Role of ulnar forearm free flap in oromandibular reconstruction
The ulnar forearm flap is not frequently utilized for oromandibular reconstruction. This study evaluated the usefulness of the ulnar free flap for reconstruction. A retrospective study of 32 patients was conducted. The ulnar forearm flap was combined with an osseous flap in 24 patients. Nine females...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Microsurgery 2004, Vol.24 (4), p.285-288 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 288 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 285 |
container_title | Microsurgery |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Gabr, E.M. Kobayashi, M.R. Salibian, A.H. Armstrong, W.B. Sundine, M. Calvert, J.W. Evans, G.R.D. |
description | The ulnar forearm flap is not frequently utilized for oromandibular reconstruction. This study evaluated the usefulness of the ulnar free flap for reconstruction. A retrospective study of 32 patients was conducted. The ulnar forearm flap was combined with an osseous flap in 24 patients. Nine females and 23 males with a mean age of 58.15 years comprised our study population. Squamous‐cell carcinoma was the diagnosis in 93.75% of cases (56.25% T4), of which 20% were recurrent. Functional evaluation of swallowing was based on the University of Washington Questionnaire (UWQ). The mean hospital stay was 9.8 days. The external carotid (100%) was the recipient artery, and the internal jugular (74.07%) was the main recipient vein. Overall flap survival was 96.8%. One flap was lost due to unsalvageable venous thrombosis. Major local complications were seen in 9.4% of cases and included partial flap loss, hematoma, and an orocutaneous fistula. At the time of this study, 21 patients were available for functional evaluation. Speech was rated excellent and good in 33.3% of patients. Swallowing was found good in 28.6% of patients. Chewing was rated excellent and good in 47.6% of patients. Cosmetic acceptance was rated good in 71.4% of cases. The ulnar forearm is a useful free flap in oromandibular reconstruction. It is available when the radial artery is the dominant artery of the hand. Being more hidden, it may be more cosmetically accepted. It affords pliable soft tissue for lining and/or covering of oromandibular defects, and can be used as a second choice after other free‐flap failures. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/micr.20021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66745734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66745734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-5ba04c27ed341e886b985d920b10408fd2ca19402735c627f532839035fbd4423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1P3DAQBmALgWALXPgBVS5wqBQYf8X2CaFVC0jLhxBVj5bj2JKLEy_2Ri3_ntDdtpw4zRyed0Z6ETrCcIoByFkfbD4l04a30AyDkjURnGyjGQgqawyS76FPpfwEAKWE2kV7mBPBsGQzdP6QoquSr8Y4mFz5lJ3JfeWzc5WPZlmFoUo59WboQjvGiWRn01BWebSrkIYDtONNLO5wM_fR929fH-dX9eLu8np-sagtVRTXvDXALBGuoww7KZtWSd4pAi0GBtJ3xBqsGBBBuW2I8JwSSRVQ7tuOMUL30cn67jKn59GVle5DsS5GM7g0Ft00gnFB2QS_rKHNqZTsvF7m0Jv8ojHot7r0W136T10T_ry5Ora96_7TTT8TON4AU6yJPpvBhvLOKcFEA5PDa_crRPfywUt9cz1_-Pu8XmdCWbnf_zImP-lGUMH1j9tLfUMwE1f393pBXwFsbY9h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66745734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of ulnar forearm free flap in oromandibular reconstruction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gabr, E.M. ; Kobayashi, M.R. ; Salibian, A.H. ; Armstrong, W.B. ; Sundine, M. ; Calvert, J.W. ; Evans, G.R.D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gabr, E.M. ; Kobayashi, M.R. ; Salibian, A.H. ; Armstrong, W.B. ; Sundine, M. ; Calvert, J.W. ; Evans, G.R.D.</creatorcontrib><description>The ulnar forearm flap is not frequently utilized for oromandibular reconstruction. This study evaluated the usefulness of the ulnar free flap for reconstruction. A retrospective study of 32 patients was conducted. The ulnar forearm flap was combined with an osseous flap in 24 patients. Nine females and 23 males with a mean age of 58.15 years comprised our study population. Squamous‐cell carcinoma was the diagnosis in 93.75% of cases (56.25% T4), of which 20% were recurrent. Functional evaluation of swallowing was based on the University of Washington Questionnaire (UWQ). The mean hospital stay was 9.8 days. The external carotid (100%) was the recipient artery, and the internal jugular (74.07%) was the main recipient vein. Overall flap survival was 96.8%. One flap was lost due to unsalvageable venous thrombosis. Major local complications were seen in 9.4% of cases and included partial flap loss, hematoma, and an orocutaneous fistula. At the time of this study, 21 patients were available for functional evaluation. Speech was rated excellent and good in 33.3% of patients. Swallowing was found good in 28.6% of patients. Chewing was rated excellent and good in 47.6% of patients. Cosmetic acceptance was rated good in 71.4% of cases. The ulnar forearm is a useful free flap in oromandibular reconstruction. It is available when the radial artery is the dominant artery of the hand. Being more hidden, it may be more cosmetically accepted. It affords pliable soft tissue for lining and/or covering of oromandibular defects, and can be used as a second choice after other free‐flap failures. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-1085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/micr.20021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15274184</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MSRGDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Basal Cell - surgery ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Chondrosarcoma - surgery ; Female ; Forearm - surgery ; General aspects ; Humans ; Ilium - transplantation ; Male ; Mandible - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mouth Neoplasms - surgery ; Oral Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Flaps ; Wounds and Injuries - etiology ; Wounds and Injuries - surgery</subject><ispartof>Microsurgery, 2004, Vol.24 (4), p.285-288</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-5ba04c27ed341e886b985d920b10408fd2ca19402735c627f532839035fbd4423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-5ba04c27ed341e886b985d920b10408fd2ca19402735c627f532839035fbd4423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmicr.20021$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmicr.20021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15974760$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15274184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gabr, E.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, M.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salibian, A.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, W.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundine, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvert, J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, G.R.D.</creatorcontrib><title>Role of ulnar forearm free flap in oromandibular reconstruction</title><title>Microsurgery</title><addtitle>Microsurgery</addtitle><description>The ulnar forearm flap is not frequently utilized for oromandibular reconstruction. This study evaluated the usefulness of the ulnar free flap for reconstruction. A retrospective study of 32 patients was conducted. The ulnar forearm flap was combined with an osseous flap in 24 patients. Nine females and 23 males with a mean age of 58.15 years comprised our study population. Squamous‐cell carcinoma was the diagnosis in 93.75% of cases (56.25% T4), of which 20% were recurrent. Functional evaluation of swallowing was based on the University of Washington Questionnaire (UWQ). The mean hospital stay was 9.8 days. The external carotid (100%) was the recipient artery, and the internal jugular (74.07%) was the main recipient vein. Overall flap survival was 96.8%. One flap was lost due to unsalvageable venous thrombosis. Major local complications were seen in 9.4% of cases and included partial flap loss, hematoma, and an orocutaneous fistula. At the time of this study, 21 patients were available for functional evaluation. Speech was rated excellent and good in 33.3% of patients. Swallowing was found good in 28.6% of patients. Chewing was rated excellent and good in 47.6% of patients. Cosmetic acceptance was rated good in 71.4% of cases. The ulnar forearm is a useful free flap in oromandibular reconstruction. It is available when the radial artery is the dominant artery of the hand. Being more hidden, it may be more cosmetically accepted. It affords pliable soft tissue for lining and/or covering of oromandibular defects, and can be used as a second choice after other free‐flap failures. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Basal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Chondrosarcoma - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forearm - surgery</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ilium - transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Oral Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - etiology</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - surgery</subject><issn>0738-1085</issn><issn>1098-2752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1P3DAQBmALgWALXPgBVS5wqBQYf8X2CaFVC0jLhxBVj5bj2JKLEy_2Ri3_ntDdtpw4zRyed0Z6ETrCcIoByFkfbD4l04a30AyDkjURnGyjGQgqawyS76FPpfwEAKWE2kV7mBPBsGQzdP6QoquSr8Y4mFz5lJ3JfeWzc5WPZlmFoUo59WboQjvGiWRn01BWebSrkIYDtONNLO5wM_fR929fH-dX9eLu8np-sagtVRTXvDXALBGuoww7KZtWSd4pAi0GBtJ3xBqsGBBBuW2I8JwSSRVQ7tuOMUL30cn67jKn59GVle5DsS5GM7g0Ft00gnFB2QS_rKHNqZTsvF7m0Jv8ojHot7r0W136T10T_ry5Ora96_7TTT8TON4AU6yJPpvBhvLOKcFEA5PDa_crRPfywUt9cz1_-Pu8XmdCWbnf_zImP-lGUMH1j9tLfUMwE1f393pBXwFsbY9h</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Gabr, E.M.</creator><creator>Kobayashi, M.R.</creator><creator>Salibian, A.H.</creator><creator>Armstrong, W.B.</creator><creator>Sundine, M.</creator><creator>Calvert, J.W.</creator><creator>Evans, G.R.D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>Role of ulnar forearm free flap in oromandibular reconstruction</title><author>Gabr, E.M. ; Kobayashi, M.R. ; Salibian, A.H. ; Armstrong, W.B. ; Sundine, M. ; Calvert, J.W. ; Evans, G.R.D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-5ba04c27ed341e886b985d920b10408fd2ca19402735c627f532839035fbd4423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Basal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Chondrosarcoma - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forearm - surgery</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ilium - transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Oral Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - etiology</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gabr, E.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, M.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salibian, A.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, W.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundine, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvert, J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, G.R.D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Microsurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gabr, E.M.</au><au>Kobayashi, M.R.</au><au>Salibian, A.H.</au><au>Armstrong, W.B.</au><au>Sundine, M.</au><au>Calvert, J.W.</au><au>Evans, G.R.D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of ulnar forearm free flap in oromandibular reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>Microsurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Microsurgery</addtitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>285-288</pages><issn>0738-1085</issn><eissn>1098-2752</eissn><coden>MSRGDQ</coden><abstract>The ulnar forearm flap is not frequently utilized for oromandibular reconstruction. This study evaluated the usefulness of the ulnar free flap for reconstruction. A retrospective study of 32 patients was conducted. The ulnar forearm flap was combined with an osseous flap in 24 patients. Nine females and 23 males with a mean age of 58.15 years comprised our study population. Squamous‐cell carcinoma was the diagnosis in 93.75% of cases (56.25% T4), of which 20% were recurrent. Functional evaluation of swallowing was based on the University of Washington Questionnaire (UWQ). The mean hospital stay was 9.8 days. The external carotid (100%) was the recipient artery, and the internal jugular (74.07%) was the main recipient vein. Overall flap survival was 96.8%. One flap was lost due to unsalvageable venous thrombosis. Major local complications were seen in 9.4% of cases and included partial flap loss, hematoma, and an orocutaneous fistula. At the time of this study, 21 patients were available for functional evaluation. Speech was rated excellent and good in 33.3% of patients. Swallowing was found good in 28.6% of patients. Chewing was rated excellent and good in 47.6% of patients. Cosmetic acceptance was rated good in 71.4% of cases. The ulnar forearm is a useful free flap in oromandibular reconstruction. It is available when the radial artery is the dominant artery of the hand. Being more hidden, it may be more cosmetically accepted. It affords pliable soft tissue for lining and/or covering of oromandibular defects, and can be used as a second choice after other free‐flap failures. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>15274184</pmid><doi>10.1002/micr.20021</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0738-1085 |
ispartof | Microsurgery, 2004, Vol.24 (4), p.285-288 |
issn | 0738-1085 1098-2752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66745734 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Carcinoma, Basal Cell - surgery Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery Chondrosarcoma - surgery Female Forearm - surgery General aspects Humans Ilium - transplantation Male Mandible - surgery Medical sciences Middle Aged Mouth Neoplasms - surgery Oral Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods Retrospective Studies Surgical Flaps Wounds and Injuries - etiology Wounds and Injuries - surgery |
title | Role of ulnar forearm free flap in oromandibular reconstruction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A40%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20ulnar%20forearm%20free%20flap%20in%20oromandibular%20reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Microsurgery&rft.au=Gabr,%20E.M.&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=285-288&rft.issn=0738-1085&rft.eissn=1098-2752&rft.coden=MSRGDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/micr.20021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66745734%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66745734&rft_id=info:pmid/15274184&rfr_iscdi=true |