Assessing the validity and reliability of well-being and stress in family caregivers
Relatively little is known about the psychometric properties of measures that assess the constructs of caregiver strain and well-being. Using structural equation modeling, the authors validated two scales used in the caregiving literature: Caregiver Well-Being Scale and Caregiver Strain Index. Two m...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Social work research 1999-03, Vol.23 (1), p.54-64 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 64 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 54 |
| container_title | Social work research |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Rubio, Doris McGartland Berg-Weger, Marla Tebb, Susan S. |
| description | Relatively little is known about the psychometric properties of measures that assess the constructs of caregiver strain and well-being. Using structural equation modeling, the authors validated two scales used in the caregiving literature: Caregiver Well-Being Scale and Caregiver Strain Index. Two models were generated for the Well-Being Scale that demonstrate the measure's validity and reliability. Nineteen of the 45 items on the Well-Being Scale validated the scale. Of the original 13 items on the Strain Index, 11 are valid indicators of their respective factors. Structural equation modeling is a useful technique to evaluate these measures, because it identifies the most reliable and valid items for each scale. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/swr/23.1.54 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61660434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A54232987</galeid><jstor_id>42659381</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A54232987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-d4b87b8393cc229c877a5e97a276872f42b4d826ebf133a3e59359c5caa57d863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiNEJUrhxBkp4sAFsrU98ddxVQFFCu2BIlVcLMeZLF68SWtnW_bf42irVkKVqOdgj-cZz-vRFMUbShaUaDhOt_GYwYIueP2sOKS85pVQoJ7nM5Gk4kD0i-JlSmuSlwZ6WFwsU8KU_LAqp19Y3tjgOz_tSjt0ZcTgbevD7I99eYshVC3O6BxNU8yJpR_K3m582JXORlz5G4zpVXHQ25Dw9d1-VPz4_Oni5LRqzr98PVk2leOgp6qrWyVbBRqcY0w7JaXlqKVlUijJ-pq1daeYwLanABaQa-DacWctl50ScFS83797FcfrLabJbHxyWaYdcNwmI6gQpIb6CSBwKjj5L8ilEFncXPrdP-B63MYh_9YwyijorDtDH_fQygY0fujHKVq3wgGjDeOAvc_XS14zYFrJjFeP4Nk63Hj3GP9hz7s4phSxN1fRb2zcGUrMPA8mz4NhYKjhcw_e7ul1msZ4j9ZM5LYq-lDdpwn_3Mdt_G2EBMnN6eVPc_m94WffGmYa-AuchsAs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212139826</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the validity and reliability of well-being and stress in family caregivers</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Rubio, Doris McGartland ; Berg-Weger, Marla ; Tebb, Susan S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rubio, Doris McGartland ; Berg-Weger, Marla ; Tebb, Susan S.</creatorcontrib><description>Relatively little is known about the psychometric properties of measures that assess the constructs of caregiver strain and well-being. Using structural equation modeling, the authors validated two scales used in the caregiving literature: Caregiver Well-Being Scale and Caregiver Strain Index. Two models were generated for the Well-Being Scale that demonstrate the measure's validity and reliability. Nineteen of the 45 items on the Well-Being Scale validated the scale. Of the original 13 items on the Strain Index, 11 are valid indicators of their respective factors. Structural equation modeling is a useful technique to evaluate these measures, because it identifies the most reliable and valid items for each scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-5309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-6838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/swr/23.1.54</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Basic needs ; Caregiver Burden ; Caregivers ; Carers ; Error of Measurement ; Factor Analysis ; Family Relations ; Gerontologists ; INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT ; Life Satisfaction ; Literature Reviews ; Measurement ; Measures ; Mental health ; Modeling ; Older adults ; Psychological aspects ; Psychological stress ; Psychological tests ; Psychometric properties ; Psychometrics ; Reliability ; Researchers ; Scales ; Social work ; Stress ; Stress (Psychology) ; structural equation modeling ; Structural Equation Models ; Validity ; Well Being ; Wellbeing</subject><ispartof>Social work research, 1999-03, Vol.23 (1), p.54-64</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1999 National Association of Social Workers,Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1999 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright National Association of Social Workers, Incorporated Mar 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-d4b87b8393cc229c877a5e97a276872f42b4d826ebf133a3e59359c5caa57d863</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42659381$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42659381$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,12825,27321,27901,27902,30976,30977,33751,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rubio, Doris McGartland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg-Weger, Marla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tebb, Susan S.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the validity and reliability of well-being and stress in family caregivers</title><title>Social work research</title><addtitle>Social Work Research</addtitle><description>Relatively little is known about the psychometric properties of measures that assess the constructs of caregiver strain and well-being. Using structural equation modeling, the authors validated two scales used in the caregiving literature: Caregiver Well-Being Scale and Caregiver Strain Index. Two models were generated for the Well-Being Scale that demonstrate the measure's validity and reliability. Nineteen of the 45 items on the Well-Being Scale validated the scale. Of the original 13 items on the Strain Index, 11 are valid indicators of their respective factors. Structural equation modeling is a useful technique to evaluate these measures, because it identifies the most reliable and valid items for each scale.