Molecular Phylogeny, Historical Biogeography, and Divergence Time Estimates for Swallowtail Butterflies of the Genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)
Swallowtail butterflies are recognized as model organisms in ecology, evolutionary biology, genetics, and conservation biology but present numerous unresolved phylogenetic problems. We inferred phylogenetic relationships for 51 of about 205 species of the genus Papilio (sensu lato) from 3.3-Kilobase...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Systematic biology 2004-04, Vol.53 (2), p.193-215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 215 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 193 |
container_title | Systematic biology |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Zakharov, Evgueni V. Caterino, Michael S. Sperling, Felix A.H. Schultz, Ted |
description | Swallowtail butterflies are recognized as model organisms in ecology, evolutionary biology, genetics, and conservation biology but present numerous unresolved phylogenetic problems. We inferred phylogenetic relationships for 51 of about 205 species of the genus Papilio (sensu lato) from 3.3-Kilobase (kb) sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA (2.3 kb of cytochrome oxidases I and II and 1.0 kb of elongation factor 1α). Congruent phylogenetic trees were recovered within Papilio from analyses of combined data using maximum likelihood, Bayesian analysis, and maximum parsimony bootstrap consensus. Several disagreements with the traditional classification of Papilio were found. Five major previously hypothesized subdivisions within Papilio were well supported: Heraclides, Pterourus, Chilasa, Papilio (sensu stricto), and Eleppone. Further studies are required to clarify relationships within traditional “Princeps,” which was paraphyletic. Several biologically interesting characteristics of Papilio appear to have polyphyletic origins, including mimetic adults, larval host associations, and larval morphology. Early diversification within Papilio is estimated at 55–65 million years ago based on a combination of biogeographic time constraints rather than fossils. This divergence time suggests that Papilio has slower apparent substitution rates than do Drosophila and fig-pollinating wasps and/or divergences corrected using best-fit substitution models are still being consistently underestimated. The amount of sequence divergence between Papilio subdivisions is equivalent to divergences between genera in other tribes of the Papilionidae, and between genera of moths of the noctuid subfamily Heliothinae. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10635150490423403 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66651915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4135408</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1080/10635150490423403</oup_id><sourcerecordid>4135408</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-3779f9c79be27c8d84d4014be587ff82b1684da3f363959f7ea59906dc389d713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEoj_wAEgIWSwQSA3Y8V_MDoa2AxqgEoOo2Fie5KbjqSdO7YQyb8Lj4miGIsECVrbu-c6RfI-z7AHBzwku8QuCBeWEY6YwKyjD9Fa2T7AUeUnF-e3xLmieALmXHcS4wpgQwcndbI_wAo-2_ezHe--gGpwJ6Gy5cf4C2s0RmtrY-2Ar49Brm2b-IphumQTT1uiN_QYhcRWguV0DOo69XZseImp8QJ-ujXP-ujc2eYe-h9A4mzTfoH4J6BTaIaIz01lnPXo6g87WvkuUeflr2trawLN72Z3GuAj3d-dh9vnkeD6Z5rOPp28nr2Z5xQXucyqlalQl1QIKWZV1yWqGCVsAL2XTlMWCiDQytKGCKq4aCYYrhUVd0VLVktDD7Mk2twv-aoDY67WNFThnWvBD1EKklSnC_wkSqaTibAQf_wGu_BDa9AhNFJMSk7JIENlCVfAxBmh0F9IWw0YTrMdy9V_lJs-jXfCwWEP927FrMwFHW8AP3X_lPdziq7HtGwMjlDNcJjnfyukzwPcb2YRLLSSVXE_Pv-oPJ_Mv5B2e6IL-BFbKxKs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194770182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Molecular Phylogeny, Historical Biogeography, and Divergence Time Estimates for Swallowtail Butterflies of the Genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Zakharov, Evgueni V. ; Caterino, Michael S. ; Sperling, Felix A.H. ; Schultz, Ted</creator><contributor>Schultz, Ted</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zakharov, Evgueni V. ; Caterino, Michael S. ; Sperling, Felix A.H. ; Schultz, Ted ; Schultz, Ted</creatorcontrib><description>Swallowtail butterflies are recognized as model organisms in ecology, evolutionary biology, genetics, and conservation biology but present numerous unresolved phylogenetic problems. We inferred phylogenetic relationships for 51 of about 205 species of the genus Papilio (sensu lato) from 3.3-Kilobase (kb) sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA (2.3 kb of cytochrome