Spinal Accessory Nerve Monitoring in Posterior Fossa Surgery

The role of intraoperative monitoring of lower cranial nerves is not well established. In this study, the authors retrospectively analyzed the intraoperative monitoring data and the clinical outcome of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) in patients who have undergone posterior fossa surgery. SAN was m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical neurophysiology 2008-12, Vol.25 (6), p.346-350
Hauptverfasser: Karlikaya, Geysu, Çitçi, Beyza, Güçlü, Bülent, Türe, Hatice, Türe, Uğur, Bingöl, Canan Aykut
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 350
container_issue 6
container_start_page 346
container_title Journal of clinical neurophysiology
container_volume 25
creator Karlikaya, Geysu
Çitçi, Beyza
Güçlü, Bülent
Türe, Hatice
Türe, Uğur
Bingöl, Canan Aykut
description The role of intraoperative monitoring of lower cranial nerves is not well established. In this study, the authors retrospectively analyzed the intraoperative monitoring data and the clinical outcome of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) in patients who have undergone posterior fossa surgery. SAN was monitored in 19 patients. Subcutaneous needle electrodes were placed in the trapezius, and any abnormal spontaneous activity was documented for duration and amplitude. A bipolar stimulation probe was used for triggered electromyogram, with a maximum stimulation intensity of 3 mA. All patients were clinically evaluated for SAN dysfunction postoperatively 24 hours and 7 days. Neurotonic discharges, lasting between 3 and 90 minutes were seen in 84% of the patients. Continuous discharges lasting longer than 5 minutes were seen in 36% of the patients. The SAN was stimulated in 57.8% of the patients. With clinical examination, none of our patients had postoperative SAN dysfunction. Long lasting dense neurotonic discharges and high stimulation thresholds have been correlated with postoperative facial nerve injury; however, this does seem be true in the case of SAN monitoring. Neurotonic discharges are commonly false-positive and stimulation intensity up to 3 mA can be related with a good outcome. The intraoperative monitoring of SAN may not be valuable as much as facial nerve monitoring.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/WNP.0b013e31818e7ff2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66682720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20533068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-7c6c34e478991d76b012f7d092fb6384c01103b5657b3c4896e6a3dc37800f613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKw0AQhhdRbK2-gUhO3lJnd5LdDXgpYlWotVDFY0i2kzaaZutuY-nbG2lB8KCnuXz_PzMfY-cc-hwSdfU6nvQhB46EXHNNqijEAevyGFXIJeAh64JCGYKIdYedeP8GwBWiOGYdrpNESZF02fV0VdZZFQyMIe-t2wZjcp8UPNq6XFtX1vOgrIOJ9WtypXXB0HqfBdPGzcltT9lRkVWezvazx16Gt8839-Ho6e7hZjAKDepYhMpIgxFFqt3KZ0q2R4tCzSARRS5RRwY4B8xjGascTaQTSTLDmUGlAQrJsccud70rZz8a8ut0WXpDVZXVZBufSim1UAL-BQXEiCB1C0Y70Lj2IUdFunLlMnPblEP6rTdt9aa_9baxi31_ky9p9hPa-2wBvQM2tmqN-feq2ZBLF5RV68Xf3V_0v4fp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20533068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spinal Accessory Nerve Monitoring in Posterior Fossa Surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Karlikaya, Geysu ; Çitçi, Beyza ; Güçlü, Bülent ; Türe, Hatice ; Türe, Uğur ; Bingöl, Canan Aykut</creator><creatorcontrib>Karlikaya, Geysu ; Çitçi, Beyza ; Güçlü, Bülent ; Türe, Hatice ; Türe, Uğur ; Bingöl, Canan Aykut</creatorcontrib><description>The role of intraoperative monitoring of lower cranial nerves is not well established. In this study, the authors retrospectively analyzed the intraoperative monitoring data and the clinical outcome of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) in patients who have undergone posterior fossa surgery. SAN was monitored in 19 patients. Subcutaneous needle electrodes were placed in the trapezius, and any abnormal spontaneous activity was documented for duration and amplitude. A bipolar stimulation probe was used for triggered electromyogram, with a maximum stimulation intensity of 3 mA. All patients were clinically evaluated for SAN dysfunction postoperatively 24 hours and 7 days. Neurotonic discharges, lasting between 3 and 90 minutes were seen in 84% of the patients. Continuous discharges lasting longer than 5 minutes were seen in 36% of the patients. The SAN was stimulated in 57.8% of the patients. With clinical examination, none of our patients had postoperative SAN dysfunction. Long