Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking
Watson and Humphreys (1997) have proposed that the ability to prioritize new elements over old elements involves a time-consuming process (of at least 400 msec) of active inhibition of the locations of the old elements, which they referred to as visual marking. Recently, Donk and Theeuwes (2001) hav...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychonomic bulletin & review 2004-04, Vol.11 (2), p.282-288 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 288 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 282 |
| container_title | Psychonomic bulletin & review |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | DONK, Mieke VERBURG, Roel C |
| description | Watson and Humphreys (1997) have proposed that the ability to prioritize new elements over old elements involves a time-consuming process (of at least 400 msec) of active inhibition of the locations of the old elements, which they referred to as visual marking. Recently, Donk and Theeuwes (2001) have suggested that prioritized selection of new over old elements is an instantaneous process related to the luminance change accompanying the appearance of the new elements. The aim of the present study was to test these two alternatives by investigating whether prioritized selection of new over old elements could be achieved with a very short preview of the old elements (50 msec). The results indicated that participants were able to prioritize selection of new over old elements when the new elements were presented with luminance onset whereas the old elements were not. New elements could not be prioritized if both the old and the new elements appeared with luminance onset. The results indicated that prioritization of new elements is based on an instantaneous process, rather than on a time-consuming process. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3758/BF03196571 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66723872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66723872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-192d0568ba60de0077b1b341daec43b9fba5f216caee13b384b9ad74f3db24263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E9LwzAYBvAgitPpxQ8gQdCDUM2fNmm86dhUGOhBvZakfTszu3Ym7YZ-eiMrTDyEBPLj4X0fhE4oueIySa_vJoRTJRJJd9ABTTiNEs7IbngToSLF03iADr2fE0ISocQ-GtCECUJVfIDenp1tnG3tt61nuIY1hgoWULcer237jjU2zkKJlw5WNvwuIfjiBo9XtoA6B6xn2ta-xSvrO13hhXYfIekI7ZW68nDc30P0Ohm_jB6i6dP94-h2GuVcijaiihVhptRoQQogREpDDY9poSGPuVGl0UnJqMg1AOUmbGKULmRc8sKwmAk-RBeb3KVrPjvwbbawPoeq0jU0nc-EkIyn4QzR2T84bzpXh9kyRmJFOZM0oMsNyl3jvYMyWzobNvrKKMl-q862VQd82id2ZgHFlvbdBnDeA-1zXZVO17n1f1wq0jSR_AebXYWc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204913271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink_现刊</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>DONK, Mieke ; VERBURG, Roel C</creator><creatorcontrib>DONK, Mieke ; VERBURG, Roel C</creatorcontrib><description>Watson and Humphreys (1997) have proposed that the ability to prioritize new elements over old elements involves a time-consuming process (of at least 400 msec) of active inhibition of the locations of the old elements, which they referred to as visual marking. Recently, Donk and Theeuwes (2001) have suggested that prioritized selection of new over old elements is an instantaneous process related to the luminance change accompanying the appearance of the new elements. The aim of the present study was to test these two alternatives by investigating whether prioritized selection of new over old elements could be achieved with a very short preview of the old elements (50 msec). The results indicated that participants were able to prioritize selection of new over old elements when the new elements were presented with luminance onset whereas the old elements were not. New elements could not be prioritized if both the old and the new elements appeared with luminance onset. The results indicated that prioritization of new elements is based on an instantaneous process, rather than on a time-consuming process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/BF03196571</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15260194</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Cues ; Eye movements ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Light ; Male ; Perception ; Priorities ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Sensory perception ; Time Factors ; Vision ; Visual Perception ; Visual task performance</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2004-04, Vol.11 (2), p.282-288</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Apr 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-192d0568ba60de0077b1b341daec43b9fba5f216caee13b384b9ad74f3db24263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-192d0568ba60de0077b1b341daec43b9fba5f216caee13b384b9ad74f3db24263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15868857$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15260194$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DONK, Mieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERBURG, Roel