The power of images
This response to Jon Shields (2007) contends that he is right that those opposed to embryonic stem cell research will lose their fight -- but not for the reasons he gives. To ask people to sacrifice their loved ones or themselves so that the "dot" of an embryo can stay frozen forever seems...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Society (New Brunswick) 2007-05, Vol.44 (4), p.36-37 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 37 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 36 |
| container_title | Society (New Brunswick) |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Kaye, Howard L |
| description | This response to Jon Shields (2007) contends that he is right that those opposed to embryonic stem cell research will lose their fight -- but not for the reasons he gives. To ask people to sacrifice their loved ones or themselves so that the "dot" of an embryo can stay frozen forever seems absurd. To see this "dot" as a living person with rights equal to any other person requires more than the faculty of sight. To supporters of such research, the view of an embryonic dot as a living person rests on theology or faith, not observation & logic. To opponents, Shields among them, recognition of the human status of embryos is based on their belief in certain scientific & philosophical grounds that human development begins with conception. Shields's simplistic & distorted views of the debate are a product of his misrepresentation of the bioethical left's views. In reality, the left's views will undermine the bioethical right's campaign against stem cell research & will also bolster support for legal abortion & in vitro fertilization. It is admitted, however, that the right's success in placing restraints on federal funding of such research may have served the purpose of slowing down the rush to experiment, irresponsibly, with stem cell treatments. J. Stanton |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02919517 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61650363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36778609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fbf680978bf60bc73b96e29545d09090fb7a708f04c0ea8903844648b75343683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9LAzEQxYMouFYv-gWKggdhdfJvJjlqsSoUvNRz2F0Tbdl216RF_PamVBAE6czhXX7M8N5j7JTDNQegm7sxCMut5rTHCm4lloqE3mcFcEWlAM4P2VFKc8gjhCrY2fTdD_vu08dhF4azRfXm0zE7CFWb_MmPDtjL-H46eiwnzw9Po9tJ2UhpVmWoAxqwZLJC3ZCsLXphtdKvYPOGmioCE0A14CtjQRqlUJmatFQSjRywy-3dPnYfa59WbjFLjW_baum7dXLIUYNEuRPUlrJLFDtBiUQGwWbw4g8479Zxmd06wQnJCouYqfN_KUDiZGjz82oLNbFLKfrg-phzjF-Og9uU4n5Lkd-w9Xhm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206717872</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The power of images</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kaye, Howard L</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Howard L</creatorcontrib><description>This response to Jon Shields (2007) contends that he is right that those opposed to embryonic stem cell research will lose their fight -- but not for the reasons he gives. To ask people to sacrifice their loved ones or themselves so that the "dot" of an embryo can stay frozen forever seems absurd. To see this "dot" as a living person with rights equal to any other person requires more than the faculty of sight. To supporters of such research, the view of an embryonic dot as a living person rests on theology or faith, not observation & logic. To opponents, Shields among them, recognition of the human status of embryos is based on their belief in certain scientific & philosophical grounds that human development begins with conception. Shields's simplistic & distorted views of the debate are a product of his misrepresentation of the bioethical left's views. In reality, the left's views will undermine the bioethical right's campaign against stem cell research & will also bolster support for legal abortion & in vitro fertilization. It is admitted, however, that the right's success in placing restraints on federal funding of such research may have served the purpose of slowing down the rush to experiment, irresponsibly, with stem cell treatments. J. Stanton</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-2011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4725</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02919517</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOCYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Bioethics ; Cloning ; Experiments ; Foetus ; Legalization ; Life ; Medical Research ; Morality ; Pro choice movement ; Pro life movement ; Public Finance ; Rationality ; Rhetoric ; Rights ; Scientific research ; Social research ; Social sciences ; Stem cells ; Theology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Society (New Brunswick), 2007-05, Vol.44 (4), p.36-37</ispartof><rights>Springer 2007</rights><rights>Society is a copyright of Springer, (2007). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fbf680978bf60bc73b96e29545d09090fb7a708f04c0ea8903844648b75343683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27344,27924,27925,33774,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Howard L</creatorcontrib><title>The power of images</title><title>Society (New Brunswick)</title><description>This response to Jon Shields (2007) contends that he is right that those opposed to embryonic stem cell research will lose their fight -- but not for the reasons he gives. To ask people to sacrifice their loved ones or themselves so that the "dot" of an embryo can stay frozen forever seems absurd. To see this "dot" as a living person with rights equal to any other person requires more than the faculty of sight. To supporters of such research, the view of an embryonic dot as a living person rests on theology or faith, not observation & logic. To opponents, Shields among them, recognition of the human status of embryos is based on their belief in certain scientific & philosophical grounds that human development begins with conception. Shields's simplistic & distorted views of the debate are a product of his misrepresentation of the bioethical left's views. In reality, the left's views will undermine the bioethical right's campaign against stem cell research & will also bolster support for legal abortion & in vitro fertilization. It is admitted, however, that the right's success in placing restraints on federal funding of such research may have served the purpose of slowing down the rush to experiment, irresponsibly, with stem cell treatments. J. Stanton</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Cloning</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Foetus</subject><subject>Legalization</subject><subject>Life</subject><subject>Medical Research</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Pro choice movement</subject><subject>Pro life movement</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>Scientific research</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0147-2011</issn><issn>1936-4725</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9LAzEQxYMouFYv-gWKggdhdfJvJjlqsSoUvNRz2F0Tbdl216RF_PamVBAE6czhXX7M8N5j7JTDNQegm7sxCMut5rTHCm4lloqE3mcFcEWlAM4P2VFKc8gjhCrY2fTdD_vu08dhF4azRfXm0zE7CFWb_MmPDtjL-H46eiwnzw9Po9tJ2UhpVmWoAxqwZLJC3ZCsLXphtdKvYPOGmioCE0A14CtjQRqlUJmatFQSjRywy-3dPnYfa59WbjFLjW_baum7dXLIUYNEuRPUlrJLFDtBiUQGwWbw4g8479Zxmd06wQnJCouYqfN_KUDiZGjz82oLNbFLKfrg-phzjF-Og9uU4n5Lkd-w9Xhm</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Kaye, Howard L</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>The power of images</title><author>Kaye, Howard L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fbf680978bf60bc73b96e29545d09090fb7a708f04c0ea8903844648b75343683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Cloning</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Foetus</topic><topic>Legalization</topic><topic>Life</topic><topic>Medical Research</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Pro choice movement</topic><topic>Pro life movement</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>Scientific research</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Howard L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Society (New Brunswick)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaye, Howard L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The power of images</atitle><jtitle>Society (New Brunswick)</jtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>36-37</pages><issn>0147-2011</issn><eissn>1936-4725</eissn><coden>SOCYA6</coden><abstract>This response to Jon Shields (2007) contends that he is right that those opposed to embryonic stem cell research will lose their fight -- but not for the reasons he gives. To ask people to sacrifice their loved ones or themselves so that the "dot" of an embryo can stay frozen forever seems absurd. To see this "dot" as a living person with rights equal to any other person requires more than the faculty of sight. To supporters of such research, the view of an embryonic dot as a living person rests on theology or faith, not observation & logic. To opponents, Shields among them, recognition of the human status of embryos is based on their belief in certain scientific & philosophical grounds that human development begins with conception. Shields's simplistic & distorted views of the debate are a product of his misrepresentation of the bioethical left's views. In reality, the left's views will undermine the bioethical right's campaign against stem cell research & will also bolster support for legal abortion & in vitro fertilization. It is admitted, however, that the right's success in placing restraints on federal funding of such research may have served the purpose of slowing down the rush to experiment, irresponsibly, with stem cell treatments. J. Stanton</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02919517</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0147-2011 |
| ispartof | Society (New Brunswick), 2007-05, Vol.44 (4), p.36-37 |
| issn | 0147-2011 1936-4725 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61650363 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Abortion Bioethics Cloning Experiments Foetus Legalization Life Medical Research Morality Pro choice movement Pro life movement Public Finance Rationality Rhetoric Rights Scientific research Social research Social sciences Stem cells Theology Womens health |
| title | The power of images |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T05%3A16%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20power%20of%20images&rft.jtitle=Society%20(New%20Brunswick)&rft.au=Kaye,%20Howard%20L&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=36-37&rft.issn=0147-2011&rft.eissn=1936-4725&rft.coden=SOCYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02919517&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36778609%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206717872&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |