Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients

Femoral nail removal has been suggested as a routine procedure for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether asymptomatic patients have long-term complaints after femoral nail removal. Additionally, factors that might extend operation time and effect soft t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2004-06, Vol.423 (423), p.222-226
Hauptverfasser: GÖSLING, Thomas, HUFNER, Tobias, HANKEMEIER, Stefan, ZELLE, Boris A, MULLER-HEINE, Assia, KRETTEK, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 226
container_issue 423
container_start_page 222
container_title Clinical orthopaedics and related research
container_volume 423
creator GÖSLING, Thomas
HUFNER, Tobias
HANKEMEIER, Stefan
ZELLE, Boris A
MULLER-HEINE, Assia
KRETTEK, Christian
description Femoral nail removal has been suggested as a routine procedure for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether asymptomatic patients have long-term complaints after femoral nail removal. Additionally, factors that might extend operation time and effect soft tissue healing negatively were analyzed. A retrospective study on the removal of 164 femoral nails after fracture consolidation was done. A review of the patient charts and radiographs was done. Neither the interval between nail implantation and nail removal or the use of an end-cap significantly influenced the operation time. The surgeon's qualification and nail depth were the only variables that influenced operation time. Neither operation time, nail depth, surgeon's qualification, nor the grade of heterotopic ossification significantly influenced the incidence of wound healing problems. One hundred nine patients (73%) were available for the followup interview. Preoperatively, 58 patients (53%) had local complaints. Of these 58 patients, 78% reported improvement and 7% reported an aggravation of their local complaints. Of the 51 patients who were asymptomatic before surgery, 20% reported long-term complaints at followup. Only symptomatic patients should be considered for femoral nail removal.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.blo.0000130208.90879.67
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66673189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66673189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bbaccf18783b08ab177efeec30b94f8d78a2323f30759dc76900b5e2e42a0d373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_ghRB71pPkrZJvNPhVBh4o-BdSNIUK-mHSSfs35u5wsxFwhue5D08CF1hyDAIdgs4067PIC5MgQDPBHAmspIdoTkuCE8xpuQYzSMgUkHwxwydhfAVI80LcopmEaIkL-gcPaxs23vlkk41LvEx_MQQPvuNqxJt400YfWNGWyVNl6iwbYexb9XYmGSIu-3GcI5OauWCvZjOBXpfPb4tn9P169PL8n6dmtg6plorY2rMGacauNKYMVtbayhokde8YlzFoWhNgRWiMqwUALqwxOZEQUUZXaCb_b-D7783cS7ZNsFY51Rn-02QZVkyirmI4N0eNL4PwdtaDr5pld9KDHJnUAKW0aA8GJR_BmW5a7mcWja6tdXh6aQsAtcToIJRrvaqM034x3EuCMP0F5bretg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66673189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>GÖSLING, Thomas ; HUFNER, Tobias ; HANKEMEIER, Stefan ; ZELLE, Boris A ; MULLER-HEINE, Assia ; KRETTEK, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>GÖSLING, Thomas ; HUFNER, Tobias ; HANKEMEIER, Stefan ; ZELLE, Boris A ; MULLER-HEINE, Assia ; KRETTEK, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Femoral nail removal has been suggested as a routine procedure for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether asymptomatic patients have long-term complaints after femoral nail removal. Additionally, factors that might extend operation time and effect soft tissue healing negatively were analyzed. A retrospective study on the removal of 164 femoral nails after fracture consolidation was done. A review of the patient charts and radiographs was done. Neither the interval between nail implantation and nail removal or the use of an end-cap significantly influenced the operation time. The surgeon's qualification and nail depth were the only variables that influenced operation time. Neither operation time, nail depth, surgeon's qualification, nor the grade of heterotopic ossification significantly influenced the incidence of wound healing problems. One hundred nine patients (73%) were available for the followup interview. Preoperatively, 58 patients (53%) had local complaints. Of these 58 patients, 78% reported improvement and 7% reported an aggravation of their local complaints. Of the 51 patients who were asymptomatic before surgery, 20% reported long-term complaints at followup. Only symptomatic patients should be considered for femoral nail removal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1132</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000130208.90879.67</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15232453</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CORTBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Nails ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Device Removal ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; Femoral Fractures - surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><ispartof>Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2004-06, Vol.423 (423), p.222-226</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bbaccf18783b08ab177efeec30b94f8d78a2323f30759dc76900b5e2e42a0d373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bbaccf18783b08ab177efeec30b94f8d78a2323f30759dc76900b5e2e42a0d373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15889271$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15232453$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GÖSLING, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUFNER, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANKEMEIER, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZELLE, Boris A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MULLER-HEINE, Assia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRETTEK, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients</title><title>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><description>Femoral