Private Pensions versus Social Inclusion? Non-State Provision for Citizens at Risk in Europe

Private Pensions versus Social Inclusion? Non-State Provision for Citizens at Risk in Europe

Each chapter concentrates on answering three main questions: the nature of the public-private mix in the pensions regime; what pension levels can hypothetical 'risk biographies' on incomes below the average but above the poverty line expect, and what is the contribution of the public and p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ageing and Society 2009, Vol.29 (3), p.488-489
Hauptverfasser: GOUGH, ORLA, Meyer, Bridgen, Riedmuller, Traute, Paul, Barbara
Format: Review
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Aged
Europe
Nonfiction
Pensions
Retirement
Risk
Social policy
Social security
Welfare
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 489
container_issue 3
container_start_page 488
container_title Ageing and Society
container_volume 29
creator GOUGH, ORLA
Meyer
Bridgen
Riedmuller, Traute
Paul
Barbara
description Each chapter concentrates on answering three main questions: the nature of the public-private mix in the pensions regime; what pension levels can hypothetical 'risk biographies' on incomes below the average but above the poverty line expect, and what is the contribution of the public and private sector to their pension incomes; and how do policymakers responsible for reform aim to address the main shortcomings of their regimes for 'risk biographies' considering that a strengthening of the public sector is not a viable option? (p. 6) In the final chapter, the authors reveal their prognosis for the six countries.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0144686X08008234
format Review
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61759032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37257487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p174t-5f7e5598ba9b4e026c0bf60bdec6bb5f0b523b4369d1b4b69fbfad5e534776bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj01LAzEURYMoWKs_wF1w4W40mXy8yUqkVC0ULVbBhVCSmQRSx6QmM1346-2oKzeuHtxz7oWH0CklF5RQuFwSyrms5AupCKlKxvfQiHKpCgqg9tFowMXAD9FRzmtCaAkgRuh1kfxWdxYvbMg-hoy3NuU-42WsvW7xLNRtP4ArfB9Dsey-3RS3fgixiwlPfOc_d22sO_zo8xv2AU_7FDf2GB043WZ78nvH6Plm-jS5K-YPt7PJ9bzYUOBdIRxYIVRltDLcklLWxDhJTGNraYxwxIiSGc6kaqjhRipnnG6EFYwDSNOwMTr_2d2k-NHb3K3efa5t2-pgY59XkoJQhJX_igxKAbyCnXj2R1zHPoXdEyuqhOQgANgX0W5xTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>review</recordtype><pqid>195647577</pqid></control><display><type>review</type><title>Private Pensions versus Social Inclusion? Non-State Provision for Citizens at Risk in Europe</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>GOUGH, ORLA ; Meyer; Bridgen; Riedmuller, Traute; Paul; Barbara</creator><creatorcontrib>GOUGH, ORLA ; Meyer; Bridgen; Riedmuller, Traute; Paul; Barbara</creatorcontrib><description>Each chapter concentrates on answering three main questions: the nature of the public-private mix in the pensions regime; what pension levels can hypothetical 'risk biographies' on incomes below the average but above the poverty line expect, and what is the contribution of the public and private sector to their pension incomes; and how do policymakers responsible for reform aim to address the main shortcomings of their regimes for 'risk biographies' considering that a strengthening of the public sector is not a viable option? (p. 6) In the final chapter, the authors reveal their prognosis for the six countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-686X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X08008234</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGSOD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Europe ; Nonfiction ; Pensions ; Retirement ; Risk ; Social policy ; Social security ; Welfare</subject><ispartof>Ageing and Society, 2009, Vol.29 (3), p.488-489</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,780,784,792,27344,27922,27925,33774,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>GOUGH, ORLA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer; Bridgen; Riedmuller, Traute; Paul; Barbara</creatorcontrib><title>Private Pensions versus Social Inclusion? Non-State Provision for Citizens at Risk in Europe</title><title>Ageing and Society</title><description>Each chapter concentrates on answering three main questions: the nature of the public-private mix in the pensions regime; what pension levels can hypothetical 'risk biographies' on incomes below the average but above the poverty line expect, and what is the contribution of the public and private sector to their pension incomes; and how do policymakers responsible for reform aim to address the main shortcomings of their regimes for 'risk biographies' considering that a strengthening of the public sector is not a viable option? (p. 6) In the final chapter, the authors reveal their prognosis for the six countries.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Nonfiction</subject><subject>Pensions</subject><subject>Retirement</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Social security</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><issn>0144-686X</issn><issn>1469-1779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>review</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>review</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFj01LAzEURYMoWKs_wF1w4W40mXy8yUqkVC0ULVbBhVCSmQRSx6QmM1346-2oKzeuHtxz7oWH0CklF5RQuFwSyrms5AupCKlKxvfQiHKpCgqg9tFowMXAD9FRzmtCaAkgRuh1kfxWdxYvbMg-hoy3NuU-42WsvW7xLNRtP4ArfB9Dsey-3RS3fgixiwlPfOc_d22sO_zo8xv2AU_7FDf2GB043WZ78nvH6Plm-jS5K-YPt7PJ9bzYUOBdIRxYIVRltDLcklLWxDhJTGNraYxwxIiSGc6kaqjhRipnnG6EFYwDSNOwMTr_2d2k-NHb3K3efa5t2-pgY59XkoJQhJX_igxKAbyCnXj2R1zHPoXdEyuqhOQgANgX0W5xTg</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>GOUGH, ORLA</creator><creator>Meyer; Bridgen; Riedmuller, Traute; Paul; Barbara</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Private Pensions versus Social Inclusion? Non-State Provision for Citizens at Risk in Europe</title><author>GOUGH, ORLA ; Meyer; Bridgen; Riedmuller, Traute; Paul; Barbara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p174t-5f7e5598ba9b4e026c0bf60bdec6bb5f0b523b4369d1b4b69fbfad5e534776bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reviews</rsrctype><prefilter>reviews</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Nonfiction</topic><topic>Pensions</topic><topic>Retirement</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Social security</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GOUGH, ORLA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer; Bridgen; Riedmuller, Traute; Paul; Barbara</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GOUGH, ORLA</au><au>Meyer; Bridgen; Riedmuller, Traute; Paul; Barbara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Private Pensions versus Social Inclusion? Non-State Provision for Citizens at Risk in Europe</atitle><jtitle>Ageing and Society</jtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>488</spage><epage>489</epage><pages>488-489</pages><issn>0144-686X</issn><eissn>1469-1779</eissn><coden>AGSOD9</coden><abstract>Each chapter concentrates on answering three main questions: the nature of the public-private mix in the pensions regime; what pension levels can hypothetical 'risk biographies' on incomes below the average but above the poverty line expect, and what is the contribution of the public and private sector to their pension incomes; and how do policymakers responsible for reform aim to address the main shortcomings of their regimes for 'risk biographies' considering that a strengthening of the public sector is not a viable option? (p. 6) In the final chapter, the authors reveal their prognosis for the six countries.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0144686X08008234</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-686X
ispartof Ageing and Society, 2009, Vol.29 (3), p.488-489
issn 0144-686X
1469-1779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61759032
source Sociological Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Aged
Europe
Nonfiction
Pensions
Retirement
Risk
Social policy
Social security
Welfare
title Private Pensions versus Social Inclusion? Non-State Provision for Citizens at Risk in Europe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T12%3A31%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Private%20Pensions%20versus%20Social%20Inclusion?%20Non-State%20Provision%20for%20Citizens%20at%20Risk%20in%20Europe&rft.jtitle=Ageing%20and%20Society&rft.au=GOUGH,%20ORLA&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=488&rft.epage=489&rft.pages=488-489&rft.issn=0144-686X&rft.eissn=1469-1779&rft.coden=AGSOD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0144686X08008234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E37257487%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195647577&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true