The transformation of morals in markets: death, benefits, and the exchange of life insurance policies

This article adopts an institutional approach to describe the changing secondary market for life insurance in the United States. Since the 1990s, this market, in which investors buy strangers' life insurance policies, has grown in the face of considerable moral ambivalence. The author uses news...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sociology 2008-11, Vol.114 (3), p.738-780
1. Verfasser: Quinn, Sarah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 780
container_issue 3
container_start_page 738
container_title The American journal of sociology
container_volume 114
creator Quinn, Sarah
description This article adopts an institutional approach to describe the changing secondary market for life insurance in the United States. Since the 1990s, this market, in which investors buy strangers' life insurance policies, has grown in the face of considerable moral ambivalence. The author uses news reports and interviews to identify and describe three conceptions of this market: sacred revulsion, consumerist consolation, and rationalized reconciliation. Differences among the conceptions are considered in view of the institutional legacy of life insurance and its success in organizing practices, perceptions, and understandings about markets and death. From this case, the author draws implications for analyses of morals in markets, an important and emergent topic within economic sociology.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/592861
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66716467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>59854306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-4207d2aec6d8a8bfd37f8146c1ccfafcfea2ebf3b410f707d5b2bc0655b6fbd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtr3DAURkVpaCbT9icU0UVXcXJlWa_uwpAXBLJJ10aSrzpObWsq2ZD8-2rIQKCb2UgIzncWOoR8ZXDBQMtLYWot2QeyYoKrSnADH8kKAOrKSKhPyVnOz-UJDOpP5JQZIQ03akXwaYt0TnbKIabRzn2caAx0jMkOmfYTHW36g3P-STu08_acOpww9HM-p3bq6FzW-OK3dvqN-93QByyrvBSjR7qLQ-97zJ_JSSg-_HK41-TXzfXT5q56eLy931w9VLapYa7KobraopedttqFjqugWSM98z7Y4APaGl3grmEQVGGFq50HKYSTwXXA1-THm3eX4t8F89yOffY4DHbCuORWSsVkI9VxkCndCGOOgsJo0XCQR0GuQCso7Jp8_w98jkuayre0JYsRTQP63eZTzDlhaHepLyleWwbtPnj7FryA3w62xY3YvWOHwvwfaOqlAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195954408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The transformation of morals in markets: death, benefits, and the exchange of life insurance policies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Quinn, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>This article adopts an institutional approach to describe the changing secondary market for life insurance in the United States. Since the 1990s, this market, in which investors buy strangers' life insurance policies, has grown in the face of considerable moral ambivalence. The author uses news reports and interviews to identify and describe three conceptions of this market: sacred revulsion, consumerist consolation, and rationalized reconciliation. Differences among the conceptions are considered in view of the institutional legacy of life insurance and its success in organizing practices, perceptions, and understandings about markets and death. From this case, the author draws implications for analyses of morals in markets, an important and emergent topic within economic sociology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9602</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/592861</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19569397</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSOAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University of Chicago, acting through its Press</publisher><subject>Accelerated death benefits ; Attitude to Death ; Commerce - ethics ; Consumers ; Death ; Death benefits ; Economic sociology ; Ethics, Institutional ; History of medicine ; History of medicine and histology ; Humans ; Insurance ; Insurance Benefits - ethics ; Insurance policies ; Insurance, Life - economics ; Insurance, Life - ethics ; Life insurance ; Markets ; Morality ; Morals ; Social science research ; Sociological analysis ; Sociological theory ; U.S.A ; United States ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sociology, 2008-11, Vol.114 (3), p.738-780</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Nov 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-4207d2aec6d8a8bfd37f8146c1ccfafcfea2ebf3b410f707d5b2bc0655b6fbd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-4207d2aec6d8a8bfd37f8146c1ccfafcfea2ebf3b410f707d5b2bc0655b6fbd03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,33755,33756</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19569397$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>The transformation of morals in markets: death, benefits, and the exchange of life insurance policies</title><title>The American journal of sociology</title><addtitle>AJS</addtitle><description>This article adopts an institutional approach to describe the changing secondary market for life insurance in the United States. Since the 1990s, this market, in which investors buy strangers' life insurance policies, has grown in the face of considerable moral ambivalence. The author uses news reports and interviews to identify and describe three conceptions of this market: sacred revulsion, consumerist consolation, and rationalized reconciliation. Differences among the conceptions are considered in view of the institutional legacy of life insurance and its success in organizing practices, perceptions, and understandings about markets and death. From this case, the author draws implications for analyses of morals in markets, an important and emergent topic within economic sociology.