Likelihood of additional work-up among women undergoing routine screening mammography: the impact of age, breast density, and hormone therapy use

Background. Mammography screening can involve subsequent work-up to determine a final screening outcome. Understanding the likelihood of different events that follow initial screening is important if women and their health care providers are to be accurately informed about the screening process. Met...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventive medicine 2004-07, Vol.39 (1), p.48-55
Hauptverfasser: Carney, Patricia A, Kasales, Claudia J, Tosteson, Anna N.A, Weiss, Julia E, Goodrich, Martha E, Poplack, Steven P, Wells, Wendy S, Titus-Ernstoff, Linda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background. Mammography screening can involve subsequent work-up to determine a final screening outcome. Understanding the likelihood of different events that follow initial screening is important if women and their health care providers are to be accurately informed about the screening process. Methods. We conducted an analysis of additional work-up following screening mammography to characterize use of supplemental imaging and recommendations for biopsy and/or surgical consultation and the factors associated with their use. We included all events following screening mammography performed between 1/1/1998 and 12/31/1999 on a population-based sample of 37,632 New Hampshire women. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for supplemental imaging and recommended biopsy and/or surgical consultation as function of age, menopausal status and HRT use, breast density, and family history of breast cancer. Results. Ninety-one percent of women ( n = 34,445) did not require supplemental imaging. Among those who did ( n = 3187), 84% had additional views, 9% ultrasound, and 7% received both. Supplemental imaging was affected by age (OR 0.84; 95% CI = 0.76–0.94 for 50–59; OR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.58–0.75 for ≥60 versus < 50), menopausal status, and HRT use (OR = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.21–1.47 for peri- or post-menopausal HRT users; OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.01–1.29 for premenopausal versus peri- or post-menopausal non-HRT users), breast density (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.33–1.55 for dense versus fatty breasts) and family history (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.06–1.25 for any versus none). In women with supplemental imaging, age (OR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.11–2.90 for ≥60, relative to
ISSN:0091-7435
1096-0260
DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.025