Fear and Security: A Vulnerability-led Policy Response
The aim of this article is to explore the rise of vulnerability‐led policy‐making. It attempts to engage with the apparent puzzle of why the official rhetoric of promoting resilience frequently gives way to an orientation towards an emphasis on vulnerability. It contends that the current conceptuali...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Social policy & administration 2008-12, Vol.42 (6), p.645-661 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 661 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 645 |
| container_title | Social policy & administration |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Furedi, Frank |
| description | The aim of this article is to explore the rise of vulnerability‐led policy‐making. It attempts to engage with the apparent puzzle of why the official rhetoric of promoting resilience frequently gives way to an orientation towards an emphasis on vulnerability. It contends that the current conceptualization of resilience assumes that vulnerability is the defining condition of social life. One likely consequence of this approach is the reinforcement of the passive side of public life. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00629.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61788549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19618827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5339-67765019ee8dc31c46095c7ccbba85be5b79aad5f30179fc863f90d540daf9983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v0zAYgK1pSOsG_yHiwC3Z-8bxx4vEYZromFaxibHBzXIcR0rJkmI3WvvvcSnagUvniy37eSzLD2MZQoFpnC8LrKTKSaAoSgBdAMiSis0Rm70cHLMZYFXlQpA8YacxLgFAAOkZk3NvQ2aHJrv3bgrdevsxu8gep37wwdZdnzby3jfZ3dh3bpt983E1DtG_ZW9a20f_7t98xh7mn79ffskXt1fXlxeL3AnOKZdKSQFI3uvGcXSVBBJOOVfXVovai1qRtY1oOaCi1mnJW4JGVNDYlkjzM_Zhf-8qjL8nH9fmqYvO970d_DhFI1FpLSp6BVghaqwOgoJIaq7LgyBXwFFqPAgiSdS6VAl8_x-4HKcwpP8zZXqeBBQyQXoPuTDGGHxrVqF7smFrEMyuuFmaXVizC2t2xc3f4maT1E979bnr_fbVnrm_u12kVfLzvd_Ftd-8-Db8MlJxJcyPr1emJP1zcTMnQ_wPOVa9zw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214160156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fear and Security: A Vulnerability-led Policy Response</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Furedi, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>Furedi, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this article is to explore the rise of vulnerability‐led policy‐making. It attempts to engage with the apparent puzzle of why the official rhetoric of promoting resilience frequently gives way to an orientation towards an emphasis on vulnerability. It contends that the current conceptualization of resilience assumes that vulnerability is the defining condition of social life. One likely consequence of this approach is the reinforcement of the passive side of public life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-5596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9515</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00629.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPOAD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Concept Formation ; Fear ; Fear & phobias ; Insecurity ; Law Enforcement ; National security ; Policy analysis ; Policy Making ; Policy studies ; Political sociology ; Public life ; Resilience ; Rhetoric ; Security ; Social policy ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Social policy & administration, 2008-12, Vol.42 (6), p.645-661</ispartof><rights>2008 The Author. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5339-67765019ee8dc31c46095c7ccbba85be5b79aad5f30179fc863f90d540daf9983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5339-67765019ee8dc31c46095c7ccbba85be5b79aad5f30179fc863f90d540daf9983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9515.2008.00629.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9515.2008.00629.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27868,27926,27927,31001,33776,33777,45576,45577</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Furedi, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>Fear and Security: A Vulnerability-led Policy Response</title><title>Social policy & administration</title><description>The aim of this article is to explore the rise of vulnerability‐led policy‐making. It attempts to engage with the apparent puzzle of why the official rhetoric of promoting resilience frequently gives way to an orientation towards an emphasis on vulnerability. It contends that the current conceptualization of resilience assumes that vulnerability is the defining condition of social life. One likely consequence of this approach is the reinforcement of the passive side of public life.</description><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Fear</subject><subject>Fear & phobias</subject><subject>Insecurity</subject><subject>Law Enforcement</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Policy studies</subject><subject>Political sociology</subject><subject>Public life</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>0144-5596</issn><issn>1467-9515</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v0zAYgK1pSOsG_yHiwC3Z-8bxx4vEYZromFaxibHBzXIcR0rJkmI3WvvvcSnagUvniy37eSzLD2MZQoFpnC8LrKTKSaAoSgBdAMiSis0Rm70cHLMZYFXlQpA8YacxLgFAAOkZk3NvQ2aHJrv3bgrdevsxu8gep37wwdZdnzby3jfZ3dh3bpt983E1DtG_ZW9a20f_7t98xh7mn79ffskXt1fXlxeL3AnOKZdKSQFI3uvGcXSVBBJOOVfXVovai1qRtY1oOaCi1mnJW4JGVNDYlkjzM_Zhf-8qjL8nH9fmqYvO970d_DhFI1FpLSp6BVghaqwOgoJIaq7LgyBXwFFqPAgiSdS6VAl8_x-4HKcwpP8zZXqeBBQyQXoPuTDGGHxrVqF7smFrEMyuuFmaXVizC2t2xc3f4maT1E979bnr_fbVnrm_u12kVfLzvd_Ftd-8-Db8MlJxJcyPr1emJP1zcTMnQ_wPOVa9zw</recordid><startdate>200812</startdate><enddate>200812</enddate><creator>Furedi, Frank</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200812</creationdate><title>Fear and Security: A Vulnerability-led Policy Response</title><author>Furedi, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5339-67765019ee8dc31c46095c7ccbba85be5b79aad5f30179fc863f90d540daf9983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Fear</topic><topic>Fear & phobias</topic><topic>Insecurity</topic><topic>Law Enforcement</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Policy studies</topic><topic>Political sociology</topic><topic>Public life</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Furedi, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Social policy & administration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Furedi, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fear and Security: A Vulnerability-led Policy Response</atitle><jtitle>Social policy & administration</jtitle><date>2008-12</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>661</epage><pages>645-661</pages><issn>0144-5596</issn><eissn>1467-9515</eissn><coden>SPOAD4</coden><abstract>The aim of this article is to explore the rise of vulnerability‐led policy‐making. It attempts to engage with the apparent puzzle of why the official rhetoric of promoting resilience frequently gives way to an orientation towards an emphasis on vulnerability. It contends that the current conceptualization of resilience assumes that vulnerability is the defining condition of social life. One likely consequence of this approach is the reinforcement of the passive side of public life.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00629.x</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0144-5596 |
| ispartof | Social policy & administration, 2008-12, Vol.42 (6), p.645-661 |
| issn | 0144-5596 1467-9515 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61788549 |
| source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
| subjects | Concept Formation Fear Fear & phobias Insecurity Law Enforcement National security Policy analysis Policy Making Policy studies Political sociology Public life Resilience Rhetoric Security Social policy Vulnerability |
| title | Fear and Security: A Vulnerability-led Policy Response |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A59%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fear%20and%20Security:%20A%20Vulnerability-led%20Policy%20Response&rft.jtitle=Social%20policy%20&%20administration&rft.au=Furedi,%20Frank&rft.date=2008-12&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=661&rft.pages=645-661&rft.issn=0144-5596&rft.eissn=1467-9515&rft.coden=SPOAD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00629.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19618827%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214160156&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |