School Selection as a Process: The Multiple Dimensions of Race in Framing Educational Choice
This paper examines how families make choices within the context of a school choice program. School choice proponents suggest that increasing choices for disadvantaged children will have many benefits, including decreasing racial segregation in urban areas. This argument has not been supported with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.) Calif.), 1999-08, Vol.46 (3), p.418-439 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 439 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 418 |
container_title | Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.) |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Saporito, Salvatore Lareau, Annette |
description | This paper examines how families make choices within the context of a school choice program. School choice proponents suggest that increasing choices for disadvantaged children will have many benefits, including decreasing racial segregation in urban areas. This argument has not been supported with empirical data. In this paper, we use quantitative and interview data from an entire population of eighth graders in a large northeastern school district to examine the influence of race on the schools families select. We find compelling evidence that race is a very powerful force in guiding family choices. Specifically, white families assiduously avoid schools with higher percentages of African American students. After eliminating "black" schools from consideration, white families choose "white" schools, many of which have inferior safety records, test scores, and higher rates of poverty. In contrast, African American families do not show a similar sensitivity to race; instead they tend to select schools with lower poverty rates. These findings have a number of implications for theory and policy. In terms of policy, choice advocates argue that voucher programs will give poor, African American children the same alternatives currently available to more affluent, white families. This should make choice programs compatible with the goal of racial integration. However, our evidence suggests that the marked preference of white families to avoid "black" schools could exacerbate, rather than reduce, racial segregation. These findings also have conceptual implications. Decision-making is a socially charged activity; choices are not made merely on the basis of individual taste. Rather, preferences are shaped by social factors, including one's racial background. White and African American families make distinctly different school choices. Indeed, white families eliminate from consideration schools in which 90 percent or more of the children are African American. The further theoretical implication is that choices unfold in a multi-staged process in which some alternatives are eliminated from serious consideration based upon socially salient characteristics. This has the power to inform the choice process in the social settings of housing, hiring practices, and similar areas of social life. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1525/sp.1999.46.3.03x0253s |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61594800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3097108</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3097108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-f201dfe6fe5a640b12c50db23c04ef17a5882ababb5be78978e97639648d85be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0t9rFDEQB_BFLHhW_wQhqPi2a5LZ_PJNzlaFlhZb34SQzWW9PXKbNbML-t-bo5WKIJeHBMJnvgPDVNULRhsmuHiLU8OMMU0rG2go_KRcAD6qVkwA1Lpcj6sVpaBqpQx7Uj1F3NFymOKr6tuN36YUyU2Iwc9DGolD4sh1Tj4gviO320AulzgPUwzkw7APIxaEJPXki_OBDCM5z24_jN_J2Wbx7hDhIllv0-DDs-qkdxHD8_v3tPp6fna7_lRfXH38vH5_UfuW07nuOWWbPsg-CCdb2jHuBd10HDxtQ8-UE1pz17muE11Q2igdjJJgZKs3unzBafXmLnfK6ccScLb7AX2I0Y0hLWglE6bVZQTHoDAGmGbmOCyjVBrgKAStDq1FgS__gbu05DIrtJxJw6HVuqBX_0NMatCCc8WLEnfK54SYQ2-nPOxd_mUZtYeNsDjZw0bYVlqwfzai1L2-T3foXeyzG_2AD8WiVZLJB7bDOeW_szlQZYEaxaiG3_fawFM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683852272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>School Selection as a Process: The Multiple Dimensions of Race in Framing Educational Choice</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Saporito, Salvatore ; Lareau, Annette</creator><creatorcontrib>Saporito, Salvatore ; Lareau, Annette</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines how families make choices within the context of a school choice program. School choice proponents suggest that increasing choices for disadvantaged children will have many benefits, including decreasing racial segregation in urban areas. This argument has not been supported with empirical data. In this paper, we use quantitative and interview data from an entire population of eighth graders in a large northeastern school district to examine the influence of race on the schools families select. We find compelling evidence that race is a very powerful force in guiding family choices. Specifically, white families assiduously avoid schools with higher percentages of African American students. After eliminating "black" schools from consideration, white families choose "white" schools, many of which have inferior safety records, test scores, and higher rates of poverty. In contrast, African American families do not show a similar sensitivity to race; instead they tend to select schools with lower poverty rates. These findings have a number of implications for theory and policy. In terms of policy, choice advocates argue that voucher programs will give poor, African American children the same alternatives currently available to more affluent, white families. This should make choice programs compatible with the goal of racial integration. However, our evidence suggests that the marked preference of white families to avoid "black" schools could exacerbate, rather than reduce, racial segregation. These findings also have conceptual implications. Decision-making is a socially charged activity; choices are not made merely on the basis of individual taste. Rather, preferences are shaped by social factors, including one's racial background. White and African American families make distinctly