The double victim: The sexually abused child and the judicial system

The double victim: The sexually abused child and the judicial system

The US judicial system continues to dampen the willingness of juvenile victims of sexual abuse to testify against their alleged abuser. A recent example of this continuing double victimization appears in the 1988 US Supreme Court decision of Coy v. Iowa (487 US, 101 L Ed 2d 857, 108 S CT). The right...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child & adolescent social work journal 1990-02, Vol.7 (1), p.29-42
1. Verfasser: Watkins, Sallie Ann
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Child Sexual Abuse
Legal System
United States of America
Victimization
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 29
container_title Child & adolescent social work journal
container_volume 7
creator Watkins, Sallie Ann
description The US judicial system continues to dampen the willingness of juvenile victims of sexual abuse to testify against their alleged abuser. A recent example of this continuing double victimization appears in the 1988 US Supreme Court decision of Coy v. Iowa (487 US, 101 L Ed 2d 857, 108 S CT). The rights of minor sexual abuse victims are explored through case law, statutes, legal literature, & historical references as they impact the minor during the judicial process. It is difficult to achieve justice for sexually abused children in a judicial system designed for adults; thus, the sexually abused child remains a double victim. 30 References. Modified HA
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00757587
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61581963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>61238262</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-1e96aa5a22f21f0a8bc5f3e6ba3dabeeee33cd0667a8a6da16e7de0e10521f263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLFOwzAQhi0EEqWw8ASeGJACZxvbCRsUCkiVWMocXeyL6sppSpwg-vakKhIrN9xJ___pho-xSwE3AsDePs7Hra3O7RGbCG1VJm1hj9kErMozEFqcsrOU1gBQWHk3YU_LFXHfDlUk_hVcH5p7vo8SfQ8Y445jNSTy3K1C9Bw3nvdjux58cAEjT7vUU3POTmqMiS5-75R9zJ-Xs9ds8f7yNntYZE6C6TNBhUHUKGUtRQ2YV07XikyFymNF4yjlPBhjMUfjURiynoAE6JGXRk3Z1eHvtms_B0p92YTkKEbcUDuk0gidi8Kof4BS5dLIEbw-gK5rU-qoLrddaLDblQLKvdHyz6j6AdrGaGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>61238262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The double victim: The sexually abused child and the judicial system</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Watkins, Sallie Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Sallie Ann</creatorcontrib><description>The US judicial system continues to dampen the willingness of juvenile victims of sexual abuse to testify against their alleged abuser. A recent example of this continuing double victimization appears in the 1988 US Supreme Court decision of Coy v. Iowa (487 US, 101 L Ed 2d 857, 108 S CT). The rights of minor sexual abuse victims are explored through case law, statutes, legal literature, &amp; historical references as they impact the minor during the judicial process. It is difficult to achieve justice for sexually abused children in a judicial system designed for adults; thus, the sexually abused child remains a double victim. 30 References. Modified HA</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-0151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2797</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00757587</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CASWDD</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Child Sexual Abuse ; Legal System ; United States of America ; Victimization</subject><ispartof>Child &amp; adolescent social work journal, 1990-02, Vol.7 (1), p.29-42</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-1e96aa5a22f21f0a8bc5f3e6ba3dabeeee33cd0667a8a6da16e7de0e10521f263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-1e96aa5a22f21f0a8bc5f3e6ba3dabeeee33cd0667a8a6da16e7de0e10521f263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Sallie Ann</creatorcontrib><title>The double victim: The sexually abused child and the judicial system</title><title>Child &amp; adolescent social work journal</title><description>The US judicial system continues to dampen the willingness of juvenile victims of sexual abuse to testify against their alleged abuser. A recent example of this continuing double victimization appears in the 1988 US Supreme Court decision of Coy v. Iowa (487 US, 101 L Ed 2d 857, 108 S CT). The rights of minor sexual abuse victims are explored through case law, statutes, legal literature, &amp; historical references as they impact the minor during the judicial process. It is difficult to achieve justice for sexually abused children in a judicial system designed for adults; thus, the sexually abused child remains a double victim. 30 References. Modified HA</description><subject>Child Sexual Abuse</subject><subject>Legal System</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Victimization</subject><issn>0738-0151</issn><issn>1573-2797</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkLFOwzAQhi0EEqWw8ASeGJACZxvbCRsUCkiVWMocXeyL6sppSpwg-vakKhIrN9xJ___pho-xSwE3AsDePs7Hra3O7RGbCG1VJm1hj9kErMozEFqcsrOU1gBQWHk3YU_LFXHfDlUk_hVcH5p7vo8SfQ8Y445jNSTy3K1C9Bw3nvdjux58cAEjT7vUU3POTmqMiS5-75R9zJ-Xs9ds8f7yNntYZE6C6TNBhUHUKGUtRQ2YV07XikyFymNF4yjlPBhjMUfjURiynoAE6JGXRk3Z1eHvtms_B0p92YTkKEbcUDuk0gidi8Kof4BS5dLIEbw-gK5rU-qoLrddaLDblQLKvdHyz6j6AdrGaGA</recordid><startdate>19900201</startdate><enddate>19900201</enddate><creator>Watkins, Sallie Ann</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7U3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900201</creationdate><title>The double victim: The sexually abused child and the judicial system</title><author>Watkins, Sallie Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c206t-1e96aa5a22f21f0a8bc5f3e6ba3dabeeee33cd0667a8a6da16e7de0e10521f263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Child Sexual Abuse</topic><topic>Legal System</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Victimization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Sallie Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Child &amp; adolescent social work journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watkins, Sallie Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The double victim: The sexually abused child and the judicial system</atitle><jtitle>Child &amp; adolescent social work journal</jtitle><date>1990-02-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>29-42</pages><issn>0738-0151</issn><eissn>1573-2797</eissn><coden>CASWDD</coden><abstract>The US judicial system continues to dampen the willingness of juvenile victims of sexual abuse to testify against their alleged abuser. A recent example of this continuing double victimization appears in the 1988 US Supreme Court decision of Coy v. Iowa (487 US, 101 L Ed 2d 857, 108 S CT). The rights of minor sexual abuse victims are explored through case law, statutes, legal literature, &amp; historical references as they impact the minor during the judicial process. It is difficult to achieve justice for sexually abused children in a judicial system designed for adults; thus, the sexually abused child remains a double victim. 30 References. Modified HA</abstract><doi>10.1007/BF00757587</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0738-0151
ispartof Child & adolescent social work journal, 1990-02, Vol.7 (1), p.29-42
issn 0738-0151
1573-2797
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61581963
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Child Sexual Abuse
Legal System
United States of America
Victimization
title The double victim: The sexually abused child and the judicial system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T20%3A53%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20double%20victim:%20The%20sexually%20abused%20child%20and%20the%20judicial%20system&rft.jtitle=Child%20&%20adolescent%20social%20work%20journal&rft.au=Watkins,%20Sallie%20Ann&rft.date=1990-02-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=29-42&rft.issn=0738-0151&rft.eissn=1573-2797&rft.coden=CASWDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00757587&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61238262%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=61238262&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true