oxidases I and II and 1.0 kb of elongation factor 1α). Congruent phylogenetic trees were recovered within Papilio from analyses of combined data using maximum likelihood, Bayesian analysis, and maximum parsimony bootstrap consensus. Several disagreements with the traditional classification of Papilio were found. Five major previously hypothesized subdivisions within Papilio were well supported: Heraclides, Pterourus, Chilasa, Papilio (sensu stricto), and Eleppone. Further studies are required to clarify relationships within traditional “Princeps,” which was paraphyletic. Several biologically interesting characteristics of Papilio appear to have polyphyletic origins, including mimetic adults, larval host associations, and larval morphology. Early diversification within Papilio is estimated at 55–65 million years ago based on a combination of biogeographic time constraints rather than fossils. This divergence time suggests that Papilio has slower apparent substitution rates than do Drosophila and fig-pollinating wasps and/or divergences corrected using best-fit substitution models are still being consistently underestimated. The amount of sequence divergence between Papilio subdivisions is equivalent to divergences between genera in other tribes of the Papilionidae, and between genera of moths of the noctuid subfamily Heliothinae.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-5157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1076-836X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10635150490423403</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15205049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Society of Systematic Zoology</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animals ; Base Sequence ; Bayes Theorem ; Biological taxonomies ; Butterflies ; Butterflies & moths ; Butterflies - anatomy & histology ; Butterflies - classification ; Butterflies - genetics ; Butterflies - physiology ; Character evolution ; Datasets ; DNA, Mitochondrial - genetics ; Evolution ; Evolution, Molecular ; Evolutionary biology ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Fossils ; Geography ; Larva - anatomy & histology ; Larva - physiology ; Larvae ; Likelihood Functions ; mimicry ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Models, Genetic ; Molecular Sequence Data ; molecular systematics ; Papilio ; Papilionidae ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; substitution rates ; swallowtail butterflies ; Taxa ; Time Factors ; We they distinction ; Wings, Animal - anatomy & histology</subject><ispartof>Systematic biology, 2004-04, Vol.53 (2), p.193-215</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Society of Systematic Biologists</rights><rights>2004 Society of Systematic Biologists 2004</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Systematic Biologists Apr 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-3779f9c79be27c8d84d4014be587ff82b1684da3f363959f7ea59906dc389d713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-3779f9c79be27c8d84d4014be587ff82b1684da3f363959f7ea59906dc389d713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4135408$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4135408$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15205049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Schultz, Ted</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zakharov, Evgueni V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caterino, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sperling, Felix A.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Ted</creatorcontrib><title>Molecular Phylogeny, Historical Biogeography, and Divergence Time Estimates for Swallowtail Butterflies of the Genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)</title><title>Systematic biology</title><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><description>Swallowtail butterflies are recognized as model organisms in ecology, evolutionary biology, genetics, and conservation biology but present numerous unresolved phylogenetic problems. We inferred phylogenetic relationships for 51 of about 205 species of the genus Papilio (sensu lato) from 3.3-Kilobase (kb) sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA (2.3 kb of cytochrome oxidases I and II and 1.0 kb of elongation factor 1α). Congruent phylogenetic trees were recovered within Papilio from analyses of combined data using maximum likelihood, Bayesian analysis, and maximum parsimony bootstrap consensus. Several disagreements with the traditional classification of Papilio were