Rodent strain differences in the NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptor distribution and density in the central nervous system
The present study evaluates the putative differences between NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptor distribution and density throughout the central nervous system between rat and mouse strains by using in vitro quantitative autoradiography. The binding of [125I]YVP ([125I]YVPNLPQRF-NH2) and [125I]EYF ([125I]EYWSL...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain research 2004-07, Vol.1014 (1-2), p.61-70 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 70 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 61 |
container_title | Brain research |
container_volume | 1014 |
creator | GOUARDERES, C FAURA, C. C ZAJAC, J.-M |
description | The present study evaluates the putative differences between NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptor distribution and density throughout the central nervous system between rat and mouse strains by using in vitro quantitative autoradiography. The binding of [125I]YVP ([125I]YVPNLPQRF-NH2) and [125I]EYF ([125I]EYWSLAAPQRF-NH2), used to label NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptors, respectively, was compared between Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats and between Swiss and C57BL/6-SV129 mice. In contrast to Wistar, Sprague-Dawley brains contained NPFF1 binding sites in the cortical and spinal cord areas, the accumbens nucleus, the anterodorsal thalamic nucleus, the parafascicular thalamic nucleus, the inferior colliculus and the nucleus of the solitary tract. The distribution of NPFF2 binding sites was also different between the two strains of rats. As compared to Swiss, C57BL/6-SV129 mice showed higher basal NPFF2 receptor levels in cortical areas, telencephalon and some other regions. In contrast, they showed lower amounts in thalamic structures, except the reuniens nucleus, and in mesencephalic and rhombencephalic regions. In the cervical spinal cord the levels of NPFF2 receptors were similar. The NPFF1 binding levels were nearly the same in telencephalic structures while distinct in the forebrain. Differences in amount of NPFF receptor subtypes among these strains of rats or mice could lead to differences in NPFF control of opioid nociception. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.04.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66646925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17850179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-af4c03af594f051943dac41c744f3ee2a3f7d42d47ddb43c20941639c80775193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtLxDAQhYMoul7-gvRF37pOLk2bRxFXBVERfQ7ZZIJduu2aZIX996a6om_CQDLMd84MHEJOKUwpUHmxmM6DafuAccoAxHQsqHbIhDY1KyUTsEsmACDLRil-QA5jXOSWcwX75IBWjDKl2ISsngeHfSpiGu0K13qPAXuLschtesPi4Wk2o4Xp3dePFQEtrtIQMptF7Xyd2qH_mmej2KbNj9Bm32C6osfwMaxjETcx4fKY7HnTRTzZvkfkdXb9cnVb3j_e3F1d3pdWcJFK44UFbnylhIeKKsGdsYLaWgjPEZnhvnaCOVE7NxfcMlCCSq5sA3WdeX5Ezr99V2F4X2NMetlGi11neszXaCmlkIpV_4K0biqg9egov0EbhhgDer0K7dKEjaagx1D0Qv-EosdQ9FgwbjjdbljPl-h-ZdsUMnC2BUy0pvPB9LaNf7h8J2sU_wRTRZgH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17850179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rodent strain differences in the NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptor distribution and density in the central nervous system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>GOUARDERES, C ; FAURA, C. C ; ZAJAC, J.-M</creator><creatorcontrib>GOUARDERES, C ; FAURA, C. C ; ZAJAC, J.-M</creatorcontrib><description>The present study evaluates the putative differences between NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptor distribution and density throughout the central nervous system between rat and mouse strains by using in vitro quantitative autoradiography. The binding of [125I]YVP ([125I]YVPNLPQRF-NH2) and [125I]EYF ([125I]EYWSLAAPQRF-NH2), used to label NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptors, respectively, was compared between Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats and between Swiss and C57BL/6-SV129 mice. In contrast to Wistar, Sprague-Dawley brains contained NPFF1 binding sites in the cortical and spinal cord areas, the accumbens nucleus, the anterodorsal thalamic nucleus, the parafascicular thalamic nucleus, the inferior colliculus and the nucleus of the solitary tract. The distribution of NPFF2 binding sites was also different between the two strains of rats. As compared to Swiss, C57BL/6-SV129 mice showed higher basal NPFF2 receptor levels in cortical areas, telencephalon and some other regions. In contrast, they showed lower amounts in thalamic structures, except the reuniens nucleus, and in mesencephalic and rhombencephalic regions. In the cervical spinal cord the levels of NPFF2 receptors were similar. The NPFF1 binding levels were nearly the same in telencephalic structures while distinct in the forebrain. Differences in amount of NPFF receptor subtypes among these strains of rats or mice could lead to differences in NPFF control of opioid nociception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.04.