Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model

Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used in anaesthesia and emergency medicine. This study was designed to investigate the oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device, I-Gel™ (I-Gel), in comparison with two of the laryngeal mask airways, Classic™ (cLMA) and ProSeal™ (pLMA), i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2009-01, Vol.102 (1), p.135-139
Hauptverfasser: Schmidbauer, W., Bercker, S., Volk, T., Bogusch, G., Mager, G., Kerner, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 139
container_issue 1
container_start_page 135
container_title British journal of anaesthesia : BJA
container_volume 102
creator Schmidbauer, W.
Bercker, S.
Volk, T.
Bogusch, G.
Mager, G.
Kerner, T.
description Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used in anaesthesia and emergency medicine. This study was designed to investigate the oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device, I-Gel™ (I-Gel), in comparison with two of the laryngeal mask airways, Classic™ (cLMA) and ProSeal™ (pLMA), in a model of elevated oesophageal pressure. The three supralaryngeal airway devices were inserted into eight unfixed cadaver models with exposed oesophagi that had been connected to a water column producing both a slow and a fast oesophageal pressure increase. The pressure applied until the loss of oesophageal seal during a slow and fast pressure increase was measured. During the slow increase of pressure, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure up to a median of 58 cm H2O, while the cLMA was able to block the oesophagus up to a median of 37 cm H2O, and I-Gel already lost its seal at 13 cm H2O. One minute after maximum pressure had been applied, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure of 59 cm H2O, the cLMA of 46 cm H2O, and I-Gel airway of 21 cm H2O. A fast release of oesophageal fluid was accomplished through the oesophageal lumen of both the pLMA and I-Gel. Both the pLMA and cLMA provided a better seal of the oesophagus than the novel I-Gel airway. The pLMA and I-Gel drain off gastrointestinal fluid fast through the oesophageal lumen. Thus, tracheal aspiration may be prevented with their use. Further study is necessary.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bja/aen319
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66729618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/bja/aen319</oup_id><els_id>S0007091217340825</els_id><sourcerecordid>66729618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-3838f0b495d3ee0c4e80970cb0c4adc87e584509889a7603bb0dfb9009f46d713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90d1qFDEUB_BBFLtWb3wACYJeCGOT-crkUhdtK8UKVpC9CWeSM91sZ5Ixmdnae19EH80nMdtduiDiTb74nZOQf5I8ZfQ1oyI_alZwBGhzJu4lM1Zwllacs_vJjFLKUypYdpA8CmFFKeOZKB8mB0xQxrIqmyU_zzG4YQmXCB0Jm8G1ZFwisW6N8WQaPHTgb-wtAOOv4YZoXBuF5DQ9xu73j1_EWKJcP4A3wVlybcblbYt9XQ_halccyLyDEIzaFILV5JN3n6PZbKdg7CUBokDDGj3pncbucfKghS7gk918mHx5_-5ifpKenR-fzt-cpaoQbEzzOq9b2hSi1DkiVQXWVHCqmrgErWqOZV2UVNS1AF7RvGmobhtBqWiLSnOWHyYvt30H775NGEbZm6Cw68Cim4Ksqvh5FasjfP4XXLnJ2_g2yQSvM1aJLKJXW6S8C8FjKwdv-vghklG5SU3G1OQ2tYif7TpOTY96T3cxRfBiByAo6FoPVplw5zLGKC3yfO_cNPz_wnTrTBjx-50EfyUrnvNSnnxdyMXiw6K8KD7Kt9EXW48xgLVBL4MyaBVq41GNUjvzr2v-ANlw0t4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197821692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schmidbauer, W. ; Bercker, S. ; Volk, T. ; Bogusch, G. ; Mager, G. ; Kerner, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmidbauer, W. ; Bercker, S. ; Volk, T. ; Bogusch, G. ; Mager, G. ; Kerner, T.</creatorcontrib><description>Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used in anaesthesia and emergency medicine. This study was designed to investigate the oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device, I-Gel™ (I-Gel), in comparison with two of the laryngeal mask airways, Classic™ (cLMA) and ProSeal™ (pLMA), in a model of elevated oesophageal pressure. The three supralaryngeal airway devices were inserted into eight unfixed cadaver models with exposed oesophagi that had been connected to a water column producing both a slow and a fast oesophageal pressure increase. The pressure applied until the loss of oesophageal seal during a slow and fast pressure increase was measured. During the slow increase of pressure, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure up to a median of 58 cm H2O, while the cLMA was able to block the oesophagus up to a median of 37 cm H2O, and I-Gel already lost its seal at 13 cm H2O. One minute after maximum pressure had been applied, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure of 59 cm H2O, the cLMA of 46 cm H2O, and I-Gel airway of 21 cm H2O. A fast release of oesophageal fluid was accomplished through the oesophageal lumen of both the pLMA and I-Gel. Both the pLMA and cLMA provided a better seal of the oesophagus than the novel I-Gel airway. The pLMA and I-Gel drain off gastrointestinal fluid fast through the oesophageal lumen. Thus, tracheal aspiration may be