“Every African a Nationalist”: Scientific Forestry and Forest Nationalism in Colonial Tanzania
Scientific forestry was practiced in virtually the entire colonized world. Although methods of scientific forestry might differ from one colony to another, its basic premise was the need for the state to assume control over forests and woodlands so that they might be managed productively for their t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative studies in society and history 2007-10, Vol.49 (4), p.883-913 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 913 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 883 |
container_title | Comparative studies in society and history |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Sunseri, Thaddeus |
description | Scientific forestry was practiced in virtually the entire colonized world. Although methods of scientific forestry might differ from one colony to another, its basic premise was the need for the state to assume control over forests and woodlands so that they might be managed productively for their timber and other forest resources as part of a strategy of colonial development. The author analyzes grassroots Tanzanian attempts to thwart 'scientific forestry' within the larger context of Cold War global economy and anti-colonial nationalist movements. As British governmental and industrial interests created huge reserves of hardwood forests in Tanzania, dressing their actions in a rhetoric of conservation, progressive resource management, and colonial development, they emptied them of peasants and pastoralists, and policed against encroachment by people and livestock. Tanzanians were mustered as laborers to cut fire lines, fight forest fires, and fell and transport trees, often for private corporations, while at the same time villagers would be largely deprived of the use of these forests for their own subsistence or commercial purposes, and as religious sites. Popular dissatisfaction with the reserves, and with working conditions inside them, was channeled into support for the Tanzanian independence movement. The author argues that this collision of factors led to national independence far in advance of the British timetable. Figures, References. Adapted from the source document. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0010417507000795 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61688606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0010417507000795</cupid><jstor_id>4497710</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4497710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-4cf6237761577e6a5b14cfec363d31c4075f2a3c85cdaee2d12a7a6dce6d3acf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS1EJULKAyCxGLFgN-Brj31n2JXQBqoWhFqk7qwbjwc5TMbFniDKqg8CL9cnwVGigkCoK_-c79jHPow9Bv4cOOCLM86BV4CKI-ccG3WPTaBCVYqmae6zyUYuN_oD9jClZWYaBWLCFjfXPw6_unhVHHTRWxoKKt7R6MNAvU_jzfXPl8WZ9W4YfedtcRSiS2OmaWh3iz_wVeGHYhb6MHjqi3MavlOe7bO9jvrkHu3GKft4dHg-e1OevJ-_nR2clLbS9VhWttNCImpQiE6TWkDeclZq2UqwFUfVCZK2VrYl50QLgpB0a51uJdlOTtmz7bmXMXxZ52Rm5ZN1fU-DC-tkNOi61lzfCaoGUdVNcycoNaKQnGfw6V_gMqxj_pNkBAiNXOWnTRlsIRtDStF15jL6FcUrA9xsSjT_lJg9T7aeZRpDvDVUVY4Im3vLrZyrct9uZYqfjUaJyuj5BzNX8Pri-NWFOc283EWg1SL69pP7HfT_IX4B9Wy4Rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212670562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Every African a Nationalist”: Scientific Forestry and Forest Nationalism in Colonial Tanzania</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Sunseri, Thaddeus</creator><creatorcontrib>Sunseri, Thaddeus</creatorcontrib><description>Scientific forestry was practiced in virtually the entire colonized world. Although methods of scientific forestry might differ from one colony to another, its basic premise was the need for the state to assume control over forests and woodlands so that they might be managed productively for their timber and other forest resources as part of a strategy of colonial development. The author analyzes grassroots Tanzanian attempts to thwart 'scientific forestry' within the larger context of Cold War global economy and anti-colonial nationalist movements. As British governmental and industrial interests created huge reserves of hardwood forests in Tanzania, dressing their actions in a rhetoric of conservation, progressive resource management, and colonial development, they emptied them of peasants and pastoralists, and policed against encroachment by people and livestock. Tanzanians were mustered as laborers to cut fire lines, fight forest fires, and fell and transport trees, often for private corporations, while at the same time villagers would be largely deprived of the use of these forests for their own subsistence or commercial purposes, and as religious sites. Popular dissatisfaction with the reserves, and with working conditions inside them, was channeled into support for the Tanzanian independence movement. The author argues that this collision of factors led to national independence far in advance of the British timetable. Figures, References. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-633X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0010417507000795</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CSSHAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Against the Benefits of Trade ; Agriculture ; Black people ; Case studies ; Clubs ; Colonial government ; Colonial history ; Colonialism ; Colonies & territories ; Commercial forests ; Complaints ; Dance ; Demonstrations & protests ; Farming ; Fertility ; Fires ; Forest conservation ; Forest management ; Forest reserves ; Forestry ; Forestry development ; Forestry policy ; Forestry workers ; Forests ; Grass roots movement ; Historians ; Historiography ; Independence ; Labor unions ; Land use ; Leisure ; Livestock ; Methods ; Nationalism ; Nationalists ; Peasant class ; Peasants ; Plantation forestry ; Political ecology ; Political Movements ; Politics ; Rebellions ; Resource Management ; Science ; Self government ; Self help ; Soil erosion ; Soil erosion control ; Soil fertility ; State government ; Tanzania ; Timber ; War ; World War II ; Youth organizations</subject><ispartof>Comparative studies in society and history, 2007-10, Vol.49 (4), p.883-913</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Society for Comparative Study of Society and History 2007</rights><rights>Copyright 2007 Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Oct 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-4cf6237761577e6a5b14cfec363d31c4075f2a3c85cdaee2d12a7a6dce6d3acf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-4cf6237761577e6a5b14cfec363d31c4075f2a3c85cdaee2d12a7a6dce6d3acf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4497710$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0010417507000795/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,12824,27321,27901,27902,33751,33752,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sunseri, Thaddeus</creatorcontrib><title>“Every African a Nationalist”: Scientific Forestry and Forest Nationalism in Colonial Tanzania</title><title>Comparative studies in society and history</title><addtitle>Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist</addtitle><description>Scientific forestry was practiced in virtually the entire colonized world. Although methods of scientific forestry might differ from one colony to another, its basic premise was the need for the state to assume control over forests and woodlands so that they might be managed productively for their timber and other forest resources as part of a strategy of colonial development. The author analyzes grassroots Tanzanian attempts to thwart 'scientific forestry' within the larger context of Cold War global economy and anti-colonial nationalist movements. As British governmental and industrial interests created huge reserves of hardwood forests in Tanzania, dressing their actions in a rhetoric of conservation, progressive resource management, and colonial development, they emptied them of peasants and pastoralists, and policed against encroachment by people and livestock. Tanzanians were mustered as laborers to cut fire lines, fight forest fires, and fell and transport trees, often for private corporations, while at the same time villagers would be largely deprived of the use of these forests for their own subsistence or commercial purposes, and as religious sites. Popular dissatisfaction with the reserves, and with working conditions inside them, was channeled into support for the Tanzanian independence movement. The author argues that this collision of factors led to national independence far in advance of the British timetable. Figures, References. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Against the Benefits of Trade</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Clubs</subject><subject>Colonial government</subject><subject>Colonial history</subject><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Colonies & territories</subject><subject>Commercial forests</subject><subject>Complaints</subject><subject>Dance</subject><subject>Demonstrations & protests</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest reserves</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forestry development</subject><subject>Forestry policy</subject><subject>Forestry workers</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Grass roots movement</subject><subject>Historians</subject><subject>Historiography</subject><subject>Independence</subject><subject>Labor unions</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Leisure</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Nationalists</subject><subject>Peasant class</subject><subject>Peasants</subject><subject>Plantation forestry</subject><subject>Political ecology</subject><subject>Political Movements</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Rebellions</subject><subject>Resource Management</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Self government</subject><subject>Self help</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil erosion control</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>Tanzania</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>World War II</subject><subject>Youth organizations</subject><issn>0010-4175</issn><issn>1475-2999</issn><issn>1471-633X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS1EJULKAyCxGLFgN-Brj31n2JXQBqoWhFqk7qwbjwc5TMbFniDKqg8CL9cnwVGigkCoK_-c79jHPow9Bv4cOOCLM86BV4CKI-ccG3WPTaBCVYqmae6zyUYuN_oD9jClZWYaBWLCFjfXPw6_unhVHHTRWxoKKt7R6MNAvU_jzfXPl8WZ9W4YfedtcRSiS2OmaWh3iz_wVeGHYhb6MHjqi3MavlOe7bO9jvrkHu3GKft4dHg-e1OevJ-_nR2clLbS9VhWttNCImpQiE6TWkDeclZq2UqwFUfVCZK2VrYl50QLgpB0a51uJdlOTtmz7bmXMXxZ52Rm5ZN1fU-DC-tkNOi61lzfCaoGUdVNcycoNaKQnGfw6V_gMqxj_pNkBAiNXOWnTRlsIRtDStF15jL6FcUrA9xsSjT_lJg9T7aeZRpDvDVUVY4Im3vLrZyrct9uZYqfjUaJyuj5BzNX8Pri-NWFOc283EWg1SL69pP7HfT_IX4B9Wy4Rw</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Sunseri, Thaddeus</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>“Every African a Nationalist”: Scientific Forestry and Forest Nationalism in Colonial Tanzania</title><author>Sunseri, Thaddeus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-4cf6237761577e6a5b14cfec363d31c4075f2a3c85cdaee2d12a7a6dce6d3acf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Against