The transformation of morals in markets: death, benefits, and the exchange of life insurance policies
This article adopts an institutional approach to describe the changing secondary market for life insurance in the United States. Since the 1990s, this market, in which investors buy strangers' life insurance policies, has grown in the face of considerable moral ambivalence. The author uses news...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of sociology 2008-11, Vol.114 (3), p.738-780 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 780 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 738 |
container_title | The American journal of sociology |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Quinn, Sarah |
description | This article adopts an institutional approach to describe the changing secondary market for life insurance in the United States. Since the 1990s, this market, in which investors buy strangers' life insurance policies, has grown in the face of considerable moral ambivalence. The author uses news reports and interviews to identify and describe three conceptions of this market: sacred revulsion, consumerist consolation, and rationalized reconciliation. Differences among the conceptions are considered in view of the institutional legacy of life insurance and its success in organizing practices, perceptions, and understandings about markets and death. From this case, the author draws implications for analyses of morals in markets, an important and emergent topic within economic sociology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/592861 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66716467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>59854306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-4207d2aec6d8a8bfd37f8146c1ccfafcfea2ebf3b410f707d5b2bc0655b6fbd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtr3DAURkVpaCbT9icU0UVXcXJlWa_uwpAXBLJJ10aSrzpObWsq2ZD8-2rIQKCb2UgIzncWOoR8ZXDBQMtLYWot2QeyYoKrSnADH8kKAOrKSKhPyVnOz-UJDOpP5JQZIQ03akXwaYt0TnbKIabRzn2caAx0jMkOmfYTHW36g3P-STu08_acOpww9HM-p3bq6FzW-OK3dvqN-93QByyrvBSjR7qLQ-97zJ_JSSg-_HK41-TXzfXT5q56eLy931w9VLapYa7KobraopedttqFjqugWSM98z7Y4APaGl3grmEQVGGFq50HKYSTwXXA1-THm3eX4t8F89yOffY4DHbCuORWSsVkI9VxkCndCGOOgsJo0XCQR0GuQCso7Jp8_w98jkuayre0JYsRTQP63eZTzDlhaHepLyleWwbtPnj7FryA3w62xY3YvWOHwvwfaOqlAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195954408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The transformation of morals in markets: death, benefits, and the exchange of life insurance policies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Quinn, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>This article adopts an institutional approach to describe the changing secondary market for life insurance in the United States. Since the 1990s, this market, in which investors buy strangers' life insurance policies, has grown in the face of considerable moral ambivalence. The author uses news reports and interviews to identify and describe three conceptions of this market: sacred revulsion, consumerist consolation, and rationalized reconciliation. Differences among the conceptions are considered in view of the institutional legacy of life insurance and its success in organizing practices, perceptions, and understandings about markets and death. From this case, the author draws implications for analyses of morals in markets, an important and emergent topic within economic sociology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9602</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/592861</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19569397</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSOAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University of Chicago, acting through its Press</publisher><subject>Accelerated death benefits ; Attitude to Death ; Commerce - ethics ; Consumers ; Death ; Death benefits ; Economic sociology ; Ethics, Institutional ; History of medicine ; History of medicine and histology ; Humans ; Insurance ; Insurance Benefits - ethics ; Insurance policies ; Insurance, Life - economics ; Insurance, Life - ethics ; Life insurance ; Markets ; Morality ; Morals ; Social science research ; Sociological analysis ; Sociological theory ; U.S.A ; United States ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sociology, 2008-11, Vol.114 (3), p.738-780</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Nov 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-4207d2aec6d8a8bfd37f8146c1ccfafcfea2ebf3b410f707d5b2bc0655b6fbd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-4207d2aec6d8a8bfd37f8146c1ccfafcfea2ebf3b410f707d5b2bc0655b6fbd03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,33755,33756</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19569397$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>The transformation of morals in markets: death, benefits, and the exchange of life insurance policies</title><title>The American journal of sociology</title><addtitle>AJS</addtitle><description>This article adopts an institutional approach to describe the changing secondary market for life insurance in the United States. Since the 1990s, this market, in which investors buy strangers' life insurance policies, has grown in the face of considerable moral ambivalence. The author uses news reports and interviews to identify and describe three conceptions of this market: sacred revulsion, consumerist consolation, and rationalized reconciliation. Differences among the conceptions are considered in view of the institutional legacy of life insurance and its success in organizing practices, perceptions, and understandings about markets and death. From this case, the author draws implications for analyses of morals in markets, an important and emergent topic within economic sociology.