An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension
This study examined the Perceptions of Politics Model (Ferris, Russ, & Fandt, 1989) in a three-phase process. In the first phase, the model was examined using Anderson and Gerbing's (1988) two-step approach to structural equations modeling. The model was tested on data collected from 786 em...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human relations (New York) 1999-03, Vol.52 (3), p.383-416 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 416 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 383 |
container_title | Human relations (New York) |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Kacmar, K. Michele Bozeman, Dennis P. Carlson, Dawn S. Anthony, William P. |
description | This study examined the Perceptions of Politics Model (Ferris, Russ, & Fandt, 1989) in a three-phase process. In the first phase, the model was examined using Anderson and Gerbing's (1988) two-step approach to structural equations modeling. The model was tested on data collected from 786 employees of a state government agency and 469 employees of an electric utility cooperative. Results from this phase indicated that the model had acceptable fit and was more parsimonious than any of the competing models to which it was compared. In the second phase, understanding as a moderator of the relationships between perceptions of organizational politics and several outcome variables was examined. Results indicated that understanding only moderated the outcome relationship between politics and job satisfaction, not intent to turnover or job anxiety. Finally, in phase three, the additional outcome variables of organizational satisfaction, supervisor effectiveness, and self-reported individual performance were included in an effort to expand the Ferris et al. (1989) framework. Additionally, the moderating effects of understanding on the relationships between perceptions of politics and these new outcome variables were explored. Results from the final step indicated that adding the new outcome variables increased the parsimony of the model without decreasing model fit. With respect to the moderating effects, only the politics-performance relationship was moderated by understanding. All of these results are discussed in light of their implications for future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/001872679905200305 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61606416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_001872679905200305</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57601923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-5c0255eb0433c219bf112a335ff8e5e087b9462b881cc008805a22a9762dc783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLxDAQB_AgCq6PL-CpqHirziTNy5ssvkDZRTx4kZLNphrptmvSBfXTm7oiooinMMlv_oEZQnYQDhGlPAJAJamQWgOnAAz4ChmgLDCnit6tkkEP8l6sk40Yn6CvmR6Q-5MmO30xM9-YzrdN1lZZ9-iysQvWzfub2F-NwoNp_NsHMXU2bmvfeRuz63bq6uPsxs1rb5cBppmmwM41MVVbZK0ydXTbn-cmuT07vR1e5Fej88vhyVVuOYou5xYo524CBWOWop5UiNQwxqtKOe5AyYkuBJ0ohdYCKAXcUGq0FHRqpWKb5GAZOw_t88LFrpz5aF1dm8a1i1gKFCAKFP9CLgWgpuxfyJRMM8Yiwd0f8KldhDSkWFKW3rmGPm3vL4RSowIQold0qWxoYwyuKufBz0x4LRHKfsvl7y2npv3PaBOtqatgGuvjVycFLJJO7GjJonlw337_O_gdkdGxGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231435903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Kacmar, K. Michele ; Bozeman, Dennis P. ; Carlson, Dawn S. ; Anthony, William P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kacmar, K. Michele ; Bozeman, Dennis P. ; Carlson, Dawn S. ; Anthony, William P.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the Perceptions of Politics Model (Ferris, Russ, & Fandt, 1989) in a three-phase process. In the first phase, the model was examined using Anderson and Gerbing's (1988) two-step approach to structural equations modeling. The model was tested on data collected from 786 employees of a state government agency and 469 employees of an electric utility cooperative. Results from this phase indicated that the model had acceptable fit and was more parsimonious than any of the competing models to which it was compared. In the second phase, understanding as a moderator of the relationships between perceptions of organizational politics and several outcome variables was examined. Results indicated that understanding only moderated the outcome relationship between politics and job satisfaction, not intent to turnover or job anxiety. Finally, in phase three, the additional outcome variables of organizational satisfaction, supervisor effectiveness, and self-reported individual performance were included in an effort to expand the Ferris et al. (1989) framework. Additionally, the moderating effects of understanding on the relationships between perceptions of politics and these new outcome variables were explored. Results from the final step indicated that adding the new outcome variables increased the parsimony of the model without decreasing model fit. With respect to the moderating effects, only the politics-performance relationship was moderated by understanding. All of these results are discussed in light of their implications for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-282X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001872679905200305</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUREAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Civil Service ; Decision making ; Employee attitude ; Employee turnover ; Employees ; Factors ; Industrial Workers ; Intention ; Job Performance ; Job Satisfaction ; Measurement ; Mental stress ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational Culture ; Organizational politics ; Organizational Structure ; Organizations ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Political Attitudes ; Political behavior ; Political behaviour ; Politics ; Replication studies ; Satisfaction ; Sociology ; Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration ; Sociology of work and sociology of organizations ; Studies ; Turnover ; United States of America ; Withdrawal ; Work environment ; Worker Attitudes</subject><ispartof>Human relations (New York), 1999-03, Vol.52 (3), p.383-416</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Plenum Publishing Corporation Mar 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-5c0255eb0433c219bf112a335ff8e5e087b9462b881cc008805a22a9762dc783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-5c0255eb0433c219bf112a335ff8e5e087b9462b881cc008805a22a9762dc783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/001872679905200305$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001872679905200305$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27869,27924,27925,31000,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2014990$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kacmar, K. Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozeman, Dennis P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Dawn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, William P.</creatorcontrib><title>An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension</title><title>Human relations (New York)</title><description>This study examined the Perceptions of Politics Model (Ferris, Russ, & Fandt, 1989) in a three-phase process. In the first phase, the model was examined using Anderson and Gerbing's (1988) two-step approach to structural equations modeling. The model was tested on data collected from 786 employees of a state government agency and 469 employees of an electric utility cooperative. Results from this phase indicated that the model had acceptable fit and was more parsimonious than any of the competing models to which it was compared. In the second phase, understanding as a moderator of the relationships between perceptions of organizational politics and several outcome variables was examined. Results indicated that understanding only moderated the outcome relationship between politics and job satisfaction, not intent to turnover or job anxiety. Finally, in phase three, the additional outcome variables of organizational satisfaction, supervisor effectiveness, and self-reported individual performance were included in an effort to expand the Ferris et al. (1989) framework. Additionally, the moderating effects of understanding on the relationships between perceptions of politics and these new outcome variables were explored. Results from the final step indicated that adding the new outcome variables increased the parsimony of the model without decreasing model fit. With respect to the moderating effects, only the politics-performance relationship was moderated by understanding. All of these results are discussed in light of their implications for future research.