Clinical evaluation of Guido robotic walker
The Guido is a robotic walker that provides navigation and obstacle-avoidance assistance. Engineering tests have found that the device performs adequately and presents no hazard to the user. The performance of the Guido was compared with a low-tech mobility aid, the Assistive Mobility Device (AMD) d...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of rehabilitation research and development 2008-01, Vol.45 (9), p.1281-1294 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1294 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1281 |
| container_title | Journal of rehabilitation research and development |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Rentschler, Andrew J Simpson, Richard Cooper, Rory A Boninger, Michael L |
| description | The Guido is a robotic walker that provides navigation and obstacle-avoidance assistance. Engineering tests have found that the device performs adequately and presents no hazard to the user. The performance of the Guido was compared with a low-tech mobility aid, the Assistive Mobility Device (AMD) developed at the Atlanta Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, in trials involving older adults with visual impairments. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Guido could increase the safety and mobility of elderly visually impaired individuals in supervised care facilities. Subjects traversed an obstacle course with the Guido and the AMD. Completion time, obstacle/wall contacts, and reorientations were compared for both devices. No significant differences were found between the devices for any of the tests. The Guido did not perform better than the AMD during the trials. Revisions to the device as well as a change in subject requirements and testing protocol may produce different results. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1682/JRRD.2007.10.0160 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66705817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A205034220</galeid><sourcerecordid>A205034220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-786b0479a6653f5231c38e07ae676f9d1c505f16a2cf5578b4c817cb10ea2e243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ADcSXLiRxDvvybJUrUpBKLoOk8mMTE0yNQ_Ff-9A68aNnMWFw3cOnIvQOYYMC0Vuntbr24wAyCw6gAUcoCnOqUox5eQQTUEylUqJ8QSd9P0GAAgl-BhNIoRzyekUXS9q33qj68R-6nrUgw9tElyyHH0Vki6UYfAm-dL1u-1O0ZHTdW_P9neGXu_vXhYP6ep5-biYr1JDORtSqUQJTOZaCE4dJxQbqixIbYUULq-w4cAdFpoYx7lUJTMKS1NisJpYwugMXe16t134GG0_FI3vja1r3dow9oUQEniM_AsSYDkISSN4-QfchLFr44iCYE4UFYxEKNtBb7q2hW9dGDptoirbeBNa63z05wQ4UEYIxMDFvnUsG1sV2843uvsufr9LfwC5VHjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215283642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical evaluation of Guido robotic walker</title><source>U.S. Government Documents</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Rentschler, Andrew J ; Simpson, Richard ; Cooper, Rory A ; Boninger, Michael L</creator><creatorcontrib>Rentschler, Andrew J ; Simpson, Richard ; Cooper, Rory A ; Boninger, Michael L</creatorcontrib><description>The Guido is a robotic walker that provides navigation and obstacle-avoidance assistance. Engineering tests have found that the device performs adequately and presents no hazard to the user. The performance of the Guido was compared with a low-tech mobility aid, the Assistive Mobility Device (AMD) developed at the Atlanta Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, in trials involving older adults with visual impairments. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Guido could increase the safety and mobility of elderly visually impaired individuals in supervised care facilities. Subjects traversed an obstacle course with the Guido and the AMD. Completion time, obstacle/wall contacts, and reorientations were compared for both devices. No significant differences were found between the devices for any of the tests. The Guido did not perform better than the AMD during the trials. Revisions to the device as well as a change in subject requirements and testing protocol may produce different results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1352</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2007.10.0160</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19319753</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRRDDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Department of Veterans Affairs</publisher><subject>Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Analysis of Variance ; Blindness ; Cardiovascular disease ; Care and treatment ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Safety ; Humans ; Nursing homes ; Older people ; Robotics ; Safety and security measures ; Self-Help Devices ; Self-help devices for the disabled ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Visually disabled persons ; Visually Impaired Persons ; Walkers ; Walkers (Orthopedic apparatus)</subject><ispartof>Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 2008-01, Vol.45 (9), p.1281-1294</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 Department of Veterans Affairs</rights><rights>Copyright Superintendent of Documents 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-786b0479a6653f5231c38e07ae676f9d1c505f16a2cf5578b4c817cb10ea2e243</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19319753$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rentschler, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Rory A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boninger, Michael L</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical evaluation of Guido robotic walker</title><title>Journal of rehabilitation research and development</title><addtitle>J Rehabil Res Dev</addtitle><description>The Guido is a robotic walker that provides navigation and obstacle-avoidance assistance. Engineering tests have found that the device performs adequately and presents no hazard to the user. The performance of the Guido was compared with a low-tech mobility aid, the Assistive Mobility Device (AMD) developed at the Atlanta Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, in trials involving older adults with visual impairments. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Guido could increase the safety and mobility of elderly visually impaired individuals in supervised care facilities. Subjects traversed an obstacle course with the Guido and the AMD. Completion time, obstacle/wall contacts, and reorientations were compared for both devices. No significant differences were found between the devices for any of the tests. The Guido did not perform better than the AMD during the trials. Revisions to the device as well as a change in subject requirements and testing protocol may produce different results.</description><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Blindness</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Safety</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Self-Help Devices</subject><subject>Self-help devices for the disabled</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Visually disabled persons</subject><subject>Visually Impaired Persons</subject><subject>Walkers</subject><subject>Walkers (Orthopedic apparatus)</subject><issn>0748-7711</issn><issn>1938-1352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ADcSXLiRxDvvybJUrUpBKLoOk8mMTE0yNQ_Ff-9A68aNnMWFw3cOnIvQOYYMC0Vuntbr24wAyCw6gAUcoCnOqUox5eQQTUEylUqJ8QSd9P0GAAgl-BhNIoRzyekUXS9q33qj68R-6nrUgw9tElyyHH0Vki6UYfAm-dL1u-1O0ZHTdW_P9neGXu_vXhYP6ep5-biYr1JDORtSqUQJTOZaCE4dJxQbqixIbYUULq-w4cAdFpoYx7lUJTMKS1NisJpYwugMXe16t134GG0_FI3vja1r3dow9oUQEniM_AsSYDkISSN4-QfchLFr44iCYE4UFYxEKNtBb7q2hW9dGDptoirbeBNa63z05wQ4UEYIxMDFvnUsG1sV2843uvsufr9LfwC5VHjA</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Rentschler, Andrew J</creator><creator>Simpson, Richard</creator><creator>Cooper, Rory A</creator><creator>Boninger, Michael L</creator><general>Department of Veterans Affairs</general><general>Superintendent of Documents</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Clinical evaluation of Guido robotic walker</title><author>Rentschler, Andrew J ; Simpson, Richard ; Cooper, Rory A ; Boninger, Michael L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-786b0479a6653f5231c38e07ae676f9d1c505f16a2cf5578b4c817cb10ea2e243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Blindness</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Safety</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Self-Help Devices</topic><topic>Self-help devices for the disabled</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Visually disabled persons</topic><topic>Visually Impaired Persons</topic><topic>Walkers</topic><topic>Walkers (Orthopedic apparatus)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rentschler, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Rory A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boninger, Michael L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of rehabilitation research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rentschler, Andrew J</au><au>Simpson, Richard</au><au>Cooper, Rory A</au><au>Boninger, Michael L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical evaluation of Guido robotic walker</atitle><jtitle>Journal of rehabilitation research and development</jtitle><addtitle>J Rehabil Res Dev</addtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1281</spage><epage>1294</epage><pages>1281-1294</pages><issn>0748-7711</issn><eissn>1938-1352</eissn><coden>JRRDDB</coden><abstract>The Guido is a robotic walker that provides navigation and obstacle-avoidance assistance. Engineering tests have found that the device performs adequately and presents no hazard to the user. The performance of the Guido was compared with a low-tech mobility aid, the Assistive Mobility Device (AMD) developed at the Atlanta Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, in trials involving older adults with visual impairments. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Guido could increase the safety and mobility of elderly visually impaired individuals in supervised care facilities. Subjects traversed an obstacle course with the Guido and the AMD. Completion time, obstacle/wall contacts, and reorientations were compared for both devices. No significant differences were found between the devices for any of the tests. The Guido did not perform better than the AMD during the trials. Revisions to the device as well as a change in subject requirements and testing protocol may produce different results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Department of Veterans Affairs</pub><pmid>19319753</pmid><doi>10.1682/JRRD.2007.10.0160</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0748-7711 |
| ispartof | Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 2008-01, Vol.45 (9), p.1281-1294 |
| issn | 0748-7711 1938-1352 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66705817 |
| source | U.S. Government Documents; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Aged, 80 and over Algorithms Analysis of Variance Blindness Cardiovascular disease Care and treatment Equipment Design Equipment Safety Humans Nursing homes Older people Robotics Safety and security measures Self-Help Devices Self-help devices for the disabled Surveys and Questionnaires Visually disabled persons Visually Impaired Persons Walkers Walkers (Orthopedic apparatus) |
| title | Clinical evaluation of Guido robotic walker |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T02%3A39%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20evaluation%20of%20Guido%20robotic%20walker&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20rehabilitation%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Rentschler,%20Andrew%20J&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1281&rft.epage=1294&rft.pages=1281-1294&rft.issn=0748-7711&rft.eissn=1938-1352&rft.coden=JRRDDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1682/JRRD.2007.10.0160&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA205034220%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215283642&rft_id=info:pmid/19319753&rft_galeid=A205034220&rfr_iscdi=true |