Delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops by decreasing dominance and heritability
The refuge strategy is used widely for delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops that produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins. Farmers grow refuges of host plants that do not produce Bt toxins to promote survival of susceptible pests. Many modelling studies predict that refuges...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of evolutionary biology 2004-07, Vol.17 (4), p.904-912 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 912 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 904 |
container_title | Journal of evolutionary biology |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Tabashnik, B. E. Gould, F. Carrière, Y. |
description | The refuge strategy is used widely for delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops that produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins. Farmers grow refuges of host plants that do not produce Bt toxins to promote survival of susceptible pests. Many modelling studies predict that refuges will delay resistance longest if alleles conferring resistance are rare, most resistant adults mate with susceptible adults, and Bt plants have sufficiently high toxin concentration to kill heterozygous progeny from such matings. In contrast, based on their model of the cotton pest Heliothis virescens, Vacher et al. (Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 2003, 378) concluded that low rather than high toxin doses would delay resistance most effectively. We demonstrate here that their conclusion arises from invalid assumptions about larval concentration‐mortality responses and dominance of resistance. Incorporation of bioassay data from H. virescens and another key cotton pest (Pectinophora gossypiella) into a population genetic model shows that toxin concentrations high enough to kill all or nearly all heterozygotes should delay resistance longer than lower concentrations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00695.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66743076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66743076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-3db29e8328a498526daf9d401a0a4b593edf81fff31ca577d08a54d8e17269063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu2zAQRYkiRfNof6HgKjupMxQlUUA2ebVpEKCbBOiOoMSRQ0OmHFJOrb-vZBvNMp3NDMAzl-S9jHGEFKf6tkxRCkgqBEwFgEwBiipPtx_Yyb-Do2kGhAQK_H3MTmNcAmAh8_wTO8ZclAgVnjB7Q50ZnV9weu27zeB6z_uWOx-pGXig6OJgfEN86PkQjI8L8q7hTejXkdcjt9QEMnEWsP3K-R1rvOXPFNxgate5YfzMPrami_Tl0M_Y0_fbx-u75OHXj5_Xlw9JI6d3JZmtRUUqE8rISuWisKatrAQ0YGSdVxnZVmHbthk2Ji9LC8rk0irCUhQVFNkZO9_rrkP_sqE46JWLDXWd8dRvoi6KUmZQvg-iAiFVKSZQ7cHpwzEGavU6uJUJo0bQcxR6qWfH9ey4nqPQuyj0dlr9erhjU6_Ivi0evJ-Aiz3wx3U0_rewvr-9mobsL6EBmEo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18024872</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops by decreasing dominance and heritability</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tabashnik, B. E. ; Gould, F. ; Carrière, Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tabashnik, B. E. ; Gould, F. ; Carrière, Y.</creatorcontrib><description>The refuge strategy is used widely for delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops that produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins. Farmers grow refuges of host plants that do not produce Bt toxins to promote survival of susceptible pests. Many modelling studies predict that refuges will delay resistance longest if alleles conferring resistance are rare, most resistant adults mate with susceptible adults, and Bt plants have sufficiently high toxin concentration to kill heterozygous progeny from such matings. In contrast, based on their model of the cotton pest Heliothis virescens, Vacher et al. (Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 2003, 378) concluded that low rather than high toxin doses would delay resistance most effectively. We demonstrate here that their conclusion arises from invalid assumptions about larval concentration‐mortality responses and dominance of resistance. Incorporation of bioassay data from H. virescens and another key cotton pest (Pectinophora gossypiella) into a population genetic model shows that toxin concentrations high enough to kill all or nearly all heterozygotes should delay resistance longer than lower concentrations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-061X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00695.