Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model
Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used in anaesthesia and emergency medicine. This study was designed to investigate the oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device, I-Gel™ (I-Gel), in comparison with two of the laryngeal mask airways, Classic™ (cLMA) and ProSeal™ (pLMA), i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2009-01, Vol.102 (1), p.135-139 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 139 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 135 |
container_title | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Schmidbauer, W. Bercker, S. Volk, T. Bogusch, G. Mager, G. Kerner, T. |
description | Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used in anaesthesia and emergency medicine. This study was designed to investigate the oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device, I-Gel™ (I-Gel), in comparison with two of the laryngeal mask airways, Classic™ (cLMA) and ProSeal™ (pLMA), in a model of elevated oesophageal pressure.
The three supralaryngeal airway devices were inserted into eight unfixed cadaver models with exposed oesophagi that had been connected to a water column producing both a slow and a fast oesophageal pressure increase. The pressure applied until the loss of oesophageal seal during a slow and fast pressure increase was measured.
During the slow increase of pressure, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure up to a median of 58 cm H2O, while the cLMA was able to block the oesophagus up to a median of 37 cm H2O, and I-Gel already lost its seal at 13 cm H2O. One minute after maximum pressure had been applied, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure of 59 cm H2O, the cLMA of 46 cm H2O, and I-Gel airway of 21 cm H2O. A fast release of oesophageal fluid was accomplished through the oesophageal lumen of both the pLMA and I-Gel.
Both the pLMA and cLMA provided a better seal of the oesophagus than the novel I-Gel airway. The pLMA and I-Gel drain off gastrointestinal fluid fast through the oesophageal lumen. Thus, tracheal aspiration may be prevented with their use. Further study is necessary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bja/aen319 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66729618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/bja/aen319</oup_id><els_id>S0007091217340825</els_id><sourcerecordid>66729618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-3838f0b495d3ee0c4e80970cb0c4adc87e584509889a7603bb0dfb9009f46d713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90d1qFDEUB_BBFLtWb3wACYJeCGOT-crkUhdtK8UKVpC9CWeSM91sZ5Ixmdnae19EH80nMdtduiDiTb74nZOQf5I8ZfQ1oyI_alZwBGhzJu4lM1Zwllacs_vJjFLKUypYdpA8CmFFKeOZKB8mB0xQxrIqmyU_zzG4YQmXCB0Jm8G1ZFwisW6N8WQaPHTgb-wtAOOv4YZoXBuF5DQ9xu73j1_EWKJcP4A3wVlybcblbYt9XQ_halccyLyDEIzaFILV5JN3n6PZbKdg7CUBokDDGj3pncbucfKghS7gk918mHx5_-5ifpKenR-fzt-cpaoQbEzzOq9b2hSi1DkiVQXWVHCqmrgErWqOZV2UVNS1AF7RvGmobhtBqWiLSnOWHyYvt30H775NGEbZm6Cw68Cim4Ksqvh5FasjfP4XXLnJ2_g2yQSvM1aJLKJXW6S8C8FjKwdv-vghklG5SU3G1OQ2tYif7TpOTY96T3cxRfBiByAo6FoPVplw5zLGKC3yfO_cNPz_wnTrTBjx-50EfyUrnvNSnnxdyMXiw6K8KD7Kt9EXW48xgLVBL4MyaBVq41GNUjvzr2v-ANlw0t4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197821692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schmidbauer, W. ; Bercker, S. ; Volk, T. ; Bogusch, G. ; Mager, G. ; Kerner, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmidbauer, W. ; Bercker, S. ; Volk, T. ; Bogusch, G. ; Mager, G. ; Kerner, T.</creatorcontrib><description>Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used in anaesthesia and emergency medicine. This study was designed to investigate the oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device, I-Gel™ (I-Gel), in comparison with two of the laryngeal mask airways, Classic™ (cLMA) and ProSeal™ (pLMA), in a model of elevated oesophageal pressure.
The three supralaryngeal airway devices were inserted into eight unfixed cadaver models with exposed oesophagi that had been connected to a water column producing both a slow and a fast oesophageal pressure increase. The pressure applied until the loss of oesophageal seal during a slow and fast pressure increase was measured.