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15212992</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRREAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Animals ; Autoradiography ; Binding Sites ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - cytology ; Brain - metabolism ; Central nervous system ; Central neurotransmission. Neuromudulation. Pathways and receptors ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Rats, Wistar ; Receptors, Neuropeptide - analysis ; Receptors, Neuropeptide - metabolism ; Species Specificity ; Tissue Distribution ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Brain research, 2004-07, Vol.1014 (1-2), p.61-70</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-af4c03af594f051943dac41c744f3ee2a3f7d42d47ddb43c20941639c80775193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-af4c03af594f051943dac41c744f3ee2a3f7d42d47ddb43c20941639c80775193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15925289$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15212992$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GOUARDERES, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FAURA, C. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZAJAC, J.-M</creatorcontrib><title>Rodent strain differences in the NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptor distribution and density in the central nervous system</title><title>Brain research</title><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><description>The present study evaluates the putative differences between NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptor distribution and density throughout the central nervous system between rat and mouse strains by using in vitro quantitative autoradiography. The binding of [125I]YVP ([125I]YVPNLPQRF-NH2) and [125I]EYF ([125I]EYWSLAAPQRF-NH2), used to label NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptors, respectively, was compared between Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats and between Swiss and C57BL/6-SV129 mice. In contrast to Wistar, Sprague-Dawley brains contained NPFF1 binding sites in the cortical and spinal cord areas, the accumbens nucleus, the anterodorsal thalamic nucleus, the parafascicular thalamic nucleus, the inferior colliculus and the nucleus of the solitary tract. The distribution of NPFF2 binding sites was also different between the two strains of rats. As compared to Swiss, C57BL/6-SV129 mice showed higher basal NPFF2 receptor levels in cortical areas, telencephalon and some other regions. In contrast, they showed lower amounts in thalamic structures, except the reuniens nucleus, and in mesencephalic and rhombencephalic regions. In the cervical spinal cord the levels of NPFF2 receptors were similar. The NPFF1 binding levels were nearly the same in telencephalic structures while distinct in the forebrain. Differences in amount of NPFF receptor subtypes among these strains of rats or mice could lead to differences in NPFF control of opioid nociception.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoradiography</subject><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - cytology</subject><subject>Brain - metabolism</subject><subject>Central nervous system</subject><subject>Central neurotransmission. Neuromudulation. Pathways and receptors</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Receptors, Neuropeptide - analysis</subject><subject>Receptors, Neuropeptide - metabolism</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Tissue Distribution</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0006-8993</issn><issn>1872-6240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtLxDAQhYMoul7-gvRF37pOLk2bRxFXBVERfQ7ZZIJduu2aZIX996a6om_CQDLMd84MHEJOKUwpUHmxmM6DafuAccoAxHQsqHbIhDY1KyUTsEsmACDLRil-QA5jXOSWcwX75IBWjDKl2ISsngeHfSpiGu0K13qPAXuLschtesPi4Wk2o4Xp3dePFQEtrtIQMptF7Xyd2qH_mmej2KbNj9Bm32C6osfwMaxjETcx4fKY7HnTRTzZvkfkdXb9cnVb3j_e3F1d3pdWcJFK44UFbnylhIeKKsGdsYLaWgjPEZnhvnaCOVE7NxfcMlCCSq5sA3WdeX5Ezr99V2F4X2NMetlGi11neszXaCmlkIpV_4K0biqg9egov0EbhhgDer0K7dKEjaagx1D0Qv-EosdQ9FgwbjjdbljPl-h-ZdsUMnC2BUy0pvPB9LaNf7h8J2sU_wRTRZgH</recordid><startdate>20040716</startdate><enddate>20040716</enddate><creator>GOUARDERES, C</creator><creator>FAURA, C. C</creator><creator>ZAJAC, J.