A comparative analysis of multi-pulse techniques in contrast-enhanced ultrasound medical imaging

One of the important issues in the field of ultrasound medical imaging using contrast agents is the development of techniques able to separate the response of the contrast media from that of the biological tissues. In the literature, one can find various solutions involving the use of multiple trans...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasonics 2009, Vol.49 (1), p.120-125
Hauptverfasser: Crocco, M., Palmese, M., Sciallero, C., Trucco, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 125
container_issue 1
container_start_page 120
container_title Ultrasonics
container_volume 49
creator Crocco, M.
Palmese, M.
Sciallero, C.
Trucco, A.
description One of the important issues in the field of ultrasound medical imaging using contrast agents is the development of techniques able to separate the response of the contrast media from that of the biological tissues. In the literature, one can find various solutions involving the use of multiple transmitted signals and the combination of related echoes. However, the quality of these techniques may be reduced due to some undesired effects that are seldom considered, despite the fact that they are always present in real systems. These effects are the signal distortions introduced by the hardware equipment, the thermal noise in the electronic circuitry, and body motion between successive pulses. In this paper we propose a simulation tool that will allow the calculation of the backscattered echo from a population of contrast agents immersed in a biological tissue, considering all the mentioned effects. With this tool, an assessment of the comparative robustness of three well-known multi-pulse techniques has been carried out under realistic working conditions and the performance of the three techniques has been evaluated in terms of contrast-to-tissue ratio and signal-to-noise ratio. The results show that the undesired effects have a strong impact on these techniques and that there are notable differences in their robustness. Finally, some suggestions on the choice of the particular technique to be applied are provided on the basis of the specific work conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66728471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041624X08001157</els_id><sourcerecordid>66728471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2c7f681539d0ff0b54f14c036734a7f67e44449396b3f1a25bcebf2a63670d9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE9LwzAcDaK4Of0GIjl5a_2lTdP2IozhPxh4UfAW0zTZMtp0Ju1g396UDryZyzvkvfd77yF0SyAmQNjDLh6a3gkfJwBFDFkc4AzNSZHTqCxZcY7mAJRELKFfM3Tl_Q6A0IKkl2gWSJAmBOboe4ll1-6FE705KCysaI7eeNxp3AZ_E-2HxivcK7m15mdQHhsbFHa83EfKboWVqsZTlG6wNW5VbaRosGnFxtjNNbrQIljcnHCBPp-fPlav0fr95W21XEeSJqyPEplrVpAsLWvQGqqMakIlpCxPqQhfuaLhlWnJqlQTkWSVVJVOBAsMqEudLtD95Lt33Ziz563xUjWNsKobPGcsTwqak0CkE1G6znunNN-7kNUdOQE-Lst3fKrDx2U5ZDxAkN2d_IcqVPwTnaYMhMeJoELLg1GOe2nUuI5xSva87sz_F34BhtSNtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66728471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative analysis of multi-pulse techniques in contrast-enhanced ultrasound medical imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Crocco, M. ; Palmese, M. ; Sciallero, C. ; Trucco, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crocco, M. ; Palmese, M. ; Sciallero, C. ; Trucco, A.</creatorcontrib><description>One of the important issues in the field of ultrasound medical imaging using contrast agents is the development of techniques able to separate the response of the contrast media from that of the biological tissues. In the literature, one can find various solutions involving the use of multiple transmitted signals and the combination of related echoes. However, the quality of these techniques may be reduced due to some undesired effects that are seldom considered, despite the fact that they are always present in real systems. These effects are the signal distortions introduced by the hardware equipment, the thermal noise in the electronic circuitry, and body motion between successive pulses. In this paper we propose a simulation tool that will allow the calculation of the backscattered echo from a population of contrast agents immersed in a biological tissue, considering all the mentioned effects. With this tool, an assessment of the comparative robustness of three well-known multi-pulse techniques has been carried out under realistic working conditions and the performance of the three techniques has been evaluated in terms of contrast-to-tissue ratio and signal-to-noise ratio. The results show that the undesired effects have a strong impact on these techniques and that there are notable differences in their robustness. Finally, some suggestions on the choice of the particular technique to be applied are provided on the basis of the specific work conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-624X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-9968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18703210</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Contrast Media ; Echographic simulation ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Microbubbles ; Multi-pulse techniques ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Ultrasonography - instrumentation ; Ultrasonography - methods ; Ultrasound contrast agents ; Ultrasound medical imaging ; Ultrasound signal processing</subject><ispartof>Ultrasonics, 2009, Vol.49 (1), p.120-125</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2c7f681539d0ff0b54f14c036734a7f67e44449396b3f1a25bcebf2a63670d9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2c7f681539d0ff0b54f14c036734a7f67e44449396b3f1a25bcebf2a63670d9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041624X08001157$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18703210$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crocco, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmese, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sciallero, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trucco, A.