Reliability of family report for the Gross Motor Function Classification System
The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of family reports for the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), a condition-specific discriminative measure of severity of movement disability for children with cerebral palsy (CP). We conducted a cross-sectional survey using a sho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Developmental medicine and child neurology 2004-07, Vol.46 (7), p.455-460 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 460 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 455 |
container_title | Developmental medicine and child neurology |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Morris, Christopher Galuppi, Barbara E Rosenbaum, Peter L |
description | The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of family reports for the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), a condition-specific discriminative measure of severity of movement disability for children with cerebral palsy (CP). We conducted a cross-sectional survey using a short questionnaire with families of children with CP for whom we already had ratings of GMFCS level made by a health professional. We assessed the potentially confounding effect of whether the family had discussed the GMFCS with a professional. Two hundred and one questionnaires were posted to families of which 97 (48%) were completed and returned. Mean age of the children (53 males, 40 females) was 9 years 5 months (SD 1 year 1 month), range 6 to 11 years. Children of the families who responded encompassed the spectrum of types and distribution of impairment and severity of movement disability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of agreement between professionals and families who had discussed their child's GMFCS level with a health professional (n=35) was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96 to 0.98); for those who had not (n=52) the ICC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.93); and for the whole sample (n=93) the ICC was 0.94 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96). Stability between ratings made by health professionals for children when they were in the 4 to 6 year age band of the GMFCS and ratings made by families for the same children when they were in the 6 to 12 year age band (n=35) was ICC=0.96 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.97). The excellent agreement demonstrated in this study suggests that family reports of the GMFCS made by using our questionnaire provide a reliable method for measuring gross motor function in children between 6 and 12 years old. This might be more efficient for observational studies of large populations, experimental research, or community health administration than direct observation, particularly when professional assessment is not feasible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0012162204000751 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66668372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0012162204000751</cupid><sourcerecordid>66668372</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-8f8aecb598745d2dd31303ec469989e73dfae049f78602e3d3b508f8480122e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMo7vrnA3iR4sFbNWmSNjnK4q7CyoKr55K2E83SbtakPfTbm7oFRTGXMMxv3rx5CF0QfEMwyW7XGJOEpEmCGcY44-QATQlLZSwyJg_RdGjHQ3-CTrzfBIamnB2jCeEJxYyLKVo9Q21UYWrT9pHVkVaNqfvIwc66NtLWRe07RAtnvY-ebBvqebctW2O30axW3httSvVVrnvfQnOGjrSqPZyP_yl6nd-_zB7i5WrxOLtbxiVNRRsLLRSUBZfBKa-SqqKEYgplMC-FhIxWWgFmUmcixQnQihYchyEmwkkJMHqKrve6O2c_OvBt3hhfQl2rLdjO52l4gmZJAK9-gRvbuW3wlhPJucQZJgEie6gcDnWg850zjXJ9TnA-RJ3_iTrMXI7CXdFA9T0xZhsAOoqqpnCmeoMfq_-V_QRWD4by</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195590701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of family report for the Gross Motor Function Classification System</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Morris, Christopher ; Galuppi, Barbara E ; Rosenbaum, Peter L</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris, Christopher ; Galuppi, Barbara E ; Rosenbaum, Peter L</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of family reports for the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), a condition-specific discriminative measure of severity of movement disability for children with cerebral palsy (CP). We conducted a cross-sectional survey using a short questionnaire with families of children with CP for whom we already had ratings of GMFCS level made by a health professional. We assessed the potentially confounding effect of whether the family had discussed the GMFCS with a professional. Two hundred and one questionnaires were posted to families of which 97 (48%) were completed and returned. Mean age of the children (53 males, 40 females) was 9 years 5 months (SD 1 year 1 month), range 6 to 11 years. Children of the families who responded encompassed the spectrum of types and distribution of impairment and severity of movement disability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of agreement between professionals and families who had discussed their child's GMFCS level with a health professional (n=35) was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96 to 0.98); for those who had not (n=52) the ICC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.93); and for the whole sample (n=93) the ICC was 0.94 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96). Stability between ratings made by health professionals for children when they were in the 4 to 6 year age band of the GMFCS and ratings made by families for the same children when they were in the 6 to 12 