the Benefits of Trade</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Clubs</topic><topic>Colonial government</topic><topic>Colonial history</topic><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Colonies & territories</topic><topic>Commercial forests</topic><topic>Complaints</topic><topic>Dance</topic><topic>Demonstrations & protests</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest reserves</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forestry development</topic><topic>Forestry policy</topic><topic>Forestry workers</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Grass roots movement</topic><topic>Historians</topic><topic>Historiography</topic><topic>Independence</topic><topic>Labor unions</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Leisure</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Nationalists</topic><topic>Peasant class</topic><topic>Peasants</topic><topic>Plantation forestry</topic><topic>Political ecology</topic><topic>Political Movements</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Rebellions</topic><topic>Resource Management</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Self government</topic><topic>Self help</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil erosion control</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>Tanzania</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>World War II</topic><topic>Youth organizations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sunseri, Thaddeus</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Comparative studies in society and history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sunseri, Thaddeus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Every African a Nationalist”: Scientific Forestry and Forest Nationalism in Colonial Tanzania</atitle><jtitle>Comparative studies in society and history</jtitle><addtitle>Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>883</spage><epage>913</epage><pages>883-913</pages><issn>0010-4175</issn><eissn>1475-2999</eissn><eissn>1471-633X</eissn><coden>CSSHAN</coden><abstract>Scientific forestry was practiced in virtually the entire colonized world. Although methods of scientific forestry might differ from one colony to another, its basic premise was the need for the state to assume control over forests and woodlands so that they might be managed productively for their timber and other forest resources as part of a strategy of colonial development. The author analyzes grassroots Tanzanian attempts to thwart 'scientific forestry' within the larger context of Cold War global economy and anti-colonial nationalist movements. As British governmental and industrial interests created huge reserves of hardwood forests in Tanzania, dressing their actions in a rhetoric of conservation, progressive resource management, and colonial development, they emptied them of peasants and pastoralists, and policed against encroachment by people and livestock. Tanzanians were mustered as laborers to cut fire lines, fight forest fires, and fell and transport trees, often for private corporations, while at the same time villagers would be largely deprived of the use of these forests for their own subsistence or commercial purposes, and as religious sites. Popular dissatisfaction with the reserves, and with working conditions inside them, was channeled into support for the Tanzanian independence movement. The author argues that this collision of factors led to national independence far in advance of the British timetable. Figures, References. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0010417507000795</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4175 |
ispartof | Comparative studies in society and history, 2007-10, Vol.49 (4), p.883-913 |
issn | 0010-4175 1475-2999 1471-633X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61688606 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Against the Benefits of Trade Agriculture Black people Case studies Clubs Colonial government Colonial history Colonialism Colonies & territories Commercial forests Complaints Dance Demonstrations & protests Farming Fertility Fires Forest conservation Forest management Forest reserves Forestry Forestry development Forestry policy Forestry workers Forests Grass roots movement Historians Historiography Independence Labor unions Land use Leisure Livestock Methods Nationalism Nationalists Peasant class Peasants Plantation forestry Political ecology Political Movements Politics Rebellions Resource Management Science Self government Self help Soil erosion Soil erosion control Soil fertility State government Tanzania Timber War World War II Youth organizations |
title | “Every African a Nationalist”: Scientific Forestry and Forest Nationalism in Colonial Tanzania |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A23%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CEvery%20African%20a%20Nationalist%E2%80%9D:%20Scientific%20Forestry%20and%20Forest%20Nationalism%20in%20Colonial%20Tanzania&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20studies%20in%20society%20and%20history&rft.au=Sunseri,%20Thaddeus&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=913&rft.pages=883-913&rft.issn=0010-4175&rft.eissn=1475-2999&rft.coden=CSSHAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0010417507000795&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4497710%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212670562&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0010417507000795&rft_jstor_id=4497710&rfr_iscdi=true |