C</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin & review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>Watson and Humphreys (1997) have proposed that the ability to prioritize new elements over old elements involves a time-consuming process (of at least 400 msec) of active inhibition of the locations of the old elements, which they referred to as visual marking. Recently, Donk and Theeuwes (2001) have suggested that prioritized selection of new over old elements is an instantaneous process related to the luminance change accompanying the appearance of the new elements. The aim of the present study was to test these two alternatives by investigating whether prioritized selection of new over old elements could be achieved with a very short preview of the old elements (50 msec). The results indicated that participants were able to prioritize selection of new over old elements when the new elements were presented with luminance onset whereas the old elements were not. New elements could not be prioritized if both the old and the new elements appeared with luminance onset. The results indicated that prioritization of new elements is based on an instantaneous process, rather than on a time-consuming process.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Priorities</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E9LwzAYBvAgitPpxQ8gQdCDUM2fNmm86dhUGOhBvZakfTszu3Ym7YZ-eiMrTDyEBPLj4X0fhE4oueIySa_vJoRTJRJJd9ABTTiNEs7IbngToSLF03iADr2fE0ISocQ-GtCECUJVfIDenp1tnG3tt61nuIY1hgoWULcer237jjU2zkKJlw5WNvwuIfjiBo9XtoA6B6xn2ta-xSvrO13hhXYfIekI7ZW68nDc30P0Ohm_jB6i6dP94-h2GuVcijaiihVhptRoQQogREpDDY9poSGPuVGl0UnJqMg1AOUmbGKULmRc8sKwmAk-RBeb3KVrPjvwbbawPoeq0jU0nc-EkIyn4QzR2T84bzpXh9kyRmJFOZM0oMsNyl3jvYMyWzobNvrKKMl-q862VQd82id2ZgHFlvbdBnDeA-1zXZVO17n1f1wq0jSR_AebXYWc</recordid><startdate>20040401</startdate><enddate>20040401</enddate><creator>DONK, Mieke</creator><creator>VERBURG, Roel C</creator><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040401</creationdate><title>Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking</title><author>DONK, Mieke ; VERBURG, Roel C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-192d0568ba60de0077b1b341daec43b9fba5f216caee13b384b9ad74f3db24263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Priorities</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DONK, Mieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERBURG, Roel C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DONK, Mieke</au><au>VERBURG, Roel C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2004-04-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>282-288</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><abstract>Watson and Humphreys (1997) have proposed that the ability to prioritize new elements over old elements involves a time-consuming process (of at least 400 msec) of active inhibition of the locations of the old elements, which they referred to as visual marking. Recently, Donk and Theeuwes (2001) have suggested that prioritized selection of new over old elements is an instantaneous process related to the luminance change accompanying the appearance of the new elements. The aim of the present study was to test these two alternatives by investigating whether prioritized selection of new over old elements could be achieved with a very short preview of the old elements (50 msec). The results indicated that participants were able to prioritize selection of new over old elements when the new elements were presented with luminance onset whereas the old elements were not. New elements could not be prioritized if both the old and the new elements appeared with luminance onset. The results indicated that prioritization of new elements is based on an instantaneous process, rather than on a time-consuming process.</abstract><cop>Austin, TX</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society</pub><pmid>15260194</pmid><doi>10.3758/BF03196571</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1069-9384 |
| ispartof | Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2004-04, Vol.11 (2), p.282-288 |
| issn | 1069-9384 1531-5320 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66723872 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink_现刊; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Choice Behavior Cues Eye movements Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Light Male Perception Priorities Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Sensory perception Time Factors Vision Visual Perception Visual task performance |
| title | Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A41%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritizing%20new%20elements%20with%20a%20brief%20preview%20period:%20Evidence%20against%20visual%20marking&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=DONK,%20Mieke&rft.date=2004-04-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=282-288&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/BF03196571&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66723872%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204913271&rft_id=info:pmid/15260194&rfr_iscdi=true |