Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients
Femoral nail removal has been suggested as a routine procedure for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether asymptomatic patients have long-term complaints after femoral nail removal. Additionally, factors that might extend operation time and effect soft t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2004-06, Vol.423 (423), p.222-226 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 226 |
---|---|
container_issue | 423 |
container_start_page | 222 |
container_title | Clinical orthopaedics and related research |
container_volume | 423 |
creator | GÖSLING, Thomas HUFNER, Tobias HANKEMEIER, Stefan ZELLE, Boris A MULLER-HEINE, Assia KRETTEK, Christian |
description | Femoral nail removal has been suggested as a routine procedure for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether asymptomatic patients have long-term complaints after femoral nail removal. Additionally, factors that might extend operation time and effect soft tissue healing negatively were analyzed. A retrospective study on the removal of 164 femoral nails after fracture consolidation was done. A review of the patient charts and radiographs was done. Neither the interval between nail implantation and nail removal or the use of an end-cap significantly influenced the operation time. The surgeon's qualification and nail depth were the only variables that influenced operation time. Neither operation time, nail depth, surgeon's qualification, nor the grade of heterotopic ossification significantly influenced the incidence of wound healing problems. One hundred nine patients (73%) were available for the followup interview. Preoperatively, 58 patients (53%) had local complaints. Of these 58 patients, 78% reported improvement and 7% reported an aggravation of their local complaints. Of the 51 patients who were asymptomatic before surgery, 20% reported long-term complaints at followup. Only symptomatic patients should be considered for femoral nail removal. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.blo.0000130208.90879.67 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66673189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66673189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bbaccf18783b08ab177efeec30b94f8d78a2323f30759dc76900b5e2e42a0d373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_ghRB71pPkrZJvNPhVBh4o-BdSNIUK-mHSSfs35u5wsxFwhue5D08CF1hyDAIdgs4067PIC5MgQDPBHAmspIdoTkuCE8xpuQYzSMgUkHwxwydhfAVI80LcopmEaIkL-gcPaxs23vlkk41LvEx_MQQPvuNqxJt400YfWNGWyVNl6iwbYexb9XYmGSIu-3GcI5OauWCvZjOBXpfPb4tn9P169PL8n6dmtg6plorY2rMGacauNKYMVtbayhokde8YlzFoWhNgRWiMqwUALqwxOZEQUUZXaCb_b-D7783cS7ZNsFY51Rn-02QZVkyirmI4N0eNL4PwdtaDr5pld9KDHJnUAKW0aA8GJR_BmW5a7mcWja6tdXh6aQsAtcToIJRrvaqM034x3EuCMP0F5bretg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>66673189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>GÖSLING, Thomas ; HUFNER, Tobias ; HANKEMEIER, Stefan ; ZELLE, Boris A ; MULLER-HEINE, Assia ; KRETTEK, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>GÖSLING, Thomas ; HUFNER, Tobias ; HANKEMEIER, Stefan ; ZELLE, Boris A ; MULLER-HEINE, Assia ; KRETTEK, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Femoral nail removal has been suggested as a routine procedure for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether asymptomatic patients have long-term complaints after femoral nail removal. Additionally, factors that might extend operation time and effect soft tissue healing negatively were analyzed. A retrospective study on the removal of 164 femoral nails after fracture consolidation was done. A review of the patient charts and radiographs was done. Neither the interval between nail implantation and nail removal or the use of an end-cap significantly influenced the operation time. The surgeon's qualification and nail depth were the only variables that influenced operation time. Neither operation time, nail depth, surgeon's qualification, nor the grade of heterotopic ossification significantly influenced the incidence of wound healing problems. One hundred nine patients (73%) were available for the followup interview. Preoperatively, 58 patients (53%) had local complaints. Of these 58 patients, 78% reported improvement and 7% reported an aggravation of their local complaints. Of the 51 patients who were asymptomatic before surgery, 20% reported long-term complaints at followup. Only symptomatic patients should be considered for femoral nail removal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1132</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000130208.90879.67</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15232453</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CORTBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Nails ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Device Removal ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; Femoral Fractures - surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><ispartof>Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2004-06, Vol.423 (423), p.222-226</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bbaccf18783b08ab177efeec30b94f8d78a2323f30759dc76900b5e2e42a0d373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bbaccf18783b08ab177efeec30b94f8d78a2323f30759dc76900b5e2e42a0d373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15889271$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15232453$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GÖSLING, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUFNER, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANKEMEIER, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZELLE, Boris A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MULLER-HEINE, Assia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRETTEK, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients</title><title>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><description>Femoral nail removal has been suggested as a routine procedure for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether asymptomatic patients have long-term complaints after femoral nail removal. Additionally, factors that might extend operation time and effect soft tissue healing negatively were analyzed. A retrospective study on the removal of 164 femoral nails after fracture consolidation was done. A review of the patient charts and radiographs was done. Neither the interval between nail implantation and nail removal or the use of an end-cap significantly influenced the operation time. The surgeon's qualification and nail depth were the only variables that influenced operation time. Neither operation time, nail depth, surgeon's qualification, nor the grade of heterotopic ossification significantly influenced the incidence of wound healing problems. One hundred nine patients (73%) were available for the followup interview. Preoperatively, 58 patients (53%) had local complaints. Of these 58 patients, 78% reported improvement and 7% reported an aggravation of their local complaints. Of the 51 patients who were asymptomatic before surgery, 20% reported long-term complaints at followup. Only symptomatic patients should be considered for femoral nail removal.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Nails</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><issn>0009-921X</issn><issn>1528-1132</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_ghRB71pPkrZJvNPhVBh4o-BdSNIUK-mHSSfs35u5wsxFwhue5D08CF1hyDAIdgs4067PIC5MgQDPBHAmspIdoTkuCE8xpuQYzSMgUkHwxwydhfAVI80LcopmEaIkL-gcPaxs23vlkk41LvEx_MQQPvuNqxJt400YfWNGWyVNl6iwbYexb9XYmGSIu-3GcI5OauWCvZjOBXpfPb4tn9P169PL8n6dmtg6plorY2rMGacauNKYMVtbayhokde8YlzFoWhNgRWiMqwUALqwxOZEQUUZXaCb_b-D7783cS7ZNsFY51Rn-02QZVkyirmI4N0eNL4PwdtaDr5pld9KDHJnUAKW0aA8GJR_BmW5a7mcWja6tdXh6aQsAtcToIJRrvaqM034x3EuCMP0F5bretg</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>GÖSLING, Thomas</creator><creator>HUFNER, Tobias</creator><creator>HANKEMEIER, Stefan</creator><creator>ZELLE, Boris A</creator><creator>MULLER-HEINE, Assia</creator><creator>KRETTEK, Christian</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients</title><author>GÖSLING, Thomas ; HUFNER, Tobias ; HANKEMEIER, Stefan ; ZELLE, Boris A ; MULLER-HEINE, Assia ; KRETTEK, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-bbaccf18783b08ab177efeec30b94f8d78a2323f30759dc76900b5e2e42a0d373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Nails</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GÖSLING, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUFNER, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANKEMEIER, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZELLE, Boris A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MULLER-HEINE, Assia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRETTEK, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GÖSLING, Thomas</au><au>HUFNER, Tobias</au><au>HANKEMEIER, Stefan</au><au>ZELLE, Boris A</au><au>MULLER-HEINE, Assia</au><au>KRETTEK, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients</atitle><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>423</volume><issue>423</issue><spage>222</spage><epage>226</epage><pages>222-226</pages><issn>0009-921X</issn><eissn>1528-1132</eissn><coden>CORTBR</coden><abstract>Femoral nail removal has been suggested as a routine procedure for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether asymptomatic patients have long-term complaints after femoral nail removal. Additionally, factors that might extend operation time and effect soft tissue healing negatively were analyzed. A retrospective study on the removal of 164 femoral nails after fracture consolidation was done. A review of the patient charts and radiographs was done. Neither the interval between nail implantation and nail removal or the use of an end-cap significantly influenced the operation time. The surgeon's qualification and nail depth were the only variables that influenced operation time. Neither operation time, nail depth, surgeon's qualification, nor the grade of heterotopic ossification significantly influenced the incidence of wound healing problems. One hundred nine patients (73%) were available for the followup interview. Preoperatively, 58 patients (53%) had local complaints. Of these 58 patients, 78% reported improvement and 7% reported an aggravation of their local complaints. Of the 51 patients who were asymptomatic before surgery, 20% reported long-term complaints at followup. Only symptomatic patients should be considered for femoral nail removal.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>15232453</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.blo.0000130208.90879.67</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-921X |
ispartof | Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2004-06, Vol.423 (423), p.222-226 |
issn | 0009-921X 1528-1132 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66673189 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Analysis of Variance Biological and medical sciences Bone Nails Chi-Square Distribution Device Removal Diseases of the osteoarticular system Female Femoral Fractures - surgery Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - instrumentation Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Retrospective Studies Statistics, Nonparametric |
title | Femoral nail removal should be restricted in asymptomatic patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T12%3A43%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Femoral%20nail%20removal%20should%20be%20restricted%20in%20asymptomatic%20patients&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=G%C3%96SLING,%20Thomas&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=423&rft.issue=423&rft.spage=222&rft.epage=226&rft.pages=222-226&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft.eissn=1528-1132&rft.coden=CORTBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.blo.0000130208.90879.67&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66673189%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=66673189&rft_id=info:pmid/15232453&rfr_iscdi=true |