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Basic needs</subject><subject>Caregiver Burden</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Carers</subject><subject>Error of Measurement</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Family Relations</subject><subject>Gerontologists</subject><subject>INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT</subject><subject>Life Satisfaction</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Older adults</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological stress</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychometric properties</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Scales</subject><subject>Social work</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress (Psychology)</subject><subject>structural equation modeling</subject><subject>Structural Equation Models</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Well Being</subject><subject>Wellbeing</subject><issn>1070-5309</issn><issn>1545-6838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiNEJUrhxBkp4sAFsrU98ddxVQFFCu2BIlVcLMeZLF68SWtnW_bf42irVkKVqOdgj-cZz-vRFMUbShaUaDhOt_GYwYIueP2sOKS85pVQoJ7nM5Gk4kD0i-JlSmuSlwZ6WFwsU8KU_LAqp19Y3tjgOz_tSjt0ZcTgbevD7I99eYshVC3O6BxNU8yJpR_K3m582JXORlz5G4zpVXHQ25Dw9d1-VPz4_Oni5LRqzr98PVk2leOgp6qrWyVbBRqcY0w7JaXlqKVlUijJ-pq1daeYwLanABaQa-DacWctl50ScFS83797FcfrLabJbHxyWaYdcNwmI6gQpIb6CSBwKjj5L8ilEFncXPrdP-B63MYh_9YwyijorDtDH_fQygY0fujHKVq3wgGjDeOAvc_XS14zYFrJjFeP4Nk63Hj3GP9hz7s4phSxN1fRb2zcGUrMPA8mz4NhYKjhcw_e7ul1msZ4j9ZM5LYq-lDdpwn_3Mdt_G2EBMnN6eVPc_m94WffGmYa-AuchsAs</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Rubio, Doris McGartland</creator><creator>Berg-Weger, Marla</creator><creator>Tebb, Susan S.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>National Association of Social Workers</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>Assessing the validity and reliability of well-being and stress in family caregivers</title><author>Rubio, Doris McGartland ; Berg-Weger, Marla ; Tebb, Susan S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-d4b87b8393cc229c877a5e97a276872f42b4d826ebf133a3e59359c5caa57d863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Basic needs</topic><topic>Caregiver Burden</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Carers</topic><topic>Error of Measurement</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Family Relations</topic><topic>Gerontologists</topic><topic>INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT</topic><topic>Life Satisfaction</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Older adults</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological stress</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychometric properties</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Scales</topic><topic>Social work</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress (Psychology)</topic><topic>structural equation modeling</topic><topic>Structural Equation Models</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Well Being</topic><topic>Wellbeing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rubio, Doris McGartland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg-Weger, Marla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tebb, Susan S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Social work research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rubio, Doris McGartland</au><au>Berg-Weger, Marla</au><au>Tebb, Susan S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the validity and reliability of well-being and stress in family caregivers</atitle><jtitle>Social work research</jtitle><addtitle>Social Work Research</addtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>54</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>54-64</pages><issn>1070-5309</issn><eissn>1545-6838</eissn><abstract>Relatively little is known about the psychometric properties of measures that assess the constructs of caregiver strain and well-being. Using structural equation modeling, the authors validated two scales used in the caregiving literature: Caregiver Well-Being Scale and Caregiver Strain Index. Two models were generated for the Well-Being Scale that demonstrate the measure's validity and reliability. Nineteen of the 45 items on the Well-Being Scale validated the scale. Of the original 13 items on the Strain Index, 11 are valid indicators of their respective factors. Structural equation modeling is a useful technique to evaluate these measures, because it identifies the most reliable and valid items for each scale.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/swr/23.1.54</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1070-5309 |
| ispartof | Social work research, 1999-03, Vol.23 (1), p.54-64 |
| issn | 1070-5309 1545-6838 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61660434 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Education Source; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Analysis Basic needs Caregiver Burden Caregivers Carers Error of Measurement Factor Analysis Family Relations Gerontologists INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT Life Satisfaction Literature Reviews Measurement Measures Mental health Modeling Older adults Psychological aspects Psychological stress Psychological tests Psychometric properties Psychometrics Reliability Researchers Scales Social work Stress Stress (Psychology) structural equation modeling Structural Equation Models Validity Well Being Wellbeing |
| title | Assessing the validity and reliability of well-being and stress in family caregivers |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T13%3A25%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20well-being%20and%20stress%20in%20family%20caregivers&rft.jtitle=Social%20work%20research&rft.au=Rubio,%20Doris%20McGartland&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=54&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=54-64&rft.issn=1070-5309&rft.eissn=1545-6838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/swr/23.1.54&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA54232987%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212139826&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A54232987&rft_jstor_id=42659381&rfr_iscdi=true |