An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension

This study examined the Perceptions of Politics Model (Ferris, Russ, & Fandt, 1989) in a three-phase process. In the first phase, the model was examined using Anderson and Gerbing's (1988) two-step approach to structural equations modeling. The model was tested on data collected from 786 em...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human relations (New York) 1999-03, Vol.52 (3), p.383-416
Hauptverfasser: Kacmar, K. Michele, Bozeman, Dennis P., Carlson, Dawn S., Anthony, William P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 416
container_issue 3
container_start_page 383
container_title Human relations (New York)
container_volume 52
creator Kacmar, K. Michele
Bozeman, Dennis P.
Carlson, Dawn S.
Anthony, William P.
description This study examined the Perceptions of Politics Model (Ferris, Russ, & Fandt, 1989) in a three-phase process. In the first phase, the model was examined using Anderson and Gerbing's (1988) two-step approach to structural equations modeling. The model was tested on data collected from 786 employees of a state government agency and 469 employees of an electric utility cooperative. Results from this phase indicated that the model had acceptable fit and was more parsimonious than any of the competing models to which it was compared. In the second phase, understanding as a moderator of the relationships between perceptions of organizational politics and several outcome variables was examined. Results indicated that understanding only moderated the outcome relationship between politics and job satisfaction, not intent to turnover or job anxiety. Finally, in phase three, the additional outcome variables of organizational satisfaction, supervisor effectiveness, and self-reported individual performance were included in an effort to expand the Ferris et al. (1989) framework. Additionally, the moderating effects of understanding on the relationships between perceptions of politics and these new outcome variables were explored. Results from the final step indicated that adding the new outcome variables increased the parsimony of the model without decreasing model fit. With respect to the moderating effects, only the politics-performance relationship was moderated by understanding. All of these results are discussed in light of their implications for future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/001872679905200305
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61606416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_001872679905200305</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57601923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-5c0255eb0433c219bf112a335ff8e5e087b9462b881cc008805a22a9762dc783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLxDAQB_AgCq6PL-CpqHirziTNy5ssvkDZRTx4kZLNphrptmvSBfXTm7oiooinMMlv_oEZQnYQDhGlPAJAJamQWgOnAAz4ChmgLDCnit6tkkEP8l6sk40Yn6CvmR6Q-5MmO30xM9-YzrdN1lZZ9-iysQvWzfub2F-NwoNp_NsHMXU2bmvfeRuz63bq6uPsxs1rb5cBppmmwM41MVVbZK0ydXTbn-cmuT07vR1e5Fej88vhyVVuOYou5xYo524CBWOWop5UiNQwxqtKOe5AyYkuBJ0ohdYCKAXcUGq0FHRqpWKb5GAZOw_t88LFrpz5aF1dm8a1i1gKFCAKFP9CLgWgpuxfyJRMM8Yiwd0f8KldhDSkWFKW3rmGPm3vL4RSowIQold0qWxoYwyuKufBz0x4LRHKfsvl7y2npv3PaBOtqatgGuvjVycFLJJO7GjJonlw337_O_gdkdGxGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231435903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Kacmar, K. Michele ; Bozeman, Dennis P. ; Carlson, Dawn S. ; Anthony, William P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kacmar, K. Michele ; Bozeman, Dennis P. ; Carlson, Dawn S. ; Anthony, William P.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the Perceptions of Politics Model (Ferris, Russ, &amp; Fandt, 1989) in a three-phase process. In the first phase, the model was examined using Anderson and Gerbing's (1988) two-step approach to structural equations modeling. The model was tested on data collected from 786 employees of a state government agency and 469 employees of an electric utility cooperative. Results from this phase indicated that the model had acceptable fit and was more parsimonious than any of the competing models to which it was compared. In the second phase, understanding as a moderator of the relationships between perceptions of organizational politics and several outcome variables was examined. Results indicated that understanding only moderated the outcome relationship between politics and job satisfaction, not intent to turnover or job anxiety. Finally, in phase three, the additional outcome variables of organizational satisfaction, supervisor effectiveness, and self-reported individual performance were included in an effort to expand the Ferris et al. (1989) framework. Additionally, the moderating effects of understanding on the relationships between perceptions of politics and these new outcome variables were explored. Results from the final step indicated that adding the new outcome variables increased the parsimony of the model without decreasing model fit. With respect to the moderating effects, only the politics-performance relationship was moderated by understanding. All of these results are discussed in light of their implications for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-282X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001872679905200305</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUREAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Civil Service ; Decision making ; Employee attitude ; Employee turnover ; Employees ; Factors ; Industrial Workers ; Intention ; Job Performance ; Job Satisfaction ; Measurement ; Mental stress ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational Culture ; Organizational politics ; Organizational Structure ; Organizations ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Political Attitudes ; Political behavior ; Political behaviour ; Politics ; Replication studies ; Satisfaction ; Sociology ; Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration ; Sociology of work and sociology of organizations ; Studies ; Turnover ; United States of America ; Withdrawal ; Work environment ; Worker Attitudes</subject><ispartof>Human relations (New York), 1999-03, Vol.52 (3), p.383-416</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Plenum Publishing Corporation Mar 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-5c0255eb0433c219bf112a335ff8e5e087b9462b881cc008805a22a9762dc783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-5c0255eb0433c219bf112a335ff8e5e087b9462b881cc008805a22a9762dc783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/001872679905200305$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001872679905200305$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27869,27924,27925,31000,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2014990$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kacmar, K. Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozeman, Dennis P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Dawn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, William P.</creatorcontrib><title>An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension</title><title>Human relations (New York)</title><description>This study examined the Perceptions of Politics Model (Ferris, Russ, &amp; Fandt, 1989) in a three-phase process. In the first phase, the model was examined using Anderson and Gerbing's (1988) two-step approach to structural equations modeling. The model was tested on data collected from 786 employees of a state government agency and 469 employees of an electric utility cooperative. Results from this phase indicated that the model had acceptable fit and was more parsimonious than any of the competing models to which it was compared. In the second phase, understanding as a moderator of the relationships between perceptions of organizational politics and several outcome variables was examined. Results indicated that understanding only moderated the outcome relationship between politics and job satisfaction, not intent to turnover or job anxiety. Finally, in phase three, the additional outcome variables of organizational satisfaction, supervisor effectiveness, and self-reported individual performance were included in an effort to expand the Ferris et al. (1989) framework. Additionally, the moderating effects of understanding on the relationships between perceptions of politics and these new outcome variables were explored. Results from the final step indicated that adding the new outcome variables increased the parsimony of the model without decreasing model fit. With respect to the moderating effects, only the politics-performance relationship was moderated by understanding. All of these results are discussed in light of their implications for future research.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Civil Service</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Employee attitude</subject><subject>Employee turnover</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Industrial Workers</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Job Performance</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mental stress</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Organizational politics</subject><subject>Organizational Structure</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Political Attitudes</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Political behaviour</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Replication studies</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration</subject><subject>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Turnover</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Withdrawal</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Worker Attitudes</subject><issn>0018-7267</issn><issn>1741-282X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtLxDAQB_AgCq6PL-CpqHirziTNy5ssvkDZRTx4kZLNphrptmvSBfXTm7oiooinMMlv_oEZQnYQDhGlPAJAJamQWgOnAAz4ChmgLDCnit6tkkEP8l6sk40Yn6CvmR6Q-5MmO30xM9-YzrdN1lZZ9-iysQvWzfub2F-NwoNp_NsHMXU2bmvfeRuz63bq6uPsxs1rb5cBppmmwM41MVVbZK0ydXTbn-cmuT07vR1e5Fej88vhyVVuOYou5xYo524CBWOWop5UiNQwxqtKOe5AyYkuBJ0ohdYCKAXcUGq0FHRqpWKb5GAZOw_t88LFrpz5aF1dm8a1i1gKFCAKFP9CLgWgpuxfyJRMM8Yiwd0f8KldhDSkWFKW3rmGPm3vL4RSowIQold0qWxoYwyuKufBz0x4LRHKfsvl7y2npv3PaBOtqatgGuvjVycFLJJO7GjJonlw337_O_gdkdGxGA</recordid><startdate>19990301</startdate><enddate>19990301</enddate><creator>Kacmar, K. Michele</creator><creator>Bozeman, Dennis P.</creator><creator>Carlson, Dawn S.</creator><creator>Anthony, William P.