Pulp size in molars: underestimation on radiographs
summary The aim was to determine whether radiographs provide a clinically useful indication of pulp size in diseased/restored human first molar teeth, and to investigate accessibility of pulp tissue for diagnostic testing using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). Extracted teeth of known age were collec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oral rehabilitation 2004-08, Vol.31 (8), p.764-769 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 769 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 764 |
container_title | Journal of oral rehabilitation |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Chandler, N. P. Pitt Ford, T. R. Monteith, B. D. |
description | summary The aim was to determine whether radiographs provide a clinically useful indication of pulp size in diseased/restored human first molar teeth, and to investigate accessibility of pulp tissue for diagnostic testing using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). Extracted teeth of known age were collected. Restorative materials were removed and teeth with evidence of pulp exposures excluded. Fifty‐six teeth were radiographed from buccal and mesial aspects, and then their crowns were sectioned axiobuccolingually and photographed. Images were digitally scanned and measurements made of the total pulp area (above a line across the most superior part of the pulpal floor) and the pulp area in the clinical crown (superior to a line between the amelocemental junctions). The pulp width at the cervix and the highest point of the pulp were also recorded. Data were analysed using Pearson correlations. Pulp areas within the clinical crowns were significantly larger than indicated by radiographs, by 23% in the case of the clinically attainable buccal view (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01395.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66726900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66726900</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-5fb257b8518d130ceff1bbbc0d38b7aca23487acbf7aedbd2213d0f245ce51863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gvTKu9Z8NG3nhSDiNmVsYyjuLiRNqpn9Mllx89eb2jFvPRw4gbzvew4PAB6CAXJ1vQ4QiaiPkxAHGMIwgIgMabA9Av3DxzHoQwKpjxK86oEza9cQwoTQ-BT0EMURxQj3AVk0ee1Z_a08XXpFlXNjb7ymlMoou9EF3-iq9FwbLnX1Znj9bs_BScZzqy72cwBeRg_P9xN_Oh8_3t9N_TSEIfVpJjCNRUJRIhGBqcoyJIRIoSSJiHnKMQkTN0UWcyWFxBgRCTMc0lQ5T0QG4KrLrU312bhzWKFtqvKcl6pqLIuiGEdDCJ0w6YSpqaw1KmO1caebHUOQtcDYmrVcWMuFtcDYLzC2ddbL_Y5GFEr-GfeEnOC2E3zpXO3-Hcye5vNl-3QBfheg7UZtDwHcfLAoJjFlr7Mxm8yWq9UIzdiC_ABGCYle</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66726900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pulp size in molars: underestimation on radiographs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Chandler, N. P. ; Pitt Ford, T. R. ; Monteith, B. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chandler, N. P. ; Pitt Ford, T. R. ; Monteith, B. D.</creatorcontrib><description>summary The aim was to determine whether radiographs provide a clinically useful indication of pulp size in diseased/restored human first molar teeth, and to investigate accessibility of pulp tissue for diagnostic testing using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). Extracted teeth of known age were collected. Restorative materials were removed and teeth with evidence of pulp exposures excluded. Fifty‐six teeth were radiographed from buccal and mesial aspects, and then their crowns were sectioned axiobuccolingually and photographed. Images were digitally scanned and measurements made of the total pulp area (above a line across the most superior part of the pulpal floor) and the pulp area in the clinical crown (superior to a line between the amelocemental junctions). The pulp width at the cervix and the highest point of the pulp were also recorded. Data were analysed using Pearson correlations. Pulp areas within the clinical crowns were significantly larger than indicated by radiographs, by 23% in the case of the clinically attainable buccal view (P < 0·05). Pulps may be more accessible to flowmeter testing than they appear. Absence of pulp tissues in the crown was recorded in equal numbers of teeth on radiographs and sections, but with agreement for only one tooth. Sixteen per cent of the teeth had no pulp area in the clinical crown when sectioned, but might still be suitable for testing using LDF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-182X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2842</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01395.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15265212</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging ; Dental Caries - pathology ; Dental Pulp - diagnostic imaging ; Dental Pulp - pathology ; dental radiology ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Laser-Doppler Flowmetry ; Middle Aged ; Molar ; pulp size ; pulpal blood flow ; Radiography</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2004-08, Vol.31 (8), p.764-769</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-5fb257b8518d130ceff1bbbc0d38b7aca23487acbf7aedbd2213d0f245ce51863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-5fb257b8518d130ceff1bbbc0d38b7aca23487acbf7aedbd2213d0f245ce51863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2842.2004.01395.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2842.2004.01395.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15265212$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chandler, N. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitt Ford, T. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteith, B. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Pulp size in molars: underestimation on radiographs</title><title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><description>summary The aim was to determine whether radiographs provide a clinically useful indication of pulp size in diseased/restored human first molar teeth, and to investigate accessibility of pulp tissue for diagnostic testing using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). Extracted teeth of known age were collected. Restorative materials were removed and teeth with evidence of pulp exposures excluded. Fifty‐six teeth were radiographed from buccal and mesial aspects, and then their crowns were sectioned axiobuccolingually and photographed. Images were digitally scanned and measurements made of the total pulp area (above a line across the most superior part of the pulpal floor) and the pulp area in the clinical crown (superior to a line between the amelocemental junctions). The pulp width at the cervix and the highest point of the pulp were also recorded. Data were analysed using Pearson correlations. Pulp areas within the clinical crowns were significantly larger than indicated by radiographs, by 23% in the case of the clinically attainable buccal view (P < 0·05). Pulps may be more accessible to flowmeter testing than they appear. Absence of pulp tissues in the crown was recorded in equal numbers of teeth on radiographs and sections, but with agreement for only one tooth. Sixteen per cent of the teeth had no pulp area in the clinical crown when sectioned, but might still be suitable for testing using LDF.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dental Caries - pathology</subject><subject>Dental Pulp - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dental Pulp - pathology</subject><subject>dental radiology</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laser-Doppler Flowmetry</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molar</subject><subject>pulp size</subject><subject>pulpal blood flow</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><issn>0305-182X</issn><issn>1365-2842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gvTKu9Z8NG3nhSDiNmVsYyjuLiRNqpn9Mllx89eb2jFvPRw4gbzvew4PAB6CAXJ1vQ4QiaiPkxAHGMIwgIgMabA9Av3DxzHoQwKpjxK86oEza9cQwoTQ-BT0EMURxQj3AVk0ee1Z_a08XXpFlXNjb7ymlMoou9EF3-iq9FwbLnX1Znj9bs_BScZzqy72cwBeRg_P9xN_Oh8_3t9N_TSEIfVpJjCNRUJRIhGBqcoyJIRIoSSJiHnKMQkTN0UWcyWFxBgRCTMc0lQ5T0QG4KrLrU312bhzWKFtqvKcl6pqLIuiGEdDCJ0w6YSpqaw1KmO1caebHUOQtcDYmrVcWMuFtcDYLzC2ddbL_Y5GFEr-GfeEnOC2E3zpXO3-Hcye5vNl-3QBfheg7UZtDwHcfLAoJjFlr7Mxm8yWq9UIzdiC_ABGCYle</recordid><startdate>200408</startdate><enddate>200408</enddate><creator>Chandler, N. P.</creator><creator>Pitt Ford, T. R.</creator><creator>Monteith, B. D.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200408</creationdate><title>Pulp size in molars: underestimation on radiographs</title><author>Chandler, N. P. ; Pitt Ford, T. R. ; Monteith, B. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-5fb257b8518d130ceff1bbbc0d38b7aca23487acbf7aedbd2213d0f245ce51863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dental Caries - pathology</topic><topic>Dental Pulp - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dental Pulp - pathology</topic><topic>dental radiology</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laser-Doppler Flowmetry</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molar</topic><topic>pulp size</topic><topic>pulpal blood flow</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chandler, N. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitt Ford, T. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteith, B. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chandler, N. P.</au><au>Pitt Ford, T. R.</au><au>Monteith, B. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pulp size in molars: underestimation on radiographs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><date>2004-08</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>764</spage><epage>769</epage><pages>764-769</pages><issn>0305-182X</issn><eissn>1365-2842</eissn><abstract>summary The aim was to determine whether radiographs provide a clinically useful indication of pulp size in diseased/restored human first molar teeth, and to investigate accessibility of pulp tissue for diagnostic testing using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). Extracted teeth of known age were collected. Restorative materials were removed and teeth with evidence of pulp exposures excluded. Fifty‐six teeth were radiographed from buccal and mesial aspects, and then their crowns were sectioned axiobuccolingually and photographed. Images were digitally scanned and measurements made of the total pulp area (above a line across the most superior part of the pulpal floor) and the pulp area in the clinical crown (superior to a line between the amelocemental junctions). The pulp width at the cervix and the highest point of the pulp were also recorded. Data were analysed using Pearson correlations. Pulp areas within the clinical crowns were significantly larger than indicated by radiographs, by 23% in the case of the clinically attainable buccal view (P < 0·05). Pulps may be more accessible to flowmeter testing than they appear. Absence of pulp tissues in the crown was recorded in equal numbers of teeth on radiographs and sections, but with agreement for only one tooth. Sixteen per cent of the teeth had no pulp area in the clinical crown when sectioned, but might still be suitable for testing using LDF.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>15265212</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01395.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-182X |
ispartof | Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2004-08, Vol.31 (8), p.764-769 |
issn | 0305-182X 1365-2842 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66726900 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging Dental Caries - pathology Dental Pulp - diagnostic imaging Dental Pulp - pathology dental radiology Dental Restoration, Permanent Dentistry Humans Laser-Doppler Flowmetry Middle Aged Molar pulp size pulpal blood flow Radiography |
title | Pulp size in molars: underestimation on radiographs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A16%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pulp%20size%20in%20molars:%20underestimation%20on%20radiographs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Chandler,%20N.%20P.&rft.date=2004-08&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=764&rft.epage=769&rft.pages=764-769&rft.issn=0305-182X&rft.eissn=1365-2842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01395.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66726900%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66726900&rft_id=info:pmid/15265212&rfr_iscdi=true |