different school choices. Indeed, white families eliminate from consideration schools in which 90 percent or more of the children are African American. The further theoretical implication is that choices unfold in a multi-staged process in which some alternatives are eliminated from serious consideration based upon socially salient characteristics. This has the power to inform the choice process in the social settings of housing, hiring practices, and similar areas of social life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-7791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-8533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/sp.1999.46.3.03x0253s</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOPRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley, CA: University of California Press</publisher><subject>African-Americans ; Black White Differences ; Blacks ; Children ; Choices ; Decision Making ; Education ; Educational Reform ; Educational sector ; High school students ; High schools ; Magnet schools ; Modeling ; Neighborhood schools ; Northeastern states ; Parental choice ; Parents ; Preferences ; Public Schools ; Race ; Race and Inequality ; Race relations ; Racial aspects ; Racial differences ; Racial Segregation ; School choice ; Schools ; Social research ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Sociology ; Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education ; Transfer students ; U.S.A ; United States ; United States of America ; USA ; White people ; Whites</subject><ispartof>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.), 1999-08, Vol.46 (3), p.418-439</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 Society for the Study of Social Problems, Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Aug 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-f201dfe6fe5a640b12c50db23c04ef17a5882ababb5be78978e97639648d85be3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3097108$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3097108$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27842,27846,27901,27902,30977,33751,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1547616$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saporito, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lareau, Annette</creatorcontrib><title>School Selection as a Process: The Multiple Dimensions of Race in Framing Educational Choice</title><title>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.)</title><description>This paper examines how families make choices within the context of a school choice program. School choice proponents suggest that increasing choices for disadvantaged children will have many benefits, including decreasing racial segregation in urban areas. This argument has not been supported with empirical data. In this paper, we use quantitative and interview data from an entire population of eighth graders in a large northeastern school district to examine the influence of race on the schools families select. We find compelling evidence that race is a very powerful force in guiding family choices. Specifically, white families assiduously avoid schools with higher percentages of African American students. After eliminating "black" schools from consideration, white families choose "white" schools, many of which have inferior safety records, test scores, and higher rates of poverty. In contrast, African American families do not show a similar sensitivity to race; instead they tend to select schools with lower poverty rates. These findings have a number of implications for theory and policy. In terms of policy, choice advocates argue that voucher programs will give poor, African American children the same alternatives currently available to more affluent, white families. This should make choice programs compatible with the goal of racial integration. However, our evidence suggests that the marked preference of white families to avoid "black" schools could exacerbate, rather than reduce, racial segregation. These findings also have conceptual implications. Decision-making is a socially charged activity; choices are not made merely on the basis of individual taste. Rather, preferences are shaped by social factors, including one's racial background. White and African American families make distinctly different school choices. Indeed, white families eliminate from consideration schools in which 90 percent or more of the children are African American. The further theoretical implication is that choices unfold in a multi-staged process in which some alternatives are eliminated from serious consideration based upon socially salient characteristics. This has the power to inform the choice process in the social settings of housing, hiring practices, and similar areas of social life.</description><subject>African-Americans</subject><subject>Black White Differences</subject><subject>Blacks</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Reform</subject><subject>Educational sector</subject><subject>High school students</subject><subject>High schools</subject><subject>Magnet schools</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Neighborhood schools</subject><subject>Northeastern states</subject><subject>Parental choice</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Race and Inequality</subject><subject>Race relations</subject><subject>Racial aspects</subject><subject>Racial differences</subject><subject>Racial Segregation</subject><subject>School choice</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education</subject><subject>Transfer students</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>White people</subject><subject>Whites</subject><issn>0037-7791</issn><issn>1533-8533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0t9rFDEQB_BFLHhW_wQhqPi2a5LZ_PJNzlaFlhZb34SQzWW9PXKbNbML-t-bo5WKIJeHBMJnvgPDVNULRhsmuHiLU8OMMU0rG2go_KRcAD6qVkwA1Lpcj6sVpaBqpQx7Uj1F3NFymOKr6tuN36YUyU2Iwc9DGolD4sh1Tj4gviO320AulzgPUwzkw7APIxaEJPXki_OBDCM5z24_jN_J2Wbx7hDhIllv0-DDs-qkdxHD8_v3tPp6fna7_lRfXH38vH5_UfuW07nuOWWbPsg-CCdb2jHuBd10HDxtQ8-UE1pz17muE11Q2igdjJJgZKs3unzBafXmLnfK6ccScLb7AX2I0Y0hLWglE6bVZQTHoDAGmGbmOCyjVBrgKAStDq1FgS__gbu05DIrtJxJw6HVuqBX_0NMatCCc8WLEnfK54SYQ2-nPOxd_mUZtYeNsDjZw0bYVlqwfzai1L2-T3foXeyzG_2AD8WiVZLJB7bDOeW_szlQZYEaxaiG3_fawFM</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>Saporito, Salvatore</creator><creator>Lareau, Annette</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>Society