Partisan Cleavages, State Retrenchment, and Free Trade: Latin America in the 1990s

This article accounts for the role that partisan divisions played in shaping variation in mass preferences for market-oriented policies in Latin America during the 1990s. Most of the existing studies on attitudes toward market reforms have focused on issues such as the timing of reforms, the presenc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Latin American research review 2008-01, Vol.43 (2), p.107-135
Hauptverfasser: Magaloni, Beatriz, Romero, Vidal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue 2
container_start_page 107
container_title Latin American research review
container_volume 43
creator Magaloni, Beatriz
Romero, Vidal
description This article accounts for the role that partisan divisions played in shaping variation in mass preferences for market-oriented policies in Latin America during the 1990s. Most of the existing studies on attitudes toward market reforms have focused on issues such as the timing of reforms, the presence of economic crises, and how economic performance shaped citizens' preferences. Fewer studies have investigated whether partisan cleavages translated into divergent preferences toward market reforms. Were there systematic differences between left- and right-wing voters in their preferences toward market reforms? Did left-wing voters oppose these policies and right-wing voters favor them? Which of these structural transformations--state retrenchment or trade liberalization--witnessed greater mass polarization along partisan lines? This article answers these questions with the use of a mass survey on public opinion about market reforms conducted by Mori International in eleven Latin American countries in 1998. /// Este trabajo estudia las divisiones partidistas entre el electorado con respecto a sus preferencias sobre las reformas de mercado que fueron implementadas en la década de los noventa. La mayoría de los estudios sobre opinión pública se han enfocado en cómo factores como crisis económicas, el momento de inicio de las reformas y el desempeño económico afectaron las preferencias de los ciudadanos. Pocos estudios han investigado la manera como los clivajes partidistas se tradujeron en diversas preferencias. ¿Existieron diferencias sistemáticas entre votantes de izquierda y derecha en sus preferencias sobre políticas de mercado? ¿Los votantes de izquierda rechazaron estas políticas y los de derecha las apoyaron? ¿Cuá de las transformaciones estructurales--liberalización del comercio o reducción del estado--crearon más división partidista entre el electorado? Este trabajo contesta estas preguntas mediante el análisis sistemático de una encuesta de opinión levantada por Mori Internacional en 1998.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/lar.0.0005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61721163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20488131</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20488131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-7680478bf45284992fcba3100f06ac67453457fe6d72c50f86cc9f5daa4f482d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9rVDEQx4NYcG29eBeCBw_St05-vsRbWWwtLFTaeg5p3sS-5f2oSbbgf28eK6V46Wnm8JnvzPAh5D2DNRNKfBl8WsMaANQrsmJK8kby1rwmKwAuGtNa9oa8zXm3EEboFbn-4VPps5_oZkD_6H9hPqU3xRek11gSTuF-xKmcUj919Dwh0tvkO_xKt770Ez0bMfXB09qWe6TMWsgn5Cj6IeO7f_WY_Dz_drv53myvLi43Z9smSGlL02oDsjV3USpupLU8hjsvGEAE7YNupRJStRF11_KgIBodgo2q815GaXgnjsmnQ-5Dmn_vMRc39jngMPgJ5312mrWcMS1eBJWtl2iwL4JCW-BKLokf_wN38z5N9VvHmWFKWAUV-nyAQppzThjdQ-pHn_44Bm6x5aotB25xUWH5lLjDUMZ9xmehdbM07mYxuggFw6tQqevYh8PYLpc5PS3gII1hgom_koKdyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218153950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Partisan Cleavages, State Retrenchment, and Free Trade: Latin America in the 1990s</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Magaloni, Beatriz ; Romero, Vidal</creator><creatorcontrib>Magaloni, Beatriz ; Romero, Vidal</creatorcontrib><description>This article accounts for the role that partisan divisions played in shaping variation in mass preferences for market-oriented policies in Latin America during the 1990s. Most of the existing studies on attitudes toward market reforms have focused on issues such as the timing of reforms, the presence of economic crises, and how economic performance shaped citizens' preferences. Fewer studies have investigated whether partisan cleavages translated into divergent preferences toward market reforms. Were there systematic differences between left- and right-wing voters in their preferences toward market reforms? Did left-wing voters oppose these policies and right-wing voters favor them? Which of these structural transformations--state retrenchment or trade liberalization--witnessed greater mass polarization along partisan lines? This article answers these questions with the use of a mass survey on public opinion about market reforms conducted by Mori International in eleven Latin American countries in 1998. /// Este trabajo estudia las divisiones partidistas entre el electorado con respecto a sus preferencias sobre las reformas de mercado que fueron implementadas en la década de los noventa. La mayoría de los estudios sobre opinión pública se han enfocado en cómo factores como crisis económicas, el momento de inicio de las reformas y el desempeño económico afectaron las preferencias de los ciudadanos. Pocos estudios han investigado la manera como los clivajes partidistas se tradujeron en diversas preferencias. ¿Existieron diferencias sistemáticas entre votantes de izquierda y derecha en sus preferencias sobre políticas de mercado? ¿Los votantes de izquierda rechazaron estas políticas y los de derecha las apoyaron? ¿Cuá de las transformaciones estructurales--liberalización del comercio o reducción del estado--crearon más división partidista entre el electorado? Este trabajo contesta estas preguntas mediante el análisis sistemático de una encuesta de opinión levantada por Mori Internacional en 1998.