An Examination of the Scholarly Productivity of Social Work Journal Editorial Board Members and Guest Reviewers
This article reports findings on the scholarly productivity of editorial boards and guest reviewers for selected social work journals. This is the first study to analyze the scholarly productivity of those who serve as guest reviewers for social work journals. Scholarly productivity was defined by t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Research on social work practice 1995-04, Vol.5 (2), p.223-234 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 234 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 223 |
| container_title | Research on social work practice |
| container_volume | 5 |
| creator | Pardeck, John T. Woo Sik Chung Murphy, John W. |
| description | This article reports findings on the scholarly productivity of editorial boards and guest reviewers
for selected social work journals. This is the first study to analyze the scholarly productivity of
those who serve as guest reviewers for social work journals. Scholarly productivity was defined
by the number of citation counts and articles published by editorial board members and guest
reviewers for the years 1987 through 1990. As reported in prior studies, many editorial board
members appeared to have modest levels of scholarly productivity as defined by citation counts
and numbers of articles published. Similar findings are reported for guest reviewers. The
researchers conclude that these findings are notable and have serious implications for the
academic and professional credibility of social work. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/104973159500500206 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61606821</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_104973159500500206</sage_id><sourcerecordid>61606821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-4ce1b0887670211fdd67e9cb2c23fb0bd6fb8b27fcb973dc5ffaf6df1c7e81be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhhdRsFb_gKecxMvaTLab7B6r1KpUFKt4XPJpU7cbTbbV_nuz1JtQYSDz8bzDZCZJTgFfADA2ADwsWQZ5mWMcjWC6l_Qgz0nK8gL2ox-BtCMOk6MQFhhDRmjZS9yoQeNvvrQNb61rkDOonWs0k3NXc19v0KN3aiVbu7btpqvOnLS8Rq_Ov6M7t_JNDMbKts536UvHvUL3eim0D4g3Ck1WOrToSa-t_oq54-TA8Drok9-3n7xcj5-vbtLpw-T2ajRNZVaQNh1KDQIXBaMMEwCjFGW6lIJIkhmBhaJGFIIwI0X8t5K5MdxQZUAyXYDQWT852_b98O6zG6Fa2iB1XfNGu1WoKFBMCwL_gjmjJWU5juD5ThAYBUYA4yKiZItK70Lw2lQf3i6531SAq-5e1d97RdFgKwr8TVeL7WrDLsUPi2WWtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761721008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Examination of the Scholarly Productivity of Social Work Journal Editorial Board Members and Guest Reviewers</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Sage Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Pardeck, John T. ; Woo Sik Chung ; Murphy, John W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pardeck, John T. ; Woo Sik Chung ; Murphy, John W.</creatorcontrib><description>This article reports findings on the scholarly productivity of editorial boards and guest reviewers
for selected social work journals. This is the first study to analyze the scholarly productivity of
those who serve as guest reviewers for social work journals. Scholarly productivity was defined
by the number of citation counts and articles published by editorial board members and guest
reviewers for the years 1987 through 1990. As reported in prior studies, many editorial board
members appeared to have modest levels of scholarly productivity as defined by citation counts
and numbers of articles published. Similar findings are reported for guest reviewers. The
researchers conclude that these findings are notable and have serious implications for the
academic and professional credibility of social work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/104973159500500206</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSWPEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Editors ; Periodicals ; Productivity ; Scholarship ; Social Work ; USA ; Writing for Publication</subject><ispartof>Research on social work practice, 1995-04, Vol.5 (2), p.223-234</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-4ce1b0887670211fdd67e9cb2c23fb0bd6fb8b27fcb973dc5ffaf6df1c7e81be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-4ce1b0887670211fdd67e9cb2c23fb0bd6fb8b27fcb973dc5ffaf6df1c7e81be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/104973159500500206$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/104973159500500206$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,30979,33754,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pardeck, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo Sik Chung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, John W.</creatorcontrib><title>An Examination of the Scholarly Productivity of Social Work Journal Editorial Board Members and Guest Reviewers</title><title>Research on social work practice</title><description>This article reports findings on the scholarly productivity of editorial boards and guest reviewers