nail removal has been suggested as a routine procedure for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether asymptomatic patients have long-term complaints after femoral nail removal. Additionally, factors that might extend operation time and effect soft tissue healing negatively were analyzed. A retrospective study on the removal of 164 femoral nails after fracture consolidation was done. A review of the patient charts and radiographs was done. Neither the interval between nail implantation and nail removal or the use of an end-cap significantly influenced the operation time. The surgeon's qualification and nail depth were the only variables that influenced operation time. Neither operation time, nail depth, surgeon's qualification, nor the grade of heterotopic ossification significantly influenced the incidence of wound healing problems. One hundred nine patients (73%) were available for the followup interview. Preoperatively, 58 patients (53%) had local complaints. Of these 58 patients, 78% reported improvement and 7% reported an aggravation of their local complaints. Of the 51 patients who were asymptomatic before surgery, 20% reported long-term complaints at followup. Only symptomatic patients should be considered for femoral nail removal.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Nails</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><issn>0009-921X</issn><issn>1528-1132</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_ghRB71pPkrZJvNPhVBh4o-BdSNIUK-mHSSfs35u5wsxFwhue5D08CF1hyDAIdgs4067PIC5MgQDPBHAmspIdoTkuCE8xpuQYzSMgUkHwxwydhfAVI80LcopmEaIkL-gcPaxs23vlkk41LvEx_MQQPvuNqxJt400YfWNGWyVNl6iwbYexb9XYmGSIu-3GcI5OauWCvZjOBXpfPb4tn9P169PL8n6dmtg6plorY2rMGacauNKYMVtbayhokde8YlzFoWhNgRWiMqwUALqwxOZEQUUZXaCb_b-D7783cS7ZNsFY51Rn-02QZVkyirmI4N0eNL4PwdtaDr5pld9KDHJnUAKW0aA8GJR_BmW5a7mcWja6tdXh6aQsAtcToIJRrvaqM034x3EuCMP0F5bretg</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>GÖSLING, Thomas</creator><creator>HUFNER, Tobias</creator><creator>HANKEMEIER, Stefan</creator><creator>ZELLE, Boris A</creator><creator>MULLER-HEINE, Assia</creator><creator>KRETTEK, Christian</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients</title><author>GÖSLING, Thomas ; HUFNER, Tobias ; HANKEMEIER, Stefan ; ZELLE, Boris A ; MULLER-HEINE, Assia ; KRETTEK, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bbaccf18783b08ab177efeec30b94f8d78a2323f30759dc76900b5e2e42a0d373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Nails</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GÖSLING, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUFNER, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANKEMEIER, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZELLE, Boris A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MULLER-HEINE, Assia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRETTEK, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GÖSLING, Thomas</au><au>HUFNER, Tobias</au><au>HANKEMEIER, Stefan</au><au>ZELLE, Boris A</au><au>MULLER-HEINE, Assia</au><au>KRETTEK, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients</atitle><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>423</volume><issue>423</issue><spage>222</spage><epage>226</epage><pages>222-226</pages><issn>0009-921X</issn><eissn>1528-1132</eissn><coden>CORTBR</coden><abstract>Femoral nail removal has been suggested as a routine procedure for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether asymptomatic patients have long-term complaints after femoral nail removal. Additionally, factors that might extend operation time and effect soft tissue healing negatively were analyzed. A retrospective study on the removal of 164 femoral nails after fracture consolidation was done. A review of the patient charts and radiographs was done. Neither the interval between nail implantation and nail removal or the use of an end-cap significantly influenced the operation time. The surgeon's qualification and nail depth were the only variables that influenced operation time. Neither operation time, nail depth, surgeon's qualification, nor the grade of heterotopic ossification significantly influenced the incidence of wound healing problems. One hundred nine patients (73%) were available for the followup interview. Preoperatively, 58 patients (53%) had local complaints. Of these 58 patients, 78% reported improvement and 7% reported an aggravation of their local complaints. Of the 51 patients who were asymptomatic before surgery, 20% reported long-term complaints at followup. Only symptomatic patients should be considered for femoral nail removal.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>15232453</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.blo.0000130208.90879.67</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-921X
ispartof Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2004-06, Vol.423 (423), p.222-226
issn 0009-921X
1528-1132
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66673189
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analysis of Variance
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Nails
Chi-Square Distribution
Device Removal
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Female
Femoral Fractures - surgery
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Statistics, Nonparametric
title Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T12%3A43%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Femoral%20nail%20removal%20should%20be%20restricted%20in%20asymptomatic%20patients&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=G%C3%96SLING,%20Thomas&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=423&rft.issue=423&rft.spage=222&rft.epage=226&rft.pages=222-226&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft.eissn=1528-1132&rft.coden=CORTBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.blo.0000130208.90879.67&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66673189%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66673189&rft_id=info:pmid/15232453&rfr_iscdi=true