Delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops by decreasing dominance and heritability

The refuge strategy is used widely for delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops that produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins. Farmers grow refuges of host plants that do not produce Bt toxins to promote survival of susceptible pests. Many modelling studies predict that refuges...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evolutionary biology 2004-07, Vol.17 (4), p.904-912
Hauptverfasser: Tabashnik, B. E., Gould, F., Carrière, Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 912
container_issue 4
container_start_page 904
container_title Journal of evolutionary biology
container_volume 17
creator Tabashnik, B. E.
Gould, F.
Carrière, Y.
description The refuge strategy is used widely for delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops that produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins. Farmers grow refuges of host plants that do not produce Bt toxins to promote survival of susceptible pests. Many modelling studies predict that refuges will delay resistance longest if alleles conferring resistance are rare, most resistant adults mate with susceptible adults, and Bt plants have sufficiently high toxin concentration to kill heterozygous progeny from such matings. In contrast, based on their model of the cotton pest Heliothis virescens, Vacher et al. (Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 2003, 378) concluded that low rather than high toxin doses would delay resistance most effectively. We demonstrate here that their conclusion arises from invalid assumptions about larval concentration‐mortality responses and dominance of resistance. Incorporation of bioassay data from H. virescens and another key cotton pest (Pectinophora gossypiella) into a population genetic model shows that toxin concentrations high enough to kill all or nearly all heterozygotes should delay resistance longer than lower concentrations.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00695.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66743076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66743076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-3db29e8328a498526daf9d401a0a4b593edf81fff31ca577d08a54d8e17269063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu2zAQRYkiRfNof6HgKjupMxQlUUA2ebVpEKCbBOiOoMSRQ0OmHFJOrb-vZBvNMp3NDMAzl-S9jHGEFKf6tkxRCkgqBEwFgEwBiipPtx_Yyb-Do2kGhAQK_H3MTmNcAmAh8_wTO8ZclAgVnjB7Q50ZnV9weu27zeB6z_uWOx-pGXig6OJgfEN86PkQjI8L8q7hTejXkdcjt9QEMnEWsP3K-R1rvOXPFNxgate5YfzMPrami_Tl0M_Y0_fbx-u75OHXj5_Xlw9JI6d3JZmtRUUqE8rISuWisKatrAQ0YGSdVxnZVmHbthk2Ji9LC8rk0irCUhQVFNkZO9_rrkP_sqE46JWLDXWd8dRvoi6KUmZQvg-iAiFVKSZQ7cHpwzEGavU6uJUJo0bQcxR6qWfH9ey4nqPQuyj0dlr9erhjU6_Ivi0evJ-Aiz3wx3U0_rewvr-9mobsL6EBmEo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18024872</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops by decreasing dominance and heritability</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tabashnik, B. E. ; Gould, F. ; Carrière, Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tabashnik, B. E. ; Gould, F. ; Carrière, Y.</creatorcontrib><description>The refuge strategy is used widely for delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops that produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins. Farmers grow refuges of host plants that do not produce Bt toxins to promote survival of susceptible pests. Many modelling studies predict that refuges will delay resistance longest if alleles conferring resistance are rare, most resistant adults mate with susceptible adults, and Bt plants have sufficiently high toxin concentration to kill heterozygous progeny from such matings. In contrast, based on their model of the cotton pest Heliothis virescens, Vacher et al. (Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 2003, 378) concluded that low rather than high toxin doses would delay resistance most effectively. We demonstrate here that their conclusion arises from invalid assumptions about larval concentration‐mortality responses and dominance of resistance. Incorporation of bioassay data from H. virescens and another key cotton pest (Pectinophora gossypiella) into a population genetic model shows that toxin concentrations high enough to kill all or nearly all heterozygotes should delay resistance longer than lower concentrations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-061X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00695.