Correspondence Between the 17-Segment Model and Coronary Arterial Anatomy Using Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the correspondence between the coronary arterial anatomy and supplied myocardium based on the proposed American Heart Association 17-segment model. Background Standardized assignment of coronary arteries to specific myocardial segments is curre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JACC. Cardiovascular imaging 2008-05, Vol.1 (3), p.282-293
Hauptverfasser: Ortiz-Pérez, José T., MD, Rodríguez, José, MD, Meyers, Sheridan N., MD, FACC, Lee, Daniel C., MD, Davidson, Charles, MD, FACC, Wu, Edwin, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 293
container_issue 3
container_start_page 282
container_title JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
container_volume 1
creator Ortiz-Pérez, José T., MD
Rodríguez, José, MD
Meyers, Sheridan N., MD, FACC
Lee, Daniel C., MD
Davidson, Charles, MD, FACC
Wu, Edwin, MD
description Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the correspondence between the coronary arterial anatomy and supplied myocardium based on the proposed American Heart Association 17-segment model. Background Standardized assignment of coronary arteries to specific myocardial segments is currently based on empirical assumptions. Methods A cardiac magnetic resonance study was performed in 93 subjects following acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Two observers blindly reviewed all angiograms to examine the location of the culprit lesion and coronary dominancy. Two additional observers scored for the presence of cardiac magnetic resonance hyperenhancement (HE) on a 17-segment model. Segments were divided based on anatomical landmarks such as the interventricular grooves and papillary muscles. Results In a per-segment analysis, 23% of HE segments were discordant with the empirically assigned coronary distribution. Presence of HE in the basal anteroseptal, mid-anterior, mid-anteroseptal, or apical anterior wall was 100% specific for left anterior descending artery occlusion. The left anterior descending artery infarcts frequently involved the mid-anterolateral, apical lateral, and apical inferior walls. No segment was 100% specific for right coronary artery or left circumflex artery (LCX) occlusion, although HE in the basal anterolateral wall was highly specific (98%) for LCX occlusion. Combination of HE in the anterolateral and inferolateral walls was 100% specific for a LCX occlusion, and when extended to the inferior wall, was also 100% specific for a dominant or codominant LCX occlusion. Conclusions Four segments were completely specific for left anterior descending artery occlusion. No segment can be exclusively attributed to the right coronary artery or LCX occlusion. However, analysis of adjacent segments increased the specificity for a given coronary occlusion. These findings bring objective evidence in the appropriate segmentation of coronary arterial perfusion territories and assist accurate assignment of the culprit vessel in various imaging modalities.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.01.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66707632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1936878X08000302</els_id><sourcerecordid>66707632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-8dea5976d673ee913a1957c853cc6b339ab7f4ba1bfa5d398d8e7735652cf4263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUcGKFDEQDaK46-oPeJCcvPWYdLqT9EUYh11d2EVwXfAW0kl1b9ruZEwyytz9cNPMgFBQBfXeK94rhN5SsqGE8g_TZjLLuKkJkRtCSzXP0CWVglei7ejzMneMV1LIHxfoVUoTIZzwRrxEF2XR8qYhl-jvLsQIaR-8BW8Af4L8B8Dj_ASYiuoBxgV8xvfBwoy1t7jgg9fxiLcxQ3R6xluvc1iO-DE5P5a9z1GnXF37J10UC0NH67TB93r0kJ3B3yAVifXa7aLHQnqNXgx6TvDm3K_Q4831992X6u7r59vd9q4yDeO5khZ02wluuWAAHWWadq0wsmXG8J6xTvdiaHpN-0G3lnXSShCiOG1rMzQ1Z1fo_Ul3H8OvA6SsFpcMzLP2EA5JcS6I4KwuwPoENDGkFGFQ--iW4lpRotbs1aTW7NWavSK0VFNI787qh34B-59yDrsAPp4AUDz-dhCVmZ13Rs8_4QhpCofoi31FVaoVUQ_r-9bvEUkIYaRm_wBQRJdu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66707632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correspondence Between the 17-Segment Model and Coronary Arterial Anatomy Using Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ortiz-Pérez, José T., MD ; Rodríguez, José, MD ; Meyers, Sheridan N., MD, FACC ; Lee, Daniel C., MD ; Davidson, Charles, MD, FACC ; Wu, Edwin, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Ortiz-Pérez, José T., MD ; Rodríguez, José, MD ; Meyers, Sheridan N., MD, FACC ; Lee, Daniel C., MD ; Davidson, Charles, MD, FACC ; Wu, Edwin, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the correspondence between the coronary arterial anatomy and supplied myocardium based on the proposed American Heart Association 17-segment model. Background Standardized assignment of coronary arteries to specific myocardial segments is currently based on empirical assumptions. Methods A cardiac magnetic resonance study was performed in 93 subjects following acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Two observers blindly reviewed all angiograms to examine the location of the culprit lesion and coronary dominancy. Two additional observers scored for the presence of cardiac magnetic resonance hyperenhancement (HE) on a 17-segment model. Segments were divided based on anatomical landmarks such as the interventricular grooves and papillary muscles. Results In a per-segment analysis, 23% of HE segments were discordant with the empirically assigned coronary distribution. Presence of HE in the basal anteroseptal, mid-anterior, mid-anteroseptal, or apical anterior wall was 100% specific for left anterior descending artery occlusion. The left anterior descending artery infarcts frequently involved the mid-anterolateral, apical lateral, and apical inferior walls. No segment was 100% specific for right coronary artery or left circumflex artery (LCX) occlusion, although HE in the basal anterolateral wall was highly specific (98%) for LCX occlusion. Combination of HE in the anterolateral and inferolateral walls was 100% specific for a LCX occlusion, and when extended to the inferior wall, was also 100% specific for a dominant or codominant LCX occlusion. Conclusions Four segments were completely specific for left anterior descending artery occlusion. No segment can be exclusively attributed to the right coronary artery or LCX occlusion. However, analysis of adjacent segments increased the specificity for a given coronary occlusion. These findings bring objective evidence in the appropriate segmentation of coronary arterial perfusion territories and assist accurate assignment of the culprit vessel in various imaging modalities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1936-878X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-7591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.01.