During the slow increase of pressure, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure up to a median of 58 cm H2O, while the cLMA was able to block the oesophagus up to a median of 37 cm H2O, and I-Gel already lost its seal at 13 cm H2O. One minute after maximum pressure had been applied, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure of 59 cm H2O, the cLMA of 46 cm H2O, and I-Gel airway of 21 cm H2O. A fast release of oesophageal fluid was accomplished through the oesophageal lumen of both the pLMA and I-Gel.
Both the pLMA and cLMA provided a better seal of the oesophagus than the novel I-Gel airway. The pLMA and I-Gel drain off gastrointestinal fluid fast through the oesophageal lumen. Thus, tracheal aspiration may be prevented with their use. Further study is necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bja/aen319</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19011262</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJANAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; airway ; airway, anatomy ; airway, apparatus ; anatomy ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; apparatus ; aspiration ; Biological and medical sciences ; complications ; complications, aspiration ; Equipment Design ; Esophagus - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation ; intubation, laryngeal mask ; laryngeal mask ; Laryngeal Masks ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Pressure ; respiratory ; Respiratory Aspiration - prevention & control ; respiratory, upper airway ; safety ; upper airway ; Vomiting - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2009-01, Vol.102 (1), p.135-139</ispartof><rights>2009 British Journal of Anaesthesia</rights><rights>The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jan 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-3838f0b495d3ee0c4e80970cb0c4adc87e584509889a7603bb0dfb9009f46d713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-3838f0b495d3ee0c4e80970cb0c4adc87e584509889a7603bb0dfb9009f46d713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21100433$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19011262$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmidbauer, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bercker, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogusch, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mager, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerner, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used in anaesthesia and emergency medicine. This study was designed to investigate the oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device, I-Gel™ (I-Gel), in comparison with two of the laryngeal mask airways, Classic™ (cLMA) and ProSeal™ (pLMA), in a model of elevated oesophageal pressure.
The three supralaryngeal airway devices were inserted into eight unfixed cadaver models with exposed oesophagi that had been connected to a water column producing both a slow and a fast oesophageal pressure increase. The pressure applied until the loss of oesophageal seal during a slow and fast pressure increase was measured.
During the slow increase of pressure, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure up to a median of 58 cm H2O, while the cLMA was able to block the oesophagus up to a median of 37 cm H2O, and I-Gel already lost its seal at 13 cm H2O. One minute after maximum pressure had been applied, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure of 59 cm H2O, the cLMA of 46 cm H2O, and I-Gel airway of 21 cm H2O. A fast release of oesophageal fluid was accomplished through the oesophageal lumen of both the pLMA and I-Gel.
Both the pLMA and cLMA provided a better seal of the oesophagus than the novel I-Gel airway. The pLMA and I-Gel drain off gastrointestinal fluid fast through the oesophageal lumen. Thus, tracheal aspiration may be prevented with their use. Further study is necessary.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>airway</subject><subject>airway, anatomy</subject><subject>airway, apparatus</subject><subject>anatomy</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>apparatus</subject><subject>aspiration</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>complications</subject><subject>complications, aspiration</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Esophagus - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</subject><subject>intubation, laryngeal mask</subject><subject>laryngeal mask</subject><subject>Laryngeal Masks</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>respiratory</subject><subject>Respiratory Aspiration - prevention & control</subject><subject>respiratory, upper airway</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>upper airway</subject><subject>Vomiting - physiopathology</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90d1qFDEUB_BBFLtWb3wACYJeCGOT-crkUhdtK8UKVpC9CWeSM91sZ5Ixmdnae19EH80nMdtduiDiTb74nZOQf5I8ZfQ1oyI_alZwBGhzJu4lM1Zwllacs_vJjFLKUypYdpA8CmFFKeOZKB8mB0xQxrIqmyU_zzG4YQmXCB0Jm8G1ZFwisW6N8WQaPHTgb-wtAOOv4YZoXBuF5DQ9xu73j1_EWKJcP4A3wVlybcblbYt9XQ_halccyLyDEIzaFILV5JN3n6PZbKdg7CUBokDDGj3pncbucfKghS7gk918mHx5_-5ifpKenR-fzt-cpaoQbEzzOq9b2hSi1DkiVQXWVHCqmrgErWqOZV2UVNS1AF7RvGmobhtBqWiLSnOWHyYvt30H775NGEbZm6Cw68Cim4Ksqvh5FasjfP4XXLnJ2_g2yQSvM1aJLKJXW6S8C8FjKwdv-vghklG5SU3G1OQ2tYif7TpOTY96T3cxRfBiByAo6FoPVplw5zLGKC3yfO_cNPz_wnTrTBjx-50EfyUrnvNSnnxdyMXiw6K8KD7Kt9EXW48xgLVBL4MyaBVq41GNUjvzr2v-ANlw0t4</recordid><startdate>200901</startdate><enddate>200901</enddate><creator>Schmidbauer, W.