prevented with their use. Further study is necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bja/aen319</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19011262</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJANAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; airway ; airway, anatomy ; airway, apparatus ; anatomy ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; apparatus ; aspiration ; Biological and medical sciences ; complications ; complications, aspiration ; Equipment Design ; Esophagus - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation ; intubation, laryngeal mask ; laryngeal mask ; Laryngeal Masks ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Pressure ; respiratory ; Respiratory Aspiration - prevention &amp; control ; respiratory, upper airway ; safety ; upper airway ; Vomiting - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2009-01, Vol.102 (1), p.135-139</ispartof><rights>2009 British Journal of Anaesthesia</rights><rights>The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jan 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-3838f0b495d3ee0c4e80970cb0c4adc87e584509889a7603bb0dfb9009f46d713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-3838f0b495d3ee0c4e80970cb0c4adc87e584509889a7603bb0dfb9009f46d713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21100433$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19011262$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmidbauer, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bercker, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogusch, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mager, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerner, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used in anaesthesia and emergency medicine. This study was designed to investigate the oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device, I-Gel™ (I-Gel), in comparison with two of the laryngeal mask airways, Classic™ (cLMA) and ProSeal™ (pLMA), in a model of elevated oesophageal pressure. The three supralaryngeal airway devices were inserted into eight unfixed cadaver models with exposed oesophagi that had been connected to a water column producing both a slow and a fast oesophageal pressure increase. The pressure applied until the loss of oesophageal seal during a slow and fast pressure increase was measured. During the slow increase of pressure, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure up to a median of 58 cm H2O, while the cLMA was able to block the oesophagus up to a median of 37 cm H2O, and I-Gel already lost its seal at 13 cm H2O. One minute after maximum pressure had been applied, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure of 59 cm H2O, the cLMA of 46 cm H2O, and I-Gel airway of 21 cm H2O. A fast release of oesophageal fluid was accomplished through the oesophageal lumen of both the pLMA and I-Gel. Both the pLMA and cLMA provided a better seal of the oesophagus than the novel I-Gel airway. The pLMA and I-Gel drain off gastrointestinal fluid fast through the oesophageal lumen. Thus, tracheal aspiration may be prevented with their use. Further study is necessary.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>airway</subject><subject>airway, anatomy</subject><subject>airway, apparatus</subject><subject>anatomy</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>apparatus</subject><subject>aspiration</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>complications</subject><subject>complications, aspiration</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Esophagus - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</subject><subject>intubation, laryngeal mask</subject><subject>laryngeal mask</subject><subject>Laryngeal Masks</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>respiratory</subject><subject>Respiratory Aspiration - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>respiratory, upper airway</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>upper airway</subject><subject>Vomiting - physiopathology</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90d1qFDEUB_BBFLtWb3wACYJeCGOT-crkUhdtK8UKVpC9CWeSM91sZ5Ixmdnae19EH80nMdtduiDiTb74nZOQf5I8ZfQ1oyI_alZwBGhzJu4lM1Zwllacs_vJjFLKUypYdpA8CmFFKeOZKB8mB0xQxrIqmyU_zzG4YQmXCB0Jm8G1ZFwisW6N8WQaPHTgb-wtAOOv4YZoXBuF5DQ9xu73j1_EWKJcP4A3wVlybcblbYt9XQ_halccyLyDEIzaFILV5JN3n6PZbKdg7CUBokDDGj3pncbucfKghS7gk918mHx5_-5ifpKenR-fzt-cpaoQbEzzOq9b2hSi1DkiVQXWVHCqmrgErWqOZV2UVNS1AF7RvGmobhtBqWiLSnOWHyYvt30H775NGEbZm6Cw68Cim4Ksqvh5FasjfP4XXLnJ2_g2yQSvM1aJLKJXW6S8C8FjKwdv-vghklG5SU3G1OQ2tYif7TpOTY96T3cxRfBiByAo6FoPVplw5zLGKC3yfO_cNPz_wnTrTBjx-50EfyUrnvNSnnxdyMXiw6K8KD7Kt9EXW48xgLVBL4MyaBVq41GNUjvzr2v-ANlw0t4</recordid><startdate>200901</startdate><enddate>200901</enddate><creator>Schmidbauer, W.</creator><creator>Bercker, S.</creator><creator>Volk, T.</creator><creator>Bogusch, G.</creator><creator>Mager, G.</creator><creator>Kerner, T.