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19356440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; American Heart Association ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ; Cardiovascular ; Contrast Media ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease - pathology ; Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology ; Coronary Artery Disease - therapy ; Coronary Circulation ; Coronary Vessels - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Cardiovascular ; Myocardial Infarction - pathology ; Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology ; Myocardial Infarction - therapy ; Myocardium - pathology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Retrospective Studies ; United States ; Ventricular Function, Left</subject><ispartof>JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2008-05, Vol.1 (3), p.282-293</ispartof><rights>American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-8dea5976d673ee913a1957c853cc6b339ab7f4ba1bfa5d398d8e7735652cf4263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-8dea5976d673ee913a1957c853cc6b339ab7f4ba1bfa5d398d8e7735652cf4263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19356440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ortiz-Pérez, José T., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, José, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Sheridan N., MD, FACC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Daniel C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Charles, MD, FACC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Edwin, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Correspondence Between the 17-Segment Model and Coronary Arterial Anatomy Using Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><title>JACC. Cardiovascular imaging</title><addtitle>JACC Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><description>Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the correspondence between the coronary arterial anatomy and supplied myocardium based on the proposed American Heart Association 17-segment model. Background Standardized assignment of coronary arteries to specific myocardial segments is currently based on empirical assumptions. Methods A cardiac magnetic resonance study was performed in 93 subjects following acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Two observers blindly reviewed all angiograms to examine the location of the culprit lesion and coronary dominancy. Two additional observers scored for the presence of cardiac magnetic resonance hyperenhancement (HE) on a 17-segment model. Segments were divided based on anatomical landmarks such as the interventricular grooves and papillary muscles. Results In a per-segment analysis, 23% of HE segments were discordant with the empirically assigned coronary distribution. Presence of HE in the basal anteroseptal, mid-anterior, mid-anteroseptal, or apical anterior wall was 100% specific for left anterior descending artery occlusion. The left anterior descending artery infarcts frequently involved the mid-anterolateral, apical lateral, and apical inferior walls. No segment was 100% specific for right coronary artery or left circumflex artery (LCX) occlusion, although HE in the basal anterolateral wall was highly specific (98%) for LCX occlusion. Combination of HE in the anterolateral and inferolateral walls was 100% specific for a LCX occlusion, and when extended to the inferior wall, was also 100% specific for a dominant or codominant LCX occlusion. Conclusions Four segments were completely specific for left anterior descending artery occlusion. No segment can be exclusively attributed to the right coronary artery or LCX occlusion. However, analysis of adjacent segments increased the specificity for a given coronary occlusion. These findings bring objective evidence in the appropriate segmentation of coronary arterial perfusion territories and assist accurate assignment of the culprit vessel in various imaging modalities.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>American Heart Association</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - pathology</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Coronary Circulation</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Angiography</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - pathology</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</subject><subject>Myocardium - pathology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left</subject><issn>1936-878X</issn><issn>1876-7591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUcGKFDEQDaK46-oPeJCcvPWYdLqT9EUYh11d2EVwXfAW0kl1b9ruZEwyytz9cNPMgFBQBfXeK94rhN5SsqGE8g_TZjLLuKkJkRtCSzXP0CWVglei7ejzMneMV1LIHxfoVUoTIZzwRrxEF2XR8qYhl-jvLsQIaR-8BW8Af4L8B8Dj_ASYiuoBxgV8xvfBwoy1t7jgg9fxiLcxQ3R6xluvc1iO-DE5P5a9z1GnXF37J10UC0NH67TB93r0kJ3B3yAVifXa7aLHQnqNXgx6TvDm3K_Q4831992X6u7r59vd9q4yDeO5khZ02wluuWAAHWWadq0wsmXG8J6xTvdiaHpN-0G3lnXSShCiOG1rMzQ1Z1fo_Ul3H8OvA6SsFpcMzLP2EA5JcS6I4KwuwPoENDGkFGFQ--iW4lpRotbs1aTW7NWavSK0VFNI787qh34B-59yDrsAPp4AUDz-dhCVmZ13Rs8_4QhpCofoi31FVaoVUQ_r-9bvEUkIYaRm_wBQRJdu</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Ortiz-Pérez, José T., MD</creator><creator>Rodríguez, José, MD</creator><creator>Meyers, Sheridan N., MD, FACC</creator><creator>Lee, Daniel