</description><subject>Accelerated death benefits</subject><subject>Attitude to Death</subject><subject>Commerce - ethics</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Death benefits</subject><subject>Economic sociology</subject><subject>Ethics, Institutional</subject><subject>History of medicine</subject><subject>History of medicine and histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Insurance Benefits - ethics</subject><subject>Insurance policies</subject><subject>Insurance, Life - economics</subject><subject>Insurance, Life - ethics</subject><subject>Life insurance</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Social science research</subject><subject>Sociological analysis</subject><subject>Sociological theory</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0002-9602</issn><issn>1537-5390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtr3DAURkVpaCbT9icU0UVXcXJlWa_uwpAXBLJJ10aSrzpObWsq2ZD8-2rIQKCb2UgIzncWOoR8ZXDBQMtLYWot2QeyYoKrSnADH8kKAOrKSKhPyVnOz-UJDOpP5JQZIQ03akXwaYt0TnbKIabRzn2caAx0jMkOmfYTHW36g3P-STu08_acOpww9HM-p3bq6FzW-OK3dvqN-93QByyrvBSjR7qLQ-97zJ_JSSg-_HK41-TXzfXT5q56eLy931w9VLapYa7KobraopedttqFjqugWSM98z7Y4APaGl3grmEQVGGFq50HKYSTwXXA1-THm3eX4t8F89yOffY4DHbCuORWSsVkI9VxkCndCGOOgsJo0XCQR0GuQCso7Jp8_w98jkuayre0JYsRTQP63eZTzDlhaHepLyleWwbtPnj7FryA3w62xY3YvWOHwvwfaOqlAA</recordid><startdate>200811</startdate><enddate>200811</enddate><creator>Quinn, Sarah</creator><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200811</creationdate><title>The transformation of morals in markets: death, benefits, and the exchange of life insurance policies</title><author>Quinn, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-4207d2aec6d8a8bfd37f8146c1ccfafcfea2ebf3b410f707d5b2bc0655b6fbd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Accelerated death benefits</topic><topic>Attitude to Death</topic><topic>Commerce - ethics</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Death benefits</topic><topic>Economic sociology</topic><topic>Ethics, Institutional</topic><topic>History of medicine</topic><topic>History of medicine and histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Insurance Benefits - ethics</topic><topic>Insurance policies</topic><topic>Insurance, Life - economics</topic><topic>Insurance, Life - ethics</topic><topic>Life insurance</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Social science research</topic><topic>Sociological analysis</topic><topic>Sociological theory</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quinn, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The transformation of morals in markets: death, benefits, and the exchange of life insurance policies</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sociology</jtitle><addtitle>AJS</addtitle><date>2008-11</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>780</epage><pages>738-780</pages><issn>0002-9602</issn><eissn>1537-5390</eissn><coden>AJSOAR</coden><abstract>This article adopts an institutional approach to describe the changing secondary market for life insurance in the United States. Since the 1990s, this market, in which investors buy strangers' life insurance policies, has grown in the face of considerable moral ambivalence. The author uses news reports and interviews to identify and describe three conceptions of this market: sacred revulsion, consumerist consolation, and rationalized reconciliation. Differences among the conceptions are considered in view of the institutional legacy of life insurance and its success in organizing practices, perceptions, and understandings about markets and death. From this case, the author draws implications for analyses of morals in markets, an important and emergent topic within economic sociology.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</pub><pmid>19569397</pmid><doi>10.1086/592861</doi><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9602
ispartof The American journal of sociology, 2008-11, Vol.114 (3), p.738-780
issn 0002-9602
1537-5390
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66716467
source MEDLINE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Accelerated death benefits
Attitude to Death
Commerce - ethics
Consumers
Death
Death benefits
Economic sociology
Ethics, Institutional
History of medicine
History of medicine and histology
Humans
Insurance
Insurance Benefits - ethics
Insurance policies
Insurance, Life - economics
Insurance, Life - ethics
Life insurance
Markets
Morality
Morals
Social science research
Sociological analysis
Sociological theory
U.S.A
United States
United States of America
title The transformation of morals in markets: death, benefits, and the exchange of life insurance policies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A04%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20transformation%20of%20morals%20in%20markets:%20death,%20benefits,%20and%20the%20exchange%20of%20life%20insurance%20policies&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sociology&rft.au=Quinn,%20Sarah&rft.date=2008-11&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=780&rft.pages=738-780&rft.issn=0002-9602&rft.eissn=1537-5390&rft.coden=AJSOAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/592861&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E59854306%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195954408&rft_id=info:pmid/19569397&rfr_iscdi=true