Comparison of porcelain surface and flexural strength obtained by microwave and conventional oven glazing

Statement of problem Although the superior qualities of microwave technology are common knowledge in the industry, effects of microwave glazing of dental ceramics have not been investigated. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the surface roughness and flexural strength achieved by...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2009, Vol.101 (1), p.20-28
Hauptverfasser: Prasad, Soni, BDS, MS, Monaco, Edward A., DDS, Kim, Hyeongil, DDS, Davis, Elaine L., PhD, Brewer, Jane D., DDS, MS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
container_volume 101
creator Prasad, Soni, BDS, MS
Monaco, Edward A., DDS
Kim, Hyeongil, DDS
Davis, Elaine L., PhD
Brewer, Jane D., DDS, MS
description Statement of problem Although the superior qualities of microwave technology are common knowledge in the industry, effects of microwave glazing of dental ceramics have not been investigated. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the surface roughness and flexural strength achieved by glazing porcelain specimens in a conventional and microwave oven. Material and methods Thirty specimens of each type of porcelain (Omega 900 and IPS d.Sign) were fabricated and sintered in a conventional oven. The specimens were further divided into 3 groups (n=10): hand polished (using diamond rotary ceramic polishers), microwave glazed, and conventional oven glazed. Each specimen was evaluated for surface roughness using a profilometer. The flexural strength of each specimen was measured using a universal testing machine. A 2-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc analysis were used to determine significant intergroup differences in surface roughness (α=.05). Flexural strength results were also analyzed using 2-way ANOVA, and the Weibull modulus was determined for each of the 6 groups. The surfaces of the specimens were subjectively evaluated for cracks and porosities using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results A significant difference in surface roughness was found among the surface treatments ( P =.02). Follow-up tests showed a significant difference in surface roughness between oven-glazed and microwave-glazed treatments ( P =.02). There was a significant difference in flexural strength between the 2 porcelains ( P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60284-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66749931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002239130860284X</els_id><sourcerecordid>66749931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-67f25c3cee73f56f7ebfff3df4ff819cb4d9dd98aefea6634db4c7bcef13b08a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGP1CAYhonRuLOrP0HDyeihCqWlcNGYiasmm3hQk7kRCh8jawsjtKPjr5eZTjTxsic4PN_z5XtfhJ5Q8pISyl99JqSuKyYpe07EC05q0VSbe2hFiewqLhp6H63-IhfoMudbQohoO_oQXVBJSSuFWCG_juNOJ59jwNHhXUwGBu0DznNy2gDWwWI3wK856QHnKUHYTt9w7KcCgcX9AY_epPhT7xfWxLCHMPkYCh_LF28H_duH7SP0wOkhw-Pze4W-Xr_7sv5Q3Xx6_3H99qYyLa-nineubg0zAB1zLXcd9M45Zl3jnKDS9I2V1kqhwYHmnDW2b0zXG3CU9URodoWeLd5dij9myJMafS5HDTpAnLPivGukZPROkDHeSC5YAdsFLHfmnMCpXfKjTgdFiTqWoU5lqGPSigh1KkNtytzT84K5H8H-mzqnX4A3CwAlj72HpLLxEAxYn8BMykZ_54rX_xnM4IM3evgOB8i3cU6lh6yoyrUii-ToIOJk2LA_bA2yUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>33649683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of porcelain surface and flexural strength obtained by microwave and conventional oven glazing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Prasad, Soni, BDS, MS ; Monaco, Edward A., DDS ; Kim, Hyeongil, DDS ; Davis, Elaine L., PhD ; Brewer, Jane D., DDS, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Soni, BDS, MS ; Monaco, Edward A., DDS ; Kim, Hyeongil, DDS ; Davis, Elaine L., PhD ; Brewer, Jane D., DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><description>Statement of problem Although the superior qualities of microwave technology are common knowledge in the industry, effects of microwave glazing of dental ceramics have not been investigated. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the surface roughness and flexural strength achieved by glazing porcelain specimens in a conventional and microwave oven. Material and methods Thirty specimens of each type of porcelain (Omega 900 and IPS d.Sign) were fabricated and sintered in a conventional oven. The specimens were further divided into 3 groups (n=10): hand polished (using diamond rotary ceramic polishers), microwave glazed, and conventional oven glazed. Each specimen was evaluated for surface roughness using a profilometer. The flexural strength of each specimen was measured using a universal testing machine. A 2-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc analysis were used to determine significant intergroup differences in surface roughness (α=.05). Flexural strength results were also analyzed using 2-way ANOVA, and the Weibull modulus was determined for each of the 6 groups. The surfaces of the specimens were subjectively evaluated for cracks and porosities using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results A significant difference in surface roughness was found among the surface treatments ( P =.02). Follow-up tests showed a significant