year age band (n=35) was ICC=0.96 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.97). The excellent agreement demonstrated in this study suggests that family reports of the GMFCS made by using our questionnaire provide a reliable method for measuring gross motor function in children between 6 and 12 years old. This might be more efficient for observational studies of large populations, experimental research, or community health administration than direct observation, particularly when professional assessment is not feasible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8749</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0012162204000751</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15230458</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DMCNAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cerebral Palsy ; Check Lists ; Child ; Correlation ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disabled Children ; Family ; Family (Sociological Unit) ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Functional Behavioral Assessment ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Motor Development ; Motor Skills Disorders - classification ; Motor Skills Disorders - diagnosis ; Motor Skills Disorders - epidemiology ; Observation ; Observer Variation ; Original Articles ; Professional Competence ; Public Health ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Severity (of Disability) ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2004-07, Vol.46 (7), p.455-460</ispartof><rights>2004 Mac Keith Press</rights><rights>Copyright Mac Keith Press Jul 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-8f8aecb598745d2dd31303ec469989e73dfae049f78602e3d3b508f8480122e43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15230458$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galuppi, Barbara E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Peter L</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of family report for the Gross Motor Function Classification System</title><title>Developmental medicine and child neurology</title><addtitle>Dev. med. child neurol</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of family reports for the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), a condition-specific discriminative measure of severity of movement disability for children with cerebral palsy (CP). We conducted a cross-sectional survey using a short questionnaire with families of children with CP for whom we already had ratings of GMFCS level made by a health professional. We assessed the potentially confounding effect of whether the family had discussed the GMFCS with a professional. Two hundred and one questionnaires were posted to families of which 97 (48%) were completed and returned. Mean age of the children (53 males, 40 females) was 9 years 5 months (SD 1 year 1 month), range 6 to 11 years. Children of the families who responded encompassed the spectrum of types and distribution of impairment and severity of movement disability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of agreement between professionals and families who had discussed their child's GMFCS level with a health professional (n=35) was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96 to 0.98); for those who had not (n=52) the ICC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.93); and for the whole sample (n=93) the ICC was 0.94 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96). Stability between ratings made by health professionals for children when they were in the 4 to 6 year age band of the GMFCS and ratings made by families for the same children when they were in the 6 to 12 year age band (n=35) was ICC=0.96 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.97). The excellent agreement demonstrated in this study suggests that family reports of the GMFCS made by using our questionnaire provide a reliable method for measuring gross motor function in children between 6 and 12 years old. This might be more efficient for observational studies of large populations, experimental research, or community health administration than direct observation, particularly when professional assessment is not feasible.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cerebral Palsy</subject><subject>Check Lists</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disabled Children</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family (Sociological Unit)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Functional Behavioral Assessment</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor Development</subject><subject>Motor Skills Disorders - classification</subject><subject>Motor Skills Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Motor Skills Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Severity (of Disability)</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0012-1622</issn><issn>1469-8749</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMo7vrnA3iR4sFbNWmSNjnK4q7CyoKr55K2E83SbtakPfTbm7oFRTGXMMxv3rx5CF0QfEMwyW7XGJOEpEmCGcY44-QATQlLZSwyJg_RdGjHQ3-CTrzfBIamnB2jCeEJxYyLKVo9Q21UYWrT9pHVkVaNqfvIwc66NtLWRe07RAtnvY-ebBvqebctW2O30axW3httSvVVrnvfQnOGjrSqPZyP_yl6nd-_zB7i5WrxOLtbxiVNRRsLLRSUBZfBKa-SqqKEYgplMC-FhIxWWgFmUmcixQnQihYchyEmwkkJMHqKrve6O2c_OvBt3hhfQl2rLdjO52l4gmZJAK9-gRvbuW3wlhPJucQZJgEie6gcDnWg850zjXJ9TnA-RJ3_iTrMXI7CXdFA9T0xZhsAOoqqpnCmeoMfq_-V_QRWD4by</recordid><startdate>200407</startdate><enddate>200407</enddate><creator>Morris, Christopher</creator><creator>Galuppi, Barbara E</creator><creator>Rosenbaum, Peter L</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Mac Keith Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200407</creationdate><title>Reliability of family report for the Gross Motor Function Classification System</title><author>Morris, Christopher ; Galuppi, Barbara E ; Rosenbaum, Peter L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-8f8aecb598745d2dd31303ec469989e73dfae049f78602e3d3b508f8480122e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cerebral Palsy</topic><topic>Check Lists</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disabled Children</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family (Sociological Unit)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Functional Behavioral Assessment</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor Development</topic><topic>Motor Skills Disorders - classification</topic><topic>Motor Skills Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Motor Skills Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Severity (of Disability)</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galuppi, Barbara E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Peter L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Developmental medicine and child neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, Christopher</au><au>Galuppi, Barbara E</au><au>Rosenbaum, Peter L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of family report for the Gross Motor Function Classification System</atitle><jtitle>Developmental medicine and child neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Dev. med. child neurol</addtitle><date>2004-07</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>455</spage><epage>460</epage><pages>455-460</pages><issn>0012-1622</issn><eissn>1469-8749</eissn><coden>DMCNAW</coden><abstract>The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of family reports for the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), a condition-specific discriminative measure of severity of movement disability for children with cerebral palsy (CP). We conducted a cross-sectional survey using a short questionnaire with families of children with CP for whom we already had ratings of GMFCS level made by a health professional. We assessed the potentially confounding effect of whether the family had discussed the GMFCS with a professional. Two hundred and one questionnaires were posted to families of which 97 (48%) were completed and returned. Mean age of the children (53 males, 40 females) was 9 years 5 months (SD 1 year 1 month), range 6 to 11 years. Children of the families who responded encompassed the spectrum of types and distribution of impairment and severity of movement disability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of agreement between professionals and families who had discussed their child's GMFCS level with a health professional (n=35) was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96 to 0.98); for those who had not (n=52) the ICC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.93); and for the whole sample (n=93) the ICC was 0.94 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96). Stability between ratings made by health professionals for children when they were in the 4 to 6 year age band of the GMFCS and ratings made by families for the same children when they were in the 6 to 12 year age band (n=35) was ICC=0.96 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.97). The excellent agreement demonstrated in this study suggests that family reports of the GMFCS made by using our questionnaire provide a reliable method for measuring gross motor function in children between 6 and 12 years old. This might be more efficient for observational studies of large populations, experimental research, or community health administration than direct observation, particularly when professional assessment is not feasible.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>15230458</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0012162204000751</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-1622 |
ispartof | Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2004-07, Vol.46 (7), p.455-460 |
issn | 0012-1622 1469-8749 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66668372 |
source | Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Cerebral Palsy Check Lists Child Correlation Cross-Sectional Studies Disabled Children Family Family (Sociological Unit) Female Follow-Up Studies Functional Behavioral Assessment Health Personnel Humans Longitudinal Studies Male Motor Development Motor Skills Disorders - classification Motor Skills Disorders - diagnosis Motor Skills Disorders - epidemiology Observation Observer Variation Original Articles Professional Competence Public Health Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results Severity (of Disability) Surveys and Questionnaires Young Children |
title | Reliability of family report for the Gross Motor Function Classification System |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T07%3A22%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20family%20report%20for%20the%20Gross%20Motor%20Function%20Classification%20System&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20medicine%20and%20child%20neurology&rft.au=Morris,%20Christopher&rft.date=2004-07&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=460&rft.pages=455-460&rft.issn=0012-1622&rft.eissn=1469-8749&rft.coden=DMCNAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0012162204000751&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66668372%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195590701&rft_id=info:pmid/15230458&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0012162204000751&rfr_iscdi=true |