Effects of different degrees of cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram
Aim To study the effect of different degrees of nuclear cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). Methods mfERGs were recorded from 30 elderly subjects with very mild, mild, or moderate nuclear cataracts using a VERIS System (version 4.1). The subjects were divided into three groups (1...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Eye (London) 2004-07, Vol.18 (7), p.691-696 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 696 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 691 |
container_title | Eye (London) |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Tam, W-K Chan, H Brown, B Yap, M |
description | Aim
To study the effect of different degrees of nuclear cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG).
Methods
mfERGs were recorded from 30 elderly subjects with very mild, mild, or moderate nuclear cataracts using a VERIS System (version 4.1). The subjects were divided into three groups (10 in each group) according to their degree of nuclear cataracts as classified according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III). No subjects had any significant eye disease or degenerative changes except for cataracts. The mfERG responses were grouped into six concentric rings for analysis. Both the N1 and P1 amplitudes and the latencies of N1 and P1 of first-order responses were used for analysis.
Results
Amplitudes of N1 and P1 from the central retina (14°) were significantly reduced in patients with mild or moderate cataract when compared with subjects with very mild cataract. However, there was no significant reduction of N1 and P1 amplitudes in the para-central retina (14–40°). There was no difference in the latencies of N1 and P1 in these three groups of subjects.
Conclusions
The mfERG responses from the central retina (central 14°) were affected by the severity of cataract, but responses from the paracentral retina (14–40°) were not affected. This suggests that in interpreting the mfERG in subjects with mild or moderate cataract subjects some care should be taken as reduced amplitudes (N1 and P1) will be expected from the central retina. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/sj.eye.6701318 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66681566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>984150441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-340eee7343d1764f320bd6afbf60f65665039b5002a4aac1b2cd32c0ac801ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxS0EotvClRsoQiq3bMefyR6rqnxIK3HpgZs1ccZLVklcbOfQ_x7DBlZC4mTL7_fejJ4Ze8Nhy0G2N-m4pSfamga45O0ztuGqMbVWWj1nG9hpqIUQ3y7YZUpHgCI28JJdcLUzUrViw_b33pPLqQq-6odyjzTnqqdDJPr96DBjRJerMFf5O1XTMubBB4djRWNxxhApD3M4RJxesRcex0Sv1_OKPXy8f7j7XO-_fvpyd7uvndKQa6mAiBqpZM8bo7wU0PUGfecNeKON0SB3nQYQqBAd74TrpXCArgVOKK_Yh1PsYww_FkrZTkNyNI44U1iSNca0vMQU8P0_4DEscS6rWcFbqUE1qkDbE-RiSCmSt49xmDA-WQ72V8c2HW3p2K4dF8O7NXXpJurP-FpqAa5XAFPpyUec3ZDOnN415VNk4W5OXCrSfKB4Xu-_o9-eHDPmJdLfyD_6TxH5nq8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218350474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of different degrees of cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tam, W-K ; Chan, H ; Brown, B ; Yap, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Tam, W-K ; Chan, H ; Brown, B ; Yap, M</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
To study the effect of different degrees of nuclear cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG).
Methods
mfERGs were recorded from 30 elderly subjects with very mild, mild, or moderate nuclear cataracts using a VERIS System (version 4.1). The subjects were divided into three groups (10 in each group) according to their degree of nuclear cataracts as classified according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III). No subjects had any significant eye disease or degenerative changes except for cataracts. The mfERG responses were grouped into six concentric rings for analysis. Both the N1 and P1 amplitudes and the latencies of N1 and P1 of first-order responses were used for analysis.
Results
Amplitudes of N1 and P1 from the central retina (14°) were significantly reduced in patients with mild or moderate cataract when compared with subjects with very mild cataract. However, there was no significant reduction of N1 and P1 amplitudes in the para-central retina (14–40°). There was no difference in the latencies of N1 and P1 in these three groups of subjects.
Conclusions
The mfERG responses from the central retina (central 14°) were affected by the severity of cataract, but responses from the paracentral retina (14–40°) were not affected. This suggests that in interpreting the mfERG in subjects with mild or moderate cataract subjects some care should be taken as reduced amplitudes (N1 and P1) will be expected from the central retina.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-222X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701318</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14963482</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EYEEEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cataract - pathology ; Cataract - physiopathology ; clinical-study ; Electroretinography ; Humans ; Laboratory Medicine ; Lens diseases ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology ; Reaction Time ; Retina - physiopathology ; Scattering, Radiation ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Eye (London), 2004-07, Vol.18 (7), p.691-696</ispartof><rights>Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2004</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jul 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-340eee7343d1764f320bd6afbf60f65665039b5002a4aac1b2cd32c0ac801ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-340eee7343d1764f320bd6afbf60f65665039b5002a4aac1b2cd32c0ac801ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15972223$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14963482$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tam, W-K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yap, M</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of different degrees of cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram</title><title>Eye (London)</title><addtitle>Eye</addtitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><description>Aim
To study the effect of different degrees of nuclear cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG).
