International Well-being Index: The Austrian Version
The International Well-being Index (IWI) measures both personal and national well-being. It comprises two subscales: the Personal Well-being Index (PWI) and the National Well-being Index (NWI). The aim of this paper is to test the psychometric properties (validity and reliability) of the translated...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Social indicators research 2009, Vol.90 (2), p.243-256 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 256 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 243 |
| container_title | Social indicators research |
| container_volume | 90 |
| creator | Renn, Daniela Pfaffenberger, Nicole Platter, Marion Mitmansgruber, Horst Cummins, Robert A Höfer, Stefan |
| description | The International Well-being Index (IWI) measures both personal and national well-being. It comprises two subscales: the Personal Well-being Index (PWI) and the National Well-being Index (NWI). The aim of this paper is to test the psychometric properties (validity and reliability) of the translated scale in Austria. Convergent validity is assessed using the Scales of Psychological Well-Being, the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. In addition, a Visual-Analog Scales capturing “satisfaction with life as a whole” was applied. The participants were 581 students of the Medical University Innsbruck (female: 47.7%; age: 23.2 ± 3.7). Internal consistency (Cronbach's α) of the IWI was for both scales > .70 (PWI: .85; NWI: .83). The exploratory factor analysis of the IWI identified a 2-factor-structure identical with the two scales of the IWI explaining 54.2% of the variance. The convergent validity hypotheses were confirmed, construct validity was partly confirmed for the PWI being a deconstruction of a first factor called “satisfaction with life” (38.1% explained variance). Happy participants scored higher on the PWI (84.3 ± 7.9 vs. 68.7 ± 13.7; p < .001) and NWI (64.3 ± 15.8 vs. 57.9 ± 15.1; p < .001) scores than unhappy participants. It is concluded that the Austrian version of the IWI is a reliable and valid instrument to assess personal and national well-being. Further studies including a representative sample should be carried out on a recurring basis to use the IWI as an indicator for social science research in Austria. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11205-008-9255-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61726090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ815305</ericid><jstor_id>27734786</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27734786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-713b90186a6d6dc75e013272475df6331fc6e16ecdd78224b1c535eef4c27293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFEEQxRsx4Jr4AQTFQdBba_X_aW8hRF0JeHDVY9PbU7POMulJumdBv70VJsSQg6c-vN-revWasecC3gkA974KIcFwgJZ7aQyXj9hKGKc4eCkesxUoULxVAE_Y01r3AGC00Sum13nGkuM8TDmOzU8cR77FIe-ade7w94dm8wub00OdyxBz8wNLJfCEHfVxrPjs9j1mm4_nm7PP_OLrp_XZ6QVPWquZO6G2HkRro-1sl5xBEEo6qZ3pequU6JNFYTF1nWul1FuRjDKIvU5EeXXM3i5jr8p0fcA6h8uhJkoYM06HGqxw0oIHAl8_APfTgY4aaxDeWe2l0wSJBUplqrVgH67KcBnLnyAg3HQYlg4DdRhuOgySPG9uB8ea4tiXmNNQ74ySbIY8xL1YOCxDupPPv7TCKDAky0WuJOUdlnv5_rP75WLa13kq_3Y6p7RrLemvFr2PU4i7Qrm-f5PUMNC_O--N-gsfQpoi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197649274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>International Well-being Index: The Austrian Version</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Renn, Daniela ; Pfaffenberger, Nicole ; Platter, Marion ; Mitmansgruber, Horst ; Cummins, Robert A ; Höfer, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Renn, Daniela ; Pfaffenberger, Nicole ; Platter, Marion ; Mitmansgruber, Horst ; Cummins, Robert A ; Höfer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>The International Well-being Index (IWI) measures both personal and national well-being. It comprises two subscales: the Personal Well-being Index (PWI) and the National Well-being Index (NWI). The aim of this paper is to test the psychometric properties (validity and reliability) of the translated scale in Austria. Convergent validity is assessed using the Scales of Psychological Well-Being, the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. In addition, a Visual-Analog Scales capturing “satisfaction with life as a whole” was applied. The participants were 581 students of the Medical University Innsbruck (female: 47.7%; age: 23.2 ± 3.7). Internal consistency (Cronbach's α) of the IWI was for both scales > .70 (PWI: .85; NWI: .83). The exploratory factor analysis of the IWI identified a 2-factor-structure identical with the two scales of the IWI explaining 54.2% of the variance. The convergent validity hypotheses were confirmed, construct validity was partly confirmed for the PWI being a deconstruction of a first factor called “satisfaction with life” (38.1% explained variance). Happy participants scored higher on the PWI (84.3 ± 7.9 vs. 68.7 ± 13.7; p < .001) and NWI (64.3 ± 15.8 vs. 57.9 ± 15.1; p < .001) scores than unhappy participants. It is concluded that the Austrian version of the IWI is a reliable and valid instrument to assess personal and national well-being. Further studies including a representative sample should be carried out on a recurring basis to use the IWI as an indicator for social science research in Austria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11205-008-9255-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SINRDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Austria ; Construct Validity ; Correlation coefficients ; Criminal