Irony and Origami
Unfolding Social Constructionism is a book that stands as a testimony to the growing influence of social constructionism right across the social sciences. Gone are the days when it was just a voice from the margins—now it is a force to be reckoned with. Here Hibberd locks horns with social construct...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2007-03, Vol.37 (1), p.100-104 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 100 |
container_title | Philosophy of the Social Sciences |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Edley, Nigel |
description | Unfolding Social Constructionism is a book that stands as a testimony to the growing influence of social constructionism right across the social sciences. Gone are the days when it was just a voice from the margins—now it is a force to be reckoned with. Here Hibberd locks horns with social constructionism’s most pivotal character: Kenneth Gergen. In a careful review of his work, she dissects the key components of constructionism’s meta-theory, and she also considers (and dismisses) some of the more common lines of critique. Yet for all her sophistication, Hibberd misses (or refuses?) something very simple—that her own critique is a view from somewhere. She simply asserts realist epistemology as the truth, without for one moment seeing the irony of this assertion (from a social constructionist perspective, that is). I put her straight... |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0048393106296577 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61663086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0048393106296577</sage_id><sourcerecordid>36614728</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9c190113f55a6c64dcfdb0834e5fd1b00d665bc11fadbb989af5d75644934f2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0D1LA0EQBuBFFIzRws4yINid7uzH7G4pwWggkEbrZW8_woXkLu4mRf69F2IhAUk1xfvMwLyEPAB9BlDqhVKhueFAkRmUSl2QAUjJKiUEXJLBIa4O-TW5KWVJKTCUOCD309y1-5Frw2iem4VbN7fkKrlViXe_c0i-Jm-f449qNn-fjl9nledSbivjwVAAnqR06FEEn0JNNRdRpgA1pQFR1h4guVDXRhuXZFAShTBcJBb5kDwd725y972LZWvXTfFxtXJt7HbFIiByqvEslEYJLTg7CzkiCMV0Dx9P4LLb5bb_1oJhWgvgSvaKHpXPXSk5JrvJzdrlvQVqD53b0877leq4Utwi_jn6n_8B-S189A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928841375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Irony and Origami</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Edley, Nigel</creator><creatorcontrib>Edley, Nigel</creatorcontrib><description>Unfolding Social Constructionism is a book that stands as a testimony to the growing influence of social constructionism right across the social sciences. Gone are the days when it was just a voice from the margins—now it is a force to be reckoned with. Here Hibberd locks horns with social constructionism’s most pivotal character: Kenneth Gergen. In a careful review of his work, she dissects the key components of constructionism’s meta-theory, and she also considers (and dismisses) some of the more common lines of critique. Yet for all her sophistication, Hibberd misses (or refuses?) something very simple—that her own critique is a view from somewhere. She simply asserts realist epistemology as the truth, without for one moment seeing the irony of this assertion (from a social constructionist perspective, that is). I put her straight...</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-3931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0048393106296577</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHSSCM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic discipline ; Constructionism ; Constructivism ; Epistemology ; Irony ; Philosophy of science ; Research trends ; Review articles ; Social construction ; Social Constructionism ; Social Sciences ; Sophistication ; Testimony ; Truth ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2007-03, Vol.37 (1), p.100-104</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Mar 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9c190113f55a6c64dcfdb0834e5fd1b00d665bc11fadbb989af5d75644934f2e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0048393106296577$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0048393106296577$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,21818,27921,27923,27924,33773,33774,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edley, Nigel</creatorcontrib><title>Irony and Origami</title><title>Philosophy of the Social Sciences</title><description>Unfolding Social Constructionism is a book that stands as a testimony to the growing influence of social constructionism right across the social sciences. Gone are the days when it was just a voice from the margins—now it is a force to be reckoned with. Here Hibberd locks horns with social constructionism’s most pivotal character: Kenneth Gergen. In a careful review of his work, she dissects the key components of constructionism’s meta-theory, and she also considers (and dismisses) some of the more common lines of critique. Yet for all her sophistication, Hibberd misses (or refuses?) something very simple—that her own critique is a view from somewhere. She simply asserts realist epistemology as the truth, without for one moment seeing the irony of this assertion (from a social constructionist perspective, that is). I put her straight...</description><subject>Academic discipline</subject><subject>Constructionism</subject><subject>Constructivism</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Irony</subject><subject>Philosophy of science</subject><subject>Research trends</subject><subject>Review articles</subject><subject>Social construction</subject><subject>Social Constructionism</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sophistication</subject><subject>Testimony</subject><subject>Truth</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0048-3931</issn><issn>1552-7441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0D1LA0EQBuBFFIzRws4yINid7uzH7G4pwWggkEbrZW8_woXkLu4mRf69F2IhAUk1xfvMwLyEPAB9BlDqhVKhueFAkRmUSl2QAUjJKiUEXJLBIa4O-TW5KWVJKTCUOCD309y1-5Frw2iem4VbN7fkKrlViXe_c0i-Jm-f449qNn-fjl9nledSbivjwVAAnqR06FEEn0JNNRdRpgA1pQFR1h4guVDXRhuXZFAShTBcJBb5kDwd725y972LZWvXTfFxtXJt7HbFIiByqvEslEYJLTg7CzkiCMV0Dx9P4LLb5bb_1oJhWgvgSvaKHpXPXSk5JrvJzdrlvQVqD53b0877leq4Utwi_jn6n_8B-S189A</recordid><startdate>200703</startdate><enddate>200703</enddate><creator>Edley, Nigel</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200703</creationdate><title>Irony and Origami</title><author>Edley, Nigel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-9c190113f55a6c64dcfdb0834e5fd1b00d665bc11fadbb989af5d75644934f2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Academic discipline</topic><topic>Constructionism</topic><topic>Constructivism</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Irony</topic><topic>Philosophy of science</topic><topic>Research trends</topic><topic>Review articles</topic><topic>Social construction</topic><topic>Social Constructionism</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sophistication</topic><topic>Testimony</topic><topic>Truth</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edley, Nigel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Philosophy of the Social Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edley, Nigel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Irony and Origami</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy of the Social Sciences</jtitle><date>2007-03</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>100-104</pages><issn>0048-3931</issn><eissn>1552-7441</eissn><coden>PHSSCM</coden><abstract>Unfolding Social Constructionism is a book that stands as a testimony to the growing influence of social constructionism right across the social sciences. Gone are the days when it was just a voice from the margins—now it is a force to be reckoned with. Here Hibberd locks horns with social constructionism’s most pivotal character: Kenneth Gergen. In a careful review of his work, she dissects the key components of constructionism’s meta-theory, and she also considers (and dismisses) some of the more common lines of critique. Yet for all her sophistication, Hibberd misses (or refuses?) something very simple—that her own critique is a view from somewhere. She simply asserts realist epistemology as the truth, without for one moment seeing the irony of this assertion (from a social constructionist perspective, that is). I put her straight...</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0048393106296577</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-3931 |
ispartof | Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2007-03, Vol.37 (1), p.100-104 |
issn | 0048-3931 1552-7441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61663086 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Academic discipline Constructionism Constructivism Epistemology Irony Philosophy of science Research trends Review articles Social construction Social Constructionism Social Sciences Sophistication Testimony Truth Wastes |
title | Irony and Origami |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T09%3A57%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Irony%20and%20Origami&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20of%20the%20Social%20Sciences&rft.au=Edley,%20Nigel&rft.date=2007-03&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=100-104&rft.issn=0048-3931&rft.eissn=1552-7441&rft.coden=PHSSCM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0048393106296577&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36614728%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928841375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0048393106296577&rfr_iscdi=true |