99mTc depreotide scan compared with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases and prediction of response to hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUNDThe purpose of this study was to determine the potential role of Tc depreotide scintigraphy for the evaluation of bone metastases compared with Tc methylenediphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy and for the prediction of treatment response in breast cancer patients in whom first- or second-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nuclear medicine communications 2004-08, Vol.25 (8), p.787-792
Hauptverfasser: Van Den Bossche, Bieke, Dʼhaeninck, Eveline, De Winter, Frederic, Van Belle, Simon, Dierckx, Rudi A, Van de Wiele, Christophe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 792
container_issue 8
container_start_page 787
container_title Nuclear medicine communications
container_volume 25
creator Van Den Bossche, Bieke
Dʼhaeninck, Eveline
De Winter, Frederic
Van Belle, Simon
Dierckx, Rudi A
Van de Wiele, Christophe
description BACKGROUNDThe purpose of this study was to determine the potential role of Tc depreotide scintigraphy for the evaluation of bone metastases compared with Tc methylenediphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy and for the prediction of treatment response in breast cancer patients in whom first- or second-line hormonal therapy was to be initiated. METHODSTwelve patients with a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer were included. All patients underwent both a bone scan and a depreotide scan and at least one other conventional imaging procedure, including plain film radiography (n=11), computed tomography (n=6) or magnetic resonance imaging (n=5), for confirmation of metastatic disease. The mean time interval between the bone scan and the depreotide scan was 30.6 days. Follow-up data were retrieved from routine clinical evaluation by means of physical examination, imaging and blood analysis. RESULTSOn a patient basis we found a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of, respectively 100%, 50% and 83.3% for the bone scan and 62.5%, 100% and 75% for the depreotide scan in the diagnosis of bone metastasis. In eight patients with available follow-up data two with a positive depreotide scan remained stable and five of six patients with a negative depreotide scan had progressive disease. CONCLUSIONIn this small series of breast cancer patients Tc depreotide scintigraphy proves less sensitive but more specific as compared to Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy in measuring the extent of bone metastasis. On the other hand Tc depreotide scintigraphy elucidates, non-invasively, tumour characteristics and may be indicative for prognosis and response to hormonal treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.mnm.0000134934.87929.84
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66733966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66733966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2075-21eea0b7fbaa387b89782a0ccdbbb8d0b66146ae1822ba37505ec4e1ac3ea5aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkctu1TAURTMA0VL4BWQxYJbUj8R2mKFSoFIRDMrYsp0TYojtYPvqqv_FB-L7ELUs-bX2PkfeTfOW4I7gUVxj0vngO1wHYf3I-k6KkY6d7J81l5j0rGWc8YvmZc6_KiMZFy-aCzJQzomgl83fcfQPFk2wJYjFTYCy1QHZ6DedYEJ7VxZ0ZNqvH78jE8OBcKG4n0lvyyOaY0JlgepQwBYXA4rzCfNQdK4TMtJhQrXA5P4TCfIWQwZUIlpi8jHoFZUEungIBbmANl1c3eZTC6Y-5YJqbxbSq-b5rNcMr8_rVfPj0-3DzZf2_tvnu5sP962lWAwtJQAaGzEbrZkURo5CUo2tnYwxcsKm_kHPNRBJqdFMDHgA2wPRloEequaqeXfy3VL8s4NclHfZwrrqAHGXFeeCsZHzCr4_gTbFnBPMakvO6_SoCFaHnBQmquaknnJSx5yU7Kv4zbnKzniYnqTnkCrQn4B9XAuk_Hvd7SGpBfRalqMlp4y0FOMey3pqD1cD-wdzeqYf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66733966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>99mTc depreotide scan compared with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases and prediction of response to hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Van Den Bossche, Bieke ; Dʼhaeninck, Eveline ; De Winter, Frederic ; Van Belle, Simon ; Dierckx, Rudi A ; Van de Wiele, Christophe</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Den Bossche, Bieke ; Dʼhaeninck, Eveline ; De Winter, Frederic ; Van Belle, Simon ; Dierckx, Rudi A ; Van de Wiele, Christophe</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDThe purpose of this study was to determine the potential role of Tc depreotide scintigraphy for the evaluation of bone metastases compared with Tc methylenediphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy and for the prediction of treatment response in breast cancer patients in whom first- or second-line hormonal therapy was to be initiated. METHODSTwelve patients with a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer were included. All patients underwent both a bone scan and a depreotide scan and at least one other conventional imaging procedure, including plain film radiography (n=11), computed tomography (n=6) or magnetic resonance imaging (n=5), for confirmation of metastatic disease. The mean time interval between the bone scan and the depreotide scan was 30.6 days. Follow-up data were retrieved from routine clinical evaluation by means of physical examination, imaging and blood analysis. RESULTSOn a patient basis we found a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of, respectively 100%, 50% and 83.3% for the bone scan and 62.5%, 100% and 75% for the depreotide scan