The effect of Alaska's home visitation program for high-risk families on trends in abuse and neglect

Abstract Objectives At 6 sites serving 21 communities, Alaska implemented Healthy Families Alaska, a home visitation program using paraprofessionals designed to decrease child abuse and neglect. The primary study objective was to compare changes over time in Child Protective Services outcomes by Hea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child abuse & neglect 2008-03, Vol.32 (3), p.317-333
1. Verfasser: Gessner, Bradford D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 333
container_issue 3
container_start_page 317
container_title Child abuse & neglect
container_volume 32
creator Gessner, Bradford D
description Abstract Objectives At 6 sites serving 21 communities, Alaska implemented Healthy Families Alaska, a home visitation program using paraprofessionals designed to decrease child abuse and neglect. The primary study objective was to compare changes over time in Child Protective Services outcomes by Healthy Families Alaska enrollment status. Methods Enrollment status was linked to birth certificates for birth years 1996–2002 which in turn was linked to the Alaska Child Protective Services database for outcome years 1996–2004. All children were followed through the study databases until age 2 years. Results There were 40,099 children born during 1996–2002 to residents of Healthy Families Alaska communities and 985 were enrolled in the program. Physical abuse referrals among enrolled children decreased from 73 to 42 per 1000 child-years of follow-up from 1996–1998 to 2000–2002 ( p = .005); all of this decrease occurred among children who received 20 or more home visitations. This decrease may have been unrelated to program impact as a similar decrease in referral was seen among unenrolled high-risk children. Compared to unenrolled high-risk children, enrolled children had a modest decrease in the proportion with substantiated neglect but no difference in the proportion with neglect referral or physical abuse referral or substantiation. Conclusions Little evidence exists that Alaska's home visitation program had a measurable impact on child maltreatment outcomes. Practice implications Within Alaskan communities that had a home visitation program targeting families at high risk for child abuse, changes in Child Protective Services outcomes among children less than 2 years of age were followed over time by program enrollment status. Enrollment was associated with a substantial decrease in physical abuse referrals, but a similar decrease was seen among unenrolled high-risk children. No improvement was seen in physical abuse substantiation. A greater number of home visitations was not associated with fewer abuse outcomes. This work supports most of the recent literature, which questions the field effectiveness of home visitation programs. In combination with other studies, the current work may lead decision-makers and funding agencies to re-examine the usefulness of home visitation programs, particularly those using a methodology similar to that implemented in Alaska.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.08.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61661039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ790513</ericid><els_id>1_s2_0_S0145213408000136</els_id><sourcerecordid>61661039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-10751aba51c6b90e2b175972034903b90549a5602c1cc73cbb4bdc569ef24b7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1r3DAQhk1pabZp_0EootCPi7cz-rDsSyGENG0J9ND0LGR5vKtdf6SSN5B_X5ldtpBDUh9k0Dx6GemZLDtDWCJg8XmzdGtv692SA-gllEsA-SxbYKlFrrXSz7MFoFQ5RyFPslcxbiB9SquX2QmWQuuqgkXW3KyJUduSm9jYsvPOxq39GNl67Ind-egnO_lxYLdhXAXbs3YMbO1X6zz4uGWt7X3nKbJETIGGJjI_sNRUJGaHhg206lLy6-xFa7tIbw7_0-z318ubi2_59c-r7xfn17krsJpyBK3Q1lahK-oKiNeoVaU5CFmBSDtKVlYVwB06p4Wra1k3ThUVtVzWmsRp9mGfm7r9s6M4md5HR11nBxp30RRYFAii-g9QAiqpnwQ5aF5UJU_gp0dBVOkaQgqYM989QDfjLgzpYQwXyey8JEjuIRfGGAO15jb43oZ7g2Bm_2Zj9v7N7N9AaZL_dOztIXtX99T8O3QQnoD3B8BGZ7s22MH5eOQ4cCVFWSbubM9R8O5YvvyhkwUUqfzlUE467zwFE52nwVHjQxJumtE_1ejDANf5waeWtnRP8fgiaCI3YH7NozxPMpRpiFEU4i_oJesF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230162301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of Alaska's home visitation program for high-risk families on trends in abuse and neglect</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Gessner, Bradford D</creator><creatorcontrib>Gessner, Bradford D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives At 6 sites serving 21 communities, Alaska implemented Healthy Families Alaska, a home visitation program using paraprofessionals designed to decrease child abuse and neglect. The primary study objective was to compare changes over time in Child Protective Services outcomes by Healthy Families Alaska enrollment status. Methods Enrollment status was linked to birth certificates for birth years 1996–2002 which in turn was linked to the Alaska Child Protective Services database for outcome years 1996–2004. All children were followed through the study databases until age 2 years. Results There were 40,099 children born during 1996–2002 to residents of Healthy Families Alaska communities and 985 were enrolled in the program. Physical abuse referrals among enrolled children