Institutionalized obstacles to development: The case of Egypt

Slow economic development in Egypt and other developing countries results from an institutionalized behavior pattern based on Indecision, Procrastination, and Indifference (IPI). The IPI behavior, given the socioeconomic and political environment, results in frustrated or lack of entrepreneurship, l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World development 1988-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1185-1198
1. Verfasser: Tuma, Elias H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1198
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1185
container_title World development
container_volume 16
creator Tuma, Elias H.
description Slow economic development in Egypt and other developing countries results from an institutionalized behavior pattern based on Indecision, Procrastination, and Indifference (IPI). The IPI behavior, given the socioeconomic and political environment, results in frustrated or lack of entrepreneurship, low incentives, low productivity, low incomes, low savings, and hence slow development. Five major institutions help to breed, sustain, and perpetuate the IPI behavior pattern; these are religion, family structure, land tenure, education, and government. The costs and benefits of IPI are distributed differentially among economic classes in a way that helps to maintain the status quo, and change will come primarily by a change in the distribution of benefits or the class structure. The model is illustrated by reference to both private and public sectors.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0305-750X(88)90085-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61601254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0305750X8890085X</els_id><sourcerecordid>60866340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-a67cab654b5b90296583402f555b76766d1f6b6a3c65c3455e0430721e12f8fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhgdR8Fr9By4GBKmL0XMmky_BgpRWCxU3Fe4uZDJnbMrcyTjJvXL99c30ShcuWjfJgTzvmwNPUbxGeI-A4gMw4JXksD5W6p0GULxaPylWqCSruNb4tFjdI8-LFzHeAABnWq6KTxdjTD5tkw-jHfwf6srQxmTdQLFMoexoR0OYNjSmj-XVNZXORipDX5793E_pZfGst0OkV3_vo-LH-dnV6dfq8vuXi9PPl5UTNUuVFdLZVvCm5a2GWguuWAN1zzlvpZBCdNiLVljmBHes4ZygYSBrJKx71RM7Kt4eeqc5_NpSTGbjo6NhsCOFbTQCBWDNm8dBUELkvx8FmdCY18MMHj8IohQoUTH8DxQYlw1K0Bl98w96E7ZzNpCpWjea1UzVmWoOlJtDjDP1Zpr9xs77XGUW82bRahatRilzZ96sc-zbITbTRO4-Q0S_73SanWE2h5ndL4POUWb9MkI-pmXAXIT5xVynTe47OfRRVrzzNJvoPI2OOj-TS6YL_uGFbgHu9cua</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1294932382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutionalized obstacles to development: The case of Egypt</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tuma, Elias H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tuma, Elias H.</creatorcontrib><description>Slow economic development in Egypt and other developing countries results from an institutionalized behavior pattern based on Indecision, Procrastination, and Indifference (IPI). The IPI behavior, given the socioeconomic and political environment, results in frustrated or lack of entrepreneurship, low incentives, low productivity, low incomes, low savings, and hence slow development. Five major institutions help to breed, sustain, and perpetuate the IPI behavior pattern; these are religion, family structure, land tenure, education, and government. The costs and benefits of IPI are distributed differentially among economic classes in a way that helps to maintain the status quo, and change will come primarily by a change in the distribution of benefits or the class structure. The model is illustrated by reference to both private and public sectors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-750X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(88)90085-X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, Eng: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Africa ; Bureaucratization ; Development ; Economic Development ; ECONOMIC POLICY ; Egypt ; NATIONAL GOVERNMENT ; Obstacles to development ; Organization</subject><ispartof>World development, 1988-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1185-1198</ispartof><rights>1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-a67cab654b5b90296583402f555b76766d1f6b6a3c65c3455e0430721e12f8fe3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(88)90085-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,4005,27867,27922,27923,33773,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeewdevel/v_3a16_3ay_3a1988_3ai_3a10_3ap_3a1185-1198.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tuma, Elias H.