lasting dense neurotonic discharges and high stimulation thresholds have been correlated with postoperative facial nerve injury; however, this does seem be true in the case of SAN monitoring. Neurotonic discharges are commonly false-positive and stimulation intensity up to 3 mA can be related with a good outcome. The intraoperative monitoring of SAN may not be valuable as much as facial nerve monitoring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-0258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-1603</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e31818e7ff2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18997629</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright American Clinical Neurophysiology Society</publisher><subject>Accessory Nerve - physiology ; Adult ; Aged ; Back - innervation ; Child ; Electric Stimulation ; Electromyography ; Evoked Potentials, Motor ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods ; Muscle, Skeletal - innervation ; Neck - innervation ; Neurosurgical Procedures - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Shoulder - innervation</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical neurophysiology, 2008-12, Vol.25 (6), p.346-350</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 American Clinical Neurophysiology Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-7c6c34e478991d76b012f7d092fb6384c01103b5657b3c4896e6a3dc37800f613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-7c6c34e478991d76b012f7d092fb6384c01103b5657b3c4896e6a3dc37800f613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18997629$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karlikaya, Geysu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çitçi, Beyza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güçlü, Bülent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türe, Hatice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türe, Uğur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingöl, Canan Aykut</creatorcontrib><title>Spinal Accessory Nerve Monitoring in Posterior Fossa Surgery</title><title>Journal of clinical neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>The role of intraoperative monitoring of lower cranial nerves is not well established. In this study, the authors retrospectively analyzed the intraoperative monitoring data and the clinical outcome of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) in patients who have undergone posterior fossa surgery. SAN was monitored in 19 patients. Subcutaneous needle electrodes were placed in the trapezius, and any abnormal spontaneous activity was documented for duration and amplitude. A bipolar stimulation probe was used for triggered electromyogram, with a maximum stimulation intensity of 3 mA. All patients were clinically evaluated for SAN dysfunction postoperatively 24 hours and 7 days. Neurotonic discharges, lasting between 3 and 90 minutes were seen in 84% of the patients. Continuous discharges lasting longer than 5 minutes were seen in 36% of the patients. The SAN was stimulated in 57.8% of the patients. With clinical examination, none of our patients had postoperative SAN dysfunction. Long lasting dense neurotonic discharges and high stimulation thresholds have been correlated with postoperative facial nerve injury; however, this does seem be true in the case of SAN monitoring. Neurotonic discharges are commonly false-positive and stimulation intensity up to 3 mA can be related with a good outcome. The intraoperative monitoring of SAN may not be valuable as much as facial nerve monitoring.</description><subject>Accessory Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Back - innervation</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</subject><subject>Neck - innervation</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Shoulder - innervation</subject><issn>0736-0258</issn><issn>1537-1603</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFKw0AQhhdRbK2-gUhO3lJnd5LdDXgpYlWotVDFY0i2kzaaZutuY-nbG2lB8KCnuXz_PzMfY-cc-hwSdfU6nvQhB46EXHNNqijEAevyGFXIJeAh64JCGYKIdYedeP8GwBWiOGYdrpNESZF02fV0VdZZFQyMIe-t2wZjcp8UPNq6XFtX1vOgrIOJ9WtypXXB0HqfBdPGzcltT9lRkVWezvazx16Gt8839-Ho6e7hZjAKDepYhMpIgxFFqt3KZ0q2R4tCzSARRS5RRwY4B8xjGascTaQTSTLDmUGlAQrJsccud70rZz8a8ut0WXpDVZXVZBufSim1UAL-BQXEiCB1C0Y70Lj2IUdFunLlMnPblEP6rTdt9aa_9baxi31_ky9p9hPa-2wBvQM2tmqN-feq2ZBLF5RV68Xf3V_0v4fp</recordid><startdate>200812</startdate><enddate>200812</enddate><creator>Karlikaya, Geysu</creator><creator>Çitçi, Beyza</creator><creator>Güçlü, Bülent</creator><creator>Türe, Hatice</creator><creator>Türe, Uğur</creator><creator>Bingöl, Canan