Unfinished Work: From Cyborg to Cognisphere
The cyborg that Donna Haraway appropriated in ‘Manifesto for Cyborgs’ as a metaphor for political action and theoretical inquiry has ceased to have the potency it did 20 years ago. While Haraway has turned from a central focus on technoculture to companion species, much important cultural work remai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Theory, culture & society culture & society, 2006-12, Vol.23 (7-8), p.159-166 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 166 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7-8 |
container_start_page | 159 |
container_title | Theory, culture & society |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Hayles, N. Katherine |
description | The cyborg that Donna Haraway appropriated in ‘Manifesto for Cyborgs’ as a metaphor for political action and theoretical inquiry has ceased to have the potency it did 20 years ago. While Haraway has turned from a central focus on technoculture to companion species, much important cultural work remains to be done, especially in networked and programmable media. Problems with the cyborg as a metaphor include the implication that the liberal humanist subject, however problematized by its hybridization with cybernetic mechanism, continues as a singular entity operating with localized agency. In a word, the cyborg is not networked enough to encompass the emergent possibilities associated with the Internet and the world-wide web and other phenomena of the contemporary digital era. Instead I propose the idea of the cognisphere. As operational concept and suggestive metaphor, the cognisphere recognizes that networked and programmable media are not only more pervasive than ever before in human history but also more cognitively powerful. It is closely associated with what many researchers regard as a major insight: the idea that the physical world is fundamentally computational. While these scientists regard computation as a physical process, the cultural critic is apt to see it as an over-determined metaphor. The binary choice between seeing the computational universe as a literal description of the physical world and reading it as an over-determined metaphor misses a crucial aspect of contemporary cultural dynamics: the interaction between means and metaphor, technology and cultural presupposition. Taking this dynamic into account leads to a more complete understanding summed up in the aphorism, ‘What we make and what (we think) we are co-evolve together.’ |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0263276406069229 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61644714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0263276406069229</sage_id><sourcerecordid>61644714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6e50f739393215f42f644e7c8bb0057949608c7adec30965575e9dfb9a65040b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LxDAUxIMoWFfx6tGL3qovXy_NURZXhQUvLh5Dmibatduuyfbgf29LFwRB5B3mML8ZHkPIBYUbSpW6BYacKRSAgJoxfUAyKhByjhQPSTba-egfk5OU1gDABPKMnK_aULd1evfV5WsXP07JUbBN8md7nZHV4v5l_pgvnx-e5nfL3HGGuxy9hKC4Ho5RGQQLKIRXrihLAKm00AiFU7byjoNGKZX0ugqltihBQMln5Hrq3cbus_dpZzZ1cr5pbOu7PpnhayEUFf-CHJFprXAAYQJd7FKKPphtrDc2fhkKZpzI_J5oiFztu21ytgnRtq5OP7lCcJCcD1w-ccm-ebPu-tgO2_zd-w3ZFG7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>36629976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unfinished Work: From Cyborg to Cognisphere</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hayles, N. Katherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayles, N. Katherine</creatorcontrib><description>The cyborg that Donna Haraway appropriated in ‘Manifesto for Cyborgs’ as a metaphor for political action and theoretical inquiry has ceased to have the potency it did 20 years ago. While Haraway has turned from a central focus on technoculture to companion species, much important cultural work remains to be done, especially in networked and programmable media. Problems with the cyborg as a metaphor include the implication that the liberal humanist subject, however problematized by its hybridization with cybernetic mechanism, continues as a singular entity operating with localized agency. In a word, the cyborg is not networked enough to encompass the emergent possibilities associated with the Internet and the world-wide web and other phenomena of the contemporary digital era. Instead I propose the idea of the cognisphere. As operational concept and suggestive metaphor, the cognisphere recognizes that networked and programmable media are not only more pervasive than ever before in human history but also more cognitively powerful. It is closely associated with what many researchers regard as a major insight: the idea that the physical world is fundamentally computational. While these scientists regard computation as a physical process, the cultural critic is apt to see it as an over-determined metaphor. The binary choice between seeing the computational universe as a literal description of the physical world and reading it as an over-determined metaphor misses a crucial aspect of contemporary cultural dynamics: the interaction between means and metaphor, technology and cultural presupposition. Taking this dynamic into account leads to a more complete understanding summed up in the aphorism, ‘What we make and what (we think) we are co-evolve together.’</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-2764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0263276406069229</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TCSUD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cultural studies ; Cybernetics ; Emancipation ; Forecasts ; History and organization of sociology ; History and present state ; History, theory and methodology ; Human Technology Relationship ; Humanity ; Individuals ; Innovation ; Philosophy ; Sociology ; Suffrage ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Theory, culture & society, 2006-12, Vol.23 (7-8), p.159-166</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6e50f739393215f42f644e7c8bb0057949608c7adec30965575e9dfb9a65040b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0263276406069229$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263276406069229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18430533$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayles, N. Katherine</creatorcontrib><title>Unfinished Work: From Cyborg to Cognisphere</title><title>Theory, culture & society</title><description>The cyborg that Donna Haraway appropriated in ‘Manifesto for Cyborgs’ as a metaphor for political action and theoretical inquiry has ceased to have the potency it did 20 years ago. While Haraway has turned from a central focus on technoculture to companion species, much important cultural work remains to