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200901</creationdate><title>Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model</title><author>Schmidbauer, W. ; Bercker, S. ; Volk, T. ; Bogusch, G. ; Mager, G. ; Kerner, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-3838f0b495d3ee0c4e80970cb0c4adc87e584509889a7603bb0dfb9009f46d713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>airway</topic><topic>airway, anatomy</topic><topic>airway, apparatus</topic><topic>anatomy</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>apparatus</topic><topic>aspiration</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>complications, aspiration</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Esophagus - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</topic><topic>intubation, laryngeal mask</topic><topic>laryngeal mask</topic><topic>Laryngeal Masks</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>respiratory</topic><topic>Respiratory Aspiration - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>respiratory, upper airway</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>upper airway</topic><topic>Vomiting - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmidbauer, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bercker, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogusch, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mager, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerner, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmidbauer, W.</au><au>Bercker, S.</au><au>Volk, T.</au><au>Bogusch, G.</au><au>Mager, G.</au><au>Kerner, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><stitle>Br J Anaesth</stitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2009-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>135-139</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><coden>BJANAD</coden><abstract>Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used in anaesthesia and emergency medicine. This study was designed to investigate the oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device, I-Gel™ (I-Gel), in comparison with two of the laryngeal mask airways, Classic™ (cLMA) and ProSeal™ (pLMA), in a model of elevated oesophageal pressure. The three supralaryngeal airway devices were inserted into eight unfixed cadaver models with exposed oesophagi that had been connected to a water column producing both a slow and a fast oesophageal pressure increase. The pressure applied until the loss of oesophageal seal during a slow and fast pressure increase was measured. During the slow increase of pressure, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure up to a median of 58 cm H2O, while the cLMA was able to block the oesophagus up to a median of 37 cm H2O, and I-Gel already lost its seal at 13 cm H2O. One minute after maximum pressure had been applied, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure of 59 cm H2O, the cLMA of 46 cm H2O, and I-Gel airway of 21 cm H2O. A fast release of oesophageal fluid was accomplished through the oesophageal lumen of both the pLMA and I-Gel. Both the pLMA and cLMA provided a better seal of the oesophagus than the novel I-Gel airway. The pLMA and I-Gel drain off gastrointestinal fluid fast through the oesophageal lumen. Thus, tracheal aspiration may be prevented with their use. Further study is necessary.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19011262</pmid><doi>10.1093/bja/aen319</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0912
ispartof British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2009-01, Vol.102 (1), p.135-139
issn 0007-0912
1471-6771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66729618
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
airway
airway, anatomy
airway, apparatus
anatomy
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
apparatus
aspiration
Biological and medical sciences
complications
complications, aspiration
Equipment Design
Esophagus - physiology
Female
Humans
intubation
Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation
intubation, laryngeal mask
laryngeal mask
Laryngeal Masks
Male
Medical sciences
Pressure
respiratory
Respiratory Aspiration - prevention & control
respiratory, upper airway
safety
upper airway
Vomiting - physiopathology
title Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A51%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oesophageal%20seal%20of%20the%20novel%20supralaryngeal%20airway%20device%20I-Gel%E2%84%A2%20in%20comparison%20with%20the%20laryngeal%20mask%20airways%20Classic%E2%84%A2%20and%20ProSeal%E2%84%A2%20using%20a%20cadaver%20model&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Schmidbauer,%20W.&rft.date=2009-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=135-139&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft.coden=BJANAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bja/aen319&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66729618%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197821692&rft_id=info:pmid/19011262&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bja/aen319&rft_els_id=S0007091217340825&rfr_iscdi=true