How Confucian are Contemporary Chinese? Construction of an Ideal Type and its Application to Three Chinese Communities

As a major source of social values in East Asia, Confucianism assumes especial significance amidst the proliferation of instrumental rationality in modern societies. This study attempts to answer the question: how Confucian are contemporary Chinese? By way of constructing an ideal type of Confucian...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of East Asian studies 2006, Vol.5 (2), p.157-180
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Chung Fang, Chiu, Chi Yue, Chan, Kin Man, King, Ambrose, Cheung, Tak Sing, Chan, Hoi Man
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 180
container_issue 2
container_start_page 157
container_title European journal of East Asian studies
container_volume 5
creator Yang, Chung Fang
Chiu, Chi Yue
Chan, Kin Man
King, Ambrose
Cheung, Tak Sing
Chan, Hoi Man
description As a major source of social values in East Asia, Confucianism assumes especial significance amidst the proliferation of instrumental rationality in modern societies. This study attempts to answer the question: how Confucian are contemporary Chinese? By way of constructing an ideal type of Confucian actors, which is then applied to a survey of three Chinese communities, this study tries to formulate a new perspective in depicting the character of modern Confucian actors, measured in terms of their dynamic proximity to the Confucian ideal type. Our approach marks a shift of emphasis, both empirically and methodologically, compared with previous work on this topic. On the empirical side, our study breaks with the long-standing, classical distinction between the 'gentleman' and the 'commoner' prevalent in Confucian discourse. Degrees of proximity to Confucian values are viewed in representational—i.e. non-evaluative—terms. In constructing the ideal type of Confucian actors, we distinguish between formal and substantive values in Confucianism. This analytical distinction allows our study to demonstrate the continued relevance of Confucianism. While substantive values change over time, the formal, analytical core that captures the essence of Confucianism continues to survive in the face of the vicissitudes of modernity and the spread of instrumental rationality.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/157006106778869289
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61668842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23615674</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23615674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2542-2847df728cefc6d83013732ba83a286844eae3a0ea1337fbd1e59d0b9c06ca513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEUkvhBSoheQO7FP_FdlaoikpbaFWkXtaW40xUX5I42A7Qt69DSlkgsbJnzjdHozNFcUzwCSGCvSeVxFgQLKRUStRU1c-Kw7VZ5m71fP0LVeJK8YPiZYx7jInkVB4WPy78T9T4qV-sMxMyAdYqwTj7YMI9au7cBBE-rN2YwmKT8xPyPcrwZQdmQLv7GXLVIZciOp3nwVnzG0oe7e4CwB-PbDGOy-SSg_iqeNGbIcLrx_eo-PrxbNdclFc355fN6VXZ0orTkiouu15SZaG3olMMEyYZbY1ihiqhOAcDzGAwhDHZtx2Bqu5wW1ssrKkIOyrebb5z8N8XiEmPLloYBjOBX6IWRAilOM0g3UAbfIwBej0HN-YENMF6jVj_G3EeevvobqI1Qx_MZF38O6lYjTldt3izcfuYfHjSKcu3EZJnvdx0FxP8etJN-KaFZLLSnz7vdPOFXp_f8lutMo83vg1uGPTeL2HKKf5v1QenJqKM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>61668842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Confucian are Contemporary Chinese? Construction of an Ideal Type and its Application to Three Chinese Communities</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Yang, Chung Fang ; Chiu, Chi Yue ; Chan, Kin Man ; King, Ambrose ; Cheung, Tak Sing ; Chan, Hoi Man</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Chung Fang ; Chiu, Chi Yue ; Chan, Kin Man ; King, Ambrose ; Cheung, Tak Sing ; Chan, Hoi Man</creatorcontrib><description>As a major source of social values in East Asia, Confucianism assumes especial significance amidst the proliferation of instrumental rationality in modern societies. This study attempts to answer the question: how Confucian are contemporary Chinese? By way of constructing an ideal type of Confucian actors, which is then applied to a survey of three Chinese communities, this study tries to formulate a new perspective in depicting the character of modern Confucian actors, measured in terms of their dynamic proximity to the Confucian ideal type. Our approach marks a shift of emphasis, both empirically and methodologically, compared with previous work on this topic. On the empirical side, our study breaks with the long-standing, classical distinction between the 'gentleman' and the 'commoner' prevalent in Confucian discourse. Degrees of proximity to Confucian values are viewed in representational—i.e. non-evaluative—terms. In constructing the ideal type of Confucian actors, we distinguish between formal and substantive values in Confucianism. This analytical distinction allows our study to demonstrate the continued