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15271091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacillus thuringiensis ; Bacillus thuringiensis - chemistry ; Bacillus thuringiensis - genetics ; Bacterial Toxins - chemistry ; Bacterial Toxins - genetics ; Biological Evolution ; Bt cotton ; Crops, Agricultural - physiology ; dominance ; Gene Frequency ; Genes, Dominant ; genetically modified crops ; Genetics, Population ; Gossypium hirsutum ; Heliothis virescens ; Insecticide Resistance - genetics ; Models, Biological ; Moths - genetics ; Moths - metabolism ; Noctuidae ; Pectinophora gossypiella ; Pest Control, Biological - methods ; Plants, Genetically Modified ; refuges ; resistance management ; transgenic crops</subject><ispartof>Journal of evolutionary biology, 2004-07, Vol.17 (4), p.904-912</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-3db29e8328a498526daf9d401a0a4b593edf81fff31ca577d08a54d8e17269063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-3db29e8328a498526daf9d401a0a4b593edf81fff31ca577d08a54d8e17269063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1420-9101.2004.00695.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1420-9101.2004.00695.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15271091$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tabashnik, B. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gould, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrière, Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops by decreasing dominance and heritability</title><title>Journal of evolutionary biology</title><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><description>The refuge strategy is used widely for delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops that produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins. Farmers grow refuges of host plants that do not produce Bt toxins to promote survival of susceptible pests. Many modelling studies predict that refuges will delay resistance longest if alleles conferring resistance are rare, most resistant adults mate with susceptible adults, and Bt plants have sufficiently high toxin concentration to kill heterozygous progeny from such matings. In contrast, based on their model of the cotton pest Heliothis virescens, Vacher et al. (Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 2003, 378) concluded that low rather than high toxin doses would delay resistance most effectively. We demonstrate here that their conclusion arises from invalid assumptions about larval concentration‐mortality responses and dominance of resistance. Incorporation of bioassay data from H. virescens and another key cotton pest (Pectinophora gossypiella) into a population genetic model shows that toxin concentrations high enough to kill all or nearly all heterozygotes should delay resistance longer than lower concentrations.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacillus thuringiensis</subject><subject>Bacillus thuringiensis - chemistry</subject><subject>Bacillus thuringiensis - genetics</subject><subject>Bacterial Toxins - chemistry</subject><subject>Bacterial Toxins - genetics</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Bt cotton</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural - physiology</subject><subject>dominance</subject><subject>Gene Frequency</subject><subject>Genes, Dominant</subject><subject>genetically modified crops</subject><subject>Genetics, Population</subject><subject>Gossypium hirsutum</subject><subject>Heliothis virescens</subject><subject>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Moths - genetics</subject><subject>Moths - metabolism</subject><subject>Noctuidae</subject><subject>Pectinophora gossypiella</subject><subject>Pest Control, Biological - methods</subject><subject>Plants, Genetically Modified</subject><subject>refuges</subject><subject>resistance management</subject><subject>transgenic crops</subject><issn>1010-061X</issn><issn>1420-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu2zAQRYkiRfNof6HgKjupMxQlUUA2ebVpEKCbBOiOoMSRQ0OmHFJOrb-vZBvNMp3NDMAzl-S9jHGEFKf6tkxRCkgqBEwFgEwBiipPtx_Yyb-Do2kGhAQK_H3MTmNcAmAh8_wTO8ZclAgVnjB7Q50ZnV9weu27zeB6z_uWOx-pGXig6OJgfEN86PkQjI8L8q7hTejXkdcjt9QEMnEWsP3K-R1rvOXPFNxgate5YfzMPrami_Tl0M_Y0_fbx-u75OHXj5_Xlw9JI6d3JZmtRUUqE8rISuWisKatrAQ0YGSdVxnZVmHbthk2Ji9LC8rk0irCUhQVFNkZO9_rrkP_sqE46JWLDXWd8dRvoi6KUmZQvg-iAiFVKSZQ7cHpwzEGavU6uJUJo0bQcxR6qWfH9ey4nqPQuyj0dlr9erhjU6_Ivi0evJ-Aiz3wx3U0_rewvr-9mobsL6EBmEo</recordid><startdate>200407</startdate><enddate>200407</enddate><creator>Tabashnik, B. E.</creator><creator>Gould, F.</creator><creator>Carrière, Y.