difference in surface roughness between oven-glazed and microwave-glazed treatments ( P =.02). There was a significant difference in flexural strength between the 2 porcelains ( P &lt;.005), but no significant difference in flexural strength by surface treatment ( P =.48). The Weibull modulus value for the Omega 900 microwave-glazed group was the highest (1.9) as compared to the other groups. Conclusions The surface character of microwave-glazed porcelain was superior to oven-glazed porcelain. Omega 900 had an overall higher flexural strength than IPS d.Sign. Weibull distributions of flexural strengths for Omega 900 oven-glazed and microwave-glazed specimens were similar. SEM analysis demonstrated a greater number of surface voids and imperfections in IPS d. Sign as compared to Omega 900. (J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:20-28)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60284-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19105988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Dental Polishing - methods ; Dental Porcelain ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; Hot Temperature ; Materials Testing ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Microwaves ; Pliability ; Porosity ; Surface Properties ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2009, Vol.101 (1), p.20-28</ispartof><rights>The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>2009 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-67f25c3cee73f56f7ebfff3df4ff819cb4d9dd98aefea6634db4c7bcef13b08a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-67f25c3cee73f56f7ebfff3df4ff819cb4d9dd98aefea6634db4c7bcef13b08a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60284-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19105988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Soni, BDS, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaco, Edward A., DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyeongil, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Elaine L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Jane D., DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of porcelain surface and flexural strength obtained by microwave and conventional oven glazing</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description>Statement of problem Although the superior qualities of microwave technology are common knowledge in the industry, effects of microwave glazing of dental ceramics have not been investigated. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the surface roughness and flexural strength achieved by glazing porcelain specimens in a conventional and microwave oven. Material and methods Thirty specimens of each type of porcelain (Omega 900 and IPS d.Sign) were fabricated and sintered in a conventional oven. The specimens were further divided into 3 groups (n=10): hand polished (using diamond rotary ceramic polishers), microwave glazed, and conventional oven glazed. Each specimen was evaluated for surface roughness using a profilometer. The flexural strength of each specimen was measured using a universal testing machine. A 2-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc analysis were used to determine significant intergroup differences in surface roughness (α=.05). Flexural strength results were also analyzed using 2-way ANOVA, and the Weibull modulus was determined for each of the 6 groups. The surfaces of the specimens were subjectively evaluated for cracks and porosities using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results A significant difference in surface roughness was found among the surface treatments ( P =.02). Follow-up tests showed a significant difference in surface roughness between oven-glazed and microwave-glazed treatments ( P =.02). There was a significant difference in flexural strength between the 2 porcelains ( P &lt;.005), but no significant difference in flexural strength by surface treatment ( P =.48). The Weibull modulus value for the Omega 900 microwave-glazed group was the highest (1.9) as compared to the other groups. Conclusions The surface character of microwave-glazed porcelain was superior to oven-glazed porcelain. Omega 900 had an overall higher flexural strength than IPS d.Sign. Weibull distributions of flexural strengths for Omega 900 oven-glazed and microwave-glazed specimens were similar. SEM analysis demonstrated a greater number of surface voids and imperfections in IPS d. Sign as compared to Omega 900. (J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:20-28)</description><subject>Dental Polishing - methods</subject><subject>Dental Porcelain</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Microwaves</subject><subject>Pliability</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUGP1CAYhonRuLOrP0HDyeihCqWlcNGYiasmm3hQk7kRCh8jawsjtKPjr5eZTjTxsic4PN_z5XtfhJ5Q8pISyl99JqSuKyYpe07EC05q0VSbe2hFiewqLhp6H63-IhfoMudbQohoO_oQXVBJSSuFWCG_juNOJ59jwNHhXUwGBu0DznNy2gDWwWI3wK856QHnKUHYTt9w7KcCgcX9AY_epPhT7xfWxLCHMPkYCh_LF28H_duH7SP0wOkhw-Pze4W-Xr_7sv5Q3Xx6_3H99qYyLa-nineubg0zAB1zLXcd9M45Zl3jnKDS9I2V1kqhwYHmnDW2b0zXG3CU9URodoWeLd5dij9myJMafS5HDTpAnLPivGukZPROkDHeSC5YAdsFLHfmnMCpXfKjTgdFiTqWoU5lqGPSigh1KkNtytzT84K5H8H-mzqnX4A3CwAlj72HpLLxEAxYn8BMykZ_54rX_xnM4IM3evgOB8i3cU6lh6yoyrUii-ToIOJk2LA_bA2yUw</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Prasad, Soni, BDS, MS</creator><creator>Monaco, Edward