How Confucian are Contemporary Chinese? Construction of an Ideal Type and its Application to Three Chinese Communities
As a major source of social values in East Asia, Confucianism assumes especial significance amidst the proliferation of instrumental rationality in modern societies. This study attempts to answer the question: how Confucian are contemporary Chinese? By way of constructing an ideal type of Confucian...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of East Asian studies 2006, Vol.5 (2), p.157-180 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 180 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 157 |
container_title | European journal of East Asian studies |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Yang, Chung Fang Chiu, Chi Yue Chan, Kin Man King, Ambrose Cheung, Tak Sing Chan, Hoi Man |
description | As a major source of social values in East Asia, Confucianism assumes especial significance amidst the proliferation of instrumental rationality in modern societies. This study attempts to answer the question: how Confucian are contemporary Chinese? By way of constructing an ideal type of Confucian actors, which is then applied to a survey of three Chinese communities, this study tries to formulate a new perspective in depicting the character of modern Confucian actors, measured in terms of their dynamic proximity to the Confucian ideal type. Our approach marks a shift of emphasis, both empirically and methodologically, compared with previous work on this topic. On the empirical side, our study breaks with the long-standing, classical distinction between the 'gentleman' and the 'commoner' prevalent in Confucian discourse. Degrees of proximity to Confucian values are viewed in representational—i.e. non-evaluative—terms. In constructing the ideal type of Confucian actors, we distinguish between formal and substantive values in Confucianism. This analytical distinction allows our study to demonstrate the continued relevance of Confucianism. While substantive values change over time, the formal, analytical core that captures the essence of Confucianism continues to survive in the face of the vicissitudes of modernity and the spread of instrumental rationality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/157006106778869289 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61668842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23615674</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23615674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2542-2847df728cefc6d83013732ba83a286844eae3a0ea1337fbd1e59d0b9c06ca513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEUkvhBSoheQO7FP_FdlaoikpbaFWkXtaW40xUX5I42A7Qt69DSlkgsbJnzjdHozNFcUzwCSGCvSeVxFgQLKRUStRU1c-Kw7VZ5m71fP0LVeJK8YPiZYx7jInkVB4WPy78T9T4qV-sMxMyAdYqwTj7YMI9au7cBBE-rN2YwmKT8xPyPcrwZQdmQLv7GXLVIZciOp3nwVnzG0oe7e4CwB-PbDGOy-SSg_iqeNGbIcLrx_eo-PrxbNdclFc355fN6VXZ0orTkiouu15SZaG3olMMEyYZbY1ihiqhOAcDzGAwhDHZtx2Bqu5wW1ssrKkIOyrebb5z8N8XiEmPLloYBjOBX6IWRAilOM0g3UAbfIwBej0HN-YENMF6jVj_G3EeevvobqI1Qx_MZF38O6lYjTldt3izcfuYfHjSKcu3EZJnvdx0FxP8etJN-KaFZLLSnz7vdPOFXp_f8lutMo83vg1uGPTeL2HKKf5v1QenJqKM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>61668842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Confucian are Contemporary Chinese? Construction of an Ideal Type and its Application to Three Chinese Communities</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Yang, Chung Fang ; Chiu, Chi Yue ; Chan, Kin Man ; King, Ambrose ; Cheung, Tak Sing ; Chan, Hoi Man</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Chung Fang ; Chiu, Chi Yue ; Chan, Kin Man ; King, Ambrose ; Cheung, Tak Sing ; Chan, Hoi Man</creatorcontrib><description>As a major source of social values in East Asia, Confucianism assumes especial significance amidst the proliferation of instrumental rationality in modern societies. This study attempts to answer the question: how Confucian are contemporary Chinese? By way of constructing an ideal type of Confucian actors, which is then applied to a survey of three Chinese communities, this study tries to formulate a new perspective in depicting the character of modern Confucian actors, measured in terms of their dynamic proximity to the Confucian ideal type. Our approach marks a shift of emphasis, both empirically and methodologically, compared with previous work on this topic. On the empirical side, our study breaks with the long-standing, classical distinction between the 'gentleman' and the 'commoner' prevalent in Confucian discourse. Degrees of proximity to Confucian values are viewed in representational—i.e. non-evaluative—terms. In constructing the ideal type of Confucian actors, we distinguish between formal and substantive values in Confucianism. This analytical distinction allows our study to demonstrate the continued relevance of Confucianism. While substantive values change over time, the formal, analytical