How Resource Dependency Can Influence Social Resilience within a Primary Resource Industry
Maintaining a healthy balance between human prosperity and environmental integrity is at the core of the principles of Ecological Sustainable Development. Resource-protection policies are frequently implemented so as to regulate the balance between resource access and use, however, they can inadvert...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rural sociology 2007-09, Vol.72 (3), p.359-390 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 390 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 359 |
container_title | Rural sociology |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Marshall, N.A Fenton, D.M Marshall, P.A Sutton, S.G |
description | Maintaining a healthy balance between human prosperity and environmental integrity is at the core of the principles of Ecological Sustainable Development. Resource-protection policies are frequently implemented so as to regulate the balance between resource access and use, however, they can inadvertently compromise the ability of resource users to adapt and be resilient. Resource users who are especially dependent on a resource are more seriously compromised. But how do we define and measure resource dependency? And how do we assess its ability to influence social resilience? In this study, a conceptual model of resource dependency is developed in terms of: (i) occupational attachment, (ii) attachment to place, (iii) employability, (iv) family attitude to change, (v) business size, (vi) business approach, (vii) financial situation, (viii) level of specialisation, (ix) time spent harvesting, and (x) interest in and knowledge of the environment. The model of resource dependency and its effect on social resilience are (quantitatively and qualitatively) tested and explored using the commercial fishing industry in North Queensland, Australia. Results show that occupational attachment and employability were important influences as were business size and approach. Results can be used to identify vulnerability to institutional change and guide policy development processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1526/003601107781799254 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61690944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ806519</ericid><sourcerecordid>61690944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6253-1b67ada66bfbda0537839c361e309c94487aeea0f63fd6d73bb7c4a511a3f2ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVFv0zAQxy0EEqXwBRASERK8BXx2fI4fWTfWoonBugppL5bjOOCRJcVuVPrtcZdpk-Bh84vlu9__f-c7Ql4CfQ-C4QdKOVIAKmUJUikmikdkAqJQOS05PCaTPZAngj0lz2K8pOkIgRNyMe-32ZmL_RCsyw7d2nW16-wum5kuW3RNO6SXy5a99abdg77115Gt3_z0XWayr8FfmbC7M1l09RA3YfecPGlMG92Lm3tKVp-Ozmfz_OT0eDH7eJJbZILnUKE0tUGsmqo2VHBZcmU5guNUWVUUpTTOGdogb2qsJa8qaQsjAAxvWGX4lLwbfdeh_z24uNFXPlrXtqZz_RA1AiqafB4CIleS3Q9SRoUCuBfkWBYAoBL45h_wMg2rS2PRoFQBDFPpKWEjZEMfY3CNXo-z1UD1fs36_zUn0dsbZxOtaZtgOuvjnXL_dcQyca9GzgVvb9NHn0uK4rpBOaa3vnW7BxTWZ6vlKUOelPmo9HHj_twqTfilUXIp9Pcvx3p-Qc9nB4dcf0v865FvTK_Nj5CaXS0ZBU5pWaKUgv8F8KrW-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199412666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Resource Dependency Can Influence Social Resilience within a Primary Resource Industry</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Marshall, N.A ; Fenton, D.M ; Marshall, P.A ; Sutton, S.G</creator><creatorcontrib>Marshall, N.A ; Fenton, D.M ; Marshall, P.A ; Sutton, S.G</creatorcontrib><description>Maintaining a healthy balance between human prosperity and environmental integrity is at the core of the principles of Ecological Sustainable Development. Resource-protection policies are frequently implemented so as to regulate the balance between resource access and use, however, they can inadvertently compromise the ability of resource users to adapt and be resilient. Resource users who are especially dependent on a resource are more seriously compromised. But how do we define and measure resource dependency? And how do we assess its ability to influence social resilience? In this study, a conceptual model of resource dependency is developed in terms of: (i) occupational attachment, (ii) attachment to place, (iii) employability, (iv) family attitude to change, (v) business size, (vi) business approach, (vii) financial situation, (viii) level of specialisation, (ix) time spent harvesting, and (x) interest in and knowledge of the environment. The model of resource dependency and its effect on social resilience are (quantitatively and qualitatively) tested and explored using the commercial fishing industry in North Queensland, Australia. Results show that occupational attachment and employability were important influences as were business size and approach. Results can be used to identify vulnerability to institutional change and guide policy development processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-0112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-0831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1526/003601107781799254</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RUSOAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adjustment (to Environment) ; Agricultural Occupations ; Attachment ; attachment behavior ; Attitude change ; Attitudes ; Australia ; Business ; Business Skills ; Commercial fishing ; Conservation (Environment) ; Coping ; Decision making ; Dependence ; Development policy ; Ecology ; Economic Factors ; Employability ; employment opportunities ; Employment Potential ; Environment ; Environmental problems ; Families & family life ; Family Attitudes ; fisheries ; Fishing ; Foreign Countries ; Harvesting ; Human ecology and demography ; Industry ; Influence ; Integrity ; Natural Resources ; occupational attachment ; Occupations ; Older people ; Organizational Change ; Organizational Commitment ; Personality Traits ; Policy making ; Prior Learning ; Protection ; Public Policy ; Qualitative analysis ; Queensland ; Resilience ; resource dependency ; Resource Management ; Rural Areas ; Rural sociology ; Rural studies ; Self esteem ; Social Influences ; social resilience ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Sociology ; Specialization ; Studies ; Sustainable Development ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Rural sociology, 2007-09, Vol.72 (3), p.359-390</ispartof><rights>2007 Rural Sociological Society</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Rural Sociological Society Sep 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6253-1b67ada66bfbda0537839c361e309c94487aeea0f63fd6d73bb7c4a511a3f2ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6253-1b67ada66bfbda0537839c361e309c94487aeea0f63fd6d73bb7c4a511a3f2ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1526%2F003601107781799254$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1526%2F003601107781799254$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27343,27923,27924,33773,33774,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ806519$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19094668$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marshall, N.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenton, D.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, S.G</creatorcontrib><title>How Resource Dependency Can Influence Social Resilience within a Primary Resource Industry</title><title>Rural sociology</title><description>Maintaining a healthy balance between human prosperity and environmental integrity is at the core of the principles of Ecological Sustainable Development. Resource-protection policies are frequently implemented so as to regulate the balance between resource access and use, however, they can inadvertently compromise the ability of resource users to adapt and be resilient. Resource users who are especially dependent on a resource are more seriously compromised. But how do we define and measure resource dependency? And how do we assess its ability to influence social resilience? In this study, a conceptual model of resource dependency is developed in terms of: (i) occupational attachment, (ii) attachment to place, (iii) employability, (iv) family attitude to change, (v) business size, (vi) business approach, (vii) financial situation, (viii) level of specialisation, (ix) time spent harvesting, and (x) interest in and knowledge of the environment. The model of resource dependency and its effect on social resilience are (quantitatively and qualitatively) tested and explored using the commercial fishing industry in North Queensland, Australia. Results show that occupational attachment and employability were important influences as were business size and approach. Results can be used to identify vulnerability to institutional change and guide policy development processes.</description><subject>Adjustment (to Environment)</subject><subject>Agricultural Occupations</subject><subject>Attachment</subject><subject>attachment behavior</subject><subject>Attitude change</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Business Skills</subject><subject>Commercial fishing</subject><subject>Conservation (Environment)</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Development policy</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic Factors</subject><subject>Employability</subject><subject>employment opportunities</subject><subject>Employment Potential</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental problems</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family Attitudes</subject><subject>fisheries</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Human ecology and demography</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Integrity</subject><subject>Natural Resources</subject><subject>occupational attachment</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Organizational Change</subject><subject>Organizational Commitment</subject><subject>Personality Traits</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Prior Learning</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Queensland</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>resource dependency</subject><subject>Resource Management</subject><subject>Rural Areas</subject><subject>Rural sociology</subject><subject>Rural studies</subject><subject>Self esteem</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>social resilience</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Specialization</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>0036-0112</issn><issn>1549-0831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVFv0zAQxy0EEqXwBRASERK8BXx2fI4fWTfWoonBugppL5bjOOCRJcVuVPrtcZdpk-Bh84vlu9__f-c7Ql4CfQ-C4QdKOVIAKmUJUikmikdkAqJQOS05PCaTPZAngj0lz2K8pOkIgRNyMe-32ZmL_RCsyw7d2nW16-wum5kuW3RNO6SXy5a99abdg77115Gt3_z0XWayr8FfmbC7M1l09RA3YfecPGlMG92Lm3tKVp-Ozmfz_OT0eDH7eJJbZILnUKE0tUGsmqo2VHBZcmU5guNUWVUUpTTOGdogb2qsJa8qaQsjAAxvWGX4lLwbfdeh_z24uNFXPlrXtqZz_RA1AiqafB4CIleS3Q9SRoUCuBfkWBYAoBL45h_wMg2rS2PRoFQBDFPpKWEjZEMfY3CNXo-z1UD1fs36_zUn0dsbZxOtaZtgOuvjnXL_dcQyca9GzgVvb9NHn0uK4rpBOaa3vnW7BxTWZ6vlKUOelPmo9HHj_twqTfilUXIp9Pcvx3p-Qc9nB4dcf0v865FvTK_Nj5CaXS0ZBU5pWaKUgv8F8KrW-w</recordid><startdate>200709</startdate><enddate>200709</enddate><creator>Marshall, N.A</creator><creator>Fenton, D.M</creator><creator>Marshall, P.A</creator><creator>Sutton, S.G</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Rural Sociological Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200709</creationdate><title>How Resource Dependency Can Influence Social Resilience within a Primary Resource Industry</title><author>Marshall, N.A ; Fenton, D.M ; Marshall, P.A ; Sutton, S.G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6253-1b67ada66bfbda0537839c361e309c94487aeea0f63fd6d73bb7c4a511a3f2ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adjustment (to Environment)</topic><topic>Agricultural Occupations</topic><topic>Attachment</topic><topic>attachment behavior</topic><topic>Attitude change</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Business Skills</topic><topic>Commercial fishing</topic><topic>Conservation (Environment)</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Development policy</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic Factors</topic><topic>Employability</topic><topic>employment opportunities</topic><topic>Employment Potential</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental problems</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family Attitudes</topic><topic>fisheries</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Human ecology and demography</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Integrity</topic><topic>Natural Resources</topic><topic>occupational attachment</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Organizational Change</topic><topic>Organizational Commitment</topic><topic>Personality Traits</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Prior Learning</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Queensland</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>resource dependency</topic><topic>Resource Management</topic><topic>Rural Areas</topic><topic>Rural sociology</topic><topic>Rural studies</topic><topic>Self esteem</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>social resilience</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Specialization</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marshall, N.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenton, D.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, S.G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Rural sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marshall, N.A</au><au>Fenton, D.M</au><au>Marshall, P.A</au><au>Sutton, S.G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ806519</ericid><atitle>How Resource Dependency Can Influence Social Resilience within a Primary Resource Industry</atitle><jtitle>Rural sociology</jtitle><date>2007-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>359</spage><epage>390</epage><pages>359-390</pages><issn>0036-0112</issn><eissn>1549-0831</eissn><coden>RUSOAJ</coden><abstract>Maintaining a healthy balance between human prosperity and environmental integrity is at the core of the principles of Ecological Sustainable Development. Resource-protection policies are frequently implemented so as to regulate the balance between resource access and use, however, they can inadvertently compromise the ability of resource users to adapt and be resilient. Resource users who are especially dependent on a resource are more seriously compromised. But how do we define and measure resource dependency? And how do we assess its ability to influence social resilience? In this study, a conceptual model of resource dependency is developed in terms of: (i) occupational attachment, (ii) attachment to place, (iii) employability, (iv) family attitude to change, (v) business size, (vi) business approach, (vii) financial situation, (viii) level of specialisation, (ix) time spent harvesting, and (x) interest in and knowledge of the environment. The model of resource dependency and its effect on social resilience are (quantitatively and qualitatively) tested and explored using the commercial fishing industry in North Queensland, Australia. Results show that occupational attachment and employability were important influences as were business size and approach. Results can be used to identify vulnerability to institutional change and guide policy development processes.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1526/003601107781799254</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-0112 |
ispartof | Rural sociology, 2007-09, Vol.72 (3), p.359-390 |
issn | 0036-0112 1549-0831 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61690944 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Adjustment (to Environment) Agricultural Occupations Attachment attachment behavior Attitude change Attitudes Australia Business Business Skills Commercial fishing Conservation (Environment) Coping Decision making Dependence Development policy Ecology Economic Factors Employability employment opportunities Employment Potential Environment Environmental problems Families & family life Family Attitudes fisheries Fishing Foreign Countries Harvesting Human ecology and demography Industry Influence Integrity Natural Resources occupational attachment Occupations Older people Organizational Change Organizational Commitment Personality Traits Policy making Prior Learning Protection Public Policy Qualitative analysis Queensland Resilience resource dependency Resource Management Rural Areas Rural sociology Rural studies Self esteem Social Influences social resilience Socioeconomic Factors Sociology Specialization Studies Sustainable Development Vulnerability |
title | How Resource Dependency Can Influence Social Resilience within a Primary Resource Industry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A32%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Resource%20Dependency%20Can%20Influence%20Social%20Resilience%20within%20a%20Primary%20Resource%20Industry&rft.jtitle=Rural%20sociology&rft.au=Marshall,%20N.A&rft.date=2007-09&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=359&rft.epage=390&rft.pages=359-390&rft.issn=0036-0112&rft.eissn=1549-0831&rft.coden=RUSOAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1526/003601107781799254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61690944%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199412666&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ806519&rfr_iscdi=true |