99mTc depreotide scan compared with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases and prediction of response to hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer
BACKGROUNDThe purpose of this study was to determine the potential role of Tc depreotide scintigraphy for the evaluation of bone metastases compared with Tc methylenediphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy and for the prediction of treatment response in breast cancer patients in whom first- or second-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nuclear medicine communications 2004-08, Vol.25 (8), p.787-792 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 792 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 787 |
container_title | Nuclear medicine communications |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Van Den Bossche, Bieke Dʼhaeninck, Eveline De Winter, Frederic Van Belle, Simon Dierckx, Rudi A Van de Wiele, Christophe |
description | BACKGROUNDThe purpose of this study was to determine the potential role of Tc depreotide scintigraphy for the evaluation of bone metastases compared with Tc methylenediphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy and for the prediction of treatment response in breast cancer patients in whom first- or second-line hormonal therapy was to be initiated.
METHODSTwelve patients with a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer were included. All patients underwent both a bone scan and a depreotide scan and at least one other conventional imaging procedure, including plain film radiography (n=11), computed tomography (n=6) or magnetic resonance imaging (n=5), for confirmation of metastatic disease. The mean time interval between the bone scan and the depreotide scan was 30.6 days. Follow-up data were retrieved from routine clinical evaluation by means of physical examination, imaging and blood analysis.
RESULTSOn a patient basis we found a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of, respectively 100%, 50% and 83.3% for the bone scan and 62.5%, 100% and 75% for the depreotide scan in the diagnosis of bone metastasis. In eight patients with available follow-up data two with a positive depreotide scan remained stable and five of six patients with a negative depreotide scan had progressive disease.
CONCLUSIONIn this small series of breast cancer patients Tc depreotide scintigraphy proves less sensitive but more specific as compared to Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy in measuring the extent of bone metastasis. On the other hand Tc depreotide scintigraphy elucidates, non-invasively, tumour characteristics and may be indicative for prognosis and response to hormonal treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.mnm.0000134934.87929.84 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66733966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66733966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2075-21eea0b7fbaa387b89782a0ccdbbb8d0b66146ae1822ba37505ec4e1ac3ea5aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkctu1TAURTMA0VL4BWQxYJbUj8R2mKFSoFIRDMrYsp0TYojtYPvqqv_FB-L7ELUs-bX2PkfeTfOW4I7gUVxj0vngO1wHYf3I-k6KkY6d7J81l5j0rGWc8YvmZc6_KiMZFy-aCzJQzomgl83fcfQPFk2wJYjFTYCy1QHZ6DedYEJ7VxZ0ZNqvH78jE8OBcKG4n0lvyyOaY0JlgepQwBYXA4rzCfNQdK4TMtJhQrXA5P4TCfIWQwZUIlpi8jHoFZUEungIBbmANl1c3eZTC6Y-5YJqbxbSq-b5rNcMr8_rVfPj0-3DzZf2_tvnu5sP962lWAwtJQAaGzEbrZkURo5CUo2tnYwxcsKm_kHPNRBJqdFMDHgA2wPRloEequaqeXfy3VL8s4NclHfZwrrqAHGXFeeCsZHzCr4_gTbFnBPMakvO6_SoCFaHnBQmquaknnJSx5yU7Kv4zbnKzniYnqTnkCrQn4B9XAuk_Hvd7SGpBfRalqMlp4y0FOMey3pqD1cD-wdzeqYf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66733966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>99mTc depreotide scan compared with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases and prediction of response to hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Van Den Bossche, Bieke ; Dʼhaeninck, Eveline ; De Winter, Frederic ; Van Belle, Simon ; Dierckx, Rudi A ; Van de Wiele, Christophe</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Den Bossche, Bieke ; Dʼhaeninck, Eveline ; De Winter, Frederic ; Van Belle, Simon ; Dierckx, Rudi A ; Van de Wiele, Christophe</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDThe purpose of this study was to determine the potential role of Tc depreotide scintigraphy for the evaluation of bone metastases compared with Tc methylenediphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy and for the prediction of treatment response in breast cancer patients in whom first- or second-line hormonal therapy was to be initiated.