Aykut</creator><general>Copyright American Clinical Neurophysiology Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200812</creationdate><title>Spinal Accessory Nerve Monitoring in Posterior Fossa Surgery</title><author>Karlikaya, Geysu ; Çitçi, Beyza ; Güçlü, Bülent ; Türe, Hatice ; Türe, Uğur ; Bingöl, Canan Aykut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-7c6c34e478991d76b012f7d092fb6384c01103b5657b3c4896e6a3dc37800f613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Accessory Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Back - innervation</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</topic><topic>Neck - innervation</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Shoulder - innervation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karlikaya, Geysu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çitçi, Beyza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güçlü, Bülent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türe, Hatice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Türe, Uğur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingöl, Canan Aykut</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karlikaya, Geysu</au><au>Çitçi, Beyza</au><au>Güçlü, Bülent</au><au>Türe, Hatice</au><au>Türe, Uğur</au><au>Bingöl, Canan Aykut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spinal Accessory Nerve Monitoring in Posterior Fossa Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2008-12</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>350</epage><pages>346-350</pages><issn>0736-0258</issn><eissn>1537-1603</eissn><abstract>The role of intraoperative monitoring of lower cranial nerves is not well established. In this study, the authors retrospectively analyzed the intraoperative monitoring data and the clinical outcome of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) in patients who have undergone posterior fossa surgery. SAN was monitored in 19 patients. Subcutaneous needle electrodes were placed in the trapezius, and any abnormal spontaneous activity was documented for duration and amplitude. A bipolar stimulation probe was used for triggered electromyogram, with a maximum stimulation intensity of 3 mA. All patients were clinically evaluated for SAN dysfunction postoperatively 24 hours and 7 days. Neurotonic discharges, lasting between 3 and 90 minutes were seen in 84% of the patients. Continuous discharges lasting longer than 5 minutes were seen in 36% of the patients. The SAN was stimulated in 57.8% of the patients. With clinical examination, none of our patients had postoperative SAN dysfunction. Long lasting dense neurotonic discharges and high stimulation thresholds have been correlated with postoperative facial nerve injury; however, this does seem be true in the case of SAN monitoring. Neurotonic discharges are commonly false-positive and stimulation intensity up to 3 mA can be related with a good outcome. The intraoperative monitoring of SAN may not be valuable as much as facial nerve monitoring.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright American Clinical Neurophysiology Society</pub><pmid>18997629</pmid><doi>10.1097/WNP.0b013e31818e7ff2</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0736-0258
ispartof Journal of clinical neurophysiology, 2008-12, Vol.25 (6), p.346-350
issn 0736-0258
1537-1603
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66682720
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Accessory Nerve - physiology
Adult
Aged
Back - innervation
Child
Electric Stimulation
Electromyography
Evoked Potentials, Motor
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods
Muscle, Skeletal - innervation
Neck - innervation
Neurosurgical Procedures - methods
Retrospective Studies
Shoulder - innervation
title Spinal Accessory Nerve Monitoring in Posterior Fossa Surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A10%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spinal%20Accessory%20Nerve%20Monitoring%20in%20Posterior%20Fossa%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Karlikaya,%20Geysu&rft.date=2008-12&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=350&rft.pages=346-350&rft.issn=0736-0258&rft.eissn=1537-1603&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/WNP.0b013e31818e7ff2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20533068%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20533068&rft_id=info:pmid/18997629&rfr_iscdi=true