Experimental Research in Criminal Justice Settings: Is There a Role for Scholarly Societies?
In 1997, the American Society of Criminology received a request for a friend-of-the-court brief in support of an experimental evaluation of a court-mandated counseling program for domestic offenders. The experiment was opposed by the prosecuting attorney in the jurisdiction where it was to take plac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Crime and delinquency 2000-07, Vol.46 (3), p.295-298 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 298 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 295 |
container_title | Crime and delinquency |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Short, James F. Zahn, Margaret A. Farrington, David P. |
description | In 1997, the American Society of Criminology received a request for a friend-of-the-court brief in support of an experimental evaluation of a court-mandated counseling program for domestic offenders. The experiment was opposed by the prosecuting attorney in the jurisdiction where it was to take place. In this article, it is argued that scholarly societies have an obligation to uphold and promulgate the principle that random assignment to treatment options is the best scientific method for determining the effectiveness of options such as those proposed in this case. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0011128700046003002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61652927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0011128700046003002</sage_id><sourcerecordid>61539426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-5a59ebadd1fa8fa7f96dae9440a7e9639b1d6e408b669e970817cc589683610f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UFLwzAUB_AgCs7pJ_ASPHirvjRN0ngRGVMngrBN8CCULH3dOrpmJi24b2_HBEFEPT14_P7_w3uEnDK4YEypSwDGWJwqAEgkAAeI90iPCRFHPFUv-6S3FdGWHJKjEJYdBK5Zj7wO39foyxXWjanoGAMabxe0rOmg25Z1t3xoQ1NapBNsmrKehys6CnS6QI_U0LGrkBbO04lduMr4akMnzpbYlBiuj8lBYaqAJ5-zT55vh9PBffT4dDca3DxGNmHQRMIIjTOT56wwaWFUoWVuUCcJGIVacj1jucQE0pmUGrWClClrRaplyiWDgvfJ-a537d1bi6HJVmWwWFWmRteGTDIpYh2rf0DBdRLLP6FQKtWKQwfPvsGla313tpDFMUuEVFp3iO-Q9S4Ej0W27o5r_CZjkG0fmP3wwC4Fu1Qwc_yq_S3yAXMYmXo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221456799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental Research in Criminal Justice Settings: Is There a Role for Scholarly Societies?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Short, James F. ; Zahn, Margaret A. ; Farrington, David P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Short, James F. ; Zahn, Margaret A. ; Farrington, David P.</creatorcontrib><description>In 1997, the American Society of Criminology received a request for a friend-of-the-court brief in support of an experimental evaluation of a court-mandated counseling program for domestic offenders. The experiment was opposed by the prosecuting attorney in the jurisdiction where it was to take place. In this article, it is argued that scholarly societies have an obligation to uphold and promulgate the principle that random assignment to treatment options is the best scientific method for determining the effectiveness of options such as those proposed in this case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-1287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-387X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0011128700046003002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRDLAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Counseling ; Counselling ; Criminal justice ; Criminal justice system ; Criminology ; Domestic violence ; Evaluation ; Experiments ; Family Violence ; Florida ; Methodological Problems ; Professional Associations ; Program Evaluation ; Research Design ; Research Ethics ; Role ; Scientific Research ; Treatment Programs ; USA</subject><ispartof>Crime and delinquency, 2000-07, Vol.46 (3), p.295-298</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications, Inc. Jul 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-5a59ebadd1fa8fa7f96dae9440a7e9639b1d6e408b669e970817cc589683610f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0011128700046003002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0011128700046003002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30977,33751,33752,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Short, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahn, Margaret A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrington, David P.</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental Research in Criminal Justice Settings: Is There a Role for Scholarly Societies?</title><title>Crime and delinquency</title><description>In 1997, the American Society of Criminology received a request for a friend-of-the-court brief in support of an experimental evaluation of a court-mandated counseling program for domestic offenders. The experiment was opposed by the prosecuting attorney in the jurisdiction where it was to take place. In this article, it is argued that scholarly societies have an obligation to uphold and promulgate the principle that random assignment to treatment options is the best scientific method for determining the effectiveness of options such as those proposed in this case.