Methods
mfERGs were recorded from 30 elderly subjects with very mild, mild, or moderate nuclear cataracts using a VERIS System (version 4.1). The subjects were divided into three groups (10 in each group) according to their degree of nuclear cataracts as classified according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III). No subjects had any significant eye disease or degenerative changes except for cataracts. The mfERG responses were grouped into six concentric rings for analysis. Both the N1 and P1 amplitudes and the latencies of N1 and P1 of first-order responses were used for analysis.
Results
Amplitudes of N1 and P1 from the central retina (14°) were significantly reduced in patients with mild or moderate cataract when compared with subjects with very mild cataract. However, there was no significant reduction of N1 and P1 amplitudes in the para-central retina (14–40°). There was no difference in the latencies of N1 and P1 in these three groups of subjects.
Conclusions
The mfERG responses from the central retina (central 14°) were affected by the severity of cataract, but responses from the paracentral retina (14–40°) were not affected. This suggests that in interpreting the mfERG in subjects with mild or moderate cataract subjects some care should be taken as reduced amplitudes (N1 and P1) will be expected from the central retina.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cataract - pathology</subject><subject>Cataract - physiopathology</subject><subject>clinical-study</subject><subject>Electroretinography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Lens diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Retina - physiopathology</subject><subject>Scattering, Radiation</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>0950-222X</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxS0EotvClRsoQiq3bMefyR6rqnxIK3HpgZs1ccZLVklcbOfQ_x7DBlZC4mTL7_fejJ4Ze8Nhy0G2N-m4pSfamga45O0ztuGqMbVWWj1nG9hpqIUQ3y7YZUpHgCI28JJdcLUzUrViw_b33pPLqQq-6odyjzTnqqdDJPr96DBjRJerMFf5O1XTMubBB4djRWNxxhApD3M4RJxesRcex0Sv1_OKPXy8f7j7XO-_fvpyd7uvndKQa6mAiBqpZM8bo7wU0PUGfecNeKON0SB3nQYQqBAd74TrpXCArgVOKK_Yh1PsYww_FkrZTkNyNI44U1iSNca0vMQU8P0_4DEscS6rWcFbqUE1qkDbE-RiSCmSt49xmDA-WQ72V8c2HW3p2K4dF8O7NXXpJurP-FpqAa5XAFPpyUec3ZDOnN415VNk4W5OXCrSfKB4Xu-_o9-eHDPmJdLfyD_6TxH5nq8</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Tam, W-K</creator><creator>Chan, H</creator><creator>Brown, B</creator><creator>Yap, M</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Effects of different degrees of cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram</title><author>Tam, W-K ; Chan, H ; Brown, B ; Yap, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-340eee7343d1764f320bd6afbf60f65665039b5002a4aac1b2cd32c0ac801ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cataract - pathology</topic><topic>Cataract - physiopathology</topic><topic>clinical-study</topic><topic>Electroretinography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Lens diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Retina - physiopathology</topic><topic>Scattering, Radiation</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tam, W-K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yap, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tam, W-K</au><au>Chan, H</au><au>Brown, B</au><au>Yap, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of different degrees of cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram</atitle><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle><stitle>Eye</stitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>696</epage><pages>691-696</pages><issn>0950-222X</issn><eissn>1476-5454</eissn><coden>EYEEEC</coden><abstract>Aim
To study the effect of different degrees of nuclear cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG).
Methods
mfERGs were recorded from 30 elderly subjects with very mild, mild, or moderate nuclear cataracts using a VERIS System (version 4.1). The subjects were divided into three groups (10 in each group) according to their degree of nuclear cataracts as classified according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III). No subjects had any significant eye disease or degenerative changes except for cataracts. The mfERG responses were grouped into six concentric rings for analysis. Both the N1 and P1 amplitudes and the latencies of N1 and P1 of first-order responses were used for analysis.
Results
Amplitudes of N1 and P1 from the central retina (14°) were significantly reduced in patients with mild or moderate cataract when compared with subjects with very mild cataract. However, there was no significant reduction of N1 and P1 amplitudes in the para-central retina (14–40°). There was no difference in the latencies of N1 and P1 in these three groups of subjects.
Conclusions
The mfERG responses from the central retina (central 14°) were affected by the severity of cataract, but responses from the paracentral retina (14–40°) were not affected. This suggests that in interpreting the mfERG in subjects with mild or moderate cataract subjects some care should be taken as reduced amplitudes (N1 and P1) will be expected from the central retina.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>14963482</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.eye.6701318</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-222X |
ispartof | Eye (London), 2004-07, Vol.18 (7), p.691-696 |
issn | 0950-222X 1476-5454 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66681566 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Biological and medical sciences Cataract - pathology Cataract - physiopathology clinical-study Electroretinography Humans Laboratory Medicine Lens diseases Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Ophthalmology Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology Reaction Time Retina - physiopathology Scattering, Radiation Severity of Illness Index Surgery Surgical Oncology |
title | Effects of different degrees of cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A48%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20different%20degrees%20of%20cataract%20on%20the%20multifocal%20electroretinogram&rft.jtitle=Eye%20(London)&rft.au=Tam,%20W-K&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=696&rft.pages=691-696&rft.issn=0950-222X&rft.eissn=1476-5454&rft.coden=EYEEEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.eye.6701318&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E984150441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218350474&rft_id=info:pmid/14963482&rfr_iscdi=true |