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative analysis of multi-pulse techniques in contrast-enhanced ultrasound medical imaging</title><title>Ultrasonics</title><addtitle>Ultrasonics</addtitle><description>One of the important issues in the field of ultrasound medical imaging using contrast agents is the development of techniques able to separate the response of the contrast media from that of the biological tissues. In the literature, one can find various solutions involving the use of multiple transmitted signals and the combination of related echoes. However, the quality of these techniques may be reduced due to some undesired effects that are seldom considered, despite the fact that they are always present in real systems. These effects are the signal distortions introduced by the hardware equipment, the thermal noise in the electronic circuitry, and body motion between successive pulses. In this paper we propose a simulation tool that will allow the calculation of the backscattered echo from a population of contrast agents immersed in a biological tissue, considering all the mentioned effects. With this tool, an assessment of the comparative robustness of three well-known multi-pulse techniques has been carried out under realistic working conditions and the performance of the three techniques has been evaluated in terms of contrast-to-tissue ratio and signal-to-noise ratio. The results show that the undesired effects have a strong impact on these techniques and that there are notable differences in their robustness. Finally, some suggestions on the choice of the particular technique to be applied are provided on the basis of the specific work conditions.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Echographic simulation</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Microbubbles</subject><subject>Multi-pulse techniques</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound contrast agents</subject><subject>Ultrasound medical imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound signal processing</subject><issn>0041-624X</issn><issn>1874-9968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE9LwzAcDaK4Of0GIjl5a_2lTdP2IozhPxh4UfAW0zTZMtp0Ju1g396UDryZyzvkvfd77yF0SyAmQNjDLh6a3gkfJwBFDFkc4AzNSZHTqCxZcY7mAJRELKFfM3Tl_Q6A0IKkl2gWSJAmBOboe4ll1-6FE705KCysaI7eeNxp3AZ_E-2HxivcK7m15mdQHhsbFHa83EfKboWVqsZTlG6wNW5VbaRosGnFxtjNNbrQIljcnHCBPp-fPlav0fr95W21XEeSJqyPEplrVpAsLWvQGqqMakIlpCxPqQhfuaLhlWnJqlQTkWSVVJVOBAsMqEudLtD95Lt33Ziz563xUjWNsKobPGcsTwqak0CkE1G6znunNN-7kNUdOQE-Lst3fKrDx2U5ZDxAkN2d_IcqVPwTnaYMhMeJoELLg1GOe2nUuI5xSva87sz_F34BhtSNtQ</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Crocco, M.</creator><creator>Palmese, M.</creator><creator>Sciallero, C.</creator><creator>Trucco, A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>A comparative analysis of multi-pulse techniques in contrast-enhanced ultrasound medical imaging</title><author>Crocco, M. ; Palmese, M. ; Sciallero, C. ; Trucco, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2c7f681539d0ff0b54f14c036734a7f67e44449396b3f1a25bcebf2a63670d9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Echographic simulation</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Microbubbles</topic><topic>Multi-pulse techniques</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound contrast agents</topic><topic>Ultrasound medical imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound signal processing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crocco, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmese, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sciallero, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trucco, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasonics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crocco, M.</au><au>Palmese, M.</au><au>Sciallero, C.</au><au>Trucco, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative analysis of multi-pulse techniques in contrast-enhanced ultrasound medical imaging</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasonics</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasonics</addtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>120</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>120-125</pages><issn>0041-624X</issn><eissn>1874-9968</eissn><abstract>One of the important issues in the field of ultrasound medical imaging using contrast agents is the development of techniques able to separate the response of the contrast media from that of the biological tissues. In the literature, one can find various solutions involving the use of multiple transmitted signals and the combination of related echoes. However, the quality of these techniques may be reduced due to some undesired effects that are seldom considered, despite the fact that they are always present in real systems. These effects are the signal distortions introduced by the hardware equipment, the thermal noise in the electronic circuitry, and body motion between successive pulses. In this paper we propose a simulation tool that will allow the calculation of the backscattered echo from a population of contrast agents immersed in a biological tissue, considering all the mentioned effects. With this tool, an assessment of the comparative robustness of three well-known multi-pulse techniques has been carried out under realistic working conditions and the performance of the three techniques has been evaluated in terms of contrast-to-tissue ratio and signal-to-noise ratio. The results show that the undesired effects have a strong impact on these techniques and that there are notable differences in their robustness. Finally, some suggestions on the choice of the particular technique to be applied are provided on the basis of the specific work conditions.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>18703210</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.008</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-624X
ispartof Ultrasonics, 2009, Vol.49 (1), p.120-125
issn 0041-624X
1874-9968
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66728471
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Algorithms
Contrast Media
Echographic simulation
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Microbubbles
Multi-pulse techniques
Phantoms, Imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Ultrasonography - instrumentation
Ultrasonography - methods
Ultrasound contrast agents
Ultrasound medical imaging
Ultrasound signal processing
title A comparative analysis of multi-pulse techniques in contrast-enhanced ultrasound medical imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A49%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20multi-pulse%20techniques%20in%20contrast-enhanced%20ultrasound%20medical%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Ultrasonics&rft.au=Crocco,%20M.&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=120-125&rft.issn=0041-624X&rft.eissn=1874-9968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66728471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66728471&rft_id=info:pmid/18703210&rft_els_id=S0041624X08001157&rfr_iscdi=true