decreased from 73 to 42 per 1000 child-years of follow-up from 1996–1998 to 2000–2002 ( p = .005); all of this decrease occurred among children who received 20 or more home visitations. This decrease may have been unrelated to program impact as a similar decrease in referral was seen among unenrolled high-risk children. Compared to unenrolled high-risk children, enrolled children had a modest decrease in the proportion with substantiated neglect but no difference in the proportion with neglect referral or physical abuse referral or substantiation. Conclusions Little evidence exists that Alaska's home visitation program had a measurable impact on child maltreatment outcomes. Practice implications Within Alaskan communities that had a home visitation program targeting families at high risk for child abuse, changes in Child Protective Services outcomes among children less than 2 years of age were followed over time by program enrollment status. Enrollment was associated with a substantial decrease in physical abuse referrals, but a similar decrease was seen among unenrolled high-risk children. No improvement was seen in physical abuse substantiation. A greater number of home visitations was not associated with fewer abuse outcomes. This work supports most of the recent literature, which questions the field effectiveness of home visitation programs. In combination with other studies, the current work may lead decision-makers and funding agencies to re-examine the usefulness of home visitation programs, particularly those using a methodology similar to that implemented in Alaska.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-2134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.08.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18377990</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CABND3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abuse ; Adult ; Alaska ; At Risk Persons ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child Abuse ; Child abuse &amp; neglect ; Child Abuse - prevention &amp; control ; Child Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Child Neglect ; Child protection ; Child Welfare ; Child Welfare Services ; Children ; Comparative Analysis ; Data Banks ; Demography ; Early Intervention ; Effectiveness ; Enrollment ; Families &amp; family life ; Family - psychology ; Family Programs ; Family Violence ; Female ; Healthy Families America ; High risk ; Home health care ; Home visitation ; Home Visits ; House Calls - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mental health ; Mothers ; Neglect ; Pediatrics ; Physical abuse ; Prevention ; Prevention. Health policy. Planification ; Program Development ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Evaluation ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Referral ; Referrals ; Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry ; Social Services ; Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology ; Trend Analysis ; Trends ; Victimology ; Visitation</subject><ispartof>Child abuse &amp; neglect, 2008-03, Vol.32 (3), p.317-333</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Mar 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-10751aba51c6b90e2b175972034903b90549a5602c1cc73cbb4bdc569ef24b7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-10751aba51c6b90e2b175972034903b90549a5602c1cc73cbb4bdc569ef24b7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.08.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,30999,31000,33774,33775,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ790513$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20254388$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18377990$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gessner, Bradford D</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of Alaska's home visitation program for high-risk families on trends in abuse and neglect</title><title>Child abuse &amp; neglect</title><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives At 6 sites serving 21 communities, Alaska implemented Healthy Families Alaska, a home visitation program using paraprofessionals designed to decrease child abuse and neglect. The primary study objective was to compare changes over time in Child Protective Services outcomes by Healthy Families Alaska enrollment status. Methods Enrollment status was linked to birth certificates for birth years 1996–2002 which in turn was linked to the Alaska Child Protective Services database for outcome years 1996–2004. All children were followed through the study databases until age 2 years. Results There were 40,099 children born during 1996–2002 to residents of Healthy Families Alaska communities and 985 were enrolled in the program. Physical abuse referrals among enrolled children decreased from 73 to 42 per 1000 child-years of follow-up from 1996–1998 to 2000–2002 ( p = .005); all of this decrease occurred among children who received 20 or more home visitations. This decrease may have been unrelated to program impact as a similar decrease in referral was seen among unenrolled high-risk children. Compared to unenrolled high-risk children, enrolled children had a modest decrease in the proportion with substantiated neglect but no difference in the proportion with neglect referral