found. Five major previously hypothesized subdivisions within Papilio were well supported: Heraclides, Pterourus, Chilasa, Papilio (sensu stricto), and Eleppone. Further studies are required to clarify relationships within traditional “Princeps,” which was paraphyletic. Several biologically interesting characteristics of Papilio appear to have polyphyletic origins, including mimetic adults, larval host associations, and larval morphology. Early diversification within Papilio is estimated at 55–65 million years ago based on a combination of biogeographic time constraints rather than fossils. This divergence time suggests that Papilio has slower apparent substitution rates than do Drosophila and fig-pollinating wasps and/or divergences corrected using best-fit substitution models are still being consistently underestimated. The amount of sequence divergence between Papilio subdivisions is equivalent to divergences between genera in other tribes of the Papilionidae, and between genera of moths of the noctuid subfamily Heliothinae.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Base Sequence</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Butterflies</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Butterflies - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Butterflies - classification</subject><subject>Butterflies - genetics</subject><subject>Butterflies - physiology</subject><subject>Character evolution</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>DNA, Mitochondrial - genetics</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Larva - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Larva - physiology</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>mimicry</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>molecular systematics</subject><subject>Papilio</subject><subject>Papilionidae</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>substitution rates</subject><subject>swallowtail butterflies</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>We they distinction</subject><subject>Wings, Animal - anatomy & histology</subject><issn>1063-5157</issn><issn>1076-836X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEoj_wAEgIWSwQSA3Y8V_MDoa2AxqgEoOo2Fie5KbjqSdO7YQyb8Lj4miGIsECVrbu-c6RfI-z7AHBzwku8QuCBeWEY6YwKyjD9Fa2T7AUeUnF-e3xLmieALmXHcS4wpgQwcndbI_wAo-2_ezHe--gGpwJ6Gy5cf4C2s0RmtrY-2Ar49Brm2b-IphumQTT1uiN_QYhcRWguV0DOo69XZseImp8QJ-ujXP-ujc2eYe-h9A4mzTfoH4J6BTaIaIz01lnPXo6g87WvkuUeflr2trawLN72Z3GuAj3d-dh9vnkeD6Z5rOPp28nr2Z5xQXucyqlalQl1QIKWZV1yWqGCVsAL2XTlMWCiDQytKGCKq4aCYYrhUVd0VLVktDD7Mk2twv-aoDY67WNFThnWvBD1EKklSnC_wkSqaTibAQf_wGu_BDa9AhNFJMSk7JIENlCVfAxBmh0F9IWw0YTrMdy9V_lJs-jXfCwWEP927FrMwFHW8AP3X_lPdziq7HtGwMjlDNcJjnfyukzwPcb2YRLLSSVXE_Pv-oPJ_Mv5B2e6IL-BFbKxKs</recordid><startdate>200404</startdate><enddate>200404</enddate><creator>Zakharov, Evgueni V.</creator><creator>Caterino, Michael S.</creator><creator>Sperling, Felix A.H.</creator><creator>Schultz, Ted</creator><general>Society of Systematic Zoology</general><general>Taylor and Francis</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200404</creationdate><title>Molecular Phylogeny, Historical Biogeography, and Divergence Time Estimates for Swallowtail Butterflies of the Genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)</title><author>Zakharov, Evgueni V. ; Caterino, Michael S. ; Sperling, Felix A.H. ; Schultz, Ted</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-3779f9c79be27c8d84d4014be587ff82b1684da3f363959f7ea59906dc389d713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Base Sequence</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Butterflies</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Butterflies - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Butterflies - classification</topic><topic>Butterflies - genetics</topic><topic>Butterflies - physiology</topic><topic>Character evolution</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>DNA, Mitochondrial - genetics</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Larva - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Larva - physiology</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>mimicry</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>molecular systematics</topic><topic>Papilio</topic><topic>Papilionidae</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>substitution rates</topic><topic>swallowtail butterflies</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>We they distinction</topic><topic>Wings, Animal - anatomy & histology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zakharov, Evgueni V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caterino, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sperling, Felix A.