be done, especially in networked and programmable media. Problems with the cyborg as a metaphor include the implication that the liberal humanist subject, however problematized by its hybridization with cybernetic mechanism, continues as a singular entity operating with localized agency. In a word, the cyborg is not networked enough to encompass the emergent possibilities associated with the Internet and the world-wide web and other phenomena of the contemporary digital era. Instead I propose the idea of the cognisphere. As operational concept and suggestive metaphor, the cognisphere recognizes that networked and programmable media are not only more pervasive than ever before in human history but also more cognitively powerful. It is closely associated with what many researchers regard as a major insight: the idea that the physical world is fundamentally computational. While these scientists regard computation as a physical process, the cultural critic is apt to see it as an over-determined metaphor. The binary choice between seeing the computational universe as a literal description of the physical world and reading it as an over-determined metaphor misses a crucial aspect of contemporary cultural dynamics: the interaction between means and metaphor, technology and cultural presupposition. Taking this dynamic into account leads to a more complete understanding summed up in the aphorism, ‘What we make and what (we think) we are co-evolve together.’</description><subject>Cultural studies</subject><subject>Cybernetics</subject><subject>Emancipation</subject><subject>Forecasts</subject><subject>History and organization of sociology</subject><subject>History and present state</subject><subject>History, theory and methodology</subject><subject>Human Technology Relationship</subject><subject>Humanity</subject><subject>Individuals</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Suffrage</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0263-2764</issn><issn>1460-3616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LxDAUxIMoWFfx6tGL3qovXy_NURZXhQUvLh5Dmibatduuyfbgf29LFwRB5B3mML8ZHkPIBYUbSpW6BYacKRSAgJoxfUAyKhByjhQPSTba-egfk5OU1gDABPKMnK_aULd1evfV5WsXP07JUbBN8md7nZHV4v5l_pgvnx-e5nfL3HGGuxy9hKC4Ho5RGQQLKIRXrihLAKm00AiFU7byjoNGKZX0ugqltihBQMln5Hrq3cbus_dpZzZ1cr5pbOu7PpnhayEUFf-CHJFprXAAYQJd7FKKPphtrDc2fhkKZpzI_J5oiFztu21ytgnRtq5OP7lCcJCcD1w-ccm-ebPu-tgO2_zd-w3ZFG7Q</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Hayles, N. Katherine</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>Unfinished Work</title><author>Hayles, N. Katherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6e50f739393215f42f644e7c8bb0057949608c7adec30965575e9dfb9a65040b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Cultural studies</topic><topic>Cybernetics</topic><topic>Emancipation</topic><topic>Forecasts</topic><topic>History and organization of sociology</topic><topic>History and present state</topic><topic>History, theory and methodology</topic><topic>Human Technology Relationship</topic><topic>Humanity</topic><topic>Individuals</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Suffrage</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayles, N. Katherine</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Theory, culture & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayles, N. Katherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unfinished Work: From Cyborg to Cognisphere</atitle><jtitle>Theory, culture & society</jtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>7-8</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>159-166</pages><issn>0263-2764</issn><eissn>1460-3616</eissn><coden>TCSUD4</coden><abstract>The cyborg that Donna Haraway appropriated in ‘Manifesto for Cyborgs’ as a metaphor for political action and theoretical inquiry has ceased to have the potency it did 20 years ago. While Haraway has turned from a central focus on technoculture to companion species, much important cultural work remains to be done, especially in networked and programmable media. Problems with the cyborg as a metaphor include the implication that the liberal humanist subject, however problematized by its hybridization with cybernetic mechanism, continues as a singular entity operating with localized agency. In a word, the cyborg is not networked enough to encompass the emergent possibilities associated with the Internet and the world-wide web and other phenomena of the contemporary digital era. Instead I propose the idea of the cognisphere. As operational concept and suggestive metaphor, the cognisphere recognizes that networked and programmable media are not only more pervasive than ever before in human history but also more cognitively powerful. It is closely associated with what many researchers regard as a major insight: the idea that the physical world is fundamentally computational. While these scientists regard computation as a physical process, the cultural critic is apt to see it as an over-determined metaphor. The binary choice between seeing the computational universe as a literal description of the physical world and reading it as an over-determined metaphor misses a crucial aspect of contemporary cultural dynamics: the interaction between means and metaphor, technology and cultural presupposition. Taking this dynamic into account leads to a more complete understanding summed up in the aphorism, ‘What we make and what (we think) we are co-evolve together.’</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0263276406069229</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0263-2764 |
ispartof | Theory, culture & society, 2006-12, Vol.23 (7-8), p.159-166 |
issn | 0263-2764 1460-3616 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61644714 |
source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Cultural studies Cybernetics Emancipation Forecasts History and organization of sociology History and present state History, theory and methodology Human Technology Relationship Humanity Individuals Innovation Philosophy Sociology Suffrage Technology |
title | Unfinished Work: From Cyborg to Cognisphere |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A16%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unfinished%20Work:%20From%20Cyborg%20to%20Cognisphere&rft.jtitle=Theory,%20culture%20&%20society&rft.au=Hayles,%20N.%20Katherine&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=7-8&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=159-166&rft.issn=0263-2764&rft.eissn=1460-3616&rft.coden=TCSUD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0263276406069229&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61644714%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=36629976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0263276406069229&rfr_iscdi=true |