Different approaches to the vaccination of free ranging village chickens against Newcastle disease in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa

The aim of this study was to develop a strategy to control Newcastle disease (ND) in free ranging village chickens using the Nobilis ® ND Inkukhu vaccine (Intervet South Africa). The study was conducted at Thibella village in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa from April 2001 to October 2002. Three different rou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary microbiology 2004-06, Vol.101 (1), p.23-30
Hauptverfasser: Thekisoe, M.M.O, Mbati, P.A, Bisschop, S.P.R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 30
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Veterinary microbiology
container_volume 101
creator Thekisoe, M.M.O
Mbati, P.A
Bisschop, S.P.R
description The aim of this study was to develop a strategy to control Newcastle disease (ND) in free ranging village chickens using the Nobilis ® ND Inkukhu vaccine (Intervet South Africa). The study was conducted at Thibella village in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa from April 2001 to October 2002. Three different routes of vaccination (administration via eye-drop, drinking water and feed) were investigated. The haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test was conducted monthly in order to measure the antibody response of village chickens after immunization against Newcastle disease. Using a South African isolate of velogenic ND virus, challenge trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of the vaccine. A questionnaire was provided to evaluate perceptions of farmers on vaccinations. The eye-drop vaccination route produced the highest HI titres ranging between 2.7 and 4.4, followed by the drinking water vaccination route with titres ranging between 2.3 and 4.0. The lowest titres were from the feed vaccination route which ranged between 1.6 and 3.0. Following the challenge, the entire control group died on the third and fourth day after infection. However, 70% of the chickens immunized by using either the eye-drop or drinking water route survived the challenge. Only 20% of the chickens from the group immunized through the feed route survived. Evidently both the eye-drop and drinking water routes were efficient in preventing disease. Necropsies showed that vaccinated chickens had mild lesions whilst control chickens had severe lesions compatible with Newcastle disease. The efficacy of the vaccine using either of the routes can be enhanced by administration of booster vaccinations at 3-month intervals during the first year of a vaccination campaign and then at 6-month intervals from the second year onwards. The majority of the owners indicated that they would prefer to vaccinate their flocks using the drinking water route.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.03.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66640169</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378113504000872</els_id><sourcerecordid>17989228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-805c692ca3ecd3c428f7923e5efd061f17dc7d868c88e6a51e68644d42c71cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EomnhHyDkC5y6i7_W670gVaUFpAqE6N0ys-PEYeMNtpOq4s_jKpHgRA_WXJ53NH4fQl5x1nLG9bt1u8eyCdAKxlTLZMs4f0IW3PSyEZ0ST8mCyd40nMvuhJzmvGYVHDR7Tk54Jxhnki3I7w_Be0wYC3XbbZodrDDTMtOyQrp3ACG6EuZIZ099QqTJxWWIS7oP0-SWSGEV4CfGTN3ShZgL_YJ34HKZkI4ho8tIQ6Tf7lxT3zn9Pu_Kil74FMC9IM-8mzK-PM4zcnt9dXv5qbn5-vHz5cVNA4oPpTGsAz0IcBJhlKCE8f0gJHboR6a55_0I_Wi0AWNQu46jNlqpUQnoeU2ckbeHtfV7v3aYi92EDFjPjzjvstVaq1ro8CjI-8EMQpgKqgMIac45obfbFDYu3VvO7IMcu7YHOfZBjmXSVjk19vq4f_djg-Pf0NFGBd4cAZfBTb52DSH_ww1MSdVV7v2Bw9raPmCyGQJGwDEkhGLHOfz_kj-ekbAJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17989228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different approaches to the vaccination of free ranging village chickens against Newcastle disease in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Thekisoe, M.M.O ; Mbati, P.A ; Bisschop, S.P.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Thekisoe, M.M.O ; Mbati, P.A ; Bisschop, S.P.R</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to develop a strategy to control Newcastle disease (ND) in free ranging village chickens using the Nobilis ® ND Inkukhu vaccine (Intervet South Africa). The study was conducted at Thibella village in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa from April 2001 to October 2002. Three different routes of vaccination (administration via eye-drop, drinking water and feed) were investigated. The haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test was conducted monthly in order to measure the antibody response of village chickens after immunization against Newcastle disease. Using a South African isolate of velogenic ND virus, challenge trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of the vaccine. A questionnaire was provided to evaluate perceptions of farmers on vaccinations. The eye-drop vaccination route produced the highest HI titres ranging between 2.7 and 4.4, followed by the drinking water vaccination route with titres ranging between 2.3 and 4.0. The lowest titres were from the feed vaccination route which ranged between 1.6 and 3.0. Following the challenge, the entire control group died on the third and fourth day after infection. However, 70% of the chickens immunized by using either the eye-drop or drinking water route survived the challenge. Only 20% of the chickens from the group immunized through the feed route survived. Evidently both the eye-drop and drinking water routes were efficient in preventing disease. Necropsies showed that vaccinated chickens had mild lesions whilst control chickens had severe lesions compatible with Newcastle disease. The efficacy of the vaccine using either of the routes can be enhanced by administration of booster vaccinations at 3-month intervals during the first year of a vaccination campaign and then at 6-month intervals from the second year onwards. The majority of the owners indicated that they would prefer to vaccinate their flocks using the drinking water route.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.03.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15201030</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VMICDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies, Viral - blood ; Applied microbiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chickens ; Free ranging chickens ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests - veterinary ; Humans ; Microbiology ; Newcastle disease ; Newcastle Disease - immunology ; Newcastle Disease - prevention &amp; control ; Newcastle disease virus - immunology ; Nobilis ® ND Inkukhu vaccine ; Rural Population ; Seasons ; South Africa ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vaccination - methods ; Vaccination - veterinary ; Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects) ; Vaccines, Attenuated - immunology ; Vaccines, Attenuated - therapeutic use ; Viral Vaccines - immunology ; Viral Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Veterinary microbiology, 2004-06, Vol.101 (1), p.23-30</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 Elsiever B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-805c692ca3ecd3c428f7923e5efd061f17dc7d868c88e6a51e68644d42c71cd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.03.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15904345$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15201030$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thekisoe, M.M.O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbati, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisschop, S.P.R</creatorcontrib><title>Different approaches to the vaccination of free ranging village chickens against Newcastle disease in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa</title><title>Veterinary microbiology</title><addtitle>Vet Microbiol</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to develop a strategy to control Newcastle disease (ND) in free ranging village chickens using the Nobilis ® ND Inkukhu vaccine (Intervet South Africa). The study was conducted at Thibella village in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa from April 2001 to October 2002. Three different routes of vaccination (administration via eye-drop, drinking water and feed) were investigated. The haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test was conducted monthly in order to measure the antibody response of village chickens after immunization against Newcastle disease. Using a South African isolate of velogenic ND virus, challenge trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of the vaccine. A questionnaire was provided to evaluate perceptions of farmers on vaccinations. The eye-drop vaccination route produced the highest HI titres ranging between 2.7 and 4.4, followed by the drinking water vaccination route with titres ranging between 2.3 and 4.0. The lowest titres were from the feed vaccination route which ranged between 1.6 and 3.0. Following the challenge, the entire control group died on the third and fourth day after infection. However, 70% of the chickens immunized by using either the eye-drop or drinking water route survived the challenge. Only 20% of the chickens from the group immunized through the feed route survived. Evidently both the eye-drop and drinking water routes were efficient in preventing disease. Necropsies showed that vaccinated chickens had mild lesions whilst control chickens had severe lesions compatible with Newcastle disease. The efficacy of the vaccine using either of the routes can be enhanced by administration of booster vaccinations at 3-month intervals during the first year of a vaccination campaign and then at 6-month intervals from the second year onwards. The majority of the owners indicated that they would prefer to vaccinate their flocks using the drinking water route.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Applied microbiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Free ranging chickens</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests - veterinary</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Newcastle disease</subject><subject>Newcastle Disease - immunology</subject><subject>Newcastle Disease - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Newcastle disease virus - immunology</subject><subject>Nobilis ® ND Inkukhu vaccine</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vaccination - methods</subject><subject>Vaccination - veterinary</subject><subject>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects)</subject><subject>Vaccines, Attenuated - immunology</subject><subject>Vaccines, Attenuated - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Viral Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>Viral Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0378-1135</issn><issn>1873-2542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EomnhHyDkC5y6i7_W670gVaUFpAqE6N0ys-PEYeMNtpOq4s_jKpHgRA_WXJ53NH4fQl5x1nLG9bt1u8eyCdAKxlTLZMs4f0IW3PSyEZ0ST8mCyd40nMvuhJzmvGYVHDR7Tk54Jxhnki3I7w_Be0wYC3XbbZodrDDTMtOyQrp3ACG6EuZIZ099QqTJxWWIS7oP0-SWSGEV4CfGTN3ShZgL_YJ34HKZkI4ho8tIQ6Tf7lxT3zn9Pu_Kil74FMC9IM-8mzK-PM4zcnt9dXv5qbn5-vHz5cVNA4oPpTGsAz0IcBJhlKCE8f0gJHboR6a55_0I_Wi0AWNQu46jNlqpUQnoeU2ckbeHtfV7v3aYi92EDFjPjzjvstVaq1ro8CjI-8EMQpgKqgMIac45obfbFDYu3VvO7IMcu7YHOfZBjmXSVjk19vq4f_djg-Pf0NFGBd4cAZfBTb52DSH_ww1MSdVV7v2Bw9raPmCyGQJGwDEkhGLHOfz_kj-ekbAJ</recordid><startdate>20040610</startdate><enddate>20040610</enddate><creator>Thekisoe, M.M.O</creator><creator>Mbati, P.A</creator><creator>Bisschop, S.P.R</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040610</creationdate><title>Different approaches to the vaccination of free ranging village chickens against Newcastle disease in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa</title><author>Thekisoe, M.M.O ; Mbati, P.A ; Bisschop, S.P.