in the diagnosis of bone metastasis. In eight patients with available follow-up data two with a positive depreotide scan remained stable and five of six patients with a negative depreotide scan had progressive disease. CONCLUSIONIn this small series of breast cancer patients Tc depreotide scintigraphy proves less sensitive but more specific as compared to Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy in measuring the extent of bone metastasis. On the other hand Tc depreotide scintigraphy elucidates, non-invasively, tumour characteristics and may be indicative for prognosis and response to hormonal treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-3636</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000134934.87929.84</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15266172</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use ; Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Bone Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Bone Neoplasms - secondary ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Female ; Hormones - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Organotechnetium Compounds ; Prognosis ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Somatostatin - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Technetium Tc 99m Medronate ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Nuclear medicine communications, 2004-08, Vol.25 (8), p.787-792</ispartof><rights>2004 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2075-21eea0b7fbaa387b89782a0ccdbbb8d0b66146ae1822ba37505ec4e1ac3ea5aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2075-21eea0b7fbaa387b89782a0ccdbbb8d0b66146ae1822ba37505ec4e1ac3ea5aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15266172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Den Bossche, Bieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dʼhaeninck, Eveline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Winter, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Belle, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierckx, Rudi A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Wiele, Christophe</creatorcontrib><title>99mTc depreotide scan compared with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases and prediction of response to hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer</title><title>Nuclear medicine communications</title><addtitle>Nucl Med Commun</addtitle><description>BACKGROUNDThe purpose of this study was to determine the potential role of Tc depreotide scintigraphy for the evaluation of bone metastases compared with Tc methylenediphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy and for the prediction of treatment response in breast cancer patients in whom first- or second-line hormonal therapy was to be initiated. METHODSTwelve patients with a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer were included. All patients underwent both a bone scan and a depreotide scan and at least one other conventional imaging procedure, including plain film radiography (n=11), computed tomography (n=6) or magnetic resonance imaging (n=5), for confirmation of metastatic disease. The mean time interval between the bone scan and the depreotide scan was 30.6 days. Follow-up data were retrieved from routine clinical evaluation by means of physical examination, imaging and blood analysis. RESULTSOn a patient basis we found a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of, respectively 100%, 50% and 83.3% for the bone scan and 62.5%, 100% and 75% for the depreotide scan in the diagnosis of bone metastasis. In eight patients with available follow-up data two with a positive depreotide scan remained stable and five of six patients with a negative depreotide scan had progressive disease. CONCLUSIONIn this small series of breast cancer patients Tc depreotide scintigraphy proves less sensitive but more specific as compared to Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy in measuring the extent of bone metastasis. On the other hand Tc depreotide scintigraphy elucidates, non-invasively, tumour characteristics and may be indicative for prognosis and response to hormonal treatment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hormones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Organotechnetium Compounds</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Somatostatin - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Technetium Tc 99m Medronate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0143-3636</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkctu1TAURTMA0VL4BWQxYJbUj8R2mKFSoFIRDMrYsp0TYojtYPvqqv_FB-L7ELUs-bX2PkfeTfOW4I7gUVxj0vngO1wHYf3I-k6KkY6d7J81l5j0rGWc8YvmZc6_KiMZFy-aCzJQzomgl83fcfQPFk2wJYjFTYCy1QHZ6DedYEJ7VxZ0ZNqvH78jE8OBcKG4n0lvyyOaY0JlgepQwBYXA4rzCfNQdK4TMtJhQrXA5P4TCfIWQwZUIlpi8jHoFZUEungIBbmANl1c3eZTC6Y-5YJqbxbSq-b5rNcMr8_rVfPj0-3DzZf2_tvnu5sP962lWAwtJQAaGzEbrZkURo5CUo2tnYwxcsKm_kHPNRBJqdFMDHgA2wPRloEequaqeXfy3VL8s4NclHfZwrrqAHGXFeeCsZHzCr4_gTbFnBPMakvO6_SoCFaHnBQmquaknnJSx5yU7Kv4zbnKzniYnqTnkCrQn4B9XAuk_Hvd7SGpBfRalqMlp4y0FOMey3pqD1cD-wdzeqYf</recordid><startdate>200408</startdate><enddate>200408</enddate><creator>Van Den Bossche, Bieke</creator><creator>Dʼhaeninck, Eveline</creator><creator>De Winter, Frederic</creator><creator>Van Belle, Simon</creator><creator>Dierckx, Rudi A</creator><creator>Van de Wiele, Christophe</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200408</creationdate><title>99mTc depreotide scan compared with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases and prediction of response to hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer</title><author>Van Den Bossche, Bieke ; Dʼhaeninck, Eveline ; De Winter, Frederic ; Van Belle, Simon ; Dierckx, Rudi A ; Van de Wiele, Christophe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2075-21eea0b7fbaa387b89782a0ccdbbb8d0b66146ae1822ba37505ec4e1ac3ea5aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hormones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Organotechnetium Compounds</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Somatostatin - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Technetium Tc 99m Medronate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Den Bossche, Bieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dʼhaeninck, Eveline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Winter, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Belle, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierckx, Rudi A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Wiele, Christophe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nuclear medicine communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Den Bossche, Bieke</au><au>Dʼhaeninck, Eveline</au><au>De Winter, Frederic</au><au>Van Belle, Simon</au><au>Dierckx, Rudi A</au><au>Van de Wiele, Christophe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>99mTc depreotide scan compared with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases and prediction of response to hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear medicine communications</jtitle><addtitle>Nucl Med Commun</addtitle><date>2004-08</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>792</epage><pages>787-792</pages><issn>0143-3636</issn><abstract>BACKGROUNDThe purpose of this study was to determine the potential role of Tc depreotide scintigraphy for the evaluation of bone metastases compared with Tc methylenediphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy and for the prediction of treatment response in breast cancer patients in whom first- or second-line hormonal therapy was to be initiated. METHODSTwelve patients with a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer were included. All patients underwent both a bone scan and a depreotide scan and at least one other conventional imaging procedure, including plain film radiography (n=11), computed tomography (n=6) or magnetic resonance imaging (n=5), for confirmation of metastatic disease. The mean time interval between the bone scan and the depreotide scan was 30.6 days. Follow-up data were retrieved from routine clinical evaluation by means of physical examination, imaging and blood analysis. RESULTSOn a patient basis we found a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of, respectively 100%, 50% and 83.3% for the bone scan and 62.5%, 100% and 75% for the depreotide scan in the diagnosis of bone metastasis. In eight patients with available follow-up data two with a positive depreotide scan remained stable and five of six patients with a negative depreotide scan had progressive disease. CONCLUSIONIn this small series of breast cancer patients Tc depreotide scintigraphy proves less sensitive but more specific as compared to Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy in measuring the extent of bone metastasis. On the other hand Tc depreotide scintigraphy elucidates, non-invasively, tumour characteristics and may be indicative for prognosis and response to hormonal treatment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>15266172</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.mnm.0000134934.87929.84</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-3636
ispartof Nuclear medicine communications, 2004-08, Vol.25 (8), p.787-792
issn 0143-3636
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66733966
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use
Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Bone Neoplasms - prevention & control
Bone Neoplasms - secondary
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy
Female
Hormones - therapeutic use
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Organotechnetium Compounds
Prognosis
Radionuclide Imaging
Radiopharmaceuticals
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Somatostatin - analogs & derivatives
Technetium Tc 99m Medronate
Treatment Outcome
title 99mTc depreotide scan compared with 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases and prediction of response to hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A20%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=99mTc%20depreotide%20scan%20compared%20with%2099mTc-MDP%20bone%20scintigraphy%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20bone%20metastases%20and%20prediction%20of%20response%20to%20hormonal%20treatment%20in%20patients%20with%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20medicine%20communications&rft.au=Van%20Den%20Bossche,%20Bieke&rft.date=2004-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=792&rft.pages=787-792&rft.issn=0143-3636&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.mnm.0000134934.87929.84&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66733966%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66733966&rft_id=info:pmid/15266172&rfr_iscdi=true