relevance of Confucianism. While substantive values change over time, the formal, analytical core that captures the essence of Confucianism continues to survive in the face of the vicissitudes of modernity and the spread of instrumental rationality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1568-0584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1570-0615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-0584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/157006106778869289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>Communities ; CONFUCIAN ACTORS ; CONFUCIANISM ; Cultures and civilizations ; Economic value ; Family values ; Far East ; General studies ; IDEAL TYPE ; Ideal Types ; MEASUREMENT ; Modern Society ; MODERNITY ; Morality ; Political systems ; Politics ; Rationality ; Social order ; Social Values ; Sociology ; The gentleman ; TRADITION ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>European journal of East Asian studies, 2006, Vol.5 (2), p.157-180</ispartof><rights>2006 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Brill 2006</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2542-2847df728cefc6d83013732ba83a286844eae3a0ea1337fbd1e59d0b9c06ca513</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23615674$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23615674$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18390421$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Chung Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Chi Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kin Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Ambrose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Tak Sing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Hoi Man</creatorcontrib><title>How Confucian are Contemporary Chinese? Construction of an Ideal Type and its Application to Three Chinese Communities</title><title>European journal of East Asian studies</title><addtitle>EJEA</addtitle><description>As a major source of social values in East Asia, Confucianism assumes especial significance amidst the proliferation of instrumental rationality in modern societies. This study attempts to answer the question: how Confucian are contemporary Chinese? By way of constructing an ideal type of Confucian actors, which is then applied to a survey of three Chinese communities, this study tries to formulate a new perspective in depicting the character of modern Confucian actors, measured in terms of their dynamic proximity to the Confucian ideal type. Our approach marks a shift of emphasis, both empirically and methodologically, compared with previous work on this topic. On the empirical side, our study breaks with the long-standing, classical distinction between the 'gentleman' and the 'commoner' prevalent in Confucian discourse. Degrees of proximity to Confucian values are viewed in representational—i.e. non-evaluative—terms. In constructing the ideal type of Confucian actors, we distinguish between formal and substantive values in Confucianism. This analytical distinction allows our study to demonstrate the continued relevance of Confucianism. While substantive values change over time, the formal, analytical core that captures the essence of Confucianism continues to survive in the face of the vicissitudes of modernity and the spread of instrumental rationality.</description><subject>Communities</subject><subject>CONFUCIAN ACTORS</subject><subject>CONFUCIANISM</subject><subject>Cultures and civilizations</subject><subject>Economic value</subject><subject>Family values</subject><subject>Far East</subject><subject>General studies</subject><subject>IDEAL TYPE</subject><subject>Ideal Types</subject><subject>MEASUREMENT</subject><subject>Modern Society</subject><subject>MODERNITY</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Social order</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>The gentleman</subject><subject>TRADITION</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>1568-0584</issn><issn>1570-0615</issn><issn>1568-0584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEUkvhBSoheQO7FP_FdlaoikpbaFWkXtaW40xUX5I42A7Qt69DSlkgsbJnzjdHozNFcUzwCSGCvSeVxFgQLKRUStRU1c-Kw7VZ5m71fP0LVeJK8YPiZYx7jInkVB4WPy78T9T4qV-sMxMyAdYqwTj7YMI9au7cBBE-rN2YwmKT8xPyPcrwZQdmQLv7GXLVIZciOp3nwVnzG0oe7e4CwB-PbDGOy-SSg_iqeNGbIcLrx_eo-PrxbNdclFc355fN6VXZ0orTkiouu15SZaG3olMMEyYZbY1ihiqhOAcDzGAwhDHZtx2Bqu5wW1ssrKkIOyrebb5z8N8XiEmPLloYBjOBX6IWRAilOM0g3UAbfIwBej0HN-YENMF6jVj_G3EeevvobqI1Qx_MZF38O6lYjTldt3izcfuYfHjSKcu3EZJnvdx0FxP8etJN-KaFZLLSnz7vdPOFXp_f8lutMo83vg1uGPTeL2HKKf5v1QenJqKM</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Yang, Chung Fang</creator><creator>Chiu, Chi Yue</creator><creator>Chan, Kin Man</creator><creator>King, Ambrose</creator><creator>Cheung, Tak Sing</creator><creator>Chan, Hoi Man</creator><general>BRILL</general><general>Brill</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>How