Disability as Human Variation: Implications for Policy
The impact of any disability policy depends on the conceptual model of disability upon which that policy rests. For the past quarter century of disability policymaking, culminating in the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the dominant paradigm of disability has been a minority...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1997-01, Vol.549 (1), p.148-159 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 159 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 148 |
| container_title | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science |
| container_volume | 549 |
| creator | Scotch, Richard K. Schriner, Kay |
| description | The impact of any disability policy depends on the conceptual model of disability upon which that policy rests. For the past quarter century of disability policymaking, culminating in the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the dominant paradigm of disability has been a minority group model. That model identifies discrimination as the primary barrier facing people with disabilities in their desire for full social participation, and it proposes civil rights strategies as the proper policy response to that barrier. An alternative model of disability based on the concept of human variation is proposed that implies additional strategies for achieving the goal of integration of people with disabilities. The utility of a human variation model is illustrated by its application to the issue of access to employment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0002716297549001011 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61771701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A19097896</galeid><jstor_id>1048092</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0002716297549001011</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A19097896</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-a6ea028df6a3e613794effd8a6059f58726eab0b8dc554a570fa5c002d7455663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0kuLFDEQAOBGFBxXf4EeGgVPtlblHW_L-tiFBT2o16amOxkydHfGpOcw_9607WGR0U0OocJXqSpIVT1HeIuo9TsAYBoVs1oKC4CA-KDaoJSs4VzYh9VmEc1CHldPct7DstBuKvUhZNqGIcynmnJ9fRxpqn9QCjSHOL2vb8bDELrfQa59TPXXWOLT0-qRpyG7Z3_Oi-r7p4_frq6b2y-fb64ub5tOcjY3pBwBM71XxJ1Crq1w3veGFEjrpdGsgC1sTd9JKUhq8CS70mqvhZRK8Yvq9fruIcWfR5fndgy5c8NAk4vH3KoyPWrAe6G01qDi-l7IjTUCNC_w5V9wH49pKtO2DK1kzCgo6NW_EAotGEoml5pvVrWjwbVh8nFO1O3c5BINcXI-lOtLtGC1scvQzRledu_G0J3zfPVdijkn59tDCiOlU4vQLv-jPfM_ShasWZl27k7b_015sabs8xzTnSrCgGX8F-Fmv90</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1474215257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disability as Human Variation: Implications for Policy</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Scotch, Richard K. ; Schriner, Kay</creator><creatorcontrib>Scotch, Richard K. ; Schriner, Kay</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of any disability policy depends on the conceptual model of disability upon which that policy rests. For the past quarter century of disability policymaking, culminating in the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the dominant paradigm of disability has been a minority group model. That model identifies discrimination as the primary barrier facing people with disabilities in their desire for full social participation, and it proposes civil rights strategies as the proper policy response to that barrier. An alternative model of disability based on the concept of human variation is proposed that implies additional strategies for achieving the goal of integration of people with disabilities. The utility of a human variation model is illustrated by its application to the issue of access to employment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3349</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0002716297549001011</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAYPAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Ableism ; Civil rights ; Disabilities ; Disability ; Disability law ; Disabled persons ; Discrimination ; Economic models ; Employment ; Employment Discrimination ; Employment Opportunities ; Handicapped ; Handicapped people ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Minorities ; Minority groups ; Policy making ; Policymaking ; Public policy ; Social discrimination ; Social Policy ; United States</subject><ispartof>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1997-01, Vol.549 (1), p.148-159</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1997 The American Academy of Political and Social Science</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1997 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications, Inc. Jan 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-a6ea028df6a3e613794effd8a6059f58726eab0b8dc554a570fa5c002d7455663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-a6ea028df6a3e613794effd8a6059f58726eab0b8dc554a570fa5c002d7455663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0002716297549001011$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716297549001011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21800,27848,27903,27904,33753,33754,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scotch, Richard K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schriner, Kay</creatorcontrib><title>Disability as Human Variation: Implications for Policy</title><title>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</title><description>The impact of any disability policy depends on the conceptual model of disability upon which that policy rests. For the past quarter century of disability policymaking, culminating in the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the dominant paradigm of disability has been a minority group model. That model identifies discrimination as the primary barrier facing people with disabilities in their desire for full social participation, and it proposes civil rights strategies as the proper policy response to that barrier. An alternative model of disability based on the concept of human variation is proposed that implies additional strategies for achieving the goal of integration of people with disabilities. The utility of a human variation model is illustrated by its application to the issue of access to employment.</description><subject>Ableism</subject><subject>Civil rights</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Disability law</subject><subject>Disabled persons</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment Discrimination</subject><subject>Employment Opportunities</subject><subject>Handicapped</subject><subject>Handicapped people</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Minorities</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Policymaking</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Social discrimination</subject><subject>Social Policy</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0002-7162</issn><issn>1552-3349</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0kuLFDEQAOBGFBxXf4EeGgVPtlblHW_L-tiFBT2o16amOxkydHfGpOcw_9607WGR0U0OocJXqSpIVT1HeIuo9TsAYBoVs1oKC4CA-KDaoJSs4VzYh9VmEc1CHldPct7DstBuKvUhZNqGIcynmnJ9fRxpqn9QCjSHOL2vb8bDELrfQa59TPXXWOLT0-qRpyG7Z3_Oi-r7p4_frq6b2y-fb64ub5tOcjY3pBwBM71XxJ1Crq1w3veGFEjrpdGsgC1sTd9JKUhq8CS70mqvhZRK8Yvq9fruIcWfR5fndgy5c8NAk4vH3KoyPWrAe6G01qDi-l7IjTUCNC_w5V9wH49pKtO2DK1kzCgo6NW_EAotGEoml5pvVrWjwbVh8nFO1O3c5BINcXI-lOtLtGC1scvQzRledu_G0J3zfPVdijkn59tDCiOlU4vQLv-jPfM_ShasWZl27k7b_015sabs8xzTnSrCgGX8F-Fmv90</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Scotch, Richard K.</creator><creator>Schriner, Kay</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Periodicals Press</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>A. L. Hummel for the American Academy of Political and Social Science</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>Disability as Human Variation: Implications for Policy</title><author>Scotch, Richard K. ; Schriner, Kay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-a6ea028df6a3e613794effd8a6059f58726eab0b8dc554a570fa5c002d7455663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Ableism</topic><topic>Civil rights</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Disability law</topic><topic>Disabled persons</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment Discrimination</topic><topic>Employment Opportunities</topic><topic>Handicapped</topic><topic>Handicapped people</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Minorities</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Policymaking</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Social discrimination</topic><topic>Social Policy</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scotch, Richard K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schriner, Kay</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scotch, Richard K.</au><au>Schriner, Kay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disability as Human Variation: Implications for Policy</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</jtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>549</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>148</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>148-159</pages><issn>0002-7162</issn><eissn>1552-3349</eissn><coden>AAYPAV</coden><abstract>The impact of any disability policy depends on the conceptual model of disability upon which that policy rests. For the past quarter century of disability policymaking, culminating in the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the dominant paradigm of disability has been a minority group model. That model identifies discrimination as the primary barrier facing people with disabilities in their desire for full social participation, and it proposes civil rights strategies as the proper policy response to that barrier. An alternative model of disability based on the concept of human variation is proposed that implies additional strategies for achieving the goal of integration of people with disabilities. The utility of a human variation model is illustrated by its application to the issue of access to employment.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0002716297549001011</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-7162 |
| ispartof | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1997-01, Vol.549 (1), p.148-159 |
| issn | 0002-7162 1552-3349 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61771701 |
| source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Ableism Civil rights Disabilities Disability Disability law Disabled persons Discrimination Economic models Employment Employment Discrimination Employment Opportunities Handicapped Handicapped people Laws, regulations and rules Minorities Minority groups Policy making Policymaking Public policy Social discrimination Social Policy United States |
| title | Disability as Human Variation: Implications for Policy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A07%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disability%20as%20Human%20Variation:%20Implications%20for%20Policy&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Political%20and%20Social%20Science&rft.au=Scotch,%20Richard%20K.&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=549&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=148&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=148-159&rft.issn=0002-7162&rft.eissn=1552-3349&rft.coden=AAYPAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0002716297549001011&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA19097896%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1474215257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A19097896&rft_jstor_id=1048092&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0002716297549001011&rfr_iscdi=true |