</creatorcontrib><title>Institutionalized obstacles to development: The case of Egypt</title><title>World development</title><description>Slow economic development in Egypt and other developing countries results from an institutionalized behavior pattern based on Indecision, Procrastination, and Indifference (IPI). The IPI behavior, given the socioeconomic and political environment, results in frustrated or lack of entrepreneurship, low incentives, low productivity, low incomes, low savings, and hence slow development. Five major institutions help to breed, sustain, and perpetuate the IPI behavior pattern; these are religion, family structure, land tenure, education, and government. The costs and benefits of IPI are distributed differentially among economic classes in a way that helps to maintain the status quo, and change will come primarily by a change in the distribution of benefits or the class structure. The model is illustrated by reference to both private and public sectors.</description><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Bureaucratization</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>ECONOMIC POLICY</subject><subject>Egypt</subject><subject>NATIONAL GOVERNMENT</subject><subject>Obstacles to development</subject><subject>Organization</subject><issn>0305-750X</issn><issn>1873-5991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhgdR8Fr9By4GBKmL0XMmky_BgpRWCxU3Fe4uZDJnbMrcyTjJvXL99c30ShcuWjfJgTzvmwNPUbxGeI-A4gMw4JXksD5W6p0GULxaPylWqCSruNb4tFjdI8-LFzHeAABnWq6KTxdjTD5tkw-jHfwf6srQxmTdQLFMoexoR0OYNjSmj-XVNZXORipDX5793E_pZfGst0OkV3_vo-LH-dnV6dfq8vuXi9PPl5UTNUuVFdLZVvCm5a2GWguuWAN1zzlvpZBCdNiLVljmBHes4ZygYSBrJKx71RM7Kt4eeqc5_NpSTGbjo6NhsCOFbTQCBWDNm8dBUELkvx8FmdCY18MMHj8IohQoUTH8DxQYlw1K0Bl98w96E7ZzNpCpWjea1UzVmWoOlJtDjDP1Zpr9xs77XGUW82bRahatRilzZ96sc-zbITbTRO4-Q0S_73SanWE2h5ndL4POUWb9MkI-pmXAXIT5xVynTe47OfRRVrzzNJvoPI2OOj-TS6YL_uGFbgHu9cua</recordid><startdate>19881001</startdate><enddate>19881001</enddate><creator>Tuma, Elias H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19881001</creationdate><title>Institutionalized obstacles to development: The case of Egypt</title><author>Tuma, Elias H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-a67cab654b5b90296583402f555b76766d1f6b6a3c65c3455e0430721e12f8fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Bureaucratization</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>ECONOMIC POLICY</topic><topic>Egypt</topic><topic>NATIONAL GOVERNMENT</topic><topic>Obstacles to development</topic><topic>Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tuma, Elias H.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>World development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tuma, Elias H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutionalized obstacles to development: The case of Egypt</atitle><jtitle>World development</jtitle><date>1988-10-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1185</spage><epage>1198</epage><pages>1185-1198</pages><issn>0305-750X</issn><eissn>1873-5991</eissn><abstract>Slow economic development in Egypt and other developing countries results from an institutionalized behavior pattern based on Indecision, Procrastination, and Indifference (IPI). The IPI behavior, given the socioeconomic and political environment, results in frustrated or lack of entrepreneurship, low incentives, low productivity, low incomes, low savings, and hence slow development. Five major institutions help to breed, sustain, and perpetuate the IPI behavior pattern; these are religion, family structure, land tenure, education, and government. The costs and benefits of IPI are distributed differentially among economic classes in a way that helps to maintain the status quo, and change will come primarily by a change in the distribution of benefits or the class structure. The model is illustrated by reference to both private and public sectors.</abstract><cop>Oxford, Eng</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0305-750X(88)90085-X</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-750X
ispartof World development, 1988-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1185-1198
issn 0305-750X
1873-5991
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61601254
source RePEc; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Africa
Bureaucratization
Development
Economic Development
ECONOMIC POLICY
Egypt
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
Obstacles to development
Organization
title Institutionalized obstacles to development: The case of Egypt
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T21%3A00%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutionalized%20obstacles%20to%20development:%20The%20case%20of%20Egypt&rft.jtitle=World%20development&rft.au=Tuma,%20Elias%20H.&rft.date=1988-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1185&rft.epage=1198&rft.pages=1185-1198&rft.issn=0305-750X&rft.eissn=1873-5991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0305-750X(88)90085-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60866340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1294932382&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0305750X8890085X&rfr_iscdi=true