A new measure to assess the difficulty of liver resection

Abstract Background There is no valid measure to assess surgical difficulty and feasibility of a planned liver resection. It is the objective of this study to evaluate a mathematical measure from a 3D graphical analysis. Methods Eleven different 3D models of hepatic tumours were evaluated by experts...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of surgical oncology 2009-01, Vol.35 (1), p.59-64
Hauptverfasser: Beller, S, Eulenstein, S, Lange, T, Niederstrasser, M, Hünerbein, M, Schlag, P.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 64
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title European journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 35
creator Beller, S
Eulenstein, S
Lange, T
Niederstrasser, M
Hünerbein, M
Schlag, P.M
description Abstract Background There is no valid measure to assess surgical difficulty and feasibility of a planned liver resection. It is the objective of this study to evaluate a mathematical measure from a 3D graphical analysis. Methods Eleven different 3D models of hepatic tumours were evaluated by experts for resectability and analysed with Amira® graphic software taking into consideration the portal and hepatic venous vascular relationships. Virtual resection volumes with increasing resection margins from 1 to 30 mm were determined separately for portal veins, hepatic veins, their intersections and volume unions. The integral of the increasing resection volumes was defined as risk coefficient. The risk coefficients from this volumetric analysis were compared with the expert opinion. Results The risk coefficient based on the integral of portal venous and hepatic venous volume unions reproduced the expert opinion highly significantly (correlation coefficient 0.9, p < 0.05) and more accurately than volumetric analysis of the planned resection margin. Conclusion With automated volumetric analysis, anatomically problematic situations in liver surgery can be reproduced and scaled. The risk coefficient obtained is a suitable objective measure for defining risk areas in liver surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.07.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66749498</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0748798308017290</els_id><sourcerecordid>66749498</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-589c5bb6e2eeadf3983b4e24a610cf98f88828fc037a0000641f25ef12e2657c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGL1TAUhYMozvPpH3AhXblrvUnTJgERhkGdgQEX6jrkpTeY2teMue3I-_emvAeCC1d3c87h3O8w9ppDw4H378YGR0qNANANqAa4fMJ2vGtFLXinnrIdKKlrZXR7xV4QjQBgWmWesyuulTZaih0z19WMv6sjOlozVkuqHBESVcsPrIYYQvTrtJyqFKopPmKuMhL6Jab5JXsW3ET46nL37Punj99ubuv7L5_vbq7vay9Vt9SdNr47HHoUiG4IbWlzkCik6zn4YHTQWgsdPLTKlYLQSx5Eh4ELFH2nfLtnb8-5Dzn9WpEWe4zkcZrcjGkl2_dKGlli90ychT4noozBPuR4dPlkOdgNmB3tBsxuwCwoW4AV05tL-no44vDXciFUBO_PAiw_PkbMlnzE2eMQcwFhhxT_n__hH7uf4hy9m37iCWlMa54LPcstCQv26zbZthho4EoYaP8ATVSQbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66749498</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new measure to assess the difficulty of liver resection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Beller, S ; Eulenstein, S ; Lange, T ; Niederstrasser, M ; Hünerbein, M ; Schlag, P.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Beller, S ; Eulenstein, S ; Lange, T ; Niederstrasser, M ; Hünerbein, M ; Schlag, P.M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background There is no valid measure to assess surgical difficulty and feasibility of a planned liver resection. It is the objective of this study to evaluate a mathematical measure from a 3D graphical analysis. Methods Eleven different 3D models of hepatic tumours were evaluated by experts for resectability and analysed with Amira® graphic software taking into consideration the portal and hepatic venous vascular relationships. Virtual resection volumes with increasing resection margins from 1 to 30 mm were determined separately for portal veins, hepatic veins, their intersections and volume unions. The integral of the increasing resection volumes was defined as risk coefficient. The risk coefficients from this volumetric analysis were compared with the expert opinion. Results The risk coefficient based on the integral of portal venous and hepatic venous volume unions reproduced the expert opinion highly significantly (correlation coefficient 0.9, p &lt; 0.05) and more accurately than volumetric analysis of the planned resection margin. Conclusion With automated volumetric analysis, anatomically problematic situations in liver surgery can be reproduced and scaled. The risk coefficient obtained is a suitable objective measure for defining risk areas in liver surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.07.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18789842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Expert Systems ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Hepatectomy - instrumentation ; Hepatic Artery - surgery ; Hepatic Veins - surgery ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Liver ; Liver Neoplasms - blood supply ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Risk ; Software ; Surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation ; User-Computer Interface ; Volumetry</subject><ispartof>European journal of surgical oncology, 2009-01, Vol.35 (1), p.59-64</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-589c5bb6e2eeadf3983b4e24a610cf98f88828fc037a0000641f25ef12e2657c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-589c5bb6e2eeadf3983b4e24a610cf98f88828fc037a0000641f25ef12e2657c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.07.