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Civil Service</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Employee attitude</subject><subject>Employee turnover</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Industrial Workers</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Job Performance</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mental stress</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Organizational politics</subject><subject>Organizational Structure</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Political Attitudes</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Political behaviour</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Replication studies</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration</subject><subject>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Turnover</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Withdrawal</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Worker Attitudes</subject><issn>0018-7267</issn><issn>1741-282X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtLxDAQB_AgCq6PL-CpqHirziTNy5ssvkDZRTx4kZLNphrptmvSBfXTm7oiooinMMlv_oEZQnYQDhGlPAJAJamQWgOnAAz4ChmgLDCnit6tkkEP8l6sk40Yn6CvmR6Q-5MmO30xM9-YzrdN1lZZ9-iysQvWzfub2F-NwoNp_NsHMXU2bmvfeRuz63bq6uPsxs1rb5cBppmmwM41MVVbZK0ydXTbn-cmuT07vR1e5Fej88vhyVVuOYou5xYo524CBWOWop5UiNQwxqtKOe5AyYkuBJ0ohdYCKAXcUGq0FHRqpWKb5GAZOw_t88LFrpz5aF1dm8a1i1gKFCAKFP9CLgWgpuxfyJRMM8Yiwd0f8KldhDSkWFKW3rmGPm3vL4RSowIQold0qWxoYwyuKufBz0x4LRHKfsvl7y2npv3PaBOtqatgGuvjVycFLJJO7GjJonlw337_O_gdkdGxGA</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Kacmar, K. Michele</creator><creator>Bozeman, Dennis P.</creator><creator>Carlson, Dawn S.</creator><creator>Anthony, William P.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Kluwer Academic</general><general>Plenum</general><general>Plenum Press, etc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension</title><author>Kacmar, K. Michele ; Bozeman, Dennis P. ; Carlson, Dawn S. ; Anthony, William P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-5c0255eb0433c219bf112a335ff8e5e087b9462b881cc008805a22a9762dc783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Civil Service</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Employee attitude</topic><topic>Employee turnover</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Industrial Workers</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Job Performance</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mental stress</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Organizational politics</topic><topic>Organizational Structure</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Political Attitudes</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Political behaviour</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Replication studies</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration</topic><topic>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Turnover</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Withdrawal</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Worker Attitudes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kacmar, K. Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozeman, Dennis P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Dawn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, William P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Human relations (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kacmar, K. Michele</au><au>Bozeman, Dennis P.</au><au>Carlson, Dawn S.</au><au>Anthony, William P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension</atitle><jtitle>Human relations (New York)</jtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>383-416</pages><issn>0018-7267</issn><eissn>1741-282X</eissn><coden>HUREAA</coden><abstract>This study examined the Perceptions of Politics Model (Ferris, Russ, & Fandt, 1989) in a three-phase process. In the first phase, the model was examined using Anderson and Gerbing's (1988) two-step approach to structural equations modeling. The model was tested on data collected from 786 employees of a state government agency and 469 employees of an electric utility cooperative. Results from this phase indicated that the model had acceptable fit and was more parsimonious than any of the competing models to which it was compared. In the second phase, understanding as a moderator of the relationships between perceptions of organizational politics and several outcome variables was examined. Results indicated that understanding only moderated the outcome relationship between politics and job satisfaction, not intent to turnover or job anxiety. Finally, in phase three, the additional outcome variables of organizational satisfaction, supervisor effectiveness, and self-reported individual performance were included in an effort to expand the Ferris et al. (1989) framework. Additionally, the moderating effects of understanding on the relationships between perceptions of politics and these new outcome variables were explored. Results from the final step indicated that adding the new outcome variables increased the parsimony of the model without decreasing model fit. With respect to the moderating effects, only the politics-performance relationship was moderated by understanding. All of these results are discussed in light of their implications for future research.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/001872679905200305</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-7267 |
ispartof | Human relations (New York), 1999-03, Vol.52 (3), p.383-416 |
issn | 0018-7267 1741-282X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61606416 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Anxiety Civil Service Decision making Employee attitude Employee turnover Employees Factors Industrial Workers Intention Job Performance Job Satisfaction Measurement Mental stress Organizational behavior Organizational Culture Organizational politics Organizational Structure Organizations Perception Perceptions Political Attitudes Political behavior Political behaviour Politics Replication studies Satisfaction Sociology Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration Sociology of work and sociology of organizations Studies Turnover United States of America Withdrawal Work environment Worker Attitudes |
title | An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A52%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Examination%20of%20the%20Perceptions%20of%20Organizational%20Politics%20Model:%20Replication%20and%20Extension&rft.jtitle=Human%20relations%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Kacmar,%20K.%20Michele&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=383-416&rft.issn=0018-7267&rft.eissn=1741-282X&rft.coden=HUREAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001872679905200305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57601923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231435903&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_001872679905200305&rfr_iscdi=true |