Improving the return rate of final conference evaluations with mailed questionnaires

Improving the return rate of final conference evaluations with mailed questionnaires

For multiday & multisession conferences, written evaluations of the overall conference impact are especially difficult to secure. In the case of a two-day conference on educational reform, mailed end-of-conference evaluations resulted in a return rate of 46.0% as compared to a 20.9% return rate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evaluation practice 1988-11, Vol.9 (4), p.50-55
1. Verfasser: O'Sullivan, Rita G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Questionnaires
Research Responses
Symposia
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 55
container_issue 4
container_start_page 50
container_title Evaluation practice
container_volume 9
creator O'Sullivan, Rita G.
description For multiday & multisession conferences, written evaluations of the overall conference impact are especially difficult to secure. In the case of a two-day conference on educational reform, mailed end-of-conference evaluations resulted in a return rate of 46.0% as compared to a 20.9% return rate of on-site evaluations (N = 80 & 36, respectively). Modified AA
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0886-1633(88)80006-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61598877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0886163388800060</els_id><sourcerecordid>1761724597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2187-c874c223be0fcf9761736d8ed49bae583c9cf5c6eae33aab926940f641b1e6493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhH0AiVJ4BCSfUDkE7Dhx7BNCFT-VKnGgnC3HWVOjxCl2UsTbkzSII5xWGs3M7n4IXVByTQnlNy9ECJ5QzthCiCtBCOEJOUKzX_kEncb4TghlKSEztFk1u9DunX_D3RZwgK4PHgfdAW4tts7rGpvWWwjgDWDY67rXnWt9xJ-u2-JGuxoq_NFDHFWvXYB4ho6triOc_8w5en243yyfkvXz42p5t05MSkWRGFFkJk1ZCcQaKwtOC8YrAVUmSw25YEYamxsOGhjTupQplxmxPKMlBZ5JNkeXU-_wwuEC1bhooK61h7aPitNcClEUg3Hxp5GOu9Msl6M1n6wmtDEGsGoXXKPDl6JEjYjVAbEaWSoh1AGxIkPudsrB8PDeQVDRuJFZNRAxnapa90_DN7jPhm8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761724597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving the return rate of final conference evaluations with mailed questionnaires</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>O'Sullivan, Rita G.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Rita G.</creatorcontrib><description>For multiday &amp; multisession conferences, written evaluations of the overall conference impact are especially difficult to secure. In the case of a two-day conference on educational reform, mailed end-of-conference evaluations resulted in a return rate of 46.0% as compared to a 20.9% return rate of on-site evaluations (N = 80 &amp; 36, respectively). Modified AA</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-1633</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0886-1633(88)80006-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Questionnaires ; Research Responses ; Symposia</subject><ispartof>Evaluation practice, 1988-11, Vol.9 (4), p.50-55</ispartof><rights>1988 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2187-c874c223be0fcf9761736d8ed49bae583c9cf5c6eae33aab926940f641b1e6493</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,33756</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Rita G.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving the return rate of final conference evaluations with mailed questionnaires</title><title>Evaluation practice</title><description>For multiday &amp; multisession conferences, written evaluations of the overall conference impact are especially difficult to secure. In the case of a two-day conference on educational reform, mailed end-of-conference evaluations resulted in a return rate of 46.0% as compared to a 20.9% return rate of on-site evaluations (N = 80 &amp; 36, respectively). Modified AA</description><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research Responses</subject><subject>Symposia</subject><issn>0886-1633</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhH0AiVJ4BCSfUDkE7Dhx7BNCFT-VKnGgnC3HWVOjxCl2UsTbkzSII5xWGs3M7n4IXVByTQnlNy9ECJ5QzthCiCtBCOEJOUKzX_kEncb4TghlKSEztFk1u9DunX_D3RZwgK4PHgfdAW4tts7rGpvWWwjgDWDY67rXnWt9xJ-u2-JGuxoq_NFDHFWvXYB4ho6triOc_8w5en243yyfkvXz42p5t05MSkWRGFFkJk1ZCcQaKwtOC8YrAVUmSw25YEYamxsOGhjTupQplxmxPKMlBZ5JNkeXU-_wwuEC1bhooK61h7aPitNcClEUg3Hxp5GOu9Msl6M1n6wmtDEGsGoXXKPDl6JEjYjVAbEaWSoh1AGxIkPudsrB8PDeQVDRuJFZNRAxnapa90_DN7jPhm8</recordid><startdate>19881101</startdate><enddate>19881101</enddate><creator>O'Sullivan, Rita G.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19881101</creationdate><title>Improving the return rate of final conference evaluations with mailed questionnaires</title><author>O'Sullivan, Rita G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2187-c874c223be0fcf9761736d8ed49bae583c9cf5c6eae33aab926940f641b1e6493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research Responses</topic><topic>Symposia</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Rita G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Evaluation practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Sullivan, Rita G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving the return rate of final conference evaluations with mailed questionnaires</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation practice</jtitle><date>1988-11-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>50</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>50-55</pages><issn>0886-1633</issn><abstract>For multiday &amp; multisession conferences, written evaluations of the overall conference impact are especially difficult to secure. In the case of a two-day conference on educational reform, mailed end-of-conference evaluations resulted in a return rate of 46.0% as compared to a 20.9% return rate of on-site evaluations (N = 80 &amp; 36, respectively). Modified AA</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0886-1633(88)80006-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-1633
ispartof Evaluation practice, 1988-11, Vol.9 (4), p.50-55
issn 0886-1633
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61598877
source Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Questionnaires
Research Responses
Symposia
title Improving the return rate of final conference evaluations with mailed questionnaires
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T02%3A31%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20the%20return%20rate%20of%20final%20conference%20evaluations%20with%20mailed%20questionnaires&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20practice&rft.au=O'Sullivan,%20Rita%20G.&rft.date=1988-11-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=50-55&rft.issn=0886-1633&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0886-1633(88)80006-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1761724597%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761724597&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0886163388800060&rfr_iscdi=true