Sympathetic magic in contamination-related OCD
We examined whether patients with contamination-related obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) are characterized by sympathetic magic beliefs (i.e., an irrational understanding of how contagion is transmitted). We asked OCD patients (OCs), non-anxious control participants (NACs), and anxious control pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry 2004-06, Vol.35 (2), p.193-205 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 205 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 193 |
container_title | Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Tolin, David F Worhunsky, Patrick Maltby, Nicholas |
description | We examined whether patients with contamination-related obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) are characterized by sympathetic magic beliefs (i.e., an irrational understanding of how contagion is transmitted). We asked OCD patients (OCs), non-anxious control participants (NACs), and anxious control participants (ACs) to identify a “contaminated” object and rate its degree of contamination on a 0–100 scale. Next, we touched a clean pencil to the object, and participants rated the degree to which the pencil was contaminated. A second pencil was touched to the first pencil and was then rated. This process was continued for 12 pencils (12 degrees of removal from the original object). The same process was repeated using threat-non-relevant stimuli. Results indicated that for threat-relevant stimuli, OCs seemed to perceive a “chain of contagion” in which successive degrees of removal from the original object were not rated as less contaminated. In contrast, NACs and ACs quickly identified the pencils as not contaminated, suggesting that they recognize the contamination as degrading across objects. This difference was not seen using threat-nonrelevant stimuli. We also found that ratings of looming vulnerability (a belief that the contamination is spreading, approaching, or escalating in threat value) mediated the relationship between diagnostic group and the chain of contagion. We suggest that this process may be consistent with the sympathetic magic and disease-avoidance models of disgust, and that disgust may be a fruitful area for exploration in the study of OCD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.04.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66642985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0005791604000369</els_id><sourcerecordid>66642985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-3b256db25a6dcc90636fc140c1634f24b9a58412dbecd5f83d7effa98bdca9ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQx4Motj4-gSA9edt1snns5uBB6hMKPajnkE1mNcs-6iYV-u3d2oI3heE_c_jNDPwIuaCQUqDyuk7rMuIqzQB4ui1QB2RKi5wlueLskEwBQIwzlRNyEkINQHPI4ZhMqMgosFxNSfqyaVcmfmD0dtaa9zF9N7N9F03rOxN93yUDNiaimy3nd2fkqDJNwPN9PyVvD_ev86dksXx8nt8uEstFFhNWZkK6MYx01iqQTFaWcrBUMl5lvFRGFJxmrkTrRFUwl2NVGVWUzhqFjp2Sq93d1dB_rjFE3fpgsWlMh_06aCklz1Qh_gVFDlwoQUeQ7UA79CEMWOnV4FszbDQFvfWpa_3jU2996m2BGrcu9-fXZYvud2cvcARudgCONr48DjpYj51F5we0Ubve__ngGydZhxs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57045951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sympathetic magic in contamination-related OCD</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tolin, David F ; Worhunsky, Patrick ; Maltby, Nicholas</creator><creatorcontrib>Tolin, David F ; Worhunsky, Patrick ; Maltby, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><description>We examined whether patients with contamination-related obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) are characterized by sympathetic magic beliefs (i.e., an irrational understanding of how contagion is transmitted). We asked OCD patients (OCs), non-anxious control participants (NACs), and anxious control participants (ACs) to identify a “contaminated” object and rate its degree of contamination on a 0–100 scale. Next, we touched a clean pencil to the object, and participants rated the degree to which the pencil was contaminated. A second pencil was touched to the first pencil and was then rated. This process was continued for 12 pencils (12 degrees of removal from the original object). The same process was repeated using threat-non-relevant stimuli. Results indicated that for threat-relevant stimuli, OCs seemed to perceive a “chain of contagion” in which successive degrees of removal from the original object were not rated as less contaminated. In contrast, NACs and ACs quickly identified the pencils as not contaminated, suggesting that they recognize the contamination as degrading across objects. This difference was not seen using threat-nonrelevant stimuli. We also found that ratings of looming vulnerability (a belief that the contamination is spreading, approaching, or escalating in threat value) mediated the relationship between diagnostic group and the chain of contagion. We suggest that this process may be consistent with the sympathetic magic and disease-avoidance models of disgust, and that disgust may be a fruitful area for exploration in the study of OCD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-7916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.04.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15210379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Beliefs ; Cognition ; Cognitions ; Cognitive processes ; Contamination ; Culture ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ; Disgust ; Female ; Humans ; Magic ; Magical thinking ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - diagnosis ; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - psychology ; Obsessive-Compulsive neuroses ; Obsessive–compulsive disorder ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 2004-06, Vol.35 (2), p.193-205</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-3b256db25a6dcc90636fc140c1634f24b9a58412dbecd5f83d7effa98bdca9ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-3b256db25a6dcc90636fc140c1634f24b9a58412dbecd5f83d7effa98bdca9ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791604000369$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30977,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15210379$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tolin, David F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worhunsky, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltby, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><title>Sympathetic magic in contamination-related OCD</title><title>Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry</title><addtitle>J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry</addtitle><description>We examined whether patients with contamination-related obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) are characterized by sympathetic magic beliefs (i.e., an irrational