Practices, Opportunity, and Protest Effectiveness: Illustrations from Four Animal Rights Campaigns
Despite its central role in the study of social movements, research on political and cultural opportunity is problematic. The vague definition and broad applicability of the concept of opportunity make it difficult to identify all the opportunities that exist in a given protest situation. Furthermor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.) Calif.), 1999-05, Vol.46 (2), p.169-186 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 186 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.) |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Einwohner, Rachel L. |
description | Despite its central role in the study of social movements, research on political and cultural opportunity is problematic. The vague definition and broad applicability of the concept of opportunity make it difficult to identify all the opportunities that exist in a given protest situation. Furthermore, most analyses take place at the broad levels of culture and the state, which can obscure additional localized factors that create opportunity for protest to occur and succeed. A practice-oriented approach to studying political and cultural opportunity addresses some of these problems. Using data from a study of the outcomes of four animal rights campaigns, I examine opportunity across the campaigns by focusing on the practices targeted for change and the reasons why people engage in them. Viewing opportunity in this way highlights both structural and cultural elements of opportunity structures in national as well as local contexts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1525/sp.1999.46.2.03x0184b |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61615840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3097251</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3097251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-fceacac99cf8a5fd7cc4230da2eb408a3ea2eb208d5812c2b2865b41965c5a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkltrFTEUhQdR8Fj9CUJQ8akzZuce38qh1UKhRfoeMjmZOoc5M2N2pth_b4bWC4LU_ZCE8O21w8qqqtdAG5BMfsC5AWttI1TDGsq_UzCifVJtQHJem7I8rTaUcl1rbeF59QJxT0uBZpuqvUo-5D5EPCaX8zylvIx9vjsmftyRqzTliJmcdl0s0G0cI-JHcj4MC-bkcz-NSLo0HcjZtCRyMvYHP5Av_c3XjGTrD7Pvb0Z8WT3r_IDx1cN-VF2fnV5vP9cXl5_OtycXdRCM5roL0QcfrA2d8bLb6VDuOd15FltBjedxPTFqdtIAC6xlRslWgFUySK_4UfX-XnZO07elPNsdegxxGPwYpwWdAgXSCPofIICxnD8KSq2BU6YfBbnRQoNcwTd_gfti3FhccQyU5VSLdezbf0GgDDey1ErJeyqkCTHFzs2p2J_uHFC3xsLh7NZYOKEccz9jUfrePah7DH7okh9Dj7-aGQVhtPyN7TFP6U_t8ifacWo1k8B_AB1ww-8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683855553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practices, Opportunity, and Protest Effectiveness: Illustrations from Four Animal Rights Campaigns</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>HeinOnline</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Einwohner, Rachel L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Einwohner, Rachel L.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite its central role in the study of social movements, research on political and cultural opportunity is problematic. The vague definition and broad applicability of the concept of opportunity make it difficult to identify all the opportunities that exist in a given protest situation. Furthermore, most analyses take place at the broad levels of culture and the state, which can obscure additional localized factors that create opportunity for protest to occur and succeed. A practice-oriented approach to studying political and cultural opportunity addresses some of these problems. Using data from a study of the outcomes of four animal rights campaigns, I examine opportunity across the campaigns by focusing on the practices targeted for change and the reasons why people engage in them. Viewing opportunity in this way highlights both structural and cultural elements of opportunity structures in national as well as local contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-7791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-8533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/sp.1999.46.2.03x0184b</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOPRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley, CA: University of California Press</publisher><subject>Animal Human Relations ; Animal protection ; Animal rights ; Animal rights movement ; Animals ; Biomedical research ; Circuses ; Civil society ; Cultural aspects ; Culture ; Demonstrations & protests ; Factors ; Fur ; Hunting ; Lobbying ; Opportunity Structures ; Political campaigns ; Political Culture ; Political opportunity ; POLITICAL PROTEST ; Political protests ; Political sociology ; Protest Movements ; SOCIAL ACTION ; Social Environment ; Social impact ; SOCIAL MOVEMENTS ; Social movements. Revolutions ; Social Movements: Opportunities, Contexts, and Strategies ; Social research ; Sociology ; Sport hunting ; State ; THEORY BUILDING OR THEORETICAL APPROACH</subject><ispartof>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.), 1999-05, Vol.46 (2), p.169-186</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 Society for the Study of Social Problems, Inc.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press May 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-fceacac99cf8a5fd7cc4230da2eb408a3ea2eb208d5812c2b2865b41965c5a63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3097251$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3097251$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27850,27905,27906,30981,33755,33756,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2014875$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Einwohner, Rachel L.</creatorcontrib><title>Practices, Opportunity, and Protest Effectiveness: Illustrations from Four Animal Rights Campaigns</title><title>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.)</title><description>Despite its central role in the study of social movements, research on political and cultural opportunity is problematic. The vague definition and broad applicability of the concept of opportunity make it difficult to identify all the opportunities that exist in a given protest situation. Furthermore, most analyses take place at the broad levels of culture and the state, which can obscure additional localized factors that create opportunity for protest to occur and succeed. A practice-oriented approach to studying political and cultural opportunity addresses some of these problems. Using data from a study of the outcomes of four animal rights campaigns, I examine opportunity across the campaigns by focusing on the practices targeted for change and the reasons why people engage in them. Viewing opportunity in this way highlights both structural and cultural elements of opportunity structures in national as well as local contexts.