for the Study of Social Problems</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>School Selection as a Process: The Multiple Dimensions of Race in Framing Educational Choice</title><author>Saporito, Salvatore ; Lareau, Annette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-f201dfe6fe5a640b12c50db23c04ef17a5882ababb5be78978e97639648d85be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>African-Americans</topic><topic>Black White Differences</topic><topic>Blacks</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Reform</topic><topic>Educational sector</topic><topic>High school students</topic><topic>High schools</topic><topic>Magnet schools</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Neighborhood schools</topic><topic>Northeastern states</topic><topic>Parental choice</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Race and Inequality</topic><topic>Race relations</topic><topic>Racial aspects</topic><topic>Racial differences</topic><topic>Racial Segregation</topic><topic>School choice</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education</topic><topic>Transfer students</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>White people</topic><topic>Whites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saporito, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lareau, Annette</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saporito, Salvatore</au><au>Lareau, Annette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>School Selection as a Process: The Multiple Dimensions of Race in Framing Educational Choice</atitle><jtitle>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>418</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>418-439</pages><issn>0037-7791</issn><eissn>1533-8533</eissn><coden>SOPRAG</coden><abstract>This paper examines how families make choices within the context of a school choice program. School choice proponents suggest that increasing choices for disadvantaged children will have many benefits, including decreasing racial segregation in urban areas. This argument has not been supported with empirical data. In this paper, we use quantitative and interview data from an entire population of eighth graders in a large northeastern school district to examine the influence of race on the schools families select. We find compelling evidence that race is a very powerful force in guiding family choices. Specifically, white families assiduously avoid schools with higher percentages of African American students. After eliminating "black" schools from consideration, white families choose "white" schools, many of which have inferior safety records, test scores, and higher rates of poverty. In contrast, African American families do not show a similar sensitivity to race; instead they tend to select schools with lower poverty rates. These findings have a number of implications for theory and policy. In terms of policy, choice advocates argue that voucher programs will give poor, African American children the same alternatives currently available to more affluent, white families. This should make choice programs compatible with the goal of racial integration. However, our evidence suggests that the marked preference of white families to avoid "black" schools could exacerbate, rather than reduce, racial segregation. These findings also have conceptual implications. Decision-making is a socially charged activity; choices are not made merely on the basis of individual taste. Rather, preferences are shaped by social factors, including one's racial background. White and African American families make distinctly different school choices. Indeed, white families eliminate from consideration schools in which 90 percent or more of the children are African American. The further theoretical implication is that choices unfold in a multi-staged process in which some alternatives are eliminated from serious consideration based upon socially salient characteristics. This has the power to inform the choice process in the social settings of housing, hiring practices, and similar areas of social life.</abstract><cop>Berkeley, CA</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/sp.1999.46.3.03x0253s</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0037-7791 |
ispartof | Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.), 1999-08, Vol.46 (3), p.418-439 |
issn | 0037-7791 1533-8533 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61594800 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | African-Americans Black White Differences Blacks Children Choices Decision Making Education Educational Reform Educational sector High school students High schools Magnet schools Modeling Neighborhood schools Northeastern states Parental choice Parents Preferences Public Schools Race Race and Inequality Race relations Racial aspects Racial differences Racial Segregation School choice Schools Social research Socioeconomic Factors Sociology Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education Transfer students U.S.A United States United States of America USA White people Whites |
title | School Selection as a Process: The Multiple Dimensions of Race in Framing Educational Choice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T09%3A37%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=School%20Selection%20as%20a%20Process:%20The%20Multiple%20Dimensions%20of%20Race%20in%20Framing%20Educational%20Choice&rft.jtitle=Social%20problems%20(Berkeley,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Saporito,%20Salvatore&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=418&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=418-439&rft.issn=0037-7791&rft.eissn=1533-8533&rft.coden=SOPRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/sp.1999.46.3.03x0253s&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3097108%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683852272&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3097108&rfr_iscdi=true |