METHODSTwelve patients with a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer were included. All patients underwent both a bone scan and a depreotide scan and at least one other conventional imaging procedure, including plain film radiography (n=11), computed tomography (n=6) or magnetic resonance imaging (n=5), for confirmation of metastatic disease. The mean time interval between the bone scan and the depreotide scan was 30.6 days. Follow-up data were retrieved from routine clinical evaluation by means of physical examination, imaging and blood analysis.
RESULTSOn a patient basis we found a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of, respectively 100%, 50% and 83.3% for the bone scan and 62.5%, 100% and 75% for the depreotide scan in the diagnosis of bone metastasis. In eight patients with available follow-up data two with a positive depreotide scan remained stable and five of six patients with a negative depreotide scan had progressive disease.
CONCLUSIONIn this small series of breast cancer patients Tc depreotide scintigraphy proves less sensitive but more specific as compared to Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy in measuring the extent of bone metastasis. On the other hand Tc depreotide scintigraphy elucidates, non-invasively, tumour characteristics and may be indicative for prognosis and response to hormonal treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-3636</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000134934.87929.84</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15266172</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use ; Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Bone Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Bone Neoplasms - secondary ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Female ; Hormones - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Organotechnetium Compounds ; Prognosis ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Somatostatin - analogs & derivatives ; Technetium Tc 99m Medronate ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Nuclear medicine communications, 2004-08, Vol.25 (8), p.787-792</ispartof><rights>2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2075-21eea0b7fbaa387b89782a0ccdbbb8d0b66146ae1822ba37505ec4e1ac3ea5aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2075-21eea0b7fbaa387b89782a0ccdbbb8d0b66146ae1822ba37505ec4e1ac3ea5aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15266172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Den Bossche, Bieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dʼhaeninck, Eveline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Winter, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Belle, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierckx, Rudi A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Wiele, Christophe</creatorcontrib><title>99mTc depreotide scan compared with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases and prediction of response to hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer</title><title>Nuclear medicine communications</title><addtitle>Nucl Med Commun</addtitle><description>BACKGROUNDThe purpose of this study was to determine the potential role of Tc depreotide scintigraphy for the evaluation of bone metastases compared with Tc methylenediphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy and for the prediction of treatment response in breast cancer patients in whom first- or second-line hormonal therapy was to be initiated.
METHODSTwelve patients with a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer were included. All patients underwent both a bone scan and a depreotide scan and at least one other conventional imaging procedure, including plain film radiography (n=11), computed tomography (n=6) or magnetic resonance imaging (n=5), for confirmation of metastatic disease. The mean time interval between the bone scan and the depreotide scan was 30.6 days. Follow-up data were retrieved from routine clinical evaluation by means of physical examination, imaging and blood analysis.
RESULTSOn a patient basis we found a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of, respectively 100%, 50% and 83.3% for the bone scan and 62.5%, 100% and 75% for the depreotide scan in the diagnosis of bone metastasis. In eight patients with available follow-up data two with a positive depreotide scan remained stable and five of six patients with a negative depreotide scan had progressive disease.
CONCLUSIONIn this small series of breast cancer patients Tc depreotide scintigraphy proves less sensitive but more specific as compared to Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy in measuring the extent of bone metastasis. On the other hand Tc depreotide scintigraphy elucidates, non-invasively, tumour characteristics and may be indicative for prognosis and response to hormonal treatment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hormones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Organotechnetium Compounds</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Somatostatin - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Technetium Tc 99m Medronate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0143-3636</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkctu1TAURTMA0VL4BWQxYJbUj8R2mKFSoFIRDMrYsp0TYojtYPvqqv_FB-L7ELUs-bX2PkfeTfOW4I7gUVxj0vngO1wHYf3I-k6KkY6d7J81l5j0rGWc8YvmZc6_KiMZFy-aCzJQzomgl83fcfQPFk2wJYjFTYCy1QHZ6DedYEJ7VxZ0ZNqvH78jE8OBcKG4n0lvyyOaY0JlgepQwBYXA4rzCfNQdK4TMtJhQrXA5P4TCfIWQwZUIlpi8jHoFZUEungIBbmANl1c3eZTC6Y-5YJqbxbSq-b5rNcMr8_rVfPj0-3DzZf2_tvnu5sP962lWAwtJQAaGzEbrZkURo5CUo2tnYwxcsKm_kHPNRBJqdFMDHgA2wPRloEequaqeXfy3VL8s4NclHfZwrrqAHGXFeeCsZHzCr4_gTbFnBPMakvO6_SoCFaHnBQmquaknnJSx5yU7Kv4zbnKzniYnqTnkCrQn4B9XAuk_Hvd7SGpBfRalqMlp4y0FOMey3pqD1cD-wdzeqYf</recordid><startdate>200408</startdate><enddate>200408</enddate><creator>Van