C., MD</creator><creator>Davidson, Charles, MD, FACC</creator><creator>Wu, Edwin, MD</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Correspondence Between the 17-Segment Model and Coronary Arterial Anatomy Using Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title><author>Ortiz-Pérez, José T., MD ; Rodríguez, José, MD ; Meyers, Sheridan N., MD, FACC ; Lee, Daniel C., MD ; Davidson, Charles, MD, FACC ; Wu, Edwin, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-8dea5976d673ee913a1957c853cc6b339ab7f4ba1bfa5d398d8e7735652cf4263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>American Heart Association</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - pathology</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Coronary Circulation</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Angiography</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - pathology</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</topic><topic>Myocardium - pathology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ortiz-Pérez, José T., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, José, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyers, Sheridan N., MD, FACC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Daniel C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Charles, MD, FACC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Edwin, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JACC. Cardiovascular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ortiz-Pérez, José T., MD</au><au>Rodríguez, José, MD</au><au>Meyers, Sheridan N., MD, FACC</au><au>Lee, Daniel C., MD</au><au>Davidson, Charles, MD, FACC</au><au>Wu, Edwin, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correspondence Between the 17-Segment Model and Coronary Arterial Anatomy Using Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging</atitle><jtitle>JACC. Cardiovascular imaging</jtitle><addtitle>JACC Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>282-293</pages><issn>1936-878X</issn><eissn>1876-7591</eissn><abstract>Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the correspondence between the coronary arterial anatomy and supplied myocardium based on the proposed American Heart Association 17-segment model. Background Standardized assignment of coronary arteries to specific myocardial segments is currently based on empirical assumptions. Methods A cardiac magnetic resonance study was performed in 93 subjects following acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Two observers blindly reviewed all angiograms to examine the location of the culprit lesion and coronary dominancy. Two additional observers scored for the presence of cardiac magnetic resonance hyperenhancement (HE) on a 17-segment model. Segments were divided based on anatomical landmarks such as the interventricular grooves and papillary muscles. Results In a per-segment analysis, 23% of HE segments were discordant with the empirically assigned coronary distribution. Presence of HE in the basal anteroseptal, mid-anterior, mid-anteroseptal, or apical anterior wall was 100% specific for left anterior descending artery occlusion. The left anterior descending artery infarcts frequently involved the mid-anterolateral, apical lateral, and apical inferior walls. No segment was 100% specific for right coronary artery or left circumflex artery (LCX) occlusion, although HE in the basal anterolateral wall was highly specific (98%) for LCX occlusion. Combination of HE in the anterolateral and inferolateral walls was 100% specific for a LCX occlusion, and when extended to the inferior wall, was also 100% specific for a dominant or codominant LCX occlusion. Conclusions Four segments were completely specific for left anterior descending artery occlusion. No segment can be exclusively attributed to the right coronary artery or LCX occlusion. However, analysis of adjacent segments increased the specificity for a given coronary occlusion. These findings bring objective evidence in the appropriate segmentation of coronary arterial perfusion territories and assist accurate assignment of the culprit vessel in various imaging modalities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>19356440</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.01.014</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1936-878X
ispartof JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2008-05, Vol.1 (3), p.282-293
issn 1936-878X
1876-7591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66707632
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
American Heart Association
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary
Cardiovascular
Contrast Media
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease - pathology
Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology
Coronary Artery Disease - therapy
Coronary Circulation
Coronary Vessels - pathology
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Cardiovascular
Myocardial Infarction - pathology
Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology
Myocardial Infarction - therapy
Myocardium - pathology
Predictive Value of Tests
Retrospective Studies
United States
Ventricular Function, Left
title Correspondence Between the 17-Segment Model and Coronary Arterial Anatomy Using Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T09%3A16%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correspondence%20Between%20the%2017-Segment%20Model%20and%20Coronary%20Arterial%20Anatomy%20Using%20Contrast-Enhanced%20Cardiac%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging&rft.jtitle=JACC.%20Cardiovascular%20imaging&rft.au=Ortiz-P%C3%A9rez,%20Jos%C3%A9%20T.,%20MD&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=282-293&rft.issn=1936-878X&rft.eissn=1876-7591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.01.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66707632%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66707632&rft_id=info:pmid/19356440&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1936878X08000302&rfr_iscdi=true