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Ted</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zakharov, Evgueni V.</au><au>Caterino, Michael S.</au><au>Sperling, Felix A.H.</au><au>Schultz, Ted</au><au>Schultz, Ted</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Molecular Phylogeny, Historical Biogeography, and Divergence Time Estimates for Swallowtail Butterflies of the Genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)</atitle><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><date>2004-04</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>193-215</pages><issn>1063-5157</issn><eissn>1076-836X</eissn><abstract>Swallowtail butterflies are recognized as model organisms in ecology, evolutionary biology, genetics, and conservation biology but present numerous unresolved phylogenetic problems. We inferred phylogenetic relationships for 51 of about 205 species of the genus Papilio (sensu lato) from 3.3-Kilobase (kb) sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA (2.3 kb of cytochrome oxidases I and II and 1.0 kb of elongation factor 1α). Congruent phylogenetic trees were recovered within Papilio from analyses of combined data using maximum likelihood, Bayesian analysis, and maximum parsimony bootstrap consensus. Several disagreements with the traditional classification of Papilio were found. Five major previously hypothesized subdivisions within Papilio were well supported: Heraclides, Pterourus, Chilasa, Papilio (sensu stricto), and Eleppone. Further studies are required to clarify relationships within traditional “Princeps,” which was paraphyletic. Several biologically interesting characteristics of Papilio appear to have polyphyletic origins, including mimetic adults, larval host associations, and larval morphology. Early diversification within Papilio is estimated at 55–65 million years ago based on a combination of biogeographic time constraints rather than fossils. This divergence time suggests that Papilio has slower apparent substitution rates than do Drosophila and fig-pollinating wasps and/or divergences corrected using best-fit substitution models are still being consistently underestimated. The amount of sequence divergence between Papilio subdivisions is equivalent to divergences between genera in other tribes of the Papilionidae, and between genera of moths of the noctuid subfamily Heliothinae.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Society of Systematic Zoology</pub><pmid>15205049</pmid><doi>10.1080/10635150490423403</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1063-5157 |
ispartof | Systematic biology, 2004-04, Vol.53 (2), p.193-215 |
issn | 1063-5157 1076-836X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66651915 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Animal behavior Animals Base Sequence Bayes Theorem Biological taxonomies Butterflies Butterflies & moths Butterflies - anatomy & histology Butterflies - classification Butterflies - genetics Butterflies - physiology Character evolution Datasets DNA, Mitochondrial - genetics Evolution Evolution, Molecular Evolutionary biology Feeding Behavior - physiology Fossils Geography Larva - anatomy & histology Larva - physiology Larvae Likelihood Functions mimicry Mitochondrial DNA Models, Genetic Molecular Sequence Data molecular systematics Papilio Papilionidae Phylogenetics Phylogeny Sequence Analysis, DNA substitution rates swallowtail butterflies Taxa Time Factors We they distinction Wings, Animal - anatomy & histology |
title | Molecular Phylogeny, Historical Biogeography, and Divergence Time Estimates for Swallowtail Butterflies of the Genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T20%3A32%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Molecular%20Phylogeny,%20Historical%20Biogeography,%20and%20Divergence%20Time%20Estimates%20for%20Swallowtail%20Butterflies%20of%20the%20Genus%20Papilio%20(Lepidoptera:%20Papilionidae)&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20biology&rft.au=Zakharov,%20Evgueni%20V.&rft.date=2004-04&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=193-215&rft.issn=1063-5157&rft.eissn=1076-836X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10635150490423403&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4135408%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194770182&rft_id=info:pmid/15205049&rft_jstor_id=4135408&rft_oup_id=10.1080/10635150490423403&rfr_iscdi=true |