Quality of life indicators and program evaluation

Quality of life indicators and program evaluation

Social indicators and program evaluation research have much in common. Quality of life work specifically raises the question of objective versus subjective variables, aggregate data versus distributional and individual issues, and the reference standards used in judgment and evaluation decisions. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evaluation and program planning 1980, Vol.3 (2), p.141-143
1. Verfasser: Withey, Stephen B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Evaluation/Evaluations/Evaluative
Program/Programs/Programmer/ Programmers
Research/Researcher/Researchers
Social indicators
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 143
container_issue 2
container_start_page 141
container_title Evaluation and program planning
container_volume 3
creator Withey, Stephen B.
description Social indicators and program evaluation research have much in common. Quality of life work specifically raises the question of objective versus subjective variables, aggregate data versus distributional and individual issues, and the reference standards used in judgment and evaluation decisions. This article presents perspectives on these issues from the orientation of quality of life research and proposes that these approaches have relevance for program evaluation work.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0149-7189(80)90062-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61575804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0149718980900622</els_id><sourcerecordid>61575804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3952-b9cbc8d14e5a14bb7694afdacae813fa4a17e5dc29435c26c64651eb00666cc03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1Lw0AQzUHBWv0HHnKSeojuZDeb7EWQ4kehIIKel8lmoitpEneTQv-9WyM9duAxMLz35vGi6ArYLTCQdwyESnIo1KJgN4oxmSbpSTQ7nM-ic--_GWNC5WIWwduIjR12cVfHja0ptm1lDQ6d8zG2Vdy77tPhJqYtNiMOtmsvotMaG0-X_3sefTw9vi9fkvXr82r5sE4MV1malMqUpqhAUIYgyjKXSmBdoUEqgNcoEHLKKpMqwTOTSiOFzIDKkFhKYxifR9eTb4jwM5If9MZ6Q02DLXWj1xKyPCuYCMTFUSLkEnJWcJUHqpioxnXeO6p17-wG3U4D0_v69L4nve9JF0z_1afTIFtNMkc9mYOGwvR9eKO3miMP2AWACkqONiAN6PcnARoE11_DJnjdT14UuttactobS62hyjoyg646ezzML9I7kM8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761708397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of life indicators and program evaluation</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Withey, Stephen B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Withey, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><description>Social indicators and program evaluation research have much in common. Quality of life work specifically raises the question of objective versus subjective variables, aggregate data versus distributional and individual issues, and the reference standards used in judgment and evaluation decisions. This article presents perspectives on these issues from the orientation of quality of life research and proposes that these approaches have relevance for program evaluation work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0149-7189(80)90062-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Evaluation/Evaluations/Evaluative ; Program/Programs/Programmer/ Programmers ; Research/Researcher/Researchers ; Social indicators</subject><ispartof>Evaluation and program planning, 1980, Vol.3 (2), p.141-143</ispartof><rights>1980</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3952-b9cbc8d14e5a14bb7694afdacae813fa4a17e5dc29435c26c64651eb00666cc03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3952-b9cbc8d14e5a14bb7694afdacae813fa4a17e5dc29435c26c64651eb00666cc03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(80)90062-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,4024,27923,27924,27925,33775,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeepplan/v_3a3_3ay_3a1980_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a141-143.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Withey, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of life indicators and program evaluation</title><title>Evaluation and program planning</title><description>Social indicators and program evaluation research have much in common. Quality of life work specifically raises the question of objective versus subjective variables, aggregate data versus distributional and individual issues, and the reference standards used in judgment and evaluation decisions. This article presents perspectives on these issues from the orientation of quality of life research and proposes that these approaches have relevance for program evaluation work.</description><subject>Evaluation/Evaluations/Evaluative</subject><subject>Program/Programs/Programmer/ Programmers</subject><subject>Research/Researcher/Researchers</subject><subject>Social indicators</subject><issn>0149-7189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1Lw0AQzUHBWv0HHnKSeojuZDeb7EWQ4kehIIKel8lmoitpEneTQv-9WyM9duAxMLz35vGi6ArYLTCQdwyESnIo1KJgN4oxmSbpSTQ7nM-ic--_GWNC5WIWwduIjR12cVfHja0ptm1lDQ6d8zG2Vdy77tPhJqYtNiMOtmsvotMaG0-X_3sefTw9vi9fkvXr82r5sE4MV1malMqUpqhAUIYgyjKXSmBdoUEqgNcoEHLKKpMqwTOTSiOFzIDKkFhKYxifR9eTb4jwM5If9MZ6Q02DLXWj1xKyPCuYCMTFUSLkEnJWcJUHqpioxnXeO6p17-wG3U4D0_v69L4nve9JF0z_1afTIFtNMkc9mYOGwvR9eKO3miMP2AWACkqONiAN6PcnARoE11_DJnjdT14UuttactobS62hyjoyg646ezzML9I7kM8</recordid><startdate>1980</startdate><enddate>1980</enddate><creator>Withey, Stephen B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1980</creationdate><title>Quality of life indicators and program evaluation</title><author>Withey, Stephen B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3952-b9cbc8d14e5a14bb7694afdacae813fa4a17e5dc29435c26c64651eb00666cc03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Evaluation/Evaluations/Evaluative</topic><topic>Program/Programs/Programmer/ Programmers</topic><topic>Research/Researcher/Researchers</topic><topic>Social indicators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Withey, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Withey, Stephen B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of life indicators and program evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle><date>1980</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>141-143</pages><issn>0149-7189</issn><abstract>Social indicators and program evaluation research have much in common. Quality of life work specifically raises the question of objective versus subjective variables, aggregate data versus distributional and individual issues, and the reference standards used in judgment and evaluation decisions. This article presents perspectives on these issues from the orientation of quality of life research and proposes that these approaches have relevance for program evaluation work.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0149-7189(80)90062-2</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-7189
ispartof Evaluation and program planning, 1980, Vol.3 (2), p.141-143
issn 0149-7189
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61575804
source RePEc; Sociological Abstracts; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Evaluation/Evaluations/Evaluative
Program/Programs/Programmer/ Programmers
Research/Researcher/Researchers
Social indicators
title Quality of life indicators and program evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T03%3A37%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20life%20indicators%20and%20program%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20and%20program%20planning&rft.au=Withey,%20Stephen%20B.&rft.date=1980&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=141-143&rft.issn=0149-7189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0149-7189(80)90062-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61575804%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761708397&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0149718980900622&rfr_iscdi=true