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-8791</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1542-4278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-4278</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/lar.0.0005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LARRBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pittsburgh: Latin American Studies Association</publisher><subject>Ancient languages ; Attitudes ; Citizens ; Comparative analysis ; Countries ; Democracy ; Economic conditions ; Economic crisis ; Economic models ; Economic Policy ; Economic reform ; Economic surveys ; Free trade ; General public ; Hypotheses ; Latin America ; Left wing politics ; Legacies ; Macroeconomics ; Markets ; Partisanship ; Polarization ; Political parties ; Political partisanship ; Preferences ; Privatization ; Public opinion ; Reforms ; Regional studies ; Research review studies ; Right wing politics ; Social policy ; Socioeconomic status ; State-society relations ; Trade liberalization ; Translation methods and strategies ; Voter behavior ; Voters</subject><ispartof>Latin American research review, 2008-01, Vol.43 (2), p.107-135</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Latin American Studies Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008 the University of Texas Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Latin American Studies Association 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-7680478bf45284992fcba3100f06ac67453457fe6d72c50f86cc9f5daa4f482d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20488131$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20488131$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,12825,27323,27903,27904,33753,33754,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Magaloni, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Vidal</creatorcontrib><title>Partisan Cleavages, State Retrenchment, and Free Trade: Latin America in the 1990s</title><title>Latin American research review</title><description>This article accounts for the role that partisan divisions played in shaping variation in mass preferences for market-oriented policies in Latin America during the 1990s. Most of the existing studies on attitudes toward market reforms have focused on issues such as the timing of reforms, the presence of economic crises, and how economic performance shaped citizens' preferences. Fewer studies have investigated whether partisan cleavages translated into divergent preferences toward market reforms. Were there systematic differences between left- and right-wing voters in their preferences toward market reforms? Did left-wing voters oppose these policies and right-wing voters favor them? Which of these structural transformations--state retrenchment or trade liberalization--witnessed greater mass polarization along partisan lines? This article answers these questions with the use of a mass survey on public opinion about market reforms conducted by Mori International in eleven Latin American countries in 1998. /// Este trabajo estudia las divisiones partidistas entre el electorado con respecto a sus preferencias sobre las reformas de mercado que fueron implementadas en la década de los noventa. La mayoría de los estudios sobre opinión pública se han enfocado en cómo factores como crisis económicas, el momento de inicio de las reformas y el desempeño económico afectaron las preferencias de los ciudadanos. Pocos estudios han investigado la manera como los clivajes partidistas se tradujeron en diversas preferencias. ¿Existieron diferencias sistemáticas entre votantes de izquierda y derecha en sus preferencias sobre políticas de mercado? ¿Los votantes de izquierda rechazaron estas políticas y los de derecha las apoyaron? ¿Cuá de las transformaciones estructurales--liberalización del comercio o reducción del estado--crearon más división partidista entre el electorado? Este trabajo contesta estas preguntas mediante el análisis sistemático de una encuesta de opinión levantada por Mori Internacional en 1998.</description><subject>Ancient languages</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Economic surveys</subject><subject>Free trade</subject><subject>General public</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Latin America</subject><subject>Left wing politics</subject><subject>Legacies</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political partisanship</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Regional studies</subject><subject>Research review studies</subject><subject>Right wing politics</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>State-society relations</subject><subject>Trade liberalization</subject><subject>Translation methods and strategies</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voters</subject><issn>0023-8791</issn><issn>1542-4278</issn><issn>1542-4278</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>LD.