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200407</creationdate><title>Delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops by decreasing dominance and heritability</title><author>Tabashnik, B. E. ; Gould, F. ; Carrière, Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4455-3db29e8328a498526daf9d401a0a4b593edf81fff31ca577d08a54d8e17269063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacillus thuringiensis</topic><topic>Bacillus thuringiensis - chemistry</topic><topic>Bacillus thuringiensis - genetics</topic><topic>Bacterial Toxins - chemistry</topic><topic>Bacterial Toxins - genetics</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Bt cotton</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural - physiology</topic><topic>dominance</topic><topic>Gene Frequency</topic><topic>Genes, Dominant</topic><topic>genetically modified crops</topic><topic>Genetics, Population</topic><topic>Gossypium hirsutum</topic><topic>Heliothis virescens</topic><topic>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Moths - genetics</topic><topic>Moths - metabolism</topic><topic>Noctuidae</topic><topic>Pectinophora gossypiella</topic><topic>Pest Control, Biological - methods</topic><topic>Plants, Genetically Modified</topic><topic>refuges</topic><topic>resistance management</topic><topic>transgenic crops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tabashnik, B. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gould, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrière, Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tabashnik, B. E.</au><au>Gould, F.</au><au>Carrière, Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops by decreasing dominance and heritability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><date>2004-07</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>904</spage><epage>912</epage><pages>904-912</pages><issn>1010-061X</issn><eissn>1420-9101</eissn><abstract>The refuge strategy is used widely for delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops that produce Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins. Farmers grow refuges of host plants that do not produce Bt toxins to promote survival of susceptible pests. Many modelling studies predict that refuges will delay resistance longest if alleles conferring resistance are rare, most resistant adults mate with susceptible adults, and Bt plants have sufficiently high toxin concentration to kill heterozygous progeny from such matings. In contrast, based on their model of the cotton pest Heliothis virescens, Vacher et al. (Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 2003, 378) concluded that low rather than high toxin doses would delay resistance most effectively. We demonstrate here that their conclusion arises from invalid assumptions about larval concentration‐mortality responses and dominance of resistance. Incorporation of bioassay data from H. virescens and another key cotton pest (Pectinophora gossypiella) into a population genetic model shows that toxin concentrations high enough to kill all or nearly all heterozygotes should delay resistance longer than lower concentrations.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>15271091</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00695.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-061X
ispartof Journal of evolutionary biology, 2004-07, Vol.17 (4), p.904-912
issn 1010-061X
1420-9101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66743076
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis - chemistry
Bacillus thuringiensis - genetics
Bacterial Toxins - chemistry
Bacterial Toxins - genetics
Biological Evolution
Bt cotton
Crops, Agricultural - physiology
dominance
Gene Frequency
Genes, Dominant
genetically modified crops
Genetics, Population
Gossypium hirsutum
Heliothis virescens
Insecticide Resistance - genetics
Models, Biological
Moths - genetics
Moths - metabolism
Noctuidae
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pest Control, Biological - methods
Plants, Genetically Modified
refuges
resistance management
transgenic crops
title Delaying evolution of insect resistance to transgenic crops by decreasing dominance and heritability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T23%3A34%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delaying%20evolution%20of%20insect%20resistance%20to%20transgenic%20crops%20by%20decreasing%20dominance%20and%20heritability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evolutionary%20biology&rft.au=Tabashnik,%20B.%20E.&rft.date=2004-07&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=904&rft.epage=912&rft.pages=904-912&rft.issn=1010-061X&rft.eissn=1420-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00695.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66743076%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18024872&rft_id=info:pmid/15271091&rfr_iscdi=true