Establishing validity in evaluation: The Canadian Indian school evaluations

Establishing validity in evaluation: The Canadian Indian school evaluations

A key concern of evaluators, particularly those using naturalistic procedures, is establishing the validity of the evaluation results. In this article, an approach designed to strengthen the validity of the case study method of evaluation is outlined. Five aspects of this approach are identified tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evaluation and program planning 1986, Vol.9 (4), p.319-323
1. Verfasser: Owston, Ronald D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Canada
Educational Programs
Evaluation Research
Indigenous Populations
Methodological Problems
Program Evaluation
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 323
container_issue 4
container_start_page 319
container_title Evaluation and program planning
container_volume 9
creator Owston, Ronald D.
description A key concern of evaluators, particularly those using naturalistic procedures, is establishing the validity of the evaluation results. In this article, an approach designed to strengthen the validity of the case study method of evaluation is outlined. Five aspects of this approach are identified that accomplish this. They are the evaluator selection procedure, the method of setting out the evaluation expectations, the use of on-going feedback, the use of multiple perspectives, and the wide involvement of various audiences.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0149-7189(86)90046-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61607945</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0149718986900467</els_id><sourcerecordid>61607945</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-d17e041cbd8a21332a6213bab8ca1e1a4d58f8d66582b578fbd5c2d42cb4b4313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ULFOwzAUzAASUPgDhkwIhoBf7NgOAxKqClRUYimz5div1ChNQpxW6t_zShFiqqXT6fndna1Lkktgt8BA3jEQZaZAl9da3pSMCZmpo-T07_okOYvxk9GiVOI0eZ3EwVZ1iMvQfKQbWwcfhm0amhRpWNshtM19Ol9iOraN9cE26bT5oeiWbVv_k8Xz5Hhh64gXvzxK3p8m8_FLNnt7no4fZ5kTXAyZB4VMgKu8tjlwnltJVNlKOwsIVvhCL7SXstB5VSi9qHzhci9yV4lKcOCj5Gqf2_Xt1xrjYFYhOqxr22C7jkaCZKoUBQmvDwpBSaBOFJckFXup69sYe1yYrg8r228NMLMr1uwaNLsGjZbmp1ijyDbd23rs0P15kE7X0TNmY7gtCVsClOTkNhAEoSNwoGXOzXJYUdbDPgupu03A3kQXsHHoQ49uML4Nhz_zDam_moQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761718736</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Establishing validity in evaluation: The Canadian Indian school evaluations</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Owston, Ronald D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Owston, Ronald D.</creatorcontrib><description>A key concern of evaluators, particularly those using naturalistic procedures, is establishing the validity of the evaluation results. In this article, an approach designed to strengthen the validity of the case study method of evaluation is outlined. Five aspects of this approach are identified that accomplish this. They are the evaluator selection procedure, the method of setting out the evaluation expectations, the use of on-going feedback, the use of multiple perspectives, and the wide involvement of various audiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0149-7189(86)90046-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Canada ; Educational Programs ; Evaluation Research ; Indigenous Populations ; Methodological Problems ; Program Evaluation</subject><ispartof>Evaluation and program planning, 1986, Vol.9 (4), p.319-323</ispartof><rights>1986</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-d17e041cbd8a21332a6213bab8ca1e1a4d58f8d66582b578fbd5c2d42cb4b4313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-d17e041cbd8a21332a6213bab8ca1e1a4d58f8d66582b578fbd5c2d42cb4b4313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0149718986900467$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,4010,27900,27901,27902,33752,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeepplan/v_3a9_3ay_3a1986_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a319-323.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Owston, Ronald D.</creatorcontrib><title>Establishing validity in evaluation: The Canadian Indian school evaluations</title><title>Evaluation and program planning</title><description>A key concern of evaluators, particularly those using naturalistic procedures, is establishing the validity of the evaluation results. In this article, an approach designed to strengthen the validity of the case study method of evaluation is outlined. Five aspects of this approach are identified that accomplish this. They are the evaluator selection procedure, the method of setting out the evaluation expectations, the use of on-going feedback, the use of multiple perspectives, and the wide involvement of various audiences.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Educational Programs</subject><subject>Evaluation Research</subject><subject>Indigenous Populations</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><issn>0149-7189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ULFOwzAUzAASUPgDhkwIhoBf7NgOAxKqClRUYimz5div1ChNQpxW6t_zShFiqqXT6fndna1Lkktgt8BA3jEQZaZAl9da3pSMCZmpo-T07_okOYvxk9GiVOI0eZ3EwVZ1iMvQfKQbWwcfhm0amhRpWNshtM19Ol9iOraN9cE26bT5oeiWbVv_k8Xz5Hhh64gXvzxK3p8m8_FLNnt7no4fZ5kTXAyZB4VMgKu8tjlwnltJVNlKOwsIVvhCL7SXstB5VSi9qHzhci9yV4lKcOCj5Gqf2_Xt1xrjYFYhOqxr22C7jkaCZKoUBQmvDwpBSaBOFJckFXup69sYe1yYrg8r228NMLMr1uwaNLsGjZbmp1ijyDbd23rs0P15kE7X0TNmY7gtCVsClOTkNhAEoSNwoGXOzXJYUdbDPgupu03A3kQXsHHoQ49uML4Nhz_zDam_moQ</recordid><startdate>1986</startdate><enddate>1986</enddate><creator>Owston, Ronald D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1986</creationdate><title>Establishing validity in evaluation: The Canadian Indian school evaluations</title><author>Owston, Ronald D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-d17e041cbd8a21332a6213bab8ca1e1a4d58f8d66582b578fbd5c2d42cb4b4313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Educational Programs</topic><topic>Evaluation Research</topic><topic>Indigenous Populations</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Owston, Ronald D.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Owston, Ronald D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Establishing validity in evaluation: The Canadian Indian school evaluations</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle><date>1986</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>319-323</pages><issn>0149-7189</issn><abstract>A key concern of evaluators, particularly those using naturalistic procedures, is establishing the validity of the evaluation results. In this article, an approach designed to strengthen the validity of the case study method of evaluation is outlined. Five aspects of this approach are identified that accomplish this. They are the evaluator selection procedure, the method of setting out the evaluation expectations, the use of on-going feedback, the use of multiple perspectives, and the wide involvement of various audiences.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0149-7189(86)90046-7</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-7189
ispartof Evaluation and program planning, 1986, Vol.9 (4), p.319-323
issn 0149-7189
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61607945
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Canada
Educational Programs
Evaluation Research
Indigenous Populations
Methodological Problems
Program Evaluation
title Establishing validity in evaluation: The Canadian Indian school evaluations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A43%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Establishing%20validity%20in%20evaluation:%20The%20Canadian%20Indian%20school%20evaluations&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20and%20program%20planning&rft.au=Owston,%20Ronald%20D.&rft.date=1986&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=319-323&rft.issn=0149-7189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0149-7189(86)90046-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61607945%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761718736&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0149718986900467&rfr_iscdi=true