-M</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040716</creationdate><title>Rodent strain differences in the NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptor distribution and density in the central nervous system</title><author>GOUARDERES, C ; FAURA, C. C ; ZAJAC, J.-M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-af4c03af594f051943dac41c744f3ee2a3f7d42d47ddb43c20941639c80775193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoradiography</topic><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - cytology</topic><topic>Brain - metabolism</topic><topic>Central nervous system</topic><topic>Central neurotransmission. Neuromudulation. Pathways and receptors</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Receptors, Neuropeptide - analysis</topic><topic>Receptors, Neuropeptide - metabolism</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Tissue Distribution</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GOUARDERES, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FAURA, C. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZAJAC, J.-M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GOUARDERES, C</au><au>FAURA, C. C</au><au>ZAJAC, J.-M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rodent strain differences in the NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptor distribution and density in the central nervous system</atitle><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><date>2004-07-16</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>1014</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>61-70</pages><issn>0006-8993</issn><eissn>1872-6240</eissn><coden>BRREAP</coden><abstract>The present study evaluates the putative differences between NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptor distribution and density throughout the central nervous system between rat and mouse strains by using in vitro quantitative autoradiography. The binding of [125I]YVP ([125I]YVPNLPQRF-NH2) and [125I]EYF ([125I]EYWSLAAPQRF-NH2), used to label NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptors, respectively, was compared between Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats and between Swiss and C57BL/6-SV129 mice. In contrast to Wistar, Sprague-Dawley brains contained NPFF1 binding sites in the cortical and spinal cord areas, the accumbens nucleus, the anterodorsal thalamic nucleus, the parafascicular thalamic nucleus, the inferior colliculus and the nucleus of the solitary tract. The distribution of NPFF2 binding sites was also different between the two strains of rats. As compared to Swiss, C57BL/6-SV129 mice showed higher basal NPFF2 receptor levels in cortical areas, telencephalon and some other regions. In contrast, they showed lower amounts in thalamic structures, except the reuniens nucleus, and in mesencephalic and rhombencephalic regions. In the cervical spinal cord the levels of NPFF2 receptors were similar. The NPFF1 binding levels were nearly the same in telencephalic structures while distinct in the forebrain. Differences in amount of NPFF receptor subtypes among these strains of rats or mice could lead to differences in NPFF control of opioid nociception.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>15212992</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brainres.2004.04.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-8993 |
ispartof | Brain research, 2004-07, Vol.1014 (1-2), p.61-70 |
issn | 0006-8993 1872-6240 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66646925 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Autoradiography Binding Sites Biological and medical sciences Brain - cytology Brain - metabolism Central nervous system Central neurotransmission. Neuromudulation. Pathways and receptors Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Mice Mice, Inbred C57BL Rats Rats, Sprague-Dawley Rats, Wistar Receptors, Neuropeptide - analysis Receptors, Neuropeptide - metabolism Species Specificity Tissue Distribution Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs |
title | Rodent strain differences in the NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptor distribution and density in the central nervous system |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A35%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rodent%20strain%20differences%20in%20the%20NPFF1%20and%20NPFF2%20receptor%20distribution%20and%20density%20in%20the%20central%20nervous%20system&rft.jtitle=Brain%20research&rft.au=GOUARDERES,%20C&rft.date=2004-07-16&rft.volume=1014&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=61-70&rft.issn=0006-8993&rft.eissn=1872-6240&rft.coden=BRREAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brainres.2004.04.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17850179%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17850179&rft_id=info:pmid/15212992&rfr_iscdi=true |