understanding of how contagion is transmitted). We asked OCD patients (OCs), non-anxious control participants (NACs), and anxious control participants (ACs) to identify a “contaminated” object and rate its degree of contamination on a 0–100 scale. Next, we touched a clean pencil to the object, and participants rated the degree to which the pencil was contaminated. A second pencil was touched to the first pencil and was then rated. This process was continued for 12 pencils (12 degrees of removal from the original object). The same process was repeated using threat-non-relevant stimuli. Results indicated that for threat-relevant stimuli, OCs seemed to perceive a “chain of contagion” in which successive degrees of removal from the original object were not rated as less contaminated. In contrast, NACs and ACs quickly identified the pencils as not contaminated, suggesting that they recognize the contamination as degrading across objects. This difference was not seen using threat-nonrelevant stimuli. We also found that ratings of looming vulnerability (a belief that the contamination is spreading, approaching, or escalating in threat value) mediated the relationship between diagnostic group and the chain of contagion. We suggest that this process may be consistent with the sympathetic magic and disease-avoidance models of disgust, and that disgust may be a fruitful area for exploration in the study of OCD.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitions</subject><subject>Cognitive processes</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Disgust</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magic</subject><subject>Magical thinking</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Obsessive-Compulsive neuroses</subject><subject>Obsessive–compulsive disorder</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0005-7916</issn><issn>1873-7943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQx4Motj4-gSA9edt1snns5uBB6hMKPajnkE1mNcs-6iYV-u3d2oI3heE_c_jNDPwIuaCQUqDyuk7rMuIqzQB4ui1QB2RKi5wlueLskEwBQIwzlRNyEkINQHPI4ZhMqMgosFxNSfqyaVcmfmD0dtaa9zF9N7N9F03rOxN93yUDNiaimy3nd2fkqDJNwPN9PyVvD_ev86dksXx8nt8uEstFFhNWZkK6MYx01iqQTFaWcrBUMl5lvFRGFJxmrkTrRFUwl2NVGVWUzhqFjp2Sq93d1dB_rjFE3fpgsWlMh_06aCklz1Qh_gVFDlwoQUeQ7UA79CEMWOnV4FszbDQFvfWpa_3jU2996m2BGrcu9-fXZYvud2cvcARudgCONr48DjpYj51F5we0Ubve__ngGydZhxs</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>Tolin, David F</creator><creator>Worhunsky, Patrick</creator><creator>Maltby, Nicholas</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>Sympathetic magic in contamination-related OCD</title><author>Tolin, David F ; Worhunsky, Patrick ; Maltby, Nicholas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-3b256db25a6dcc90636fc140c1634f24b9a58412dbecd5f83d7effa98bdca9ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitions</topic><topic>Cognitive processes</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Disgust</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magic</topic><topic>Magical thinking</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Obsessive-Compulsive neuroses</topic><topic>Obsessive–compulsive disorder</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tolin, David F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worhunsky, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltby, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tolin, David F</au><au>Worhunsky, Patrick</au><au>Maltby, Nicholas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sympathetic magic in contamination-related OCD</atitle><jtitle>Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>193-205</pages><issn>0005-7916</issn><eissn>1873-7943</eissn><abstract>We examined whether patients with contamination-related obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) are characterized by sympathetic magic beliefs (i.e., an irrational understanding of how contagion is transmitted). We asked OCD patients (OCs), non-anxious control participants (NACs), and anxious control participants (ACs) to identify a “contaminated” object and rate its degree of contamination on a 0–100 scale. Next, we touched a clean pencil to the object, and participants rated the degree to which the pencil was contaminated. A second pencil was touched to the first pencil and was then rated. This process was continued for 12 pencils (12 degrees of removal from the original object). The same process was repeated using threat-non-relevant stimuli. Results indicated that for threat-relevant stimuli, OCs seemed to perceive a “chain of contagion” in which successive degrees of removal from the original object were not rated as less contaminated. In contrast, NACs and ACs quickly identified the pencils as not contaminated, suggesting that they recognize the contamination as degrading across objects. This difference was not seen using threat-nonrelevant stimuli. We also found that ratings of looming vulnerability (a belief that the contamination is spreading, approaching, or escalating in threat value) mediated the relationship between diagnostic group and the chain of contagion. We suggest that this process may be consistent with the sympathetic magic and disease-avoidance models of disgust, and that disgust may be a fruitful area for exploration in the study of OCD.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15210379</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.04.009</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0005-7916 |
ispartof | Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 2004-06, Vol.35 (2), p.193-205 |
issn | 0005-7916 1873-7943 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66642985 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Beliefs Cognition Cognitions Cognitive processes Contamination Culture Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Disgust Female Humans Magic Magical thinking Male Middle Aged Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - diagnosis Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - psychology Obsessive-Compulsive neuroses Obsessive–compulsive disorder Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Sympathetic magic in contamination-related OCD |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T05%3A00%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sympathetic%20magic%20in%20contamination-related%20OCD&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20behavior%20therapy%20and%20experimental%20psychiatry&rft.au=Tolin,%20David%20F&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=193-205&rft.issn=0005-7916&rft.eissn=1873-7943&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.04.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66642985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57045951&rft_id=info:pmid/15210379&rft_els_id=S0005791604000369&rfr_iscdi=true |