</description><subject>Accelerated death benefits</subject><subject>Attitude to Death</subject><subject>Commerce - ethics</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Death benefits</subject><subject>Economic sociology</subject><subject>Ethics, Institutional</subject><subject>History of medicine</subject><subject>History of medicine and histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Insurance Benefits - ethics</subject><subject>Insurance policies</subject><subject>Insurance, Life - economics</subject><subject>Insurance, Life - ethics</subject><subject>Life insurance</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Social science research</subject><subject>Sociological analysis</subject><subject>Sociological theory</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0002-9602</issn><issn>1537-5390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtr3DAURkVpaCbT9icU0UVXcXJlWa_uwpAXBLJJ10aSrzpObWsq2ZD8-2rIQKCb2UgIzncWOoR8ZXDBQMtLYWot2QeyYoKrSnADH8kKAOrKSKhPyVnOz-UJDOpP5JQZIQ03akXwaYt0TnbKIabRzn2caAx0jMkOmfYTHW36g3P-STu08_acOpww9HM-p3bq6FzW-OK3dvqN-93QByyrvBSjR7qLQ-97zJ_JSSg-_HK41-TXzfXT5q56eLy931w9VLapYa7KobraopedttqFjqugWSM98z7Y4APaGl3grmEQVGGFq50HKYSTwXXA1-THm3eX4t8F89yOffY4DHbCuORWSsVkI9VxkCndCGOOgsJo0XCQR0GuQCso7Jp8_w98jkuayre0JYsRTQP63eZTzDlhaHepLyleWwbtPnj7FryA3w62xY3YvWOHwvwfaOqlAA</recordid><startdate>200811</startdate><enddate>200811</enddate><creator>Quinn, Sarah</creator><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200811</creationdate><title>The transformation of morals in markets: death, benefits, and the exchange of life insurance policies</title><author>Quinn, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-4207d2aec6d8a8bfd37f8146c1ccfafcfea2ebf3b410f707d5b2bc0655b6fbd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Accelerated death benefits</topic><topic>Attitude to Death</topic><topic>Commerce - ethics</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Death benefits</topic><topic>Economic sociology</topic><topic>Ethics, Institutional</topic><topic>History of medicine</topic><topic>History of medicine and histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Insurance Benefits - ethics</topic><topic>Insurance policies</topic><topic>Insurance, Life - economics</topic><topic>Insurance, Life - ethics</topic><topic>Life insurance</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Social science research</topic><topic>Sociological analysis</topic><topic>Sociological theory</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quinn, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The transformation of morals in markets: death, benefits, and the exchange of life insurance policies</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sociology</jtitle><addtitle>AJS</addtitle><date>2008-11</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>780</epage><pages>738-780</pages><issn>0002-9602</issn><eissn>1537-5390</eissn><coden>AJSOAR</coden><abstract>This article adopts an institutional approach to describe the changing secondary market for life insurance in the United States. Since the 1990s, this market, in which investors buy strangers' life insurance policies, has grown in the face of considerable moral ambivalence. The author uses news reports and interviews to identify and describe three conceptions of this market: sacred revulsion, consumerist consolation, and rationalized reconciliation. Differences among the conceptions are considered in view of the institutional legacy of life insurance and its success in organizing practices, perceptions, and understandings about markets and death. From this case, the author draws implications for analyses of morals in markets, an important and emergent topic within economic sociology.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</pub><pmid>19569397</pmid><doi>10.1086/592861</doi><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9602 |
ispartof | The American journal of sociology, 2008-11, Vol.114 (3), p.738-780 |
issn | 0002-9602 1537-5390 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66716467 |
source | MEDLINE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Accelerated death benefits Attitude to Death Commerce - ethics Consumers Death Death benefits Economic sociology Ethics, Institutional History of medicine History of medicine and histology Humans Insurance Insurance Benefits - ethics Insurance policies Insurance, Life - economics Insurance, Life - ethics Life insurance Markets Morality Morals Social science research Sociological analysis Sociological theory U.S.A United States United States of America |
title | The transformation of morals in markets: death, benefits, and the exchange of life insurance policies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A04%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20transformation%20of%20morals%20in%20markets:%20death,%20benefits,%20and%20the%20exchange%20of%20life%20insurance%20policies&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sociology&rft.au=Quinn,%20Sarah&rft.date=2008-11&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=780&rft.pages=738-780&rft.issn=0002-9602&rft.eissn=1537-5390&rft.coden=AJSOAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/592861&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E59854306%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195954408&rft_id=info:pmid/19569397&rfr_iscdi=true |