Welfare for the Unemployed: The Rise and Fall of a Social Experiment

The development of a US public welfare policy for unemployed families is discussed via an assessment of: the history of current welfare programs for the unemployed; the Washington State Aid for Families with Dependent Children Employable (AFDC-E) program; characteristics of the population in that pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human organization 1984-07, Vol.43 (2), p.168-177
Hauptverfasser: Nelson, Hal, Fiedler, Fred P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 177
container_issue 2
container_start_page 168
container_title Human organization
container_volume 43
creator Nelson, Hal
Fiedler, Fred P.
description The development of a US public welfare policy for unemployed families is discussed via an assessment of: the history of current welfare programs for the unemployed; the Washington State Aid for Families with Dependent Children Employable (AFDC-E) program; characteristics of the population in that program; & the results of terminating the program. The AFDC-E program operated from 1963 to 1981; of the 7,758 families who lost their benefits at program termination, 531 were interviewed to determine household changes & other forms of assistance used during the 7 months following termination, & then again 17 months after termination (using only cash-assistance cases). In the first 7 months, 40% of the families moved, primarily due to an inability to pay rent, & 10% moved due to marital separations. Medical assistance & food stamps were the major forms of aid used by the families. While the termination of the program clearly threatened marital stability, it was not the cause of separations: it presented the dilemma of choosing between separation & difficult economic circumstances. Single-parent families continued to receive assistance, implying that two-parent families did not suffer similar deprivation. It is suggested that policy changes for the program, reinstated in 1983, should focus on: the discriminatory basis for eligibility (the situation of the children, rather than the adults, should be studied); welfare for the unemployed to allow families to survive; & the vulnerability of work as the base of economic survival. Free education might provide the AFDC-E families with better opportunities. 17 References. D. Graves.
doi_str_mv 10.17730/humo.43.2.p18104481g570663
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61591609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44125842</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44125842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-112a8e3ff08a29d043403ac68923322993420b88a43bb870d1e0c40481eb8bab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLxDAUhYMoOD5-ghAQxE3He3PTNtGV-IYBQUdchrST6gydpiYd0H9vdMSFC1eXc_nOgcNh7BBhjGVJcPK6WvqxpLEY96gQpFT4kpdQFLTBRqhJZZSLfJONAFBlpcj1NtuJcQEAMn1G7PLZtY0Njjc-8OHV8afOLfvWf7jZKZ8m_TCPjttuxq9t23LfcMsffT23Lb96712YL1037LGtxrbR7f_cXfZ0fTW9uM0m9zd3F-eTrCbQQ4YorHLUNKCs0DOQJIFsXSgtiITQmqSASikrqapUCTN0UEtInVylKlvRLjta5_bBv61cHMxyHmvXtrZzfhVNgbnGAnQCj_8FsSywFCInSujhH3ThV6FLNQwSgtBCSpGoszVVBx9jcI3pU3UbPgyC-Z7CfE1hJBlh_k6R3Adr9yIOPvxapUSRq5T-CdsVhM0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1310292442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Welfare for the Unemployed: The Rise and Fall of a Social Experiment</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Nelson, Hal ; Fiedler, Fred P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Hal ; Fiedler, Fred P.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The development of a US public welfare policy for unemployed families is discussed via an assessment of: the history of current welfare programs for the unemployed; the Washington State Aid for Families with Dependent Children Employable (AFDC-E) program; characteristics of the population in that program; & the results of terminating the program. The AFDC-E program operated from 1963 to 1981; of the 7,758 families who lost their benefits at program termination, 531 were interviewed to determine household changes & other forms of assistance used during the 7 months following termination, & then again 17 months after termination (using only cash-assistance cases). In the first 7 months, 40% of the families moved, primarily due to an inability to pay rent, & 10% moved due to marital separations. Medical assistance & food stamps were the major forms of aid used by the families. While the termination of the program clearly threatened marital stability, it was not the cause of separations: it presented the dilemma of choosing between separation & difficult economic circumstances. Single-parent families continued to receive assistance, implying that two-parent families did not suffer similar deprivation. It is suggested that policy changes for the program, reinstated in 1983, should focus on: the discriminatory basis for eligibility (the situation of the children, rather than the adults, should be studied); welfare for the unemployed to allow families to survive; & the vulnerability of work as the base of economic survival. Free education might provide the AFDC-E families with better opportunities. 17 References. D. Graves.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7259</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3525</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17730/humo.43.2.p18104481g570663</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: Society for Applied Anthropology</publisher><subject>Adults ; Children ; Dairy policy ; Employment ; Government and Industry ; Mothers ; Parents ; Poverty ; Public assistance programs ; Unemployed/Unemployment ; Unemployment ; Unemployment insurance ; Welfare</subject><ispartof>Human organization, 1984-07, Vol.43 (2), p.168-177</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1984 Society for Applied Anthropology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-112a8e3ff08a29d043403ac68923322993420b88a43bb870d1e0c40481eb8bab3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44125842$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44125842$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Hal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, Fred P.