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15271091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacillus thuringiensis ; Bacillus thuringiensis - chemistry ; Bacillus thuringiensis - genetics ; Bacterial Toxins - chemistry ; Bacterial Toxins - genetics ; Biological Evolution ; Bt cotton ; Crops, Agricultural - physiology ; dominance ; Gene Frequency ; Genes, Dominant ; genetically modified crops ; Genetics, Population ; Gossypium hirsutum ; Heliothis virescens ; Insecticide Resistance - genetics ; Models, Biological ; Moths - genetics ; Moths - metabolism ; Noctuidae ; Pectinophora gossypiella ; Pest Control, Biological - methods ; Plants, Genetically Modified ; refuges ; resistance management ; transgenic crops</subject><ispartof>Journal of evolutionary biology, 2004-07, Vol.17 (4), p.904-912</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-3db29e8328a498526daf9d401a0a4b593edf81fff31ca577d08a54d8e17269063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-3db29e8328a498526daf9d401a0a4b593edf81fff31ca577d08a54d8e17269063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1420-9101.2004.00695.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1420-9101.2004.00695.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15271091$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tabashnik, B. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gould, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrière, Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops by decreasing dominance and heritability</title><title>Journal of evolutionary biology</title><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><description>The refuge strategy is used widely for delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops that produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins. Farmers grow refuges of host plants that do not produce Bt toxins to promote survival of susceptible pests. Many modelling studies predict that refuges will delay resistance longest if alleles conferring resistance are rare, most resistant adults mate with susceptible adults, and Bt plants have sufficiently high toxin concentration to kill heterozygous progeny from such matings. In contrast, based on their model of the cotton pest Heliothis virescens, Vacher et al. (Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 2003, 378) concluded that low rather than high toxin doses would delay resistance most effectively. We demonstrate here that their conclusion arises from invalid assumptions about larval concentration‐mortality responses and dominance of resistance. Incorporation of bioassay data from H. virescens and another key cotton pest (Pectinophora gossypiella) into a population genetic model shows that toxin concentrations high enough to kill all or nearly all heterozygotes should delay resistance longer than lower concentrations.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacillus thuringiensis</subject><subject>Bacillus thuringiensis - chemistry</subject><subject>Bacillus thuringiensis - genetics</subject><subject>Bacterial Toxins - chemistry</subject><subject>Bacterial Toxins - genetics</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Bt cotton</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural - physiology</subject><subject>dominance</subject><subject>Gene Frequency</subject><subject>Genes, Dominant</subject><subject>genetically modified crops</subject><subject>Genetics, Population</subject><subject>Gossypium hirsutum</subject><subject>Heliothis virescens</subject><subject>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Moths - genetics</subject><subject>Moths - metabolism</subject><subject>Noctuidae</subject><subject>Pectinophora gossypiella</subject><subject>Pest Control, Biological - methods</subject><subject>Plants, Genetically Modified</subject><subject>refuges</subject><subject>resistance management</subject><subject>transgenic crops</subject><issn>1010-061X</issn><issn>1420-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu2zAQRYkiRfNof6HgKjupMxQlUUA2ebVpEKCbBOiOoMSRQ0OmHFJOrb-vZBvNMp3NDMAzl-S9jHGEFKf6tkxRCkgqBEwFgEwBiipPtx_Yyb-Do2kGhAQK_H3MTmNcAmAh8_wTO8ZclAgVnjB7Q50ZnV9weu27zeB6z_uWOx-pGXig6OJgfEN86PkQjI8L8q7hTejXkdcjt9QEMnEWsP3K-R1rvOXPFNxgate5YfzMPrami_Tl0M_Y0_fbx-u75OHXj5_Xlw9JI6d3JZmtRUUqE8rISuWisKatrAQ0YGSdVxnZVmHbthk2Ji9LC8rk0irCUhQVFNkZO9_rrkP_sqE46JWLDXWd8dRvoi6KUmZQvg-iAiFVKSZQ7cHpwzEGavU6uJUJo0bQcxR6qWfH9ey4nqPQuyj0dlr9erhjU6_Ivi0evJ-Aiz3wx3U0_rewvr-9mobsL6EBmEo</recordid><startdate>200407</startdate><enddate>200407</enddate><creator>Tabashnik, B. E.</creator><creator>Gould, F.</creator><creator>Carrière, Y.