or physical abuse referral or substantiation. Conclusions Little evidence exists that Alaska's home visitation program had a measurable impact on child maltreatment outcomes. Practice implications Within Alaskan communities that had a home visitation program targeting families at high risk for child abuse, changes in Child Protective Services outcomes among children less than 2 years of age were followed over time by program enrollment status. Enrollment was associated with a substantial decrease in physical abuse referrals, but a similar decrease was seen among unenrolled high-risk children. No improvement was seen in physical abuse substantiation. A greater number of home visitations was not associated with fewer abuse outcomes. This work supports most of the recent literature, which questions the field effectiveness of home visitation programs. In combination with other studies, the current work may lead decision-makers and funding agencies to re-examine the usefulness of home visitation programs, particularly those using a methodology similar to that implemented in Alaska.</description><subject>Abuse</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alaska</subject><subject>At Risk Persons</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Abuse</subject><subject>Child abuse &amp; neglect</subject><subject>Child Abuse - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Child Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Child Neglect</subject><subject>Child protection</subject><subject>Child Welfare</subject><subject>Child Welfare Services</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Data Banks</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Early Intervention</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Enrollment</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Family Programs</subject><subject>Family Violence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Healthy Families America</subject><subject>High risk</subject><subject>Home health care</subject><subject>Home visitation</subject><subject>Home Visits</subject><subject>House Calls - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Neglect</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physical abuse</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prevention. Health policy. Planification</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Referral</subject><subject>Referrals</subject><subject>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><subject>Social Services</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Trend Analysis</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Victimology</subject><subject>Visitation</subject><issn>0145-2134</issn><issn>1873-7757</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1r3DAQhk1pabZp_0EootCPi7cz-rDsSyGENG0J9ND0LGR5vKtdf6SSN5B_X5ldtpBDUh9k0Dx6GemZLDtDWCJg8XmzdGtv692SA-gllEsA-SxbYKlFrrXSz7MFoFQ5RyFPslcxbiB9SquX2QmWQuuqgkXW3KyJUduSm9jYsvPOxq39GNl67Ind-egnO_lxYLdhXAXbs3YMbO1X6zz4uGWt7X3nKbJETIGGJjI_sNRUJGaHhg206lLy6-xFa7tIbw7_0-z318ubi2_59c-r7xfn17krsJpyBK3Q1lahK-oKiNeoVaU5CFmBSDtKVlYVwB06p4Wra1k3ThUVtVzWmsRp9mGfm7r9s6M4md5HR11nBxp30RRYFAii-g9QAiqpnwQ5aF5UJU_gp0dBVOkaQgqYM989QDfjLgzpYQwXyey8JEjuIRfGGAO15jb43oZ7g2Bm_2Zj9v7N7N9AaZL_dOztIXtX99T8O3QQnoD3B8BGZ7s22MH5eOQ4cCVFWSbubM9R8O5YvvyhkwUUqfzlUE467zwFE52nwVHjQxJumtE_1ejDANf5waeWtnRP8fgiaCI3YH7NozxPMpRpiFEU4i_oJesF</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Gessner, Bradford D</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>The effect of Alaska's home visitation program for high-risk families on trends in abuse and neglect</title><author>Gessner, Bradford D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-10751aba51c6b90e2b175972034903b90549a5602c1cc73cbb4bdc569ef24b7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Abuse</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alaska</topic><topic>At Risk Persons</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Abuse</topic><topic>Child abuse &amp; neglect</topic><topic>Child Abuse - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Child Abuse - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Child Neglect</topic><topic>Child protection</topic><topic>Child Welfare</topic><topic>Child Welfare Services</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Data Banks</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Early Intervention</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Enrollment</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Family Programs</topic><topic>Family Violence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Healthy Families America</topic><topic>High risk</topic><topic>Home health care</topic><topic>Home visitation</topic><topic>Home Visits</topic><topic>House Calls - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Neglect</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physical abuse</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prevention. Health policy. Planification</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Referral</topic><topic>Referrals</topic><topic>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</topic><topic>Social Services</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Trend