Another Brick in the Wall? Neo-"Refoulement" and the Externalization of Asylum by Australia and Europe
Insecurity and fear in the global North produce political space to advance security measures, including the externalization of asylum. States in the global North make it increasingly difficult for asylum seekers to reach sovereign territory where they might make a refugee claim. While legal protecti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Government and opposition (London) 2008-04, Vol.43 (2), p.249-269 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 269 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 249 |
container_title | Government and opposition (London) |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Hyndman, Jennifer Mountz, Alison |
description | Insecurity and fear in the global North produce political space to advance security measures, including the externalization of asylum. States in the global North make it increasingly difficult for asylum seekers to reach sovereign territory where they might make a refugee claim. While legal protection remains intact under the Refugee Convention, extra-legal measures employ geography to restrict access to asylum and keep claimants at bay through a variety of tactics. This article probes the ways in which fear of uninvited asylum seekers is securitized and looks at the tactics utilized to keep them at bay, far from the borders of states that are signatories to the UN Refugee Convention. Drawing on research in Europe and Australia, we demonstrate how states are promoting 'protection in regions of origin' through practices of de facto neo-refoulement. Neo-refoulement refers to a geographically based strategy of preventing asylum by restricting access to territories that, in principle, provide protection to refugees. Adapted from the source document. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00251.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61786458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44484134</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44484134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bcda030f1ba5c06d6b0679521e4113bdeab3cb997ee9a4f12aaebebf4ed343503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMouH78BCF48NY6aZKmPckq6weIgih6C0k7xa7dZk1a2PXX2-6K180lDO_zzmEeQiiDmA3vch4zoVSkQPI4AVAxQCJZvNojk_9gn0wAmIoSqT4OyVEI82HkIs0npJq2rvtET699XXzRuqXDRN9N01zRJ3TR-QtWrm9wgW13Tk1bbvLZqkPfmqb-MV3tWuoqOg3rpl9Qu6bTPnR-yMwGn_XeLfGEHFSmCXj69x-Tt9vZ68199Ph893AzfYwKAbKLbFEa4FAxa2QBaZlaSFUuE4aCMW5LNJYXNs8VYm5ExRJj0KKtBJZccAn8mFxs9y69--4xdHpRhwKbxrTo-qBTprJUyGwnKPNMSQa7N_I0UxkMR94FJqCY5HIEsy1YeBeCx0ovfb0wfq0Z6NGpnutRnR7V6dGp3jjVq6F6tq3OQ-f8f08IkYlBKP8FCvufYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20715355</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Another Brick in the Wall? Neo-"Refoulement" and the Externalization of Asylum by Australia and Europe</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hyndman, Jennifer ; Mountz, Alison</creator><creatorcontrib>Hyndman, Jennifer ; Mountz, Alison</creatorcontrib><description>Insecurity and fear in the global North produce political space to advance security measures, including the externalization of asylum. States in the global North make it increasingly difficult for asylum seekers to reach sovereign territory where they might make a refugee claim. While legal protection remains intact under the Refugee Convention, extra-legal measures employ geography to restrict access to asylum and keep claimants at bay through a variety of tactics. This article probes the ways in which fear of uninvited asylum seekers is securitized and looks at the tactics utilized to keep them at bay, far from the borders of states that are signatories to the UN Refugee Convention. Drawing on research in Europe and Australia, we demonstrate how states are promoting 'protection in regions of origin' through practices of de facto neo-refoulement. Neo-refoulement refers to a geographically based strategy of preventing asylum by restricting access to territories that, in principle, provide protection to refugees. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-257X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-7053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00251.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GVOPBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Asylum ; Asylum seekers ; Australia ; Borders ; Bricks ; Citizens ; Congresses and Conventions ; Countries ; Europe ; European Union ; Geography ; Geopolitics ; Globalization ; Government ; Human rights ; International migration ; Legislation ; Political migration ; Political regimes ; Refugees ; Territories ; Treaties ; United Nations</subject><ispartof>Government and opposition (London), 2008-04, Vol.43 (2), p.249-269</ispartof><rights>2008 Government and Opposition Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bcda030f1ba5c06d6b0679521e4113bdeab3cb997ee9a4f12aaebebf4ed343503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bcda030f1ba5c06d6b0679521e4113bdeab3cb997ee9a4f12aaebebf4ed343503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44484134$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44484134$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,33756,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hyndman, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mountz, Alison</creatorcontrib><title>Another Brick in the Wall? Neo-"Refoulement" and the Externalization of Asylum by Australia and Europe</title><title>Government and opposition (London)</title><description>Insecurity and fear in the global North produce political space to advance security measures, including the externalization of asylum. States in the global North make it increasingly difficult for asylum seekers to reach sovereign territory where they might make a refugee claim. While legal protection remains intact under the Refugee Convention, extra-legal measures employ geography to restrict access to asylum and keep claimants at bay through a variety of tactics. This article probes the ways in which fear of uninvited asylum seekers is securitized and looks at the tactics utilized to keep them at bay, far from the borders of states that are signatories to the UN Refugee Convention. Drawing on research in Europe and Australia, we demonstrate how states are promoting 'protection in regions of origin' through practices of de facto neo-refoulement. Neo-refoulement refers to a geographically based strategy of preventing asylum by restricting access to territories that, in principle, provide protection to refugees. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Asylum</subject><subject>Asylum seekers</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Borders</subject><subject>Bricks</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Congresses and Conventions</subject><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>International migration</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Political migration</subject><subject>Political regimes</subject><subject>Refugees</subject><subject>Territories</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>United Nations</subject><issn>0017-257X</issn><issn>1477-7053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMouH78BCF48NY6aZKmPckq6weIgih6C0k7xa7dZk1a2PXX2-6K180lDO_zzmEeQiiDmA3vch4zoVSkQPI4AVAxQCJZvNojk_9gn0wAmIoSqT4OyVEI82HkIs0npJq2rvtET699XXzRuqXDRN9N01zRJ3TR-QtWrm9wgW13Tk1bbvLZqkPfmqb-MV3tWuoqOg3rpl9Qu6bTPnR-yMwGn_XeLfGEHFSmCXj69x-Tt9vZ68199Ph893AzfYwKAbKLbFEa4FAxa2QBaZlaSFUuE4aCMW5LNJYXNs8VYm5ExRJj0KKtBJZccAn8mFxs9y69--4xdHpRhwKbxrTo-qBTprJUyGwnKPNMSQa7N_I0UxkMR94FJqCY5HIEsy1YeBeCx0ovfb0wfq0Z6NGpnutRnR7V6dGp3jjVq6F6tq3OQ-f8f08IkYlBKP8FCvufYw</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Hyndman, Jennifer</creator><creator>Mountz, Alison</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Another Brick in the Wall? Neo-"Refoulement" and the Externalization of Asylum by Australia and Europe</title><author>Hyndman, Jennifer ; Mountz, Alison</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-bcda030f1ba5c06d6b0679521e4113bdeab3cb997ee9a4f12aaebebf4ed343503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Asylum</topic><topic>Asylum seekers</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Borders</topic><topic>Bricks</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Congresses and Conventions</topic><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>International migration</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Political migration</topic><topic>Political regimes</topic><topic>Refugees</topic><topic>Territories</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>United Nations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hyndman, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mountz, Alison</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Government and opposition (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hyndman, Jennifer</au><au>Mountz, Alison</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Another Brick in the Wall? Neo-"Refoulement" and the Externalization of Asylum by Australia and Europe</atitle><jtitle>Government and opposition (London)</jtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>249-269</pages><issn>0017-257X</issn><eissn>1477-7053</eissn><coden>GVOPBP</coden><abstract>Insecurity and fear in the global North produce political space to advance security measures, including the externalization of asylum. States in the global North make it increasingly difficult for asylum seekers to reach sovereign territory where they might make a refugee claim. While legal protection remains intact under the Refugee Convention, extra-legal measures employ geography to restrict access to asylum and keep claimants at bay through a variety of tactics. This article probes the ways in which fear of uninvited asylum seekers is securitized and looks at the tactics utilized to keep them at bay, far from the borders of states that are signatories to the UN Refugee Convention. Drawing on research in Europe and Australia, we demonstrate how states are promoting 'protection in regions of origin' through practices of de facto neo-refoulement. Neo-refoulement refers to a geographically based strategy of preventing asylum by restricting access to territories that, in principle, provide protection to refugees. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00251.x</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-257X |
ispartof | Government and opposition (London), 2008-04, Vol.43 (2), p.249-269 |
issn | 0017-257X 1477-7053 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61786458 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Asylum Asylum seekers Australia Borders Bricks Citizens Congresses and Conventions Countries Europe European Union Geography Geopolitics Globalization Government Human rights International migration Legislation Political migration Political regimes Refugees Territories Treaties United Nations |
title | Another Brick in the Wall? Neo-"Refoulement" and the Externalization of Asylum by Australia and Europe |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A55%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Another%20Brick%20in%20the%20Wall?%20Neo-%22Refoulement%22%20and%20the%20Externalization%20of%20Asylum%20by%20Australia%20and%20Europe&rft.jtitle=Government%20and%20opposition%20(London)&rft.au=Hyndman,%20Jennifer&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=249-269&rft.issn=0017-257X&rft.eissn=1477-7053&rft.coden=GVOPBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00251.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44484134%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20715355&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44484134&rfr_iscdi=true |