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200407</creationdate><title>Delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops by decreasing dominance and heritability</title><author>Tabashnik, B. E. ; Gould, F. ; Carrière, Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-3db29e8328a498526daf9d401a0a4b593edf81fff31ca577d08a54d8e17269063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacillus thuringiensis</topic><topic>Bacillus thuringiensis - chemistry</topic><topic>Bacillus thuringiensis - genetics</topic><topic>Bacterial Toxins - chemistry</topic><topic>Bacterial Toxins - genetics</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Bt cotton</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural - physiology</topic><topic>dominance</topic><topic>Gene Frequency</topic><topic>Genes, Dominant</topic><topic>genetically modified crops</topic><topic>Genetics, Population</topic><topic>Gossypium hirsutum</topic><topic>Heliothis virescens</topic><topic>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Moths - genetics</topic><topic>Moths - metabolism</topic><topic>Noctuidae</topic><topic>Pectinophora gossypiella</topic><topic>Pest Control, Biological - methods</topic><topic>Plants, Genetically Modified</topic><topic>refuges</topic><topic>resistance management</topic><topic>transgenic crops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tabashnik, B. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gould, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrière, Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tabashnik, B. E.</au><au>Gould, F.</au><au>Carrière, Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops by decreasing dominance and heritability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><date>2004-07</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>904</spage><epage>912</epage><pages>904-912</pages><issn>1010-061X</issn><eissn>1420-9101</eissn><abstract>The refuge strategy is used widely for delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops that produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins. Farmers grow refuges of host plants that do not produce Bt toxins to promote survival of susceptible pests. Many modelling studies predict that refuges will delay resistance longest if alleles conferring resistance are rare, most resistant adults mate with susceptible adults, and Bt plants have sufficiently high toxin concentration to kill heterozygous progeny from such matings. In contrast, based on their model of the cotton pest Heliothis virescens, Vacher et al. (Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 2003, 378) concluded that low rather than high toxin doses would delay resistance most effectively. We demonstrate here that their conclusion arises from invalid assumptions about larval concentration‐mortality responses and dominance of resistance. Incorporation of bioassay data from H. virescens and another key cotton pest (Pectinophora gossypiella) into a population genetic model shows that toxin concentrations high enough to kill all or nearly all heterozygotes should delay resistance longer than lower concentrations.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>15271091</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00695.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1010-061X |
ispartof | Journal of evolutionary biology, 2004-07, Vol.17 (4), p.904-912 |
issn | 1010-061X 1420-9101 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66743076 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Bacillus thuringiensis Bacillus thuringiensis - chemistry Bacillus thuringiensis - genetics Bacterial Toxins - chemistry Bacterial Toxins - genetics Biological Evolution Bt cotton Crops, Agricultural - physiology dominance Gene Frequency Genes, Dominant genetically modified crops Genetics, Population Gossypium hirsutum Heliothis virescens Insecticide Resistance - genetics Models, Biological Moths - genetics Moths - metabolism Noctuidae Pectinophora gossypiella Pest Control, Biological - methods Plants, Genetically Modified refuges resistance management transgenic crops |
title | Delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops by decreasing dominance and heritability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T23%3A34%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delaying%20evolution%20of%20insect%20resistance%20to%20transgenic%20crops%20by%20decreasing%20dominance%20and%20heritability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evolutionary%20biology&rft.au=Tabashnik,%20B.%20E.&rft.date=2004-07&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=904&rft.epage=912&rft.pages=904-912&rft.issn=1010-061X&rft.eissn=1420-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00695.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66743076%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18024872&rft_id=info:pmid/15271091&rfr_iscdi=true |