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-805c692ca3ecd3c428f7923e5efd061f17dc7d868c88e6a51e68644d42c71cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Applied microbiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Free ranging chickens</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests - veterinary</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Newcastle disease</topic><topic>Newcastle Disease - immunology</topic><topic>Newcastle Disease - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Newcastle disease virus - immunology</topic><topic>Nobilis ® ND Inkukhu vaccine</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vaccination - methods</topic><topic>Vaccination - veterinary</topic><topic>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects)</topic><topic>Vaccines, Attenuated - immunology</topic><topic>Vaccines, Attenuated - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Viral Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>Viral Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thekisoe, M.M.O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbati, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisschop, S.P.R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thekisoe, M.M.O</au><au>Mbati, P.A</au><au>Bisschop, S.P.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different approaches to the vaccination of free ranging village chickens against Newcastle disease in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Microbiol</addtitle><date>2004-06-10</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>23-30</pages><issn>0378-1135</issn><eissn>1873-2542</eissn><coden>VMICDQ</coden><abstract>The aim of this study was to develop a strategy to control Newcastle disease (ND) in free ranging village chickens using the Nobilis ® ND Inkukhu vaccine (Intervet South Africa). The study was conducted at Thibella village in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa from April 2001 to October 2002. Three different routes of vaccination (administration via eye-drop, drinking water and feed) were investigated. The haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test was conducted monthly in order to measure the antibody response of village chickens after immunization against Newcastle disease. Using a South African isolate of velogenic ND virus, challenge trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of the vaccine. A questionnaire was provided to evaluate perceptions of farmers on vaccinations. The eye-drop vaccination route produced the highest HI titres ranging between 2.7 and 4.4, followed by the drinking water vaccination route with titres ranging between 2.3 and 4.0. The lowest titres were from the feed vaccination route which ranged between 1.6 and 3.0. Following the challenge, the entire control group died on the third and fourth day after infection. However, 70% of the chickens immunized by using either the eye-drop or drinking water route survived the challenge. Only 20% of the chickens from the group immunized through the feed route survived. Evidently both the eye-drop and drinking water routes were efficient in preventing disease. Necropsies showed that vaccinated chickens had mild lesions whilst control chickens had severe lesions compatible with Newcastle disease. The efficacy of the vaccine using either of the routes can be enhanced by administration of booster vaccinations at 3-month intervals during the first year of a vaccination campaign and then at 6-month intervals from the second year onwards. The majority of the owners indicated that they would prefer to vaccinate their flocks using the drinking water route.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15201030</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.03.011</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-1135
ispartof Veterinary microbiology, 2004-06, Vol.101 (1), p.23-30
issn 0378-1135
1873-2542
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_66640169
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animals
Antibodies, Viral - blood
Applied microbiology
Biological and medical sciences
Chickens
Free ranging chickens
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests - veterinary
Humans
Microbiology
Newcastle disease
Newcastle Disease - immunology
Newcastle Disease - prevention & control
Newcastle disease virus - immunology
Nobilis ® ND Inkukhu vaccine
Rural Population
Seasons
South Africa
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vaccination - methods
Vaccination - veterinary
Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects)
Vaccines, Attenuated - immunology
Vaccines, Attenuated - therapeutic use
Viral Vaccines - immunology
Viral Vaccines - therapeutic use
title Different approaches to the vaccination of free ranging village chickens against Newcastle disease in Qwa-Qwa, South Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T06%3A02%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20approaches%20to%20the%20vaccination%20of%20free%20ranging%20village%20chickens%20against%20Newcastle%20disease%20in%20Qwa-Qwa,%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20microbiology&rft.au=Thekisoe,%20M.M.O&rft.date=2004-06-10&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=23-30&rft.issn=0378-1135&rft.eissn=1873-2542&rft.coden=VMICDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.03.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17989228%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17989228&rft_id=info:pmid/15201030&rft_els_id=S0378113504000872&rfr_iscdi=true