</creatorcontrib><title>Welfare for the Unemployed: The Rise and Fall of a Social Experiment</title><title>Human organization</title><description><![CDATA[The development of a US public welfare policy for unemployed families is discussed via an assessment of: the history of current welfare programs for the unemployed; the Washington State Aid for Families with Dependent Children Employable (AFDC-E) program; characteristics of the population in that program; & the results of terminating the program. The AFDC-E program operated from 1963 to 1981; of the 7,758 families who lost their benefits at program termination, 531 were interviewed to determine household changes & other forms of assistance used during the 7 months following termination, & then again 17 months after termination (using only cash-assistance cases). In the first 7 months, 40% of the families moved, primarily due to an inability to pay rent, & 10% moved due to marital separations. Medical assistance & food stamps were the major forms of aid used by the families. While the termination of the program clearly threatened marital stability, it was not the cause of separations: it presented the dilemma of choosing between separation & difficult economic circumstances. Single-parent families continued to receive assistance, implying that two-parent families did not suffer similar deprivation. It is suggested that policy changes for the program, reinstated in 1983, should focus on: the discriminatory basis for eligibility (the situation of the children, rather than the adults, should be studied); welfare for the unemployed to allow families to survive; & the vulnerability of work as the base of economic survival. Free education might provide the AFDC-E families with better opportunities. 17 References. D. Graves.]]></description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Dairy policy</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Government and Industry</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Public assistance programs</subject><subject>Unemployed/Unemployment</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Unemployment insurance</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><issn>0018-7259</issn><issn>1938-3525</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtLxDAUhYMoOD5-ghAQxE3He3PTNtGV-IYBQUdchrST6gydpiYd0H9vdMSFC1eXc_nOgcNh7BBhjGVJcPK6WvqxpLEY96gQpFT4kpdQFLTBRqhJZZSLfJONAFBlpcj1NtuJcQEAMn1G7PLZtY0Njjc-8OHV8afOLfvWf7jZKZ8m_TCPjttuxq9t23LfcMsffT23Lb96712YL1037LGtxrbR7f_cXfZ0fTW9uM0m9zd3F-eTrCbQQ4YorHLUNKCs0DOQJIFsXSgtiITQmqSASikrqapUCTN0UEtInVylKlvRLjta5_bBv61cHMxyHmvXtrZzfhVNgbnGAnQCj_8FsSywFCInSujhH3ThV6FLNQwSgtBCSpGoszVVBx9jcI3pU3UbPgyC-Z7CfE1hJBlh_k6R3Adr9yIOPvxapUSRq5T-CdsVhM0</recordid><startdate>19840701</startdate><enddate>19840701</enddate><creator>Nelson, Hal</creator><creator>Fiedler, Fred P.</creator><general>Society for Applied Anthropology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADABO</scope><scope>BEAJS</scope><scope>HAWNG</scope><scope>HBMBR</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDPSG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PEXHY</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>~P9</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19840701</creationdate><title>Welfare for the Unemployed: The Rise and Fall of a Social Experiment</title><author>Nelson, Hal ; Fiedler, Fred P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-112a8e3ff08a29d043403ac68923322993420b88a43bb870d1e0c40481eb8bab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Dairy policy</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Government and Industry</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Public assistance programs</topic><topic>Unemployed/Unemployment</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Unemployment insurance</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Hal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, Fred P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 13</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 14</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Human organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Hal</au><au>Fiedler, Fred P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Welfare for the Unemployed: The Rise and Fall of a Social Experiment</atitle><jtitle>Human organization</jtitle><date>1984-07-01</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>177</epage><pages>168-177</pages><issn>0018-7259</issn><eissn>1938-3525</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The development of a US public welfare policy for unemployed families is discussed via an assessment of: the history of current welfare programs for the unemployed; the Washington State Aid for Families with Dependent Children Employable (AFDC-E) program; characteristics of the population in that program; & the results of terminating the program. The AFDC-E program operated from 1963 to 1981; of the 7,758 families who lost their benefits at program termination, 531 were interviewed to determine household changes & other forms of assistance used during the 7 months following termination, & then again 17 months after termination (using only cash-assistance cases). In the first 7 months, 40% of the families moved, primarily due to an inability to pay rent, & 10% moved due to marital separations. Medical assistance & food stamps were the major forms of aid used by the families. While the termination of the program clearly threatened marital stability, it was not the cause of separations: it presented the dilemma of choosing between separation & difficult economic circumstances. Single-parent families continued to receive assistance, implying that two-parent families did not suffer similar deprivation. It is suggested that policy changes for the program, reinstated in 1983, should focus on: the discriminatory basis for eligibility (the situation of the children, rather than the adults, should be studied); welfare for the unemployed to allow families to survive; & the vulnerability of work as the base of economic survival. Free education might provide the AFDC-E families with better opportunities. 17 References. D. Graves.]]></abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>Society for Applied Anthropology</pub><doi>10.17730/humo.43.2.p18104481g570663</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-7259
ispartof Human organization, 1984-07, Vol.43 (2), p.168-177
issn 0018-7259
1938-3525
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61591609
source Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Adults
Children
Dairy policy
Employment
Government and Industry
Mothers
Parents
Poverty
Public assistance programs
Unemployed/Unemployment
Unemployment
Unemployment insurance
Welfare
title Welfare for the Unemployed: The Rise and Fall of a Social Experiment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T17%3A56%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Welfare%20for%20the%20Unemployed:%20The%20Rise%20and%20Fall%20of%20a%20Social%20Experiment&rft.jtitle=Human%20organization&rft.au=Nelson,%20Hal&rft.date=1984-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=177&rft.pages=168-177&rft.issn=0018-7259&rft.eissn=1938-3525&rft_id=info:doi/10.17730/humo.43.2.p18104481g570663&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44125842%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1310292442&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44125842&rfr_iscdi=true