Den Bossche, Bieke</creator><creator>Dʼhaeninck, Eveline</creator><creator>De Winter, Frederic</creator><creator>Van Belle, Simon</creator><creator>Dierckx, Rudi A</creator><creator>Van de Wiele, Christophe</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200408</creationdate><title>99mTc depreotide scan compared with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases and prediction of response to hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer</title><author>Van Den Bossche, Bieke ; Dʼhaeninck, Eveline ; De Winter, Frederic ; Van Belle, Simon ; Dierckx, Rudi A ; Van de Wiele, Christophe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2075-21eea0b7fbaa387b89782a0ccdbbb8d0b66146ae1822ba37505ec4e1ac3ea5aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hormones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Organotechnetium Compounds</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Somatostatin - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Technetium Tc 99m Medronate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Den Bossche, Bieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dʼhaeninck, Eveline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Winter, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Belle, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierckx, Rudi A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Wiele, Christophe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nuclear medicine communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Den Bossche, Bieke</au><au>Dʼhaeninck, Eveline</au><au>De Winter, Frederic</au><au>Van Belle, Simon</au><au>Dierckx, Rudi A</au><au>Van de Wiele, Christophe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>99mTc depreotide scan compared with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases and prediction of response to hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear medicine communications</jtitle><addtitle>Nucl Med Commun</addtitle><date>2004-08</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>792</epage><pages>787-792</pages><issn>0143-3636</issn><abstract>BACKGROUNDThe purpose of this study was to determine the potential role of Tc depreotide scintigraphy for the evaluation of bone metastases compared with Tc methylenediphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy and for the prediction of treatment response in breast cancer patients in whom first- or second-line hormonal therapy was to be initiated.
METHODSTwelve patients with a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer were included. All patients underwent both a bone scan and a depreotide scan and at least one other conventional imaging procedure, including plain film radiography (n=11), computed tomography (n=6) or magnetic resonance imaging (n=5), for confirmation of metastatic disease. The mean time interval between the bone scan and the depreotide scan was 30.6 days. Follow-up data were retrieved from routine clinical evaluation by means of physical examination, imaging and blood analysis.
RESULTSOn a patient basis we found a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of, respectively 100%, 50% and 83.3% for the bone scan and 62.5%, 100% and 75% for the depreotide scan in the diagnosis of bone metastasis. In eight patients with available follow-up data two with a positive depreotide scan remained stable and five of six patients with a negative depreotide scan had progressive disease.
CONCLUSIONIn this small series of breast cancer patients Tc depreotide scintigraphy proves less sensitive but more specific as compared to Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy in measuring the extent of bone metastasis. On the other hand Tc depreotide scintigraphy elucidates, non-invasively, tumour characteristics and may be indicative for prognosis and response to hormonal treatment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>15266172</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.mnm.0000134934.87929.84</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-3636 |
ispartof | Nuclear medicine communications, 2004-08, Vol.25 (8), p.787-792 |
issn | 0143-3636 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66733966 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Bone Neoplasms - prevention & control Bone Neoplasms - secondary Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy Female Hormones - therapeutic use Humans Male Middle Aged Organotechnetium Compounds Prognosis Radionuclide Imaging Radiopharmaceuticals Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Somatostatin - analogs & derivatives Technetium Tc 99m Medronate Treatment Outcome |
title | 99mTc depreotide scan compared with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases and prediction of response to hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A20%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=99mTc%20depreotide%20scan%20compared%20with%2099mTc-MDP%20bone%20scintigraphy%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20bone%20metastases%20and%20prediction%20of%20response%20to%20hormonal%20treatment%20in%20patients%20with%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20medicine%20communications&rft.au=Van%20Den%20Bossche,%20Bieke&rft.date=2004-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=792&rft.pages=787-792&rft.issn=0143-3636&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.mnm.0000134934.87929.84&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66733966%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66733966&rft_id=info:pmid/15266172&rfr_iscdi=true |