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18789842$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beller, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eulenstein, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niederstrasser, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hünerbein, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlag, P.M</creatorcontrib><title>A new measure to assess the difficulty of liver resection</title><title>European journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background There is no valid measure to assess surgical difficulty and feasibility of a planned liver resection. It is the objective of this study to evaluate a mathematical measure from a 3D graphical analysis. Methods Eleven different 3D models of hepatic tumours were evaluated by experts for resectability and analysed with Amira® graphic software taking into consideration the portal and hepatic venous vascular relationships. Virtual resection volumes with increasing resection margins from 1 to 30 mm were determined separately for portal veins, hepatic veins, their intersections and volume unions. The integral of the increasing resection volumes was defined as risk coefficient. The risk coefficients from this volumetric analysis were compared with the expert opinion. Results The risk coefficient based on the integral of portal venous and hepatic venous volume unions reproduced the expert opinion highly significantly (correlation coefficient 0.9, p &lt; 0.05) and more accurately than volumetric analysis of the planned resection margin. Conclusion With automated volumetric analysis, anatomically problematic situations in liver surgery can be reproduced and scaled. The risk coefficient obtained is a suitable objective measure for defining risk areas in liver surgery.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Expert Systems</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Hepatic Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Hepatic Veins - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - blood supply</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><subject>Volumetry</subject><issn>0748-7983</issn><issn>1532-2157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGL1TAUhYMozvPpH3AhXblrvUnTJgERhkGdgQEX6jrkpTeY2teMue3I-_emvAeCC1d3c87h3O8w9ppDw4H378YGR0qNANANqAa4fMJ2vGtFLXinnrIdKKlrZXR7xV4QjQBgWmWesyuulTZaih0z19WMv6sjOlozVkuqHBESVcsPrIYYQvTrtJyqFKopPmKuMhL6Jab5JXsW3ET46nL37Punj99ubuv7L5_vbq7vay9Vt9SdNr47HHoUiG4IbWlzkCik6zn4YHTQWgsdPLTKlYLQSx5Eh4ELFH2nfLtnb8-5Dzn9WpEWe4zkcZrcjGkl2_dKGlli90ychT4noozBPuR4dPlkOdgNmB3tBsxuwCwoW4AV05tL-no44vDXciFUBO_PAiw_PkbMlnzE2eMQcwFhhxT_n__hH7uf4hy9m37iCWlMa54LPcstCQv26zbZthho4EoYaP8ATVSQbw</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Beller, S</creator><creator>Eulenstein, S</creator><creator>Lange, T</creator><creator>Niederstrasser, M</creator><creator>Hünerbein, M</creator><creator>Schlag, P.M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>A new measure to assess the difficulty of liver resection</title><author>Beller, S ; Eulenstein, S ; Lange, T ; Niederstrasser, M ; Hünerbein, M ; Schlag, P.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-589c5bb6e2eeadf3983b4e24a610cf98f88828fc037a0000641f25ef12e2657c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Expert Systems</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Hepatic Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Hepatic Veins - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - blood supply</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><topic>Volumetry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beller, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eulenstein, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niederstrasser, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hünerbein, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlag, P.M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beller, S</au><au>Eulenstein, S</au><au>Lange, T</au><au>Niederstrasser, M</au><au>Hünerbein, M</au><au>Schlag, P.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new measure to assess the difficulty of liver resection</atitle><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>59-64</pages><issn>0748-7983</issn><eissn>1532-2157</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background There is no valid measure to assess surgical difficulty and feasibility of a planned liver resection. It is the objective of this study to evaluate a mathematical measure from a 3D graphical analysis. Methods Eleven different 3D models of hepatic tumours were evaluated by experts for resectability and analysed with Amira® graphic software taking into consideration the portal and hepatic venous vascular relationships. Virtual resection volumes with increasing resection margins from 1 to 30 mm were determined separately for portal veins, hepatic veins, their intersections and volume unions. The integral of the increasing resection volumes was defined as risk coefficient. The risk coefficients from this volumetric analysis were compared with the expert opinion. Results The risk coefficient based on the integral of portal venous and hepatic venous volume unions reproduced the expert opinion highly significantly (correlation coefficient 0.9, p &lt; 0.05) and more accurately than volumetric analysis of the planned resection margin. Conclusion With automated volumetric analysis, anatomically problematic situations in liver surgery can be reproduced and scaled. The risk coefficient obtained is a suitable objective measure for defining risk areas in liver surgery.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18789842</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejso.2008.07.014</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-7983
ispartof European journal of surgical oncology, 2009-01, Vol.35 (1), p.59-64
issn 0748-7983
1532-2157
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66749498
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Algorithms
Expert Systems
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Hepatectomy - instrumentation
Hepatic Artery - surgery
Hepatic Veins - surgery
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Liver
Liver Neoplasms - blood supply
Liver Neoplasms - surgery
Risk
Software
Surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation
User-Computer Interface
Volumetry
title A new measure to assess the difficulty of liver resection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T19%3A50%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20measure%20to%20assess%20the%20difficulty%20of%20liver%20resection&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Beller,%20S&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=59-64&rft.issn=0748-7983&rft.eissn=1532-2157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.07.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66749498%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66749498&rft_id=info:pmid/18789842&rft_els_id=S0748798308017290&rfr_iscdi=true