core that captures the essence of Confucianism continues to survive in the face of the vicissitudes of modernity and the spread of instrumental rationality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1568-0584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1570-0615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-0584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/157006106778869289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>Communities ; CONFUCIAN ACTORS ; CONFUCIANISM ; Cultures and civilizations ; Economic value ; Family values ; Far East ; General studies ; IDEAL TYPE ; Ideal Types ; MEASUREMENT ; Modern Society ; MODERNITY ; Morality ; Political systems ; Politics ; Rationality ; Social order ; Social Values ; Sociology ; The gentleman ; TRADITION ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>European journal of East Asian studies, 2006, Vol.5 (2), p.157-180</ispartof><rights>2006 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Brill 2006</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2542-2847df728cefc6d83013732ba83a286844eae3a0ea1337fbd1e59d0b9c06ca513</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23615674$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23615674$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18390421$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Chung Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Chi Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kin Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Ambrose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Tak Sing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Hoi Man</creatorcontrib><title>How Confucian are Contemporary Chinese? Construction of an Ideal Type and its Application to Three Chinese Communities</title><title>European journal of East Asian studies</title><addtitle>EJEA</addtitle><description>As a major source of social values in East Asia, Confucianism assumes especial significance amidst the proliferation of instrumental rationality in modern societies. This study attempts to answer the question: how Confucian are contemporary Chinese? By way of constructing an ideal type of Confucian actors, which is then applied to a survey of three Chinese communities, this study tries to formulate a new perspective in depicting the character of modern Confucian actors, measured in terms of their dynamic proximity to the Confucian ideal type. Our approach marks a shift of emphasis, both empirically and methodologically, compared with previous work on this topic. On the empirical side, our study breaks with the long-standing, classical distinction between the 'gentleman' and the 'commoner' prevalent in Confucian discourse. Degrees of proximity to Confucian values are viewed in representational—i.e. non-evaluative—terms. In constructing the ideal type of Confucian actors, we distinguish between formal and substantive values in Confucianism. This analytical distinction allows our study to demonstrate the continued relevance of Confucianism. While substantive values change over time, the formal, analytical core that captures the essence of Confucianism continues to survive in the face of the vicissitudes of modernity and the spread of instrumental rationality.</description><subject>Communities</subject><subject>CONFUCIAN ACTORS</subject><subject>CONFUCIANISM</subject><subject>Cultures and civilizations</subject><subject>Economic value</subject><subject>Family values</subject><subject>Far East</subject><subject>General studies</subject><subject>IDEAL TYPE</subject><subject>Ideal Types</subject><subject>MEASUREMENT</subject><subject>Modern Society</subject><subject>MODERNITY</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Social order</subject><subject>Social Values</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>The gentleman</subject><subject>TRADITION</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>1568-0584</issn><issn>1570-0615</issn><issn>1568-0584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEUkvhBSoheQO7FP_FdlaoikpbaFWkXtaW40xUX5I42A7Qt69DSlkgsbJnzjdHozNFcUzwCSGCvSeVxFgQLKRUStRU1c-Kw7VZ5m71fP0LVeJK8YPiZYx7jInkVB4WPy78T9T4qV-sMxMyAdYqwTj7YMI9au7cBBE-rN2YwmKT8xPyPcrwZQdmQLv7GXLVIZciOp3nwVnzG0oe7e4CwB-PbDGOy-SSg_iqeNGbIcLrx_eo-PrxbNdclFc355fN6VXZ0orTkiouu15SZaG3olMMEyYZbY1ihiqhOAcDzGAwhDHZtx2Bqu5wW1ssrKkIOyrebb5z8N8XiEmPLloYBjOBX6IWRAilOM0g3UAbfIwBej0HN-YENMF6jVj_G3EeevvobqI1Qx_MZF38O6lYjTldt3izcfuYfHjSKcu3EZJnvdx0FxP8etJN-KaFZLLSnz7vdPOFXp_f8lutMo83vg1uGPTeL2HKKf5v1QenJqKM</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Yang, Chung Fang</creator><creator>Chiu, Chi Yue</creator><creator>Chan, Kin Man</creator><creator>King, Ambrose</creator><creator>Cheung, Tak Sing</creator><creator>Chan, Hoi Man</creator><general>BRILL</general><general>Brill</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>How Confucian are Contemporary