</creator><creator>Bercker, S.</creator><creator>Volk, T.</creator><creator>Bogusch, G.</creator><creator>Mager, G.</creator><creator>Kerner, T.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200901</creationdate><title>Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model</title><author>Schmidbauer, W. ; Bercker, S. ; Volk, T. ; Bogusch, G. ; Mager, G. ; Kerner, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-3838f0b495d3ee0c4e80970cb0c4adc87e584509889a7603bb0dfb9009f46d713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>airway</topic><topic>airway, anatomy</topic><topic>airway, apparatus</topic><topic>anatomy</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>apparatus</topic><topic>aspiration</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>complications, aspiration</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Esophagus - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</topic><topic>intubation, laryngeal mask</topic><topic>laryngeal mask</topic><topic>Laryngeal Masks</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>respiratory</topic><topic>Respiratory Aspiration - prevention & control</topic><topic>respiratory, upper airway</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>upper airway</topic><topic>Vomiting - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmidbauer, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bercker, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volk, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogusch, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mager, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerner, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmidbauer, W.</au><au>Bercker, S.</au><au>Volk, T.</au><au>Bogusch, G.</au><au>Mager, G.</au><au>Kerner, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><stitle>Br J Anaesth</stitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2009-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>135-139</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><coden>BJANAD</coden><abstract>Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used in anaesthesia and emergency medicine. This study was designed to investigate the oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device, I-Gel™ (I-Gel), in comparison with two of the laryngeal mask airways, Classic™ (cLMA) and ProSeal™ (pLMA), in a model of elevated oesophageal pressure.
The three supralaryngeal airway devices were inserted into eight unfixed cadaver models with exposed oesophagi that had been connected to a water column producing both a slow and a fast oesophageal pressure increase. The pressure applied until the loss of oesophageal seal during a slow and fast pressure increase was measured.
During the slow increase of pressure, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure up to a median of 58 cm H2O, while the cLMA was able to block the oesophagus up to a median of 37 cm H2O, and I-Gel already lost its seal at 13 cm H2O. One minute after maximum pressure had been applied, the pLMA withstood an oesophageal pressure of 59 cm H2O, the cLMA of 46 cm H2O, and I-Gel airway of 21 cm H2O. A fast release of oesophageal fluid was accomplished through the oesophageal lumen of both the pLMA and I-Gel.
Both the pLMA and cLMA provided a better seal of the oesophagus than the novel I-Gel airway. The pLMA and I-Gel drain off gastrointestinal fluid fast through the oesophageal lumen. Thus, tracheal aspiration may be prevented with their use. Further study is necessary.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19011262</pmid><doi>10.1093/bja/aen319</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0912 |
ispartof | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2009-01, Vol.102 (1), p.135-139 |
issn | 0007-0912 1471-6771 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66729618 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over airway airway, anatomy airway, apparatus anatomy Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy apparatus aspiration Biological and medical sciences complications complications, aspiration Equipment Design Esophagus - physiology Female Humans intubation Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation intubation, laryngeal mask laryngeal mask Laryngeal Masks Male Medical sciences Pressure respiratory Respiratory Aspiration - prevention & control respiratory, upper airway safety upper airway Vomiting - physiopathology |
title | Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A51%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oesophageal%20seal%20of%20the%20novel%20supralaryngeal%20airway%20device%20I-Gel%E2%84%A2%20in%20comparison%20with%20the%20laryngeal%20mask%20airways%20Classic%E2%84%A2%20and%20ProSeal%E2%84%A2%20using%20a%20cadaver%20model&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Schmidbauer,%20W.&rft.date=2009-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=135-139&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft.coden=BJANAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bja/aen319&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66729618%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197821692&rft_id=info:pmid/19011262&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bja/aen319&rft_els_id=S0007091217340825&rfr_iscdi=true |