Analysis</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Victimology</topic><topic>Visitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gessner, Bradford D</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Child abuse &amp; neglect</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gessner, Bradford D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ790513</ericid><atitle>The effect of Alaska's home visitation program for high-risk families on trends in abuse and neglect</atitle><jtitle>Child abuse &amp; neglect</jtitle><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>317-333</pages><issn>0145-2134</issn><eissn>1873-7757</eissn><coden>CABND3</coden><abstract>Abstract Objectives At 6 sites serving 21 communities, Alaska implemented Healthy Families Alaska, a home visitation program using paraprofessionals designed to decrease child abuse and neglect. The primary study objective was to compare changes over time in Child Protective Services outcomes by Healthy Families Alaska enrollment status. Methods Enrollment status was linked to birth certificates for birth years 1996–2002 which in turn was linked to the Alaska Child Protective Services database for outcome years 1996–2004. All children were followed through the study databases until age 2 years. Results There were 40,099 children born during 1996–2002 to residents of Healthy Families Alaska communities and 985 were enrolled in the program. Physical abuse referrals among enrolled children decreased from 73 to 42 per 1000 child-years of follow-up from 1996–1998 to 2000–2002 ( p = .005); all of this decrease occurred among children who received 20 or more home visitations. This decrease may have been unrelated to program impact as a similar decrease in referral was seen among unenrolled high-risk children. Compared to unenrolled high-risk children, enrolled children had a modest decrease in the proportion with substantiated neglect but no difference in the proportion with neglect referral or physical abuse referral or substantiation. Conclusions Little evidence exists that Alaska's home visitation program had a measurable impact on child maltreatment outcomes. Practice implications Within Alaskan communities that had a home visitation program targeting families at high risk for child abuse, changes in Child Protective Services outcomes among children less than 2 years of age were followed over time by program enrollment status. Enrollment was associated with a substantial decrease in physical abuse referrals, but a similar decrease was seen among unenrolled high-risk children. No improvement was seen in physical abuse substantiation. A greater number of home visitations was not associated with fewer abuse outcomes. This work supports most of the recent literature, which questions the field effectiveness of home visitation programs. In combination with other studies, the current work may lead decision-makers and funding agencies to re-examine the usefulness of home visitation programs, particularly those using a methodology similar to that implemented in Alaska.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18377990</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.08.004</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0145-2134
ispartof Child abuse & neglect, 2008-03, Vol.32 (3), p.317-333
issn 0145-2134
1873-7757
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61661039
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Sociological Abstracts
subjects Abuse
Adult
Alaska
At Risk Persons
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child Abuse
Child abuse & neglect
Child Abuse - prevention & control
Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data
Child Neglect
Child protection
Child Welfare
Child Welfare Services
Children
Comparative Analysis
Data Banks
Demography
Early Intervention
Effectiveness
Enrollment
Families & family life
Family - psychology
Family Programs
Family Violence
Female
Healthy Families America
High risk
Home health care
Home visitation
Home Visits
House Calls - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Mental health
Mothers
Neglect
Pediatrics
Physical abuse
Prevention
Prevention. Health policy. Planification
Program Development
Program Effectiveness
Program Evaluation
Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Referral
Referrals
Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry
Social Services
Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology
Trend Analysis
Trends
Victimology
Visitation
title The effect of Alaska's home visitation program for high-risk families on trends in abuse and neglect
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A13%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20Alaska's%20home%20visitation%20program%20for%20high-risk%20families%20on%20trends%20in%20abuse%20and%20neglect&rft.jtitle=Child%20abuse%20&%20neglect&rft.au=Gessner,%20Bradford%20D&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=317-333&rft.issn=0145-2134&rft.eissn=1873-7757&rft.coden=CABND3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.08.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61661039%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230162301&rft_id=info:pmid/18377990&rft_ericid=EJ790513&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0145213408000136&rfr_iscdi=true