for selected social work journals. This is the first study to analyze the scholarly productivity of
those who serve as guest reviewers for social work journals. Scholarly productivity was defined
by the number of citation counts and articles published by editorial board members and guest
reviewers for the years 1987 through 1990. As reported in prior studies, many editorial board
members appeared to have modest levels of scholarly productivity as defined by citation counts
and numbers of articles published. Similar findings are reported for guest reviewers. The
researchers conclude that these findings are notable and have serious implications for the
academic and professional credibility of social work.</description><subject>Editors</subject><subject>Periodicals</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Writing for Publication</subject><issn>1049-7315</issn><issn>1552-7581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhhdRsFb_gKecxMvaTLab7B6r1KpUFKt4XPJpU7cbTbbV_nuz1JtQYSDz8bzDZCZJTgFfADA2ADwsWQZ5mWMcjWC6l_Qgz0nK8gL2ox-BtCMOk6MQFhhDRmjZS9yoQeNvvrQNb61rkDOonWs0k3NXc19v0KN3aiVbu7btpqvOnLS8Rq_Ov6M7t_JNDMbKts536UvHvUL3eim0D4g3Ck1WOrToSa-t_oq54-TA8Drok9-3n7xcj5-vbtLpw-T2ajRNZVaQNh1KDQIXBaMMEwCjFGW6lIJIkhmBhaJGFIIwI0X8t5K5MdxQZUAyXYDQWT852_b98O6zG6Fa2iB1XfNGu1WoKFBMCwL_gjmjJWU5juD5ThAYBUYA4yKiZItK70Lw2lQf3i6531SAq-5e1d97RdFgKwr8TVeL7WrDLsUPi2WWtg</recordid><startdate>19950401</startdate><enddate>19950401</enddate><creator>Pardeck, John T.</creator><creator>Woo Sik Chung</creator><creator>Murphy, John W.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950401</creationdate><title>An Examination of the Scholarly Productivity of Social Work Journal Editorial Board Members and Guest Reviewers</title><author>Pardeck, John T. ; Woo Sik Chung ; Murphy, John W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-4ce1b0887670211fdd67e9cb2c23fb0bd6fb8b27fcb973dc5ffaf6df1c7e81be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Editors</topic><topic>Periodicals</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Writing for Publication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pardeck, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo Sik Chung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, John W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pardeck, John T.</au><au>Woo Sik Chung</au><au>Murphy, John W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Examination of the Scholarly Productivity of Social Work Journal Editorial Board Members and Guest Reviewers</atitle><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle><date>1995-04-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>223-234</pages><issn>1049-7315</issn><eissn>1552-7581</eissn><coden>RSWPEW</coden><abstract>This article reports findings on the scholarly productivity of editorial boards and guest reviewers
for selected social work journals. This is the first study to analyze the scholarly productivity of
those who serve as guest reviewers for social work journals. Scholarly productivity was defined
by the number of citation counts and articles published by editorial board members and guest
reviewers for the years 1987 through 1990. As reported in prior studies, many editorial board
members appeared to have modest levels of scholarly productivity as defined by citation counts
and numbers of articles published. Similar findings are reported for guest reviewers. The
researchers conclude that these findings are notable and have serious implications for the
academic and professional credibility of social work.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/104973159500500206</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1049-7315 |
| ispartof | Research on social work practice, 1995-04, Vol.5 (2), p.223-234 |
| issn | 1049-7315 1552-7581 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61606821 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Sage Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Editors Periodicals Productivity Scholarship Social Work USA Writing for Publication |
| title | An Examination of the Scholarly Productivity of Social Work Journal Editorial Board Members and Guest Reviewers |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A37%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Examination%20of%20the%20Scholarly%20Productivity%20of%20Social%20Work%20Journal%20Editorial%20Board%20Members%20and%20Guest%20Reviewers&rft.jtitle=Research%20on%20social%20work%20practice&rft.au=Pardeck,%20John%20T.&rft.date=1995-04-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=223-234&rft.issn=1049-7315&rft.eissn=1552-7581&rft.coden=RSWPEW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/104973159500500206&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61606821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761721008&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_104973159500500206&rfr_iscdi=true |