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Kluwer Academic</general><general>Plenum</general><general>Plenum Press, etc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990301</creationdate><title>An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension</title><author>Kacmar, K. Michele ; Bozeman, Dennis P. ; Carlson, Dawn S. ; Anthony, William P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-5c0255eb0433c219bf112a335ff8e5e087b9462b881cc008805a22a9762dc783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Civil Service</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Employee attitude</topic><topic>Employee turnover</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Industrial Workers</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Job Performance</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mental stress</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Organizational politics</topic><topic>Organizational Structure</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Political Attitudes</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Political behaviour</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Replication studies</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration</topic><topic>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Turnover</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Withdrawal</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Worker Attitudes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kacmar, K. Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozeman, Dennis P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Dawn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, William P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Human relations (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kacmar, K. Michele</au><au>Bozeman, Dennis P.</au><au>Carlson, Dawn S.</au><au>Anthony, William P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension</atitle><jtitle>Human relations (New York)</jtitle><date>1999-03-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>383-416</pages><issn>0018-7267</issn><eissn>1741-282X</eissn><coden>HUREAA</coden><abstract>This study examined the Perceptions of Politics Model (Ferris, Russ, &amp; Fandt, 1989) in a three-phase process. In the first phase, the model was examined using Anderson and Gerbing's (1988) two-step approach to structural equations modeling. The model was tested on data collected from 786 employees of a state government agency and 469 employees of an electric utility cooperative. Results from this phase indicated that the model had acceptable fit and was more parsimonious than any of the competing models to which it was compared. In the second phase, understanding as a moderator of the relationships between perceptions of organizational politics and several outcome variables was examined. Results indicated that understanding only moderated the outcome relationship between politics and job satisfaction, not intent to turnover or job anxiety. Finally, in phase three, the additional outcome variables of organizational satisfaction, supervisor effectiveness, and self-reported individual performance were included in an effort to expand the Ferris et al. (1989) framework. Additionally, the moderating effects of understanding on the relationships between perceptions of politics and these new outcome variables were explored. Results from the final step indicated that adding the new outcome variables increased the parsimony of the model without decreasing model fit. With respect to the moderating effects, only the politics-performance relationship was moderated by understanding. All of these results are discussed in light of their implications for future research.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/001872679905200305</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-7267
ispartof Human relations (New York), 1999-03, Vol.52 (3), p.383-416
issn 0018-7267
1741-282X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61606416
source Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Anxiety
Civil Service
Decision making
Employee attitude
Employee turnover
Employees
Factors
Industrial Workers
Intention
Job Performance
Job Satisfaction
Measurement
Mental stress
Organizational behavior
Organizational Culture
Organizational politics
Organizational Structure
Organizations
Perception
Perceptions
Political Attitudes
Political behavior
Political behaviour
Politics
Replication studies
Satisfaction
Sociology
Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration
Sociology of work and sociology of organizations
Studies
Turnover
United States of America
Withdrawal
Work environment
Worker Attitudes
title An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A52%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Examination%20of%20the%20Perceptions%20of%20Organizational%20Politics%20Model:%20Replication%20and%20Extension&rft.jtitle=Human%20relations%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Kacmar,%20K.%20Michele&rft.date=1999-03-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=383-416&rft.issn=0018-7267&rft.eissn=1741-282X&rft.coden=HUREAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001872679905200305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57601923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231435903&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_001872679905200305&rfr_iscdi=true