statistics ; Cross Cultural Studies ; Cultures and civilizations ; Discriminant analysis ; Evaluation ; Evaluation Methods ; Factor Analysis ; Foreign Countries ; GDP ; General studies ; Gross Domestic Product ; Happiness ; Human Geography ; Indexes ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Life Satisfaction ; Lifestyles. Everyday life ; Marital Status ; Measurement ; Measures (Individuals) ; Medical Education ; Medical Students ; Microeconomics ; Modeling (Psychology) ; National security ; Personal health ; Predominantly White Institutions ; Psychometrics ; Psychotherapy ; Public Health ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life Research ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Slaws ; Social Indicators ; Social psychology ; Social research ; Social Science Research ; Social Sciences ; Sociodemographics ; Sociology ; Statistical Data ; Studies ; Validity ; Well Being ; Wellbeing</subject><ispartof>Social indicators research, 2009, Vol.90 (2), p.243-256</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-713b90186a6d6dc75e013272475df6331fc6e16ecdd78224b1c535eef4c27293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-713b90186a6d6dc75e013272475df6331fc6e16ecdd78224b1c535eef4c27293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27734786$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27734786$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4024,27344,27923,27924,27925,33774,33775,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ815305$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21005120$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Renn, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfaffenberger, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platter, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitmansgruber, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummins, Robert A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höfer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>International Well-being Index: The Austrian Version</title><title>Social indicators research</title><addtitle>Soc Indic Res</addtitle><description>The International Well-being Index (IWI) measures both personal and national well-being. It comprises two subscales: the Personal Well-being Index (PWI) and the National Well-being Index (NWI). The aim of this paper is to test the psychometric properties (validity and reliability) of the translated scale in Austria. Convergent validity is assessed using the Scales of Psychological Well-Being, the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. In addition, a Visual-Analog Scales capturing “satisfaction with life as a whole” was applied. The participants were 581 students of the Medical University Innsbruck (female: 47.7%; age: 23.2 ± 3.7). Internal consistency (Cronbach's α) of the IWI was for both scales > .70 (PWI: .85; NWI: .83). The exploratory factor analysis of the IWI identified a 2-factor-structure identical with the two scales of the IWI explaining 54.2% of the variance. The convergent validity hypotheses were confirmed, construct validity was partly confirmed for the PWI being a deconstruction of a first factor called “satisfaction with life” (38.1% explained variance). Happy participants scored higher on the PWI (84.3 ± 7.9 vs. 68.7 ± 13.7; p < .001) and NWI (64.3 ± 15.8 vs. 57.9 ± 15.1; p < .001) scores than unhappy participants. It is concluded that the Austrian version of the IWI is a reliable and valid instrument to assess personal and national well-being. Further studies including a representative sample should be carried out on a recurring basis to use the IWI as an indicator for social science research in Austria.</description><subject>Austria</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Criminal statistics</subject><subject>Cross Cultural Studies</subject><subject>Cultures and civilizations</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>General studies</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Life Satisfaction</subject><subject>Lifestyles. Everyday life</subject><subject>Marital Status</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Modeling (Psychology)</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Personal health</subject><subject>Predominantly White Institutions</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Slaws</subject><subject>Social Indicators</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social Science Research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Statistical Data</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Well Being</subject><subject>Wellbeing</subject><issn>0303-8300</issn><issn>1573-0921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFEEQxRsx4Jr4AQTFQdBba_X_aW8hRF0JeHDVY9PbU7POMulJumdBv70VJsSQg6c-vN-revWasecC3gkA974KIcFwgJZ7aQyXj9hKGKc4eCkesxUoULxVAE_Y01r3AGC00Sum13nGkuM8TDmOzU8cR77FIe-ade7w94dm8wub00OdyxBz8wNLJfCEHfVxrPjs9j1mm4_nm7PP_OLrp_XZ6QVPWquZO6G2HkRro-1sl5xBEEo6qZ3pequU6JNFYTF1nWul1FuRjDKIvU5EeXXM3i5jr8p0fcA6h8uhJkoYM06HGqxw0oIHAl8_APfTgY4aaxDeWe2l0wSJBUplqrVgH67KcBnLnyAg3HQYlg4DdRhuOgySPG9uB8ea4tiXmNNQ74ySbIY8xL1YOCxDupPPv7TCKDAky0WuJOUdlnv5_rP75WLa13kq_3Y6p7RrLemvFr2PU4i7Qrm-f5PUMNC_O--N-gsfQpoi</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Renn, Daniela</creator><creator>Pfaffenberger, Nicole</creator><creator>Platter, Marion</creator><creator>Mitmansgruber, Horst</creator><creator>Cummins, Robert A</creator><creator>Höfer, Stefan</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>International Well-being Index: The Austrian Version</title><author>Renn, Daniela ; Pfaffenberger, Nicole ; Platter, Marion ; Mitmansgruber, Horst ; Cummins, Robert A ; Höfer, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-713b90186a6d6dc75e013272475df6331fc6e16ecdd78224b1c535eef4c27293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Austria</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Criminal statistics</topic><topic>Cross Cultural Studies</topic><topic>Cultures and civilizations</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>General studies</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Life Satisfaction</topic><topic>Lifestyles. Everyday life</topic><topic>Marital Status</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Modeling (Psychology)</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Personal health</topic><topic>Predominantly White Institutions</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Slaws</topic><topic>Social Indicators</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social Science Research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Statistical Data</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Well Being</topic><topic>Wellbeing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Renn, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfaffenberger, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platter, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitmansgruber, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummins, Robert A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höfer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Renn, Daniela</au><au>Pfaffenberger, Nicole</au><au>Platter, Marion</au><au>Mitmansgruber, Horst</au><au>Cummins, Robert A</au><au>Höfer, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ815305</ericid><atitle>International Well-being Index: The Austrian Version</atitle><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle><stitle>Soc Indic Res</stitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>256</epage><pages>243-256</pages><issn>0303-8300</issn><eissn>1573-0921</eissn><coden>SINRDZ</coden><abstract>The International Well-being Index (IWI) measures both personal and national well-being. It comprises two subscales: the Personal Well-being Index (PWI) and the National Well-being Index (NWI). The aim of this paper is to test the psychometric properties (validity and reliability) of the translated scale in Austria. Convergent validity is assessed using the Scales of Psychological Well-Being, the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. In addition, a Visual-Analog Scales capturing “satisfaction with life as a whole” was applied. The participants were 581 students of the Medical University Innsbruck (female: 47.7%; age: 23.2 ± 3.7). Internal consistency (Cronbach's α) of the IWI was for both scales > .70 (PWI: .85; NWI: .83). The exploratory factor analysis of the IWI identified a 2-factor-structure identical with the two scales of the IWI explaining 54.2% of the variance. The convergent validity hypotheses were confirmed, construct validity was partly confirmed for the PWI being a deconstruction of a first factor called “satisfaction with life” (38.1% explained variance). Happy participants scored higher on the PWI (84.3 ± 7.9 vs. 68.7 ± 13.7; p < .001) and NWI (64.3 ± 15.8 vs. 57.9 ± 15.1; p < .001) scores than unhappy participants. It is concluded that the Austrian version of the IWI is a reliable and valid instrument to assess personal and national well-being. Further studies including a representative sample should be carried out on a recurring basis to use the IWI as an indicator for social science research in Austria.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11205-008-9255-2</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0303-8300 |
| ispartof | Social indicators research, 2009, Vol.90 (2), p.243-256 |
| issn | 0303-8300 1573-0921 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61726090 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Austria Construct Validity Correlation coefficients Criminal statistics Cross Cultural Studies Cultures and civilizations Discriminant analysis Evaluation Evaluation Methods Factor Analysis Foreign Countries GDP General studies Gross Domestic Product Happiness Human Geography Indexes Interpersonal Relationship Life Satisfaction Lifestyles. Everyday life Marital Status Measurement Measures (Individuals) Medical Education Medical Students Microeconomics Modeling (Psychology) National security Personal health Predominantly White Institutions Psychometrics Psychotherapy Public Health Quality of life Quality of Life Research Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Resistance (Psychology) Slaws Social Indicators Social psychology Social research Social Science Research Social Sciences Sociodemographics Sociology Statistical Data Studies Validity Well Being Wellbeing |
| title | International Well-being Index: The Austrian Version |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A03%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International%20Well-being%20Index:%20The%20Austrian%20Version&rft.jtitle=Social%20indicators%20research&rft.au=Renn,%20Daniela&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=256&rft.pages=243-256&rft.issn=0303-8300&rft.eissn=1573-0921&rft.coden=SINRDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11205-008-9255-2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27734786%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197649274&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ815305&rft_jstor_id=27734786&rfr_iscdi=true |