</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9rVDEQx4NYcG29eBeCBw_St05-vsRbWWwtLFTaeg5p3sS-5f2oSbbgf28eK6V46Wnm8JnvzPAh5D2DNRNKfBl8WsMaANQrsmJK8kby1rwmKwAuGtNa9oa8zXm3EEboFbn-4VPps5_oZkD_6H9hPqU3xRek11gSTuF-xKmcUj919Dwh0tvkO_xKt770Ez0bMfXB09qWe6TMWsgn5Cj6IeO7f_WY_Dz_drv53myvLi43Z9smSGlL02oDsjV3USpupLU8hjsvGEAE7YNupRJStRF11_KgIBodgo2q815GaXgnjsmnQ-5Dmn_vMRc39jngMPgJ5312mrWcMS1eBJWtl2iwL4JCW-BKLokf_wN38z5N9VvHmWFKWAUV-nyAQppzThjdQ-pHn_44Bm6x5aotB25xUWH5lLjDUMZ9xmehdbM07mYxuggFw6tQqevYh8PYLpc5PS3gII1hgom_koKdyA</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Magaloni, Beatriz</creator><creator>Romero, Vidal</creator><general>Latin American Studies Association</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>89V</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8BY</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BSCPQ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>UXAQP</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Partisan Cleavages, State Retrenchment, and Free Trade: Latin America in the 1990s</title><author>Magaloni, Beatriz ; Romero, Vidal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-7680478bf45284992fcba3100f06ac67453457fe6d72c50f86cc9f5daa4f482d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Ancient languages</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Economic surveys</topic><topic>Free trade</topic><topic>General public</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Latin America</topic><topic>Left wing politics</topic><topic>Legacies</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political partisanship</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Regional studies</topic><topic>Research review studies</topic><topic>Right wing politics</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>State-society relations</topic><topic>Trade liberalization</topic><topic>Translation methods and strategies</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Magaloni, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Vidal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PRISMA Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PRISMA Database with HAPI Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Black Studies Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ProQuest Black Studies</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Latin American research review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Magaloni, Beatriz</au><au>Romero, Vidal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Partisan Cleavages, State Retrenchment, and Free Trade: Latin America in the 1990s</atitle><jtitle>Latin American research review</jtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>107-135</pages><issn>0023-8791</issn><issn>1542-4278</issn><eissn>1542-4278</eissn><coden>LARRBM</coden><abstract>This article accounts for the role that partisan divisions played in shaping variation in mass preferences for market-oriented policies in Latin America during the 1990s. Most of the existing studies on attitudes toward market reforms have focused on issues such as the timing of reforms, the presence of economic crises, and how economic performance shaped citizens' preferences. Fewer studies have investigated whether partisan cleavages translated into divergent preferences toward market reforms. Were there systematic differences between left- and right-wing voters in their preferences toward market reforms? Did left-wing voters oppose these policies and right-wing voters favor them? Which of these structural transformations--state retrenchment or trade liberalization--witnessed greater mass polarization along partisan lines? This article answers these questions with the use of a mass survey on public opinion about market reforms conducted by Mori International in eleven Latin American countries in 1998. /// Este trabajo estudia las divisiones partidistas entre el electorado con respecto a sus preferencias sobre las reformas de mercado que fueron implementadas en la década de los noventa. La mayoría de los estudios sobre opinión pública se han enfocado en cómo factores como crisis económicas, el momento de inicio de las reformas y el desempeño económico afectaron las preferencias de los ciudadanos. Pocos estudios han investigado la manera como los clivajes partidistas se tradujeron en diversas preferencias. ¿Existieron diferencias sistemáticas entre votantes de izquierda y derecha en sus preferencias sobre políticas de mercado? ¿Los votantes de izquierda rechazaron estas políticas y los de derecha las apoyaron? ¿Cuá de las transformaciones estructurales--liberalización del comercio o reducción del estado--crearon más división partidista entre el electorado? Este trabajo contesta estas preguntas mediante el análisis sistemático de una encuesta de opinión levantada por Mori Internacional en 1998.</abstract><cop>Pittsburgh</cop><pub>Latin American Studies Association</pub><doi>10.1353/lar.0.0005</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-8791
ispartof Latin American research review, 2008-01, Vol.43 (2), p.107-135
issn 0023-8791
1542-4278
1542-4278
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61721163
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Ancient languages
Attitudes
Citizens
Comparative analysis
Countries
Democracy
Economic conditions
Economic crisis
Economic models
Economic Policy
Economic reform
Economic surveys
Free trade
General public
Hypotheses
Latin America
Left wing politics
Legacies
Macroeconomics
Markets
Partisanship
Polarization
Political parties
Political partisanship
Preferences
Privatization
Public opinion
Reforms
Regional studies
Research review studies
Right wing politics
Social policy
Socioeconomic status
State-society relations
Trade liberalization
Translation methods and strategies
Voter behavior
Voters
title Partisan Cleavages, State Retrenchment, and Free Trade: Latin America in the 1990s
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A11%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Partisan%20Cleavages,%20State%20Retrenchment,%20and%20Free%20Trade:%20Latin%20America%20in%20the%201990s&rft.jtitle=Latin%20American%20research%20review&rft.au=Magaloni,%20Beatriz&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=107-135&rft.issn=0023-8791&rft.eissn=1542-4278&rft.coden=LARRBM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/lar.0.0005&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20488131%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218153950&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20488131&rfr_iscdi=true