Confucian are Contemporary Chinese? Construction of an Ideal Type and its Application to Three Chinese Communities</title><author>Yang, Chung Fang ; Chiu, Chi Yue ; Chan, Kin Man ; King, Ambrose ; Cheung, Tak Sing ; Chan, Hoi Man</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2542-2847df728cefc6d83013732ba83a286844eae3a0ea1337fbd1e59d0b9c06ca513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Communities</topic><topic>CONFUCIAN ACTORS</topic><topic>CONFUCIANISM</topic><topic>Cultures and civilizations</topic><topic>Economic value</topic><topic>Family values</topic><topic>Far East</topic><topic>General studies</topic><topic>IDEAL TYPE</topic><topic>Ideal Types</topic><topic>MEASUREMENT</topic><topic>Modern Society</topic><topic>MODERNITY</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Social order</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>The gentleman</topic><topic>TRADITION</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Chung Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Chi Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kin Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Ambrose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Tak Sing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Hoi Man</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European journal of East Asian studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Chung Fang</au><au>Chiu, Chi Yue</au><au>Chan, Kin Man</au><au>King, Ambrose</au><au>Cheung, Tak Sing</au><au>Chan, Hoi Man</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Confucian are Contemporary Chinese? Construction of an Ideal Type and its Application to Three Chinese Communities</atitle><jtitle>European journal of East Asian studies</jtitle><addtitle>EJEA</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>157-180</pages><issn>1568-0584</issn><eissn>1570-0615</eissn><eissn>1568-0584</eissn><abstract>As a major source of social values in East Asia, Confucianism assumes especial significance amidst the proliferation of instrumental rationality in modern societies. This study attempts to answer the question: how Confucian are contemporary Chinese? By way of constructing an ideal type of Confucian actors, which is then applied to a survey of three Chinese communities, this study tries to formulate a new perspective in depicting the character of modern Confucian actors, measured in terms of their dynamic proximity to the Confucian ideal type. Our approach marks a shift of emphasis, both empirically and methodologically, compared with previous work on this topic. On the empirical side, our study breaks with the long-standing, classical distinction between the 'gentleman' and the 'commoner' prevalent in Confucian discourse. Degrees of proximity to Confucian values are viewed in representational—i.e. non-evaluative—terms. In constructing the ideal type of Confucian actors, we distinguish between formal and substantive values in Confucianism. This analytical distinction allows our study to demonstrate the continued relevance of Confucianism. While substantive values change over time, the formal, analytical core that captures the essence of Confucianism continues to survive in the face of the vicissitudes of modernity and the spread of instrumental rationality.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><doi>10.1163/157006106778869289</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1568-0584
ispartof European journal of East Asian studies, 2006, Vol.5 (2), p.157-180
issn 1568-0584
1570-0615
1568-0584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61668842
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; JSTOR; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Communities
CONFUCIAN ACTORS
CONFUCIANISM
Cultures and civilizations
Economic value
Family values
Far East
General studies
IDEAL TYPE
Ideal Types
MEASUREMENT
Modern Society
MODERNITY
Morality
Political systems
Politics
Rationality
Social order
Social Values
Sociology
The gentleman
TRADITION
Traditions
title How Confucian are Contemporary Chinese? Construction of an Ideal Type and its Application to Three Chinese Communities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T11%3A13%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Confucian%20are%20Contemporary%20Chinese?%20Construction%20of%20an%20Ideal%20Type%20and%20its%20Application%20to%20Three%20Chinese%20Communities&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20East%20Asian%20studies&rft.au=Yang,%20Chung%20Fang&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=157-180&rft.issn=1568-0584&rft.eissn=1570-0615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/157006106778869289&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23615674%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=61668842&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23615674&rfr_iscdi=true