Chinese? Construction of an Ideal Type and its Application to Three Chinese Communities</title><author>Yang, Chung Fang ; Chiu, Chi Yue ; Chan, Kin Man ; King, Ambrose ; Cheung, Tak Sing ; Chan, Hoi Man</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2542-2847df728cefc6d83013732ba83a286844eae3a0ea1337fbd1e59d0b9c06ca513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Communities</topic><topic>CONFUCIAN ACTORS</topic><topic>CONFUCIANISM</topic><topic>Cultures and civilizations</topic><topic>Economic value</topic><topic>Family values</topic><topic>Far East</topic><topic>General studies</topic><topic>IDEAL TYPE</topic><topic>Ideal Types</topic><topic>MEASUREMENT</topic><topic>Modern Society</topic><topic>MODERNITY</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Social order</topic><topic>Social Values</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>The gentleman</topic><topic>TRADITION</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Chung Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Chi Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kin Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Ambrose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Tak Sing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Hoi Man</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European journal of East Asian studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Chung Fang</au><au>Chiu, Chi Yue</au><au>Chan, Kin Man</au><au>King, Ambrose</au><au>Cheung, Tak Sing</au><au>Chan, Hoi Man</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Confucian are Contemporary Chinese? Construction of an Ideal Type and its Application to Three Chinese Communities</atitle><jtitle>European journal of East Asian studies</jtitle><addtitle>EJEA</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>157-180</pages><issn>1568-0584</issn><eissn>1570-0615</eissn><eissn>1568-0584</eissn><abstract>As a major source of social values in East Asia, Confucianism assumes especial significance amidst the proliferation of instrumental rationality in modern societies. This study attempts to answer the question: how Confucian are contemporary Chinese? By way of constructing an ideal type of Confucian actors, which is then applied to a survey of three Chinese communities, this study tries to formulate a new perspective in depicting the character of modern Confucian actors, measured in terms of their dynamic proximity to the Confucian ideal type. Our approach marks a shift of emphasis, both empirically and methodologically, compared with previous work on this topic. On the empirical side, our study breaks with the long-standing, classical distinction between the 'gentleman' and the 'commoner' prevalent in Confucian discourse. Degrees of proximity to Confucian values are viewed in representational—i.e. non-evaluative—terms. In constructing the ideal type of Confucian actors, we distinguish between formal and substantive values in Confucianism. This analytical distinction allows our study to demonstrate the continued relevance of Confucianism. While substantive values change over time, the formal, analytical core that captures the essence of Confucianism continues to survive in the face of the vicissitudes of modernity and the spread of instrumental rationality.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><doi>10.1163/157006106778869289</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1568-0584 |
ispartof | European journal of East Asian studies, 2006, Vol.5 (2), p.157-180 |
issn | 1568-0584 1570-0615 1568-0584 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61668842 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; JSTOR; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Communities CONFUCIAN ACTORS CONFUCIANISM Cultures and civilizations Economic value Family values Far East General studies IDEAL TYPE Ideal Types MEASUREMENT Modern Society MODERNITY Morality Political systems Politics Rationality Social order Social Values Sociology The gentleman TRADITION Traditions |
title | How Confucian are Contemporary Chinese? Construction of an Ideal Type and its Application to Three Chinese Communities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T11%3A13%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Confucian%20are%20Contemporary%20Chinese?%20Construction%20of%20an%20Ideal%20Type%20and%20its%20Application%20to%20Three%20Chinese%20Communities&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20East%20Asian%20studies&rft.au=Yang,%20Chung%20Fang&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=157-180&rft.issn=1568-0584&rft.eissn=1570-0615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/157006106778869289&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23615674%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=61668842&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23615674&rfr_iscdi=true |