</description><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Counselling</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal justice system</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Family Violence</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Professional Associations</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research Ethics</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Scientific Research</subject><subject>Treatment Programs</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0011-1287</issn><issn>1552-387X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UFLwzAUB_AgCs7pJ_ASPHirvjRN0ngRGVMngrBN8CCULH3dOrpmJi24b2_HBEFEPT14_P7_w3uEnDK4YEypSwDGWJwqAEgkAAeI90iPCRFHPFUv-6S3FdGWHJKjEJYdBK5Zj7wO39foyxXWjanoGAMabxe0rOmg25Z1t3xoQ1NapBNsmrKehys6CnS6QI_U0LGrkBbO04lduMr4akMnzpbYlBiuj8lBYaqAJ5-zT55vh9PBffT4dDca3DxGNmHQRMIIjTOT56wwaWFUoWVuUCcJGIVacj1jucQE0pmUGrWClClrRaplyiWDgvfJ-a537d1bi6HJVmWwWFWmRteGTDIpYh2rf0DBdRLLP6FQKtWKQwfPvsGla313tpDFMUuEVFp3iO-Q9S4Ej0W27o5r_CZjkG0fmP3wwC4Fu1Qwc_yq_S3yAXMYmXo</recordid><startdate>20000701</startdate><enddate>20000701</enddate><creator>Short, James F.</creator><creator>Zahn, Margaret A.</creator><creator>Farrington, David P.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000701</creationdate><title>Experimental Research in Criminal Justice Settings: Is There a Role for Scholarly Societies?</title><author>Short, James F. ; Zahn, Margaret A. ; Farrington, David P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-5a59ebadd1fa8fa7f96dae9440a7e9639b1d6e408b669e970817cc589683610f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Counselling</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal justice system</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Family Violence</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Professional Associations</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research Ethics</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Scientific Research</topic><topic>Treatment Programs</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Short, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahn, Margaret A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrington, David P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Crime and delinquency</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Short, James F.</au><au>Zahn, Margaret A.</au><au>Farrington, David P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental Research in Criminal Justice Settings: Is There a Role for Scholarly Societies?</atitle><jtitle>Crime and delinquency</jtitle><date>2000-07-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>295-298</pages><issn>0011-1287</issn><eissn>1552-387X</eissn><coden>CRDLAL</coden><abstract>In 1997, the American Society of Criminology received a request for a friend-of-the-court brief in support of an experimental evaluation of a court-mandated counseling program for domestic offenders. The experiment was opposed by the prosecuting attorney in the jurisdiction where it was to take place. In this article, it is argued that scholarly societies have an obligation to uphold and promulgate the principle that random assignment to treatment options is the best scientific method for determining the effectiveness of options such as those proposed in this case.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0011128700046003002</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-1287 |
ispartof | Crime and delinquency, 2000-07, Vol.46 (3), p.295-298 |
issn | 0011-1287 1552-387X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61652927 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Counseling Counselling Criminal justice Criminal justice system Criminology Domestic violence Evaluation Experiments Family Violence Florida Methodological Problems Professional Associations Program Evaluation Research Design Research Ethics Role Scientific Research Treatment Programs USA |
title | Experimental Research in Criminal Justice Settings: Is There a Role for Scholarly Societies? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T22%3A14%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20Research%20in%20Criminal%20Justice%20Settings:%20Is%20There%20a%20Role%20for%20Scholarly%20Societies?&rft.jtitle=Crime%20and%20delinquency&rft.au=Short,%20James%20F.&rft.date=2000-07-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=295-298&rft.issn=0011-1287&rft.eissn=1552-387X&rft.coden=CRDLAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0011128700046003002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61539426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221456799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0011128700046003002&rfr_iscdi=true |