9vbdr89jnYlJA6c5vKb0XszhLyl0FCg8sPU4JRCwwB0A6Ip8oxsaMtZzWirnpMNKKFr1Wl-QV6lNAFAx1X3klxQ3fJOsHZDtlfW5RBT5UKMONvsl5_Vo8_3VUR8cj75sFR2zBirPqJNuXZhSRgfVi7fY7T742vyYrRzwjdnvSR3V19ut9_q65uv37efr2snoMs16lHLnkNLuehHNdBBcjnyziGTveS9soyx1kpK0dFyndAShFK9G3HQjlN-Sd6fcvcx_D5gymbnk8N5tguGQzJSqrZ8CAVkJ9DFkFLE0eyj39l4NBTMWp2ZzFqdWaszIEyRYnp3Tj_0Oxz-Ws5dFeDjCcDy44PHaJLzuDgcfESXzRD8__M__WN3s1-8s_MvPGKawiEupT1DTWIGzI91vHU70ABUqI7_AVS7lO4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66750930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Bani, M.R ; Lux, M.P ; Heusinger, K ; Wenkel, E ; Magener, A ; Schulz-Wendtland, R ; Beckmann, M.W ; Fasching, P.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Bani, M.R ; Lux, M.P ; Heusinger, K ; Wenkel, E ; Magener, A ; Schulz-Wendtland, R ; Beckmann, M.W ; Fasching, P.A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate factors affecting the risk for reexcision following breast-conserving surgery. Positive tumor margins are critical for local disease control following surgery for breast cancer. Several factors, including tumor size, multifocality, and an extensive in situ component, may be associated with a higher rate of repeat operations due to positive margins. This study included mammographic density in the analysis. Methods A total of 565 breast cancer patients were considered eligible for breast-conserving therapy after a core biopsy had confirmed malignancy. The patients’ mammographic findings were reviewed, and mammographic density was documented in addition to the histopathological features of the lesions. Associations between these factors and the risk for a second operation were analyzed using the chi-squared test, and a model was developed for multivariate analysis. Results At least one repeat operation was necessary in 121 patients (21.4%), and mastectomy was ultimately necessary in 54 patients (9.6%). Tumor size, multifocality, and the presence of an in situ component were identified as risk factors. A mammographic density of category 4 was associated with a need for further surgery (OR 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2–11). Conclusions Mammographic density is an additional risk factor for a second operation following breast-conserving procedures, and it may make radiographic and intraoperative localization of the tumor technically difficult. Using mammographic density to define a group of patients with a higher risk of reexcision might allow these patients to benefit from more sophisticated methods of localization and margin assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.04.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18539425</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Breast-conserving surgery ; Carcinoma in Situ - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma in Situ - pathology ; Carcinoma in Situ - surgery ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Mammographic density ; Mammography ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Middle Aged ; Reexcision ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Risk Factors ; Second operation ; Surgery ; Tumor margins</subject><ispartof>European journal of surgical oncology, 2009-01, Vol.35 (1), p.32-37</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-e8f86b305134bf7d1d636f39ce26b63b7a2225a611ec19424860477bcfed8c313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-e8f86b305134bf7d1d636f39ce26b63b7a2225a611ec19424860477bcfed8c313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.04.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18539425$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bani, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lux, M.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heusinger, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenkel, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magener, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz-Wendtland, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckmann, M.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasching, P.A</creatorcontrib><title>Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy</title><title>European journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate factors affecting the risk for reexcision following breast-conserving surgery. Positive tumor margins are critical for local disease control following surgery for breast cancer. Several factors, including tumor size, multifocality, and an extensive in situ component, may be associated with a higher rate of repeat operations due to positive margins. This study included mammographic density in the analysis. Methods A total of 565 breast cancer patients were considered eligible for breast-conserving therapy after a core biopsy had confirmed malignancy. The patients’ mammographic findings were reviewed, and mammographic density was documented in addition to the histopathological features of the lesions. Associations between these factors and the risk for a second operation were analyzed using the chi-squared test, and a model was developed for multivariate analysis. Results At least one repeat operation was necessary in 121 patients (21.4%), and mastectomy was ultimately necessary in 54 patients (9.6%). Tumor size, multifocality, and the presence of an in situ component were identified as risk factors. A mammographic density of category 4 was associated with a need for further surgery (OR 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2–11). Conclusions Mammographic density is an additional risk factor for a second operation following breast-conserving procedures, and it may make radiographic and intraoperative localization of the tumor technically difficult. Using mammographic density to define a group of patients with a higher risk of reexcision might allow these patients to benefit from more sophisticated methods of localization and margin assessment.</description><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Breast-conserving surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - surgery</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Mammographic density</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reexcision</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Second operation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumor margins</subject><issn>0748-7983</issn><issn>1532-2157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAUxC0EokvhC3BAOXFLeP4T25EQElpRQKrUA-3ZcpwX6pCNF9vbdr89jnYlJA6c5vKb0XszhLyl0FCg8sPU4JRCwwB0A6Ip8oxsaMtZzWirnpMNKKFr1Wl-QV6lNAFAx1X3klxQ3fJOsHZDtlfW5RBT5UKMONvsl5_Vo8_3VUR8cj75sFR2zBirPqJNuXZhSRgfVi7fY7T742vyYrRzwjdnvSR3V19ut9_q65uv37efr2snoMs16lHLnkNLuehHNdBBcjnyziGTveS9soyx1kpK0dFyndAShFK9G3HQjlN-Sd6fcvcx_D5gymbnk8N5tguGQzJSqrZ8CAVkJ9DFkFLE0eyj39l4NBTMWp2ZzFqdWaszIEyRYnp3Tj_0Oxz-Ws5dFeDjCcDy44PHaJLzuDgcfESXzRD8__M__WN3s1-8s_MvPGKawiEupT1DTWIGzI91vHU70ABUqI7_AVS7lO4</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Bani, M.R</creator><creator>Lux, M.P</creator><creator>Heusinger, K</creator><creator>Wenkel, E</creator><creator>Magener, A</creator><creator>Schulz-Wendtland, R</creator><creator>Beckmann, M.W</creator><creator>Fasching, P.A</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy</title><author>Bani, M.R ; Lux, M.P ; Heusinger, K ; Wenkel, E ; Magener, A ; Schulz-Wendtland, R ; Beckmann, M.W ; Fasching, P.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-e8f86b305134bf7d1d636f39ce26b63b7a2225a611ec19424860477bcfed8c313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Breast-conserving surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - surgery</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Mammographic density</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reexcision</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Second operation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumor margins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bani, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lux, M.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heusinger, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenkel, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magener, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz-Wendtland, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckmann, M.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasching, P.A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bani, M.R</au><au>Lux, M.P</au><au>Heusinger, K</au><au>Wenkel, E</au><au>Magener, A</au><au>Schulz-Wendtland, R</au><au>Beckmann, M.W</au><au>Fasching, P.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy</atitle><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>32-37</pages><issn>0748-7983</issn><eissn>1532-2157</eissn><abstract>Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate factors affecting the risk for reexcision following breast-conserving surgery. Positive tumor margins are critical for local disease control following surgery for breast cancer. Several factors, including tumor size, multifocality, and an extensive in situ component, may be associated with a higher rate of repeat operations due to positive margins. This study included mammographic density in the analysis. Methods A total of 565 breast cancer patients were considered eligible for breast-conserving therapy after a core biopsy had confirmed malignancy. The patients’ mammographic findings were reviewed, and mammographic density was documented in addition to the histopathological features of the lesions. Associations between these factors and the risk for a second operation were analyzed using the chi-squared test, and a model was developed for multivariate analysis. Results At least one repeat operation was necessary in 121 patients (21.4%), and mastectomy was ultimately necessary in 54 patients (9.6%). Tumor size, multifocality, and the presence of an in situ component were identified as risk factors. A mammographic density of category 4 was associated with a need for further surgery (OR 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2–11). Conclusions Mammographic density is an additional risk factor for a second operation following breast-conserving procedures, and it may make radiographic and intraoperative localization of the tumor technically difficult. Using mammographic density to define a group of patients with a higher risk of reexcision might allow these patients to benefit from more sophisticated methods of localization and margin assessment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18539425</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejso.2008.04.008</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-7983
ispartof European journal of surgical oncology, 2009-01, Vol.35 (1), p.32-37
issn 0748-7983
1532-2157
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66750930
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Breast-conserving surgery
Carcinoma in Situ - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma in Situ - pathology
Carcinoma in Situ - surgery
Chi-Square Distribution
Female
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Logistic Models
Mammographic density
Mammography
Mastectomy, Segmental
Middle Aged
Reexcision
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Risk Factors
Second operation
Surgery
Tumor margins
title Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T04%3A39%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20correlating%20with%20reexcision%20after%20breast-conserving%20therapy&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Bani,%20M.R&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=32-37&rft.issn=0748-7983&rft.eissn=1532-2157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.04.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66750930%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66750930&rft_id=info:pmid/18539425&rft_els_id=S0748798308001479&rfr_iscdi=true