A., DDS</creator><creator>Kim, Hyeongil, DDS</creator><creator>Davis, Elaine L., PhD</creator><creator>Brewer, Jane D., DDS, MS</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Comparison of porcelain surface and flexural strength obtained by microwave and conventional oven glazing</title><author>Prasad, Soni, BDS, MS ; Monaco, Edward A., DDS ; Kim, Hyeongil, DDS ; Davis, Elaine L., PhD ; Brewer, Jane D., DDS, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-67f25c3cee73f56f7ebfff3df4ff819cb4d9dd98aefea6634db4c7bcef13b08a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Dental Polishing - methods</topic><topic>Dental Porcelain</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Microwaves</topic><topic>Pliability</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Soni, BDS, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaco, Edward A., DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyeongil, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Elaine L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Jane D., DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prasad, Soni, BDS, MS</au><au>Monaco, Edward A., DDS</au><au>Kim, Hyeongil, DDS</au><au>Davis, Elaine L., PhD</au><au>Brewer, Jane D., DDS, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of porcelain surface and flexural strength obtained by microwave and conventional oven glazing</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>20-28</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>Statement of problem Although the superior qualities of microwave technology are common knowledge in the industry, effects of microwave glazing of dental ceramics have not been investigated. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the surface roughness and flexural strength achieved by glazing porcelain specimens in a conventional and microwave oven. Material and methods Thirty specimens of each type of porcelain (Omega 900 and IPS d.Sign) were fabricated and sintered in a conventional oven. The specimens were further divided into 3 groups (n=10): hand polished (using diamond rotary ceramic polishers), microwave glazed, and conventional oven glazed. Each specimen was evaluated for surface roughness using a profilometer. The flexural strength of each specimen was measured using a universal testing machine. A 2-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc analysis were used to determine significant intergroup differences in surface roughness (α=.05). Flexural strength results were also analyzed using 2-way ANOVA, and the Weibull modulus was determined for each of the 6 groups. The surfaces of the specimens were subjectively evaluated for cracks and porosities using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results A significant difference in surface roughness was found among the surface treatments ( P =.02). Follow-up tests showed a significant difference in surface roughness between oven-glazed and microwave-glazed treatments ( P =.02). There was a significant difference in flexural strength between the 2 porcelains ( P &lt;.005), but no significant difference in flexural strength by surface treatment ( P =.48). The Weibull modulus value for the Omega 900 microwave-glazed group was the highest (1.9) as compared to the other groups. Conclusions The surface character of microwave-glazed porcelain was superior to oven-glazed porcelain. Omega 900 had an overall higher flexural strength than IPS d.Sign. Weibull distributions of flexural strengths for Omega 900 oven-glazed and microwave-glazed specimens were similar. SEM analysis demonstrated a greater number of surface voids and imperfections in IPS d. Sign as compared to Omega 900. (J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:20-28)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>19105988</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60284-X</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3913
ispartof The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2009, Vol.101 (1), p.20-28
issn 0022-3913
1097-6841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66749931
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Dental Polishing - methods
Dental Porcelain
Dental Stress Analysis
Dentistry
Hot Temperature
Materials Testing
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Microwaves
Pliability
Porosity
Surface Properties
Survival Analysis
title Comparison of porcelain surface and flexural strength obtained by microwave and conventional oven glazing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T06%3A10%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20porcelain%20surface%20and%20flexural%20strength%20obtained%20by%20microwave%20and%20conventional%20oven%20glazing&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Prasad,%20Soni,%20BDS,%20MS&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=20-28&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60284-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66749931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=33649683&rft_id=info:pmid/19105988&rft_els_id=S002239130860284X&rfr_iscdi=true