</description><subject>Animal Human Relations</subject><subject>Animal protection</subject><subject>Animal rights</subject><subject>Animal rights movement</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Circuses</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Cultural aspects</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Demonstrations & protests</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Fur</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Opportunity Structures</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political Culture</subject><subject>Political opportunity</subject><subject>POLITICAL PROTEST</subject><subject>Political protests</subject><subject>Political sociology</subject><subject>Protest Movements</subject><subject>SOCIAL ACTION</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>SOCIAL MOVEMENTS</subject><subject>Social movements. Revolutions</subject><subject>Social Movements: Opportunities, Contexts, and Strategies</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sport hunting</subject><subject>State</subject><subject>THEORY BUILDING OR THEORETICAL APPROACH</subject><issn>0037-7791</issn><issn>1533-8533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkltrFTEUhQdR8Fj9CUJQ8akzZuce38qh1UKhRfoeMjmZOoc5M2N2pth_b4bWC4LU_ZCE8O21w8qqqtdAG5BMfsC5AWttI1TDGsq_UzCifVJtQHJem7I8rTaUcl1rbeF59QJxT0uBZpuqvUo-5D5EPCaX8zylvIx9vjsmftyRqzTliJmcdl0s0G0cI-JHcj4MC-bkcz-NSLo0HcjZtCRyMvYHP5Av_c3XjGTrD7Pvb0Z8WT3r_IDx1cN-VF2fnV5vP9cXl5_OtycXdRCM5roL0QcfrA2d8bLb6VDuOd15FltBjedxPTFqdtIAC6xlRslWgFUySK_4UfX-XnZO07elPNsdegxxGPwYpwWdAgXSCPofIICxnD8KSq2BU6YfBbnRQoNcwTd_gfti3FhccQyU5VSLdezbf0GgDDey1ErJeyqkCTHFzs2p2J_uHFC3xsLh7NZYOKEccz9jUfrePah7DH7okh9Dj7-aGQVhtPyN7TFP6U_t8ifacWo1k8B_AB1ww-8</recordid><startdate>19990501</startdate><enddate>19990501</enddate><creator>Einwohner, Rachel L.</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>Society for the Study of Social Problems</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990501</creationdate><title>Practices, Opportunity, and Protest Effectiveness: Illustrations from Four Animal Rights Campaigns</title><author>Einwohner, Rachel L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-fceacac99cf8a5fd7cc4230da2eb408a3ea2eb208d5812c2b2865b41965c5a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animal Human Relations</topic><topic>Animal protection</topic><topic>Animal rights</topic><topic>Animal rights movement</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Circuses</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Cultural aspects</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Demonstrations & protests</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Fur</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Opportunity Structures</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political Culture</topic><topic>Political opportunity</topic><topic>POLITICAL PROTEST</topic><topic>Political protests</topic><topic>Political sociology</topic><topic>Protest Movements</topic><topic>SOCIAL ACTION</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>SOCIAL MOVEMENTS</topic><topic>Social movements. Revolutions</topic><topic>Social Movements: Opportunities, Contexts, and Strategies</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sport hunting</topic><topic>State</topic><topic>THEORY BUILDING OR THEORETICAL APPROACH</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Einwohner, Rachel L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Einwohner, Rachel L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practices, Opportunity, and Protest Effectiveness: Illustrations from Four Animal Rights Campaigns</atitle><jtitle>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle><date>1999-05-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>169-186</pages><issn>0037-7791</issn><eissn>1533-8533</eissn><coden>SOPRAG</coden><abstract>Despite its central role in the study of social movements, research on political and cultural opportunity is problematic. The vague definition and broad applicability of the concept of opportunity make it difficult to identify all the opportunities that exist in a given protest situation. Furthermore, most analyses take place at the broad levels of culture and the state, which can obscure additional localized factors that create opportunity for protest to occur and succeed. A practice-oriented approach to studying political and cultural opportunity addresses some of these problems. Using data from a study of the outcomes of four animal rights campaigns, I examine opportunity across the campaigns by focusing on the practices targeted for change and the reasons why people engage in them. Viewing opportunity in this way highlights both structural and cultural elements of opportunity structures in national as well as local contexts.</abstract><cop>Berkeley, CA</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/sp.1999.46.2.03x0184b</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0037-7791 |
ispartof | Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.), 1999-05, Vol.46 (2), p.169-186 |
issn | 0037-7791 1533-8533 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61615840 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; HeinOnline; Oxford University Press Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Animal Human Relations Animal protection Animal rights Animal rights movement Animals Biomedical research Circuses Civil society Cultural aspects Culture Demonstrations & protests Factors Fur Hunting Lobbying Opportunity Structures Political campaigns Political Culture Political opportunity POLITICAL PROTEST Political protests Political sociology Protest Movements SOCIAL ACTION Social Environment Social impact SOCIAL MOVEMENTS Social movements. Revolutions Social Movements: Opportunities, Contexts, and Strategies Social research Sociology Sport hunting State THEORY BUILDING OR THEORETICAL APPROACH |
title | Practices, Opportunity, and Protest Effectiveness: Illustrations from Four Animal Rights Campaigns |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A54%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practices,%20Opportunity,%20and%20Protest%20Effectiveness:%20Illustrations%20from%20Four%20Animal%20Rights%20Campaigns&rft.jtitle=Social%20problems%20(Berkeley,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Einwohner,%20Rachel%20L.&rft.date=1999-05-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=169-186&rft.issn=0037-7791&rft.eissn=1533-8533&rft.